Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 13 Dec 1990

Vol. 127 No. 2

Adjournment Matter. - Temporary Release of Prisoners.

I thank the Chair for allowing me to raise the matter on the Adjournment and I thank the Minister for coming to the Seanad to deal with the subject.

I raise this matter for a couple of reasons and I propose to develop a few points. I hope the Minister will be able to give a positive response in relation to some matters which I raise.

First, we have probably all seen recent comments by a District Justice in one of the courts in Dublin — District Justice Kirby — where he was concerned that a person recently let out on temporary release committed a crime and was being further sentenced. It brings to the fore the whole question of temporary release from prisons and even the whole question of how we regard the prison service, how we use it and how, hopefully, we can improve it. I may make a few other comments in passing in relation to other matters which have emerged in recent days in relation to the whole prison system.

What I would ask the Minister to consider is that we are aware that temporary release is available under section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act, 1960. Obviously, certain criteria and guidelines have to be adhered to, including consideration of the nature of the offence for which a person has been committed to prison. His previous record, the length of sentence served, the sentence involved and various other factors, including obviously reports coming from both the probation and welfare service, good behaviour and family circumstances, as well as local Garda reports, must be considered. I would ask the Minister to give an undertaking to the House to have the present situation regarding temporary release examined in order to ensure that proper procedures are being adhered to in relation to all the prisons.

Certain basic considerations are important. It is important that people who commit very serious offences are not as a rule given temporary release unless there are special circumstances. It is important that people who have committed serious offences should serve the majority of their sentences. I am sure the Minister would concur with that viewpoint. Obviously people convicted of very serious crimes must come into prison. Vacancies must be made available. This should be done regularly and not just on an ad hoc basis. Full consideration must be given to the Governor, his officials, the warders, as well as to members of the Minister's Department, the probation and welfare officers and to the local Garda, who probably know the accused person best particularly if he is a habitual criminal.

It is important that certain criteria should be laid down and that all aspects of the person's previous history be looked at. If a person is released various conditions must be imposed and matters must be gone into to ensure that people are not just being released without any in-depth discussion or full investigation. Where a person is released stringent conditions should be imposed such as bail applications or the onus of reporting to the Garda station. It is important that all these matters should be considered. Members of the Garda from the station involved should be notified. If they want to add further conditions or restrictions those conditions should be considered.

I am sure the Minister does not want the situation to develop where crimes will be committed while people are on bail or on temporary release. I would ask the Minister, in view of the welcome recommendations he announced in the last few days, particularly in relation to the facilities in prison, to have a look at the whole range of matters pertaining to custodial sentences to see can they be improved in one way or another. I would ask him to look at how the question has been dealt with in the past.

I would be interested, too, if he could give an indication, either here or at some future date, as to whether crimes are being committed by people while they are on temporary release. I would be interested to hear what steps have been taken in relation to this. This should be dealt with in a similar way to a person who commits a crime while on bail, or to a person who fails to complete a community service order. The person could be brought back to the court he previously attended and the full sentence, or even a further sentence, could be imposed.

It is also clear that there are people who are presently in our jails who might deserve a more appropriate or a more just penalty. This could be either some sort of community service work or a fine. Obviously, there are cases where people do not have money and such cases have to be looked at separately. Some areas, as I am sure the Minister will agree, need to be reviewed. We want to get to the real, hardened criminals, the criminals who are convicted of very serious crimes such as crimes involving arms and crimes against people. There should be no question of these people getting out early. I would ask the Minister to initiate an investigation in his Department in order to see that he is satisfied with present procedures. Does he think procedures may be in need of change? Perhaps there should be a set of guidelines.

I noticed in one of the prison reports that an official of the Department is present in prisons for part of the time. When decisions are being made in relation to temporary releases, obviously the Minister can only make the decision based on the information he gets. He should be given as full a report as possible. It should not be just a case of serious cases coming to a prison and the first few names at the top of the list being picked. I doubt if that is the case, but I would ask the Minister to make every effort to ensure that the proper procedures and guidelines are followed and that full reports from either welfare or probation officers are received. The views of the Garda in the area from which the person was originally sent, or the court in which he was convicted, should be sought. They should be asked whether they consider him suitable to be released. If special strict conditions are imposed, they should also be looked at.

Various reports have been made regarding other allegations as well as allegations of mistreatment. I am sure the Minister would be concerned if these allegations were to be substantiated. It behoves the Minister, as the man in charge, to ensure the public that if mistreatment has taken place it will be fully investigated. I am sure he would have it no other way.

The Minister's recent announcement of certain improvements are welcomed. There is much to be done as, no doubt, he is aware. I would ask him to respond positively to what I have said in relation to the whole question of temporary releases. A certain justice suddenly found, as happened recently, that a person was sentenced on a Friday and was out committing crime again on the following Monday and was back before a justice later in the week. Obviously, the Minister would not be satisfied with such a situation. No system is foolproof. Even with the best methods of investigation and consideration things can at times go wrong. I would ask the Minister to take a personal interest, to look at the factors involved and to ensure that his Department examine the situation from various angles. It is important that the Judiciary should be undermined. The role of the Garda, who bring criminals to justice and do the painstaking work, such as collecting evidence, must not be undermined. All these matters should be considered having regard to the whole question of temporary release.

I look forward to the Minister responding positively to what I have said. I note what he said recently in reports in relation to the prison system and I hope any allegations in relation to mistreatment will be immediately looked at. I ask the Minister to respond positively and to ensure that the situation is in hand in his Department. There should be special officers to examine the question of temporary release. Particular cases with particular problems should be looked at and lessons learned from any mistakes.

I am grateful to Senator Liam Cosgrave and to the House for providing me with the opportunity to discuss this very important matter of the system operating regarding the temporary release of prisoners.

I listened with care and attention to the very considered contribution of Senator Cosgrave in relation to this matter. Temporary releases are made under the Criminal Justice Act, 1960 and rules made in accordance with the provisions of that Act. The decision to authorise releases in particular cases rests with the Minister for Justice. All releases have standard conditions that the person released must keep the peace, be of good behaviour and of sober habits. Other conditions can be added in particular cases such as a requirement to report to the Garda, supervision by the Probation and Welfare Service, residence at a prescribed hostel. A person who breaches any conditions attaching to a release is liable to rearrest and return to prison to serve the balance of the sentence.

I have made clear on a number of occasions the criteria by which cases are assessed for release. These include the nature of the offence, the offender's previous criminal history, attitude while in custody, length of sentence served and a Garda assessment of the risk, if any, which may be posed to the community by a particular release. My over-riding concern in assessing cases for release must, of course, be the protection of the public which is exactly the point made by Senator Cosgrave.

Parole systems are a feature of civilised prison systems the world over. Our temporary release scheme is our system of parole and I am happy to tell the House that among international penological experts our procedures are widely admired particularly for the flexibility they give while, at the same time, providing a substantial measure of control over the behaviour of offenders.

There are obvious constraints on what a Minister for Justice can, with propriety, say publicly about the administration of individual prisoner's sentences. I must have particular regard to the obvious obligations of confidentiality in relation to an individual prisoner's affairs and I know no one would appreciate that more than Senator Cosgrave. Nevertheless, if any Member of this House wishes to approach me about their concerns in relation to individual cases — whether the decision was to release or not to release — I am quite prepared to have the matter examined. I want to assure you, a Leas-Chathaoirligh, and Senator Cosgrave, that I am more than willing to look at any individual case which the Senator may feel has been unjustly dealt with, whether on the basis of release or retention.

Much has been said in recent years about a so-called "revolving door" system of early releases. This was referred to by Senator Cosgrave in his contribution. I cannot deny that pressure on accommodation is a factor in some early releases but it is only one factor in a decision to release an individual prisoner and all releases are judged in the light of the criteria which I outlined earlier. I assure the House that in administering relatively long term sentences for serious offences shortage of accommodation is not a consideration and it is important that that point gets across to those who engage in serious criminal activity. As many have learned to their cost, the prison door does not revolve.

For all that, it is the case that some relatively long term prisoners are given periods of temporary release — often under the supervision of the Probation Welfare Service — coming towards the end of their sentences. Again, these cases are judged against the criteria which I outlined earlier. In considering these cases I have available to me the views of local review groups which meet regularly in all our prisons. These groups include senior prison staff and representatives of the various disciplines who work in the prisons such as the Probation and Welfare Service, chaplains and teachers. An official from the Prisons Divison of my Department also attends meetings of the review group. All prisoners serving fixed sentences obviously have to be released at some stage and it makes sense in many cases to allow some periods of temporary release to assist that prisoner's reintegration into the community. Such releases are subject to conditions and I think most people would accept that a planned approach in these cases is in the best interests of the community. The aim of the planned approach is to reduce the level of possible risk to the community.

In relation to prisoners who have served seven years or more of a current sentence — excluding capital murders — their cases now fall to be considered by the Sentence Review Group which I established last year under the chairmanship of Dr. T.K. Whitaker. I believe most people regard this as one of the most significant developments for many years in our temporary release system and I am happy to record the fact that the group has made substantial progress in its work. As part of this process I also consult with the Garda Commissioner and trial Judge before taking a decision on individual cases.

To return briefly to the question of pressure on prison aqccommodation, I might mention that the bringing into operation over the past 18 months of the new place of detention at Wheatfield has brought enormous benefits to the prison system.

No one would pretend that any prison administration anywhere has devised a perfect parole-temporary release system and I will be happy to have the points raised by Senator Cosgrave in his contribution to this debate here this evening considered. Nevertheless, I hope it is clear from what I have said that in operating our temporary release system due regard is had to all the difficult considerations which arise, especially the paramount question of providing the level of protection to the public which they rightly expect to which Senator Cosgrave has referred.

As a final point, I am particularly satisfied that this debate is taking place in a week in which I was able to announce that a team of 31 extra probation and welfare staff are to be assigned the task of providing special supervision for about 200 offenders in the community as an alternative to custody. This scheme will be directed towards offenders who require a more intensive form of supervision. The aim is not only to reduce pressure on prison accommodation but also to assist those concerned in reintegrating successfully in the community. To support this major initiative, two "drop-in" centres will be established for those concerned where counselling and other services will be made available. These centres will be in Dublin and in Cork.

I am grateful to Senator Cosgrave for raising this matter and to the House for providing me with the opportunbity to discuss it. It is, indeed, a matter of great concern to the general public, to those concerned with prison reform and with the very serious matter of reintegration of prisoners into our society after they have completed their due sentences. I can assure the Senator that if he, or any other Member of the House, has ideas as to an improvement in the system operating regarding the temporary release of prisoners I would only be too delighted to listen to him in this House or to meet him on a one-to-one basis in my Department and discuss the matter in detail with him.

I thank the Leas-Chathaoirleach and the Senator for the opportunity to discuss this matter.

The Seanad adjourned at 8.50 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 18 December 1990.

Barr
Roinn