Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 18 Oct 2006

Vol. 184 No. 20

Seanad Electoral Register.

I express my gratitude to the staff of the House. I had not anticipated this debate would be called so early. Like everyone else, I had expected a vote at 7.15 p.m. and I was meeting a guest when they managed to contact me. I am grateful for their usual efficiency.

The matter I wish to raise has been advertised in The Irish Times and elsewhere. Regrettably, as a result of human error, a considerable number of electors in my constituency have been disenfranchised. A register is kept in the alumni and Seanad electoral offices and information is gathered on an annual basis. The alumni file is used to generate the Seanad electoral register and contains information such as the name and address of the elector, degrees held by the elector, the year in which the first degree was conferred and the elector’s Seanad electoral number.

Seanad electoral claim forms are routinely given to graduates at their graduation ceremonies. If my recall is correct, I was responsible for introducing this. It used not to be automatically given and graduates had to claim it. I ensured these would be given to graduates automatically as I felt it was in my interest to see the constituency growing. The constituency has grown for a number of years.

Candidates complete the forms and submit them for processing. This is done in a small cramped office by a small and dedicated staff who have done a pretty good job over the years. They first check the eligibility of claimants, they then check the student identification number corresponds to the alumnus ID number, create an electronic file, enter the alumnus ID number into it, and enter the claimant's communications preference — whether they wish to be included in the edition of the register available to the public for commercial use — and then provide the details of the file to the information system in the college with a request to generate the file in order that the Seanad electoral claim flag is populated in the appropriate records. Those are then coded for inclusion in the next publication of the register.

Not later than 31 May this year the Seanad electoral register was published. It is normally published on the weekend preceding 1 June. That is the legally valid register for the election. This year, a situation arose where the person principally responsible had an accident, a file was left on the desk and somebody came in and tidied it away. It was not until the first person returned to the office that she realised something had gone wrong. The reason it was not noticed, because it normally would have been noticed, was that the number of additions in 2006 were 1,361 and they exceeded by 300 the numbers of admissions for the previous year. It appeared, therefore, to be all right. In other words, there was nothing to automatically alert the authorities that something was wrong. They quickly came across the situation, however, realised a regrettable error had been made and did everything they could to rectify it. I understand they took a certain amount of advice, spoke to the Department and came back with the notion that it was not possible. I believe it is possible. The college has said a new system is being put in practice which will be fully operational in 2008. That may be too late for the 700 out of 2,000 people who were left off the register. It would be intolerable to allow the accidental disenfranchisement of one third of those who were entitled.

If the Taoiseach sticks to his guns and does not call the election until the very last moment, they may just squeak on but the register comes out on 1 June and if the election is held in April or earlier, they will not have a vote. Thus the question remains, what is to be done? This is a Legislature. In an extreme situation an emergency Bill could be rushed through each House in half an hour. That is a possibility and I ask the Government to consider everything to enfranchise those people.

Something else can be done for which there is a precedent, to which I draw the Minister of State's attention. In 1997, a similar difficulty arose which was generated by the post office not delivering a large number of ballots. An instrument was unearthed, SI 321 of 1997 — Seanad (University Members) General Election (Special Difficulty) (No. 2) Order, 1997. What is this other than a special difficulty? I am sure the Minister has possession of that statutory instrument and knows what it is about. The statutory instrument states that the Minister, notwithstanding section 21 of the Seanad Electoral (University Members) Act, 1937 and paragraph 2 of the Seanad (University Members) General Election Order, 1997, can override that and personally, as Minister, direct that those persons should be enfranchised.

I have given the Minister two suggestions. The first should be to resort again, as was done in the past, to a special order of the Minister varying the Bill, powers which he clearly has, to allow these 700 people to vote or, alternatively, provide special legislation. It could be a short Bill which I have no doubt would be passed unopposed in this House. I appeal to the Minister to do that on behalf of my electorate, and as a politician he will understand the urgency of allowing people to vote in the next general election. That is within the power of this Minister and this Government and I ask him to do it.

I make this reply on behalf of my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Roche. I thank Senator Norris for raising this matter and for giving me an opportunity to set out the position on an issue which I know is of particular interest to Members of the House.

In accordance with section 9 of the Seanad Electoral (University Members) Act 1937, a registration officer for each of the university constituencies is appointed by the appropriate university governing body and is responsible for the annual revision of their respective registers.

I understand that, due to an administrative oversight, more than 700 valid applicants for inclusion on the current Trinity College register were omitted from it. Under the provisions of section 6(2) of the 1937 Act, only those on the register are entitled to vote. The subsection states, "No person shall be entitled to vote at an election in a university constituency unless he is registered as an elector in the register of electors for that constituency". The 1937 Act does not provide for a supplement to the register. The register is operative from 1 June 2006 to 31 May 2007.

It is clear in the circumstances that the persons omitted from the present register would not be eligible to vote in a Seanad election while that register remains in force, that is, up to and including 31 May 2007.

In light of the situation, the Minister, Deputy Roche, asked the college to submit a report on the issue and that has now been received. The college has investigated the circumstances involved and has reviewed the existing arrangements for compiling the register. On foot of that review, the report details changes that are being implemented in procedural and administrative practices to ensure an administrative error of this nature will not happen again. The university also confirms that the 700 or so persons involved will be included on the new register which comes into force on 1 June 2007 and will be eligible to vote in any Seanad election subsequent to that date.

In this regard, it is relevant to note the Taoiseach has made it clear on many occasions that this Government has every intention of completing its full term in office. Under Article 18.8 of the Constitution, a general election for the Seanad must take place within 90 days of the dissolution of the Dáil, therefore, in all probability, we are looking at a Seanad poll not earlier than July 2007. On this basis, the register on which the next Seanad general election will be held most likely will be the new register that comes into force on the 1 June next year and not the current register, which is giving rise to the present debate. There is no question but that the omitted names will be included on the new register.

Members of the House will be aware of the work of the all-party group on Seanad reform, which is chaired by the Minister, Deputy Roche. One of the current agenda items is the register for the election of Seanad university members. The Minister, Deputy Roche, this afternoon attended a meeting of the group where the matter was discussed. The group provides an ideal forum in which to consider these kinds of issues.

Senator Norris and others have suggested use of powers under section 164 of the Electoral Act 1992 to attempt to rectify the situation with the current register. Having considered the matter, the Minister, Deputy Roche, is satisfied that, on the information available, the present circumstances are not such as are contemplated by section 164 and therefore he is not in a position to make an order along the lines suggested.

In any event, as the Minister has already made clear, the current register is unlikely to be used for the Seanad general election next year. On the timescale as set out, the new register will be used for that purpose and will include the names of those omitted in error this year.

I thank the Minister of State for providing us with the Minister's response. I do not find it entirely satisfactory because it is a type of wing and a prayer response. We hope the election will not take place early, a hope I fervently share, and that these people will be on the register. However, the Minister of State said that the 1937 Act does not provide for a supplement to the register. It does not exclude it. There is nothing legally to prevent it. He states baldly he is satisfied that on the information available, the mechanism I have suggested does not seem to him to be operable. I would like to have a meeting with the Minister to discuss this issue with him face to face. I hope that can be arranged because it is a very important matter. If there was an election, 700 people would be excluded from an electorate of 50,000. That is a lot of people, almost 2%. I seek a meeting to address the two points I made.

I hope the Minister of State is correct in what he stated. As a Senator who is not running again it is important, from the point of view of my pension, that this Seanad continue for as long as possible.

From the experience of the past it would seem the Taoiseach will allow the Dáil to run its full term. He has given that commitment and we have no reason to believe otherwise, even though the polls are good for us at present.

The Minister of State might regret that.

Barr
Roinn