Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 7 Nov 2013

Vol. 227 No. 6

Irish Aviation Authority Act 1993 (Amendment of Schedule) (Annex 19 to Chicago Convention) Order 2013: Referral to Joint Committee

I move:

That the proposal that Seanad Éireann approves the following Order in draft:

Irish Aviation Authority Act 1993 (Amendment of Schedule) (Annex 19 to Chicago Convention) Order 2013,

a copy of which Order in draft has been laid before Seanad Éireann on 30th October 2013, be referred to the Joint Committee on Transport and Communications, in accordance with Standing Order 70A(3)(j ), which, not later than 13th November 2013, shall send a message to the Seanad in the manner prescribed in Standing Order 73, and Standing Order 75(2) shall accordingly apply.

Is the motion agreed to?

The same terms will apply to this motion.

For the purpose of clarification, may I ask that the Leader's office circulate what happens at the Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality to all members, in order that-----

I do not think-----

That would not be appropriate for the Leader.

What happens at the Joint Committee on Justice-----

In fairness, Senator-----

As so much of this is going through on the nod at committee level, we want to see what scrutiny actually take place.

I object. A debate was called for yesterday on the two motions.

We do not want a debate on this issue.

If the Senator objects, I will call a vote.

I suggest this is a matter that can be raised on the Order of Business again.

On a point of order, these matters relate to functions of the Seanad where we have equal power with the Dáil. We have no 90 day function; we have equal power. If we do not approve of this motion, it will not be passed.

That is not a point of order.

It is as simple as that. We need to take our responsibility seriously or not exercise it.

Is the motion agreed to?

Question put and agreed to.

On the motion, in fairness-----

The motion has already been agreed to.

It has not been agreed to.

It has been agreed to.

It has not been agreed to. We have not agreed to it.

We are moving on to No. 3.

I want to ask a question because Senator Mark Daly asked a specific question of the Leader. As Senator Ivana Bacik jumped in, we did not get the answer from the Leader. He asked that a commitment be given that the minutes of the scrutiny of any of these motions be circulated to members in order that we could decide. Members can see for themselves the lack of scrutiny that takes place at joint committees. That is a fact.

Certainly my office will not take the responsibility for circulating the minutes of the joint committee.

I do not think that is a matter we can resolve today.

They are on the Internet.

I would rather put this on the record of the House. That is why I do not want to have to raise this issue at a meeting of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. I want to have it raised in the House. I understand the Leader has limited resources in his office. Through the Leas-Chathaoirleach I ask that the Seanad Office take on that role to circulate to each of the Senators the minutes of any scrutiny that happens in the joint committee.

That information is online. As each of the political parties is represented on the committees, I expect those members to report back to their own groups.

When it comes back on the Order Paper, as it will, I suggest that it be circulated to us at the same time. We will be able to see quite clearly-----

It will be on the Order Paper.

It will be on the Order Paper.

Yes, but we want the minutes on the Order Paper.

I am sure the Senator has the resources to look up the minutes.

A Leas-Chathaoirligh, as-----

We had the Order of Business this morning. There are members interjecting now who should have been in the House at 10.30 a.m. I suggest this issue be dealt with on the Order of Business next Tuesday, not when the Order of Business is over.

On a point of order, are we actually on the record of the House? The screen is not showing live proceedings.

I am not sure if it is a point of order, but as the person who raised this matter yesterday and again today-----

I raised it on Tuesday.

----- I am so happy at the Leader's response because he has indicated that this material will come back to us and we can have a debate then. All I wanted to do was to highlight the volume of EU material going through. Several people suggested in legislation proposed before this House that we take on responsibility for its full load. We are not even dealing with what we have and I think we need to be very careful. We have a responsibility to look at particular issues that are of serious interest.

That is not a point of order.

As the person who raised it on both occasions and I was here to do so, I accept the Leader's response.

The Leader gave a magnanimous, fair and facilitating response which we should accept. We are moving on to No. 3.

In fairness, we are on No. 2 to which we have not agreed.

When I called for agreement, nobody said "No". As far as I am concerned, I have ruled on it.

I asked if there was agreement and Members said "Yes"; there was no dissenting voice. I declare that it was dealt with and I am not going to reopen it, with all due respect.

I cannot see where the questions-----

We are moving on to No. 3.

Barr
Roinn