I will obtain the figure for Deputy O'Shea. I think the insurance costs are similar to the insurance costs for community employment schemes. They include the usual employer's liability, public liability, etc. We can obtain details of the amount and the coverage. As with all insurance, there is obviously a limit on public liability. The usual caps apply. I do not have the details here but I will get them for the Deputy.
I wish to make absolutely clear that fishermen are eligible. It is easy to establish whether a person is a farmer because he or she will normally have a herd number. We have a similar approach with fishermen in that if a person owns a boat, has registered a boat or has a registered salmon fishing licence on a boat, it is clear that such a person will qualify. However, we have been trying to find a way to deal with people who have small currachs that are not registered. Some of these individuals might not even have a lobster licence. Third party proof from the State is necessary in some form. For example, we accept any of the licences that are issued as proof of qualification. Given that Arramara Teoranta is primarily owned by the State, we would also accept a certificate from it that a person sows seaweed.
People have suggested that a letter from a fish merchant to the effect that a person sold fish should be considered proof. However, that could be considered questionable as real proof. We are reviewing the scheme at present. We kept it very tight at the beginning because it is easier to widen a scheme rather than narrow it. It is difficult to claw back if abuses are occurring. We are nearly at the completion of the review process. We are looking at widening the scheme in a controlled way. I would not like to lead people into temptation and I would prefer if the proof were to derive from a State source. The fish assist scheme does for fishermen what farm assist does for farmers. If the Department of Social and Family Affairs states that a person is on fish assist, that is all the proof that is needed. One is in the loop, with third party proof provided by the State. It is important to stress this because some fishermen do not realise that they qualify.
I have been asked by non-farming unemployed people in rural areas to participate in the scheme. That is to miss the point of the scheme, namely, that it is aimed at self-employed people who are involved in the traditional industries of farming and fishing and whose incomes have fallen behind the average industrial wage. The scheme is for those people who are not making adequate livelihoods but who are still tied to self-employment and, for example, cannot easily commute 30 or 40 miles to work because they have farming obligations and so on. In return for very high quality work, they are given extra income to bring them back up to a satisfactory family income.
As far as I am concerned, those who are unemployed in the countryside are in a similar situation to those who are unemployed in urban areas. Therefore, the objective should be, through various labour force intervention mechanisms, to train these people and to get them into full-time employment. That is why we have community employment, social economy, job initiative and other schemes. By definition, in terms of social welfare, a farmer or fisherman on low income who is on farm assist or fish assist is not deemed to be unemployed and, therefore, does not have to be actively seeking work. There is a subtle difference. This scheme is drawn up on that basis.
In regard to the PEACE II programme and Waterways Ireland, sometimes we become obsessed with the spend year on year. Things happen within a calendar year over which we have no control. There was a delay in the formal launch of the extension by the EU until 3 June. That is just the way it happened and it has resulted in significant savings in the subheads this year. However, the target for both the ESF and the ERDF have been achieved for 2005. There is no loss of funding involved. It is just a question of redirecting funding to other areas within any calendar year.
If a project is somewhat slow in starting, one just moves on to something else and then returns to it later. It is just good money management. The one thing we should encourage is the reallocation of money. The Department has no control over how fast things happen and, accordingly, it is sensible to get the permission of the Department of Finance to put the money to some other good use instead of just yielding up a saving.
There has been much debate about drugs and everybody here would agree that more money is required under the drugs heading. Good work is being done in this area. We increased the outturn in 2004 but the Vote was increased considerably again in 2005 to €31 million. We are now going to increase it to €37 million. Since we are not losing any money from Europe, it is fair to say that the drugs Vote needs more money. Issues have been highlighted which the Minister of State, Deputy Noel Ahern, will address. When the money became available, we were right to put it into that particular heading and to see what we could do to deal with what, in general terms, is one of the greatest problems facing society and one at which we must keep working. There is no magic wand to solve the drugs problem. As stated earlier, this problem is beginning to affect sections of society one would not traditionally have associated with it. That is a significant challenge for the future.
In regard to Waterways Ireland, the major project in train at present is the building of the regional headquarters in Scariff and we are continuing with the work on the Royal Canal. A new bridge will be opening on the Royal Canal. Deputy Kelly will be well aware of the work that is going on in the opening of the Royal Canal. We are working ever closer to the Shannon. The objective is that, by 2008, we will be able to have boats going the entire way from the Shannon down the Royal Canal. If, therefore, one does not want to enter Dublin by way of Dublin 4, one can always come in from the north side. That is happening. There is also continuing investment in the maintenance programme. The headquarters building is to proceed but it will be in Northern Ireland and, therefore, issues in this regard will have to be dealt with north of the Border. It is of major importance that the building be completed.
Waterways Ireland has received some bad press. However, I have seen what is happening on the ground, particularly the magnificent work being done in the Leitrim-Cavan area. I regard this as one of the success stories, despite the difficulties in setting up the North-South body. I envisage a very bright future and, even as matters stand, fantastic developments are taking place in the region. Anybody who doubts this should spend a weekend in Leitrim and Cavan and travel from the Shannon to the Erne. If they do so, they will realise that Waterways Ireland has transformed a huge area of the countryside that was synonymous with decay and decline. A new life has been given to the area and any money we have allocated to Waterways Ireland for the purpose of economic regeneration has more than been repaid. We are dealing with issues that had to be dealt with and I am very upbeat about Waterways Ireland.
I examined the work being done in Leitrim and noted that much of it, including the building of shower blocks, toilets and other ancillary developments, in addition to marketing work and the publication of a list of restaurants along the waterways, serves as a model for those implementing the proposals pertaining to walkways. Not only is Waterways Ireland considering the narrow scene of the waterways but it is also considering the wider scene. In certain ways it is acting as a role model for other linear activities in which people become involved. I am very interested in this and I am always preaching to the people involved with walkways that they should consider Waterways Ireland's work, in terms of providing ancillary facilities and encouraging restaurants, and adopt a similar model. The walkways issue does not just involve building a walkway from A to B because one needs certain facilities at each destination. We must ensure that we provide integrated packages.
It might be worthwhile for members to examine the work of Waterways Ireland on the ground and to note its massive impact, particularly in the north west, which had very little before the work was done.