Does section 69 give the power to the company or the exchange involved to prevent the publication of the findings? Could spurious grounds be used to stop a publication?
SECTION 69.
Question proposed: "That section 69 stand part of the Bill."
Section 69 (1) states:
No information, book or document relating to a person which has been obtained under section 66 of this Act shall, without the previous consent in writing of that person, be published or disclosed, except to an appropriate authority, unless the publication or disclosure is required for all or any of the following . . . .
The reason given in section 69 (1) (b) is "for the purose of complying with any requirement or exercising any power, imposed or conferred by this Act with respect to reports made by insepctors appointed thereunder by the Court or the Bank".
Question put and agreed to.