Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Consultancy Contracts.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 9 December 2004

Thursday, 9 December 2004

Ceisteanna (4)

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

4 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will list all companies which were awarded contracts to carry out public relations work concerning the national spatial strategy since its inception; the period they were employed for; if more than one tender was sought in each case prior to the awarding of contracts; the reasons for the non-renewal of those contracts if applicable; the amount paid to those companies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32930/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (11 píosaí cainte)

The Government determined that the national spatial strategy should be informed by extensive consultations with organisations, groups and members of the public throughout the country. In June 2000, my Department accordingly invited 16 firms to tender for a consultancy contract to assist in devising and implementing the NSS communications campaign, including a range of marketing and advertising initiatives; to promote awareness and interest in the NSS; to disseminate information and identify and engage the target audience for the consultation process; and to support that process through organising consultation forums at regional level at various stages during the strategy's preparation.

In response to my Department's request for tenders, five were received, and three companies which submitted tenders were interviewed. The tender submitted by Drury Communications was selected on the basis that it best met the relevant selection criteria as set out in the request for tenders. On an hourly and monthly basis that tender was also the lowest.

A steering group, which included the person then appointed as the Department's communications co-ordinator, was established by the Department to oversee the work of the consultants. The consultants were required to work closely with and report regularly to the Department and to liaise on an ongoing basis with the then communications co-ordinator.

The contract with Drury Communications, originally of nine months' duration, contained an option for its extension for the period up to and including 31 December 2001, provided that the contractor's performance was satisfactory in all respects. The contract was extended for that period and subsequently, by agreement, on several occasions covering the period up to the end of December 2002, shortly after the NSS was published. The total amount paid to Drury Communications for the contract covering a period of two and half years was €383,556.85.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House

During the run-up to the finalisation and launch of the NSS, it was decided that the communications campaign should be intensified considerably. Additional work was initiated on the presentation aspects of the strategy, media briefings, publicity and other briefing material. A communications consultant, who had been appointed in July 2002 under a more general contract to assist the Minister and the Department on strategic communications matters, participated actively in that work and attended related team meetings. That consultancy input was provided under the general terms of the contract involved and was not specifically procured regarding the NSS.

Deputy Allen tabled a question on 10 October 2002 on the number of consultants engaged on the national spatial strategy, the costs to date and so on. Leech Communications does not appear in the list given in the reply to that question. Why was that information given at that time when the information the Minister has given us now directly contradicts or adds to that information? Drury Communications had worked on this contract for more than two years and had met the interdepartmental steering committee dealing with the national spatial strategy. That is the only firm mentioned in the Department's minutes of 2 October 2002. Will the Minister confirm that is the position? Will he also confirm that the question of rolling out the spatial strategy was dealt with at that meeting and there was no mention of the new company to which the Minister referred?

The question focuses specifically on the contract awarded to Drury Communications. The other issues are outside the ambit of the question, but I will deal with them because it is important to do so. The issue of contracts with Leech Communications is outside the scope of the question. However, notwithstanding that, it is not unusual for a consultant co-ordinator to be involved in a Department. The issues and the amounts involved in this consultant's payment have been made a matter of record. The consultant in question has carried out good work for the Department. There has been no question about her professionalism. That is important to record. I met the consultant in question twice. I record that I was impressed by her professionalism, capacity and, in particular, her ability to render complex issues more easily accessible. The public service has many qualities, but having the best communications skills is not necessarily among its top qualities.

With regard to work carried out by the consultant in question — I know the Deputy would wish me to record this — she played a role in the national spatial strategy in addition to that played by Drury Communications, as I outlined in the reply. Leech Communications also provided support in a general sense on advice on procurement of creative media consultants, for example, in the case of the race and waste against campaign and on the roll-out of events. The company was also involved in issues relating to the Irish Presidency and in particular to the Environment Council of the Irish Presidency. I will not refer to other issues on the list, which is significant, as the Deputy might want to intervene. Ms Leech also provided support in a number of other campaigns, the details of which I can make available to the Deputy if he so wishes.

Why did the Department or the then Minister not list Leech Communications in the reply to the parliamentary question to which I referred? Will the Minister publish the documentation in regard to everything he has said to ensure there is transparency surrounding this matter? When the Minister, Deputy Cullen, appeared on an RTE programme this week, he specifically said that he needed a communications specialist given the scale of the challenge of the spatial strategy and the need to roll out the strategy. Given that Drury Communications was already employed doing that job, what sense did it make to bring in somebody new who knew nothing about the spatial strategy? Drury Communications had two years' experience of dealing with it, yet it was not asked to do this particular work. Given that Leech Communications was being paid €300,000 per year, would it not have been preferable for the then Minister to have appointed special political advisers as opposed to consultants? If he felt he had an issue in regard to his role as opposed to the Department's role, why did he not appoint political advisers who would have been far cheaper on the Government payroll and would have given better value to the taxpayer? He could have appointed six special advisers at €50,000 per annum. Why did he not do that?

The suggestion that €300,000 per year was paid is an exaggeration. I believe the Deputy had inadvertently made that suggestion.

No, it would have been far cheaper for the then Minister to have appointed one or five special advisers than to do what he did.

I want to give the Deputy accurate advice.

I accept that.

The total contract payments were €303,202 from July 2002 to date, which is significantly lower than the amount the Deputy mentioned. In addition to work on the spatial strategy, work was carried out on the race against waste campaign and there was a range of issues relating to steering that campaign and communications relating to it. Work was done in connection with the Environment Council.

Why does that consultant's name not appear on the list?

I put this information on record because the Deputy asked about it. There was advice on procurement, advertising, electronic voting and other issues. If the Deputy asks a question, I will try to give him the advice he seeks. If he does not want it, that is fine, but he should not ask the question.

Barr
Roinn