Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Child Support.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 15 December 2004

Wednesday, 15 December 2004

Ceisteanna (12)

David Stanton

Ceist:

24 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the number of former spouses, and in the case of unmarried applicants, the other parent of the child, currently paying maintenance towards the support of their child; if he has satisfied himself that the maximum number of such liable relatives is contributing; the number of staff working in the recovery unit; his further plans to ensure that the maximum number of liable relatives contribute; and the action that he intends to take as a result. [33732/04]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (5 píosaí cainte)

Payment of maintenance is a private matter for the persons concerned and, if they cannot resolve the issue, for the family law courts. Under social welfare legislation, there is a statutory obligation on spouses to maintain each other and their children and on parents to maintain their children. Applicants for one-parent family payment are required to make ongoing efforts to seek adequate maintenance from their former spouses or, in the case of unmarried applicants, the other parent of their child. Normally, such maintenance is obtained by way of negotiation or by court order. In recent years, separated couples have increasingly used my Department's family mediation service to resolve differences.

Since 2001, one-parent family payment claimants are allowed to retain 50% of any maintenance received without reduction in their social welfare entitlements. This arrangement arose from a recommendation made in a review of the one-parent family payment scheme carried out by my Department in the context of the expenditure review programme which was designed to improve the incentive to seek maintenance.

Current records indicate that approximately 7,000 one-parent family payment recipients are in receipt of maintenance from their spouse or the other parent of their child. Where social welfare support is being provided to the one-parent family, the other parent is liable to contribute to the cost of this payment. In every case where a one-parent family payment is made, the maintenance recovery unit of my Department seeks to trace the liable relative involved to ascertain whether he or she is in a financial position to contribute towards the cost of the one-parent family payment. This follow-up activity takes place within two to three weeks of award of payment.

All liable relatives assessed with maintenance liability are notified by the Department and issued with a determination order setting out the amount of contribution assessed. The Department requires regular, normally weekly, payment of the contributions assessed in this way. The process of securing maintenance contributions from liable relatives can, however, be difficult and protracted. This is also the experience of all countries with similar systems in operation.

Nonetheless, my Department has realised significant savings through this system. There are 1,835 liable relatives contributing directly to my Department. As a result of maintenance recovery unit activity, savings of €8.5 million were achieved in 2002, €14.2 million in 2003 and savings for 2004 are estimated to be €14.9 million. As a result of maintenance recovery activity in 2004 to date, a total of 646 one-parent family payments were cancelled while a further 426 payments were reduced.

Legislation allows my Department to seek recovery from liable relatives through the courts in appropriate cases. To date, a total of 152 cases have been submitted for court action from 2001. The majority of these cases have resulted either in orders being written against the liable relative in court or in the liable relative agreeing to pay a contribution to either my Department or the lone parent. Further cases are in the course of preparation by my Department for court action.

The maintenance recovery unit of my Department is kept under review. A total of 12 staff work on maintenance recovery activity while a further five staff work on follow-up maintenance recovery-related work in the one-parent family payment scheme. The staffing levels in the unit are kept under review in the context of work priorities generally and available resources.

How does the Department's maintenance recovery unit determine the amount of maintenance in each case? Has the Department worked out a formula and does it take into account time spent by a child with the other parent? In some cases children spend, for example, two days a week with the other parent.

Is account taken of the sensitivities of these issues in that there is a danger of driving fathers further away from their children and there is also a danger of revisiting hurt and pain as a result of a non-amicable break-up? Is the Minister satisfied that enough staff work in the Department? Does he intend to carry out any research in this area to see if there is a more progressive and up-to-date way of dealing with this issue?

The method of assessment is based on a number of factors, including, for example, the minimum wage and the circumstances of the person who is liable to make a payment. If, for example, he or she is on social welfare, payment would not normally be required.

In many cases there is no trace of the other parent. A recent survey of 20,000 one-parent families revealed that 12% of single parents said there was no trace of the other parent. A further 13% of liable relatives were on social welfare. In 14% of cases the other parent was unknown. It was considered that no contribution was due from 47%. This category would include people in low paid employment. Determination orders were made in just 14% of the 20,000 cases. Approximately 20,000 cases are assessed every year. In round figures, the total number of individuals in receipt of lone parents allowance is 80,000. They are not all single parents in the sense of being unmarried. The figure also includes widows.

We take into account the sensitivities of the matter. I am keen to have further research undertaken in this area and to have a more focused and caring lone parents system. I have some reservations about the social benefit of the manner in which it is structured at present.

I thank the Minister for his comprehensive reply. Has an estimate been established of the number of people who could contribute but are not doing so? I note that the position from the point of view of the Exchequer has improved in recent years, although I do not want to focus on the monetary aspect as much more is involved in this issue. Will the Minister inform the House of how many cases have been dealt with by the family mediation service to which he referred? Are there plans to extend the role of the service in the area of child support? Is the Minister aware of the major difficulties and problems which have occurred in other jurisdictions in this area which have lead to pressure being placed on fathers in particular, some of which have led to suicides? Will the Minister take such considerations into account when he addresses the issue to ensure a balance is achieved?

The question asked by the Deputy is one of which I am trying to get to the bottom. Approximately 80,000 people are in receipt of lone parent allowances. If one allows for a figure of approximately 9,000 or 10,000 who are not the type of lone parents referred to here, but will still be on benefits such as widow's allowance and so on, approximately 70,000 individuals are involved. According to the survey of the 20,000 people, determination orders were made in respect of 14%. That does not sound like much but, when one deducts the other figures to which I referred, it ends up at 14%. The figure of 14% applied to the 70,000 people results in perhaps 10,000 people who, at this distance, should be liable and required to make payments, some of whom already do so.

The Deputy has assumed that when the 12% of people who cannot be traced are tracked down, they will all be liable to pay. However, one might find that when they are traced, the same percentages apply in regard to those who are unable to pay. Nevertheless, some 10,000 people should probably come forward and make a better effort. We need to get to the bottom of the issue. I spoke about this issue at a number of conferences and it is clear this is not merely a matter of finance but rather the connection between the child or children and, usually, the father. That connection must be supported by the State.

I do not have a figure for the number of people who attended mediation but I will supply it to the Deputy, although I do not think it is hugely significant. We have all spoken at length recently about the role of fathers and I am anxious that we correct the balance so that mothers and fathers have equal access to children as far as possible and are equally respected. Only in the past decade or so has society begun to recognise the role fathers play with their children. For a long time we only recognised the valuable role played by mothers.

Barr
Roinn