Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Unemployment Levels.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 2 November 2005

Wednesday, 2 November 2005

Ceisteanna (263)

Eamon Ryan

Ceist:

352 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the failure of the employment services policy unit to address the problem of long-term unemployment in recent years, which is at the same level now as it was in 2000, and represents more than one third of the overall unemployment rate. [32016/05]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Since 1997 more than 450,000 new jobs have been created. There has also been a significant fall in unemployment, from 10.4% to 4.2% at present.

Long-term unemployment fell from 5.5% in 1997 to 1.6% in 2000, and that very low level has been maintained — it is now at 1.4%. That long-term unemployment rate compares very favourably with the EU average of 4% and ranks fourth-lowest among the 25 EU member states.

However, we are not complacent about that level of long-term unemployment, and to reduce it a range of initiatives has been introduced.

In addition to the FÁS and local employment services and the community employment, social economy and job initiative programmes, the most significant measure has been the national employment action plan referral process. That involves early intervention by FÁS with unemployed people. It seeks to help the unemployed to re-integrate into the labour market as quickly as possible by providing them with the necessary skills and supports to improve their employability.

Under that process, since 2003 anyone who has been on the live register for six months, and all persons not previously referred and on the live register for more than six months, were referred to FÁS for interview. The majority of such referrals were long-term unemployed. Since June 2003, approximately 27,000 long-term unemployed clients have been referred to FÁS. Since the introduction of the NEAP in September 1998, a total of 247,000 clients have been referred to FÁS for assistance.

An external evaluation of the NEAP preventive strategy, which is due to be released shortly, concludes "that the NEAP process has been a success".

Other innovative responses developed by my Department and FÁS to assist unemployed persons have included: the pathways programme, which identifies the most appropriate development pathway to assist clients to obtain employment; the high supports process, which assists clients on a multi-agency basis to address personal barriers to employment; and the customised training fund to meet training needs of the unemployed flexibly.

We are therefore continuing to engage with those in long-term unemployment through a wide range of labour market measures and activities to help them return to employment.

Barr
Roinn