I would refer the Deputy to my replies to Questions Nos. 149, 181, 249, 215 of 26 January, 9 February, 16 February and 2 March, respectively, and a reply given to a Dáil Adjournment debate on 23 February in relation to this case.
It must be again emphasised that the person concerned is not being returned to her country of origin but rather to Belgium. She had lodged a previous asylum claim in Belgium and, in accordance with the Dublin II Regulations, it is entirely appropriate that she be returned to have her asylum claim determined there. It can hardly be argued that Belgium's welfare, medical and social protection systems are inferior to ours or that any international protection she requires cannot be provided by the Belgian authorities.
The person concerned is currently illegally present in this State but her removal to Belgium will, nonetheless, be handled with sensitivity and care, particularly as I understand that she is currently in receipt of hospital treatment. Officials in my Department have asked the legal representatives of the person concerned, the refugee legal service, to keep the Garda National Immigration Bureau informed of the whereabouts and up-to-date medical condition of the person concerned and I have been assured that the bureau will not effect her transfer to Belgium until such time as she is discharged from hospital. Additionally, the Belgian authorities will be informed of her medical status prior to her arrival and if necessary, medical escorts will be provided to accompany her on her journey.
I do not believe that the procedure being adopted in this case is in any way contrary to best humanitarian practice. Indeed, the fact that she is being returned to Belgium to have her asylum claim considered in the State where she first sought protection is fully in accord with humanitarian principles.