Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Residency Permits.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 17 November 2009

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

Ceisteanna (251, 252)

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

295 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding a residency or asylum application in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 11; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41518/09]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The person concerned applied for asylum on 6 March 2006. In accordance with Section 9 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended), the person concerned was entitled to remain in the State until her application for asylum was decided. Her asylum application was refused following consideration of her case by the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner and, on appeal, the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

Arising from the refusal of her asylum application, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned was notified, by letter dated 28 August 2009, that the Minister proposed to make a Deportation Order in respect of her. She was given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making representations to the Minister setting out the reasons why a Deportation Order should not be made against her. In addition, she was notified of her entitlement to apply for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with the European Communities (Eligibility for Protection) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 518 of 2006).

The person concerned submitted an application for Subsidiary Protection in the State in accordance with these Regulations and this application is under consideration at present. When consideration of this application has been completed, the person concerned will be notified in writing of the outcome. In the event that the application for Subsidiary Protection is refused, the position in the State of the person concerned will then be decided by reference to the provisions of Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement. All representations submitted will be considered before the file is passed to me for decision. Once a decision has been made, this decision and the consequences of the decision will be conveyed in writing to the person concerned.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

296 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding an application for leave to remain in the State on humanitarian grounds or residency in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Meath; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41519/09]

Amharc ar fhreagra

I refer the Deputy to Parliamentary Question No. 369 of Wednesday, 6 May, 2009, and the written Reply to that Question. As stated in my last Reply, the case of the person concerned now falls to be considered in accordance with the provisions of Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement.All representations submitted will be considered before the file is passed to me for decision. Once a decision has been made, this decision and the consequences of the decision will be conveyed in writing to the person concerned.

Barr
Roinn