Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin
Ceist:319 Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will grant leave to remain in respect of a person (details supplied). [19892/10]
Amharc ar fhreagraTuesday, 18 May 2010
Ceisteanna (284, 285)
Freagraí scríofa
The case of the person concerned was examined under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, (as amended), and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended), on the Prohibition of Refoulement. On 23 March 2010, I refused the person concerned permission to remain temporarily in the State and instead signed a Deportation Order in respect of him. The effect of the Deportation Order is that the person concerned must leave the State and remain thereafter out of the State. If new information or circumstances have come to light, which have a direct bearing on his case and which have arisen since the original decision to deport him was made, there remains the option of applying to me for revocation of his Deportation Order pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (11) of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended. However I wish to make clear that such an application would require substantial grounds to be successful.
The enforcement of the Deportation Order is, and remains, an operational matter for the GNIB.
Joe Costello
Ceist:320 Deputy Joe Costello asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will revoke the deportation order in respect of a person (details supplied); if he will grant them leave to remain; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19908/10]
Amharc ar fhreagraThe case of the person concerned was examined under Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act, 1999, (as amended), and Section 5 of the Refugee Act, 1996 (as amended), on the Prohibition of Refoulement. On 23 March 2010, I refused the person concerned permission to remain temporarily in the State and instead signed a Deportation Order in respect of him. The effect of the Deportation Order is that the person concerned must leave the State and remain thereafter out of the State.
If new information or circumstances have come to light, which have a direct bearing on his case and which have arisen since the original decision to deport was made, there remains the option of applying to me for revocation of his Deportation Order pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(11) of the Immigration Act, 1999, as amended. However I wish to make clear that such an application would require substantial grounds to be successful. The enforcement of the Deportation Order is, and remains, an operational matter for the GNIB.