Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Human Rights Issues

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 29 September 2010

Wednesday, 29 September 2010

Ceisteanna (1114, 1115, 1116)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

1201 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he has raised the case of a person (details supplied) at risk of execution, possibly by stoning in Iran with the Iranian authorities or the Iranian embassy here; and if he has not, if he will publicly call on the Iranian Government not to execute the person by stoning or any other method, to ban stoning as a method of execution; and to decriminalise adultery and sexual relations between consenting adults. [32014/10]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Deputy refers to the case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, an Iranian mother of two whose stoning sentence has caused the gravest concern in Ireland and internationally. The case of Ms. Ashtianai has been raised with the Iranian Ambassador to Ireland by officials in my Department who have conveyed in the strongest terms that Ireland is completely opposed to the use of stoning, a practice which has no place in the 21st century. Ireland joins others in the international community, including EU High Representative Ashton, who have issued strong calls upon the Iranian government to revoke the death sentence in the case of Ms Ashtiani.

The EU has also been active in raising this case in Tehran with a detailed démarche delivered on behalf of the EU on the Ashtiani case and other human rights issues on 29 August. In response, the Iranian authorities have indicated that the stoning sentence would not be applied and that Ms Ashtiani would not be executed for adultery. However, no clear commitment has so far been given that there are no circumstances in which the death sentence will be applied to Ms. Ashtiani. I call on Iran to provide such a commitment.

There are also worrying reports about Ms Ashtiani's family, particularly her children, being subjected to harassment and imprisonment for bravely speaking out about this case. I am also appalled that Ms Ashtiani's lawyer, Mr Mostafaei, has had to leave his country, simply for doing his job and defending his clients as best as he can.

Ms. Ashtiani's case is symptomatic of the very poor human rights situation overall now obtaining in Iran. I have raised Ireland's serious concerns about the lack of respect for human rights in Iran directly with the Iranian authorities on a number of occasions, most recently when I met with Foreign Minister Mottaki in Dublin on 9 June. During that meeting, I also outlined Ireland and the EU's particular concerns about the extensive use of the death penalty in Iran, an issue which we also highlighted in our national intervention at the current UN Human Rights Council session in Geneva on 17 September. I have also written at length to Foreign Minister Mottaki on a number of occasions to express our concerns about, and raise specific aspects of, the human rights situation in Iran. Ireland will continue to raise our concerns on the human rights situation in Iran, both bilaterally and at multilateral organisations such as the UN Human Rights Council.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

1202 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he has protested the arrest and detention of Palestinian human rights defenders objecting to Israel continuing illegal construction of a separation wall in the West Bank in recent months. [32036/10]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

1203 Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if his attention has been drawn to links between any Irish company and the companies Israel has contracted to illegally construct a separation wall in the West Bank, and has he or his officials informed those companies of Irelands opposition to the construction of the wall. [32037/10]

Amharc ar fhreagra

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1202 and 1203 together.

The Deputy will be aware of the Government's strong views on the illegality of the construction of the separation barrier on occupied land. While we recognise the responsibility on the Israeli Government to provide for the security of its citizens, I have regularly expressed my serious concern about the negative consequences of the continuing construction of the barrier, both for the daily lives of the Palestinian people and for the viability of a two-State solution. The Government has raised the issues involved directly with Israel, through the EU and at the United Nations. We have been to the fore in ensuring that the European Union continues to affirm that it will recognise no changes to the pre-1967 borders other than those negotiated between the parties in the context of a final status agreement. Ireland, and its EU partners, has consistently called on Israel to abide by the 2004 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice that found that the construction of the wall by Israel, the occupying power in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), was contrary to international law.

It should be noted that our concerns relate not to the construction of the wall itself, but the routing of very lengthy sections of the wall across Palestinian land, effectively cutting off large areas of Palestinian territory, which are left connected to Israel but isolated from the rest of the West Bank. Ireland is very concerned about the imprisonment of human rights defenders in the Occupied Territories for exercising their right to peacefully protest against the route of the separation barrier. Local EU representatives attended all court hearings in the case of Abdallah Abu Rahma, who was convicted in an Israeli military court on charges of incitement and organising and attending demonstrations. A representative of our Mission in Ramallah attended his sentencing hearing on 15 September to highlight our concern about this case.

I am not aware of any links between Irish companies and companies contracted to build the separation barrier. Cement Roadstone Holdings owns a minority shareholding of approximately 25% in Mashav Initiating and Development Limited, which is the holding company for the main Israeli cement producer, Nesher. This 25% stake does not give CRH any control over Nesher's operational matters. The Israeli company supplies cement to all of the concrete manufacturers in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Nesher does not have a say in the final use of the concrete products. It has no direct involvement in the construction of the separation barrier.

Barr
Roinn