Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Social Welfare Code

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 19 October 2011

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

Ceisteanna (65, 66)

Robert Dowds

Ceist:

64 Deputy Robert Dowds asked the Minister for Social Protection her plans to phase out the qualified adult designation in social welfare payments in favour of making independent payments to both persons in a marriage or civil partnership on the basis of their respective employment records and needs; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [30269/11]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa (Ceist ar Minister for Social Protection)

Full individualisation of personal payments within the social welfare system would involve separate and independent treatment of persons in relation to means and other conditions of entitlement and separate payments to each. There are no plans to introduce full such payments in relation to means tested or social insurance payments.

However, over the years my Department has introduced various measures to make payments directly to qualified adults, regardless of marital status. For example, separate payments are made in cases of domestic difficulty where a qualified adult might otherwise have no other form of income. Also, for certain categories of State pension (non-contributory), where the couple are both aged 66 or over, payment is made individually to each partner. In October 2002, my Department introduced administrative arrangements to provide an option to have the qualified adult increase paid directly to the qualified adult for all new applicants to State Pension (Transition), (formerly known a retirement Pension) and State Pension (Contributory), (formerly known as Old Age (Contributory) Pension). Since 2007, the increase for a qualified adult is paid directly to a qualified adult or to a person nominated by them.

Robert Dowds

Ceist:

65 Deputy Robert Dowds asked the Minister for Social Protection her views on reducing the number of hours per week a person must work in order to qualify for family income supplement, in order to eliminate a potential poverty trap; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [30270/11]

Amharc ar fhreagra

The family income supplement (FIS) is designed to provide income for employees on low earnings with families. This preserves the incentive to remain in employment in circumstances where the employee might only be marginally better off than if he or she were unemployed and claiming other social welfare payments.

To qualify for payment of FIS, a person must be engaged in full-time insurable employment which is expected to last for at least 3 months and be working for a minimum of 38 hours per fortnight or 19 hours per week. A couple may combine their hours of employment to meet the qualification criteria. The applicant must also have at least one qualified child who normally resides with him/her or is supported by him/her. Furthermore, the average family income must be below a specified amount which varies according to the number of qualified children in the family.

The "hours worked" requirement has been reduced significantly since the introduction of the scheme in 1984. The requirement was initially set at 30 hours per week but was progressively reduced to 19 hours per week in 1996. Further reducing the "hours worked" requirement could have expenditure implications and could only be decided on in a budgetary context. For low income workers (or potential workers) with less than the minimum hours of employment or who are working on a casual basis, unemployment payments provide for daily disregards and tapered withdrawal of payment which address the loss of social welfare benefits through taking up employment.

While there are no immediate plans to make any significant changes to the qualifying criteria for FIS, the Deputy should note that family and child income supports are currently being examined by the Advisory Group on Tax and Social Welfare, which I established last June. The Group has been tasked with recommending cost-effective solutions as to how employment disincentives can be improved and better poverty outcomes achieved, particularly child poverty outcomes.

Barr
Roinn