Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 25 Sep 2012

Written Answers Nos. 341-356

Fisheries Protection

Ceisteanna (341)

Michael McNamara

Ceist:

341. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if he will confirm, as per the Sea Lice Monitoring Protocol for Offshore Fin-Fish Farms, if a Notice To Treat was issued to the salmon farm operator (details supplied) following a sea lice inspection on 11 April 2012 in view of the fact that the trigger level on this particular licence is set at 0.3 egg bearing lice per fish; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40056/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As part of my Department’s sea lice control strategy a series of treatment trigger levels have been specified to ensure that lice control on offshore salmon farms is optimised. This management regime has been very successful in reducing lice infestation levels nationally. Treatment triggers during the spring period are set close to zero in the range of from 0.3 to 0.5 egg bearing females per fish and are also informed by the numbers of mobile lice on the fish. Where numbers of mobile lice are high, treatments are required even in the absence of egg bearing females. The mechanism for requiring treatments is to issue a notice to treat where appropriate.

In the case referred to by the Deputy, the lice levels on the 11th of April were 0.47 ovigerous females and a total mobile count of 2.25 lice per fish. This is within the range where a notice to treat can be issued. A treatment regime was in place and no notice to treat was required. At the subsequent inspection on the 30th of April lice levels had reduced to 0.27 ovigerous females and a total mobile count of 1.16 respectively. These are well below any treatment trigger levels and reflect the efficacy of the treatment undertaken by the company.

As a general point, the sea lice controls operated by the Marine Institute, on behalf of the State are more advanced than those operating in other jurisdictions and are regarded by the E.U. Commission as representing best practice internationally.

Bovine Disease Controls

Ceisteanna (342)

Paudie Coffey

Ceist:

342. Deputy Paudie Coffey asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine his policy regarding the culling of badgers; the extent of TB outbreak here amongst badgers; the potential impact that this outbreak could have on the national herd; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40063/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Research carried out in Ireland indicates that, up to 2008, using a detailed post mortem and histological examination, 35-50% of badgers in high cattle TB prevalence areas were infected with TB compared with an infection rate of 14.9% in areas of low cattle TB prevalence areas thereby substantiating the link between the presence of TB in cattle and in badgers. However, more recent research has shown that the percentage of badgers now infected with TB in previously high cattle prevalence areas has halved since then. The reduction in the incidence of TB in badgers is welcome and indicates an improvement in the health of the badger population. It is to be hoped this will also have knock on benefits for any future badger vaccination programme.

With regard to the impact of TB in badgers for TB in cattle, a research paper published in 2010 summarises the evidence on the role of badgers in the spread of TB in cattle both in Ireland and the UK and concludes that “badgers are directly implicated in the transmission of infection to cattle” and “the ability to eradicate tuberculosis is severely constrained while infection continues to be spread from badgers” (Mycobacterium bovis Infection in the Eurasian Badger (Meles Meles): the Disease, Pathogenesis, Epidemiology and Control (Science Direct) ).

There is considerable evidence that the removal of badgers results in a reduction in the incidence of the disease in cattle. In summary, the first major research project into the impact of badgers on TB incidence in cattle in East Offaly found that the risk of herd breakdowns was found to be 14 times higher in the control area compared with the area from which the badgers were removed. A later study, the Four Area Project, involved the intensive and proactive removal of badgers in four “removal” areas and “reactive” culling of badgers in matched reference areas. The published results of this project also demonstrated that there was a significant reduction in TB levels in cattle following the removal of badgers. In view of this research and in order to limit the spread of TB from badgers to cattle, the Bovine TB eradication programme implemented by my Department contains a wildlife strategy involving the removal of badgers by culling when an epidemiological investigation associates a TB herd breakdown with the presence of badgers. This strategy is an important element of Ireland’s bovine TB eradication programme and has contributed to a significant reduction in the incidence of bovine tuberculosis in the cattle population in recent years. TB reactor numbers were 18,500 in 2011, the lowest recorded number in any year since the commencement of the eradication programme in the 1950s.

My Department is satisfied that the badger culling strategy has contributed to a reduction in the incidence of TB over the past number of years. However, it is my intention to replace badger culling with vaccination when research demonstrates that this is a practicable proposition. There are trials ongoing at present to determine if vaccination of badgers can provide an effective alternative to badger culling in the longer-term and to develop an efficient and effective vaccine delivery methodology.

Forestry Grants

Ceisteanna (343)

Dan Neville

Ceist:

343. Deputy Dan Neville asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if forestry payments will be expedited in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Limerick; the reason for the delay in payment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40068/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This site has a history of poor maintenance and, thus, has failed two previous inspections. The latest remedial works notified to the applicant were “The oak plot has recently been filled in with oak in the pine rows. These still need weed control for at least one growing season. Vegetation control required using herbicides. Remedial works to be completed by 20th August 2012.” The completion of this work was notified to the Forest Service by the applicant’s forestry company and the file has been referred to the forestry inspector for another inspection. The inspector is aware of the urgency of the case and will inspect the site within the next two weeks.

No further payments can issue until the site is passed and all outstanding matters are resolved. Subject to the inspector passing the site as eligible for payment, the 2nd instalment grant (which is mandated to the forestry company) and the applicant’s forestry premium will be further processed for payment.

Agriculture Schemes Appeals

Ceisteanna (344)

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

344. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision has been made on an appeal in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40121/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

A request for an appeal was received by the independent Agriculture Appeals Office on the 12th of July of this year. The request is currently being processed and staff from the Appeals Office will be in touch with the person named in due course to arrange an oral hearing.

Aquaculture Licences Applications

Ceisteanna (345)

Pat Breen

Ceist:

345. Deputy Pat Breen asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Questions Nos 334 of 11 May 2010 and 405 of 18 January 2011, the timeframe for the application; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40125/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As indicated in my previous replies the area for which the licences are sought is a designated Special Area of Conservation under the EU Habitats Directive and a Special Protection Area under the EU Birds Directive (Natura 2000 site).

In the case of aquaculture sites located within Natura 2000 areas my Department, in conjunction with the Marine Institute and the National Parks and Wildlife Service of the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht is engaged in a comprehensive programme to gather the necessary baseline data appropriate to the conservation objectives of these areas. This process is ongoing and significant progress has been made. The comprehensive data collection programme together with the setting of appropriate conservation objectives will enable all new and renewal applications to be appropriately assessed for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the EU Birds and Habitats Directives. Once the relevant data has been collected, conservation objectives for the site have to be established by the National Parks and Wildlife Service. The establishment of these conservation objectives by NPWS will allow individual licence applications to be assessed against the conservation objectives.

The area in question remains part of the package of prioritised areas under assessment. This package continues to be reviewed on a regular basis with a view to expediting the appropriate assessment process.

My Department, working with the National Parks and Wildlife Service, continues to make every effort to expedite the determination of these cases having regard to the complexities of these cases and the need to comply fully with all national and EU legislation.

Sale of State Assets

Ceisteanna (346)

Michael McCarthy

Ceist:

346. Deputy Michael McCarthy asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No 642 of 17 July 2012 if he will provide an update in relation to Coillte; if a final valuation has been determined and if this is the case, the next steps that will be taken in the process; if consideration is being given to the protection of the social and amenity value of some woodlands; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40137/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As advised in my reply on 17th July 2012, the Government decided, in the context of the State asset disposal programme, that consideration would be given to the sale of certain assets of Coillte, excluding the land. The Government decided to proceed on the basis that a long-term concession contract for the harvesting rights to Coillte’s forests represents the best option for extracting value from Coillte.

The process is still at a preliminary stage as a number of issues have been identified in relation to the proposal including Coillte’s strategic importance within the forestry sector, implications for employment, recreational access to Coillte forests and the protection of People’s Millennium Forests located in the Coillte forest estate, all of which require in-depth consideration.

While certain work was done on the valuation of Coillte assets by the NewERA unit of the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA), in conjunction with my Department and the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform, in advance of the decision, further work is required. Coillte Board and Management have been actively engaged in recent months with NewERA, the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and my Department to examine the financial and other implications of developing the potential of Coillte’s forest assets.

Departmental Bodies

Ceisteanna (347)

John Browne

Ceist:

347. Deputy John Browne asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine the action he will take to revamp and reassess the Aquaculture Licence Appeals Board (details supplied) and make it fit for purpose for a modern and efficient licencing system in order that the aquaculture industry can move forward and provide much needed jobs and exports in coastal communities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40161/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Aquaculture Licences Appeals Board (ALAB) is an independent statutory body, with its own funding provided for by the Oireachtas under Section 36 of the Fisheries (Amendment) Act, 1997. The function of the Board is to provide an independent authority for the determination of appeals of decisions of the Minister on aquaculture licence applications. The management of ALAB’s functions is the responsibility of its Board and therefore the Minister does not have a role.

The fact that the majority of locations for which aquaculture licences are sought are in areas designated as Special Areas of Conservation under the EU Habitats Directive and/or Special Protection Areas under the EU Birds Directive (so-called Natura 2000 sites) has had implications for the processing of licence applications. My Department is constrained by law from issuing or renewing aquaculture licences for sites located within Natura 2000 areas until such time as an ‘appropriate assessment’ of the potential impacts of the proposed aquaculture and fishery activities on the conservation objectives for those areas has been conducted. The rate of issuing of Aquaculture licences has been affected by this change but as licences are issued the number of appeals may increase in the future.

The Secretary General and senior officials from my Department have met with the Chairman and members of the Board to review its resourcing and operational issues. An experienced officer from the Department has been assigned to work on administrative aspects of the ALAB operation. The operational needs of ALAB will be continually reviewed in the light of any change in circumstances.

Fish Landings

Ceisteanna (348)

Noel Harrington

Ceist:

348. Deputy Noel Harrington asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if he will provide in tabular form, the total fish landings including those from aquaculture and from visiting fishing vessels at each of the major fishery harbour centres in terms of total tonnage and value for the year 2011 and the most up to date figures for 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40349/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The following tables set out details of landings supplied by the Sea Fisheries Protection Authority into Irish Fishery Harbour Centres, including landings by Irish vessels in respect of 2011. Aquaculture data is not collected in the official EU logbook and is not available, therefore, in this format. Data for 2012 has not been fully tabulated and is not available at this time. Food Harvest 2020 recognised that the processing sector was fragmented, lacking in scale, uncompetitive in terms of production costs, too focused on export of commodity products and constrained by inconsistent supply of raw material. BIM is working to increase the number of foreign vessels which land their fish in Ireland so as to ensure a strong base on which the processing sector can continue to deliver added value to fish landings.

TABLE 1 - 2011 Landings in Irish Ports

-

-

-

Vessel nationality

Landing country

Port name

Data

Total

Denmark

Ireland

Killybegs

Tonnes

1,249

-

-

-

Value €

693,007

-

Ireland Tonnes

-

-

1,249

-

Ireland Value €

-

-

693,007

DenmarkTonnes

-

-

-

1,249

DenmarkValue €

-

-

-

693,007

France

Ireland

Castletownbere

Tonnes

5,188

-

-

-

Value €

10,741,022

-

-

Dingle

Tonnes

4,972

-

-

-

Value €

9,651,225

-

-

Killybegs

Tonnes

1,237

-

-

-

Value €

2,646,708

-

Ireland Tonnes

-

-

11,397

-

Ireland Value €

-

-

23,038,955

FranceTonnes

-

-

-

11,397

FranceValue €

-

-

-

23,038,955

Germany

Ireland

Castletownbere

Tonnes

112

-

-

-

Value €

372,842

-

-

Killybegs

Tonnes

74

-

-

-

Value €

44,240

-

Ireland Tonnes

-

-

186

-

Ireland Value €

-

-

417,082

GermanyTonnes

-

-

-

186

GermanyValue €

-

-

-

417,082

Ireland

Ireland

Castletownbere

Tonnes

13,985

-

-

-

Value €

20,709,120

-

-

Dingle

Tonnes

4,490

-

-

-

Value €

4,999,957

-

-

Dunmore East

Tonnes

8,409

-

-

-

Value €

12,623,980

-

-

Howth

Tonnes

3,342

-

-

-

Value €

9,599,300

-

-

Killybegs

Tonnes

83,538

-

-

-

Value €

62,968,076

-

-

Ros A Mhil

Tonnes

4,230

-

-

-

Value €

9,873,577

-

Ireland Tonnes

-

-

117,995

-

Ireland Value €

-

-

120,774,010

IrelandTonnes

-

-

-

117,995

IrelandValue €

-

-

-

120,774,010

Norway

Ireland

Killybegs

Tonnes

10,633

-

-

-

Value €

31,446,547

-

Ireland Tonnes

-

-

10,633

-

Ireland Value €

-

-

31,446,547

NorwayTonnes

-

-

-

10,633

NorwayValue €

-

-

-

31,446,547

Spain

Ireland

Castletownbere

Tonnes

3,863

-

-

-

Value €

8,327,927

-

-

Dingle

Tonnes

1,308

-

-

-

Value €

2,397,639

-

-

Killybegs

Tonnes

1,824

-

-

-

Value €

4,428,099

-

Ireland Tonnes

-

-

6,995

-

Ireland Value €

-

-

15,153,665

SpainTonnes

-

-

-

6,995

SpainValue €

-

-

-

15,153,665

United Kingdom

Ireland

Castletownbere

Tonnes

2,278

-

-

-

Value €

4,926,646

-

-

Dingle

Tonnes

156

-

-

-

Value €

373,158

-

-

Dunmore East

Tonnes

109

-

-

-

Value €

190,280

-

-

Howth

Tonnes

20

-

-

-

Value €

57,856

-

-

Killybegs

Tonnes

2,073

-

-

-

Value €

2,074,827

-

Ireland Tonnes

-

-

4,635

-

Ireland Value €

-

-

7,622,767

United KingdomTonnes

-

-

4,635

United KingdomValue €

-

-

7,622,767

TotalTonnes

-

-

153,090

TotalValue €

-

-

199,146,033

Harbours and Piers Funding

Ceisteanna (349)

Noel Harrington

Ceist:

349. Deputy Noel Harrington asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No 148 of 10 May 2012 and Parliamentary Question No. 413 on the 10 July 2012, if he will report progress on the studies on the Bull Nose Pier on Cape Clear Island, County Cork; if he has received this report; if he will publish same; if a decision on the work that will be carried out has been taken; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40363/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Officials from my Department attended a public information meeting at Cape Clear on 24th August 2012 where the Department's proposals for the development works at the Bull Nose Pier were outlined and discussed.

There was broad welcome for the proposed development works and I am happy to confirm that I have allocated funding under my Department's 2012 Fishery Harbour and Coastal Infrastructure Development programme to enable the completion of the preparatory consent works with a view to submitting the necessary planning application by mid October 2012.

I trust this clarifies the position.

Genetically Modified Organisms

Ceisteanna (350)

Kevin Humphreys

Ceist:

350. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if Teagasc developed any genetically modified organisms such as potato, barley or wheat seeds, or other important vegetable or fruit species here; if the State through Teagasc retains any patents or intellectual property in any such genetically modified food; if he will explain the position with respect to GMO's and Ireland's food security; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40484/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Teagasc have not developed any genetically modified organisms in Ireland, but were recently awarded a licence by the Environmental Protection Agency to carry out field research on a GM potato designed to resist potato blight disease. The field study is part of a publicly funded EU research project being carried out by a consortium of 22 partners representing 15 EU Member States. The GM potato variety which Teagasc are researching was generated by scientists in Wageningen University, The Netherlands, and has been made available to Teagasc via a standard material transfer agreement.

Responsibility for issues relating to the cultivation of GM crops in Ireland rests with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government, while responsibility for GM foods rests with the Minister for Health and the Food Safety Authority of Ireland. My Department is responsible for issues relating to GM animal feed and the coexistence of authorised GM crops alongside non-GM crops.

Given that GM crops are not cultivated commercially in Ireland and are unlikely to be for the foreseeable future, the issue of cultivation and co-existence does not arise at present. In relation to the authorisation and use of products consisting of or containing authorised GM ingredients in animal feed, my Department adopts, on the basis of scientific evaluation, a positive but precautionary approach to EU applications for the authorisation of GM ingredients and supports applications which have been deemed to be safe by the European Food Safety Authority.

Genetically Modified Organisms

Ceisteanna (351)

Kevin Humphreys

Ceist:

351. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if he will confirm who owns the intellectual property or patent of the genetically modified potatoes which Teagasc is field trialling; if he will clarify if Teagasc had any role in the development of this potato; if so, if it retains any share in the patent or intellectual property relating to it; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40485/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Teagasc were recently awarded a licence by the Environmental Protection Agency to carry out field research on a GM potato designed to resist potato blight disease. The field study is part of a publicly funded EU research project being carried out by a consortium of 22 partners representing 15 EU Member States.

The GM potato variety which Teagasc are researching was generated by scientists in Wageningen University, The Netherlands, and has been made available to Teagasc via a standard material transfer agreement. The field study is to assess the environmental impact of cultivation of the blight resistant potato on the Irish eco-system compared to that of conventional potatoes. Teagasc are not testing the commercial viability of GM potatoes and the biotech industry has no association with this public-funded research project.

Food Labelling

Ceisteanna (352)

Kevin Humphreys

Ceist:

352. Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine the plans he has, if any to protect food labelling terms such as artisan, farmhouse, local and traditional to ensure they are not open to abuse or misuse, and that small producers are protected; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40486/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The only method to protect a designation of the type referred to by the Deputy is through the EU Scheme of Geographical Indications (GIs). Under that scheme Protected Designation of Origin, Protected Geographical Indication and Traditional Speciality Guaranteed designations can all be legally protected on the basis that they reflect the geographical area, traditions and production methods by which foods are made. There are four such products in Ireland. My Department will advise and work with producers in making applications for such designations. Details of the conditions and scheme specifications are available on my Departments website – www.agriculture.gov.ie

I understand that at the request of the Artisan Forum, the Food Safety Authority of Ireland has agreed to produce a guidance document on voluntary advertising terms that appear on food labels such as farmhouse, artisan, hand cooked, etc. This will establish a common understanding of such terms that could serve as guidance for the food industry.

Forestry Grants

Ceisteanna (353)

Pat Breen

Ceist:

353. Deputy Pat Breen asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine when forestry payment will issue to a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40512/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This contract relates to a single tract of land which is owned by two separate applicants. The land is registered in the names of both of these applicants but it was divided equally to be the subject of two forestry contracts. One of the applicants is now disputing the entitlement to one of the plantations. The Forest Service cannot pay on a contract on which there is a dispute about legal ownership. The Forest Service wrote to both applicants informing them that payments must remain suspended on both contracts until this matter is resolved by the applicants and the Forest Service is notified accordingly.

Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Appeals

Ceisteanna (354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 360, 361, 362)

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

354. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision has been made on an appeal under the disadvantaged area scheme in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40541/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

355. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision has been made on an appeal under the disadvantaged area scheme in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40543/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

356. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision had been made on an appeal under the disadvantaged area scheme in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40544/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

357. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision had been made on an appeal under the disadvantaged area scheme in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kerry [40545/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

358. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision has been made on an appeal under the disadvantaged area scheme by a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40551/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

360. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision has been made on an appeal under the disadvantage area scheme by a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40556/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

361. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision has been made on an appeal under the disadvantage area scheme by a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40557/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

362. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture; Food and the Marine if a decision has been made on an appeal under the disadvantage area scheme by a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40558/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 354 to 358, inclusive, and 360 to 362, inclusive, together.

The persons concerned are applicants under the 2012 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme. Currently, they are part of a larger group, whose cases are impacted by a requirement of a minimum stocking density of 0.3 livestock units per forage hectare and who have applied for a derogation in this regard. These applications are currently under consideration and, immediately a decision is reached, they will be notified in writing. However, should the decision be negative, a fully independent appeals procedure is available.

On a more general level, I can also confirm that payments under the 2012 Scheme are scheduled to begin issuing as and from 26 September, directly to the nominated bank accounts of Scheme applicants, whose applications have been determined at that stage. These payments will include derogation cases where the applications have successfully met terms of the scheme and are fully processed for payment.

Barr
Roinn