Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Thursday, 25 Oct 2012

Written Answers Nos. 45-59

Departmental Staff Redeployment

Ceisteanna (45, 46)

Mary Lou McDonald

Ceist:

45. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the number of staff members from his Department that have been temporarily and or permanently redeployed to other Government Departments or agencies since 27 March 2009; the details of the grades and pay scales of same; the total amount of savings achieved in salary payments in respect of the persons concerned; the duration of assignments; the business reasons supporting the redeployment of staff; the details of sanction received from the Department of Finance and or Public Expenditure and Reform; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47181/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Mary Lou McDonald

Ceist:

46. Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the number of staff members that have been temporarily and or permanently redeployed to his Department from other Government Departments or agencies since 27 March 2009; the details of the grades and pay scales involved; the total increase in salary payments for his Department in respect of the persons concerned; the duration of assignments; the area to which each person was assigned; the business reasons supporting the redeployment of staff; the details of sanction received from the Department of Finance and or Public Expenditure and Reform; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47196/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 45 and 46 together.

My Department’s current staffing levels are within the ceilings authorised under its Employment Control Framework. No staff have been redeployed with the exception of one Architect who recently took up a position in the Office of Public Works following a reduction in the Department’s Architectural Services capital budget. With the agreement of the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform, a number of officers have been permanently redeployed to this Department to fill specific vacancies. Details are outlined in the table below. In addition, 8 officers from other Government Departments and Offices have been temporarily seconded to the Department in connection with Ireland’s Presidency of the EU from January – June 2013. These officers will return to their parent organisations at the end of the EU Presidency.

Officers Deployed to the Department Since 27 March 2009

Date

From

No of Staff

Grade

Salary scale

Assignment

30.05.2011

Department of Agriculture

2

 Clerical Officers

- Standard Scale -€ 22,015 to €35,514

Passport Office, Cork

07.06.2011

Department of Agriculture

1

Clerical Officer

– Standard Scale - € 22,015 to €35,514

Passport Office, Cork

30.05.2011

Department of Agriculture

1

Clerical Officer

 – Ex tax officer - €23,640 to €37,000

Passport Office, Cork

30.05.2011

Department of Agriculture

1

Clerical Officer

 – PPC scale - €23,177 to €37,341

Passport Office, Cork

07.06.2011

Department of Agriculture

1

Clerical Officer - (50% work sharing)

 – Higher scale -

(50% work sharing) -

 

€23,042 to €36,267

Passport Office, Cork

05.10.2011

Department of Communications, Energy & Natural Resources

-

Professional Accountant Grade 1

€68,553 to €84,935

Evaluation and Audit Unit

05.03.2012

Department of Public Expenditure and Reform

-

Assistant Principal

€67,913 to €84,296

ICT Unit

20.03.2012

Department of Arts, Heritage & the Gaeltacht

-

Principal Officer

€84,132 to €103,472

Development Cooperation Division

16.04.2012

Department of Environment, Community & Local Government

-

Principal Officer

€84,132 to €103,472

Development Cooperation Division

14.05.2012

National Museum

-

Accountant

€65,185 to €80,678

Finance Unit

 

 

Banking Licence Applications

Ceisteanna (47, 63)

Shane Ross

Ceist:

47. Deputy Shane Ross asked the Minister for Finance the number of applications in each of the last eight quarters for banking licences; the action he will take to attract new banking entrants; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47014/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

63. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the number of applications in each of the last eight quarters for banking licenses and if he will provide in detail what he intends to do to attract new banking entrants; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47087/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 47 and 63 together.

I am advised by the Central Bank, that it has received a single application this quarter and none in the previous seven quarters. As the Deputies will be aware, there is a single market in Europe and the decision on where to establish a credit institution is a commercial decision for a bank. The Central Bank of Ireland has published guidelines for banks wishing to establish a credit institution in Ireland on completing and submitting Banking License Applications to facilitate the process. In that document the Central Bank makes it clear that it welcomes applications. My Department ensures an appropriate economic and legal framework is in place which balances growth of the sector with effective regulation in the area. The Deputies may wish to note with regard to commercial banking activities, my Department plays an active role in the IFSC Clearing House Group, chaired by the Department of the Taoiseach, in developing the financial services sector in Ireland.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (48)

Mattie McGrath

Ceist:

48. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Finance his plans to prevent foster children from being discriminated against in terms of inheritance laws where the foster parent wishes to bequeath their home to the foster child where such a person has been cared for by their foster carers for all of their life (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46902/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that for the purposes of Capital Acquisitions Tax (Gift and Inheritance Tax), the relationship between the person who provides the gift or inheritance (i.e. the disponer) and the person who receives the gift or inheritance (i.e. the beneficiary), determines the maximum tax-free threshold (known as the “Group threshold”) below which gift or inheritance tax does not arise. There are, in all, three separate Group tax-free thresholds based on the relationship of the beneficiary to the disponer.

Group A: €250,000 - applies where the beneficiary is a child (including adopted child, step-child and also foster children who satisfy certain conditions ) or minor child of a deceased child of the disponer. Parents also fall within this threshold where they take an inheritance of an absolute interest from a child.

Group B: €33,500 applies where the beneficiary is a brother, sister, a nephew, a niece, or lineal ancestor or lineal descendant of the disponer.

Group C: €16,750 - applies in all other cases.

The Group A tax-free threshold of €250,000 applies to a foster child in the following circumstances:

(i) in the case of a gift or inheritance, where the foster child has resided with the disponer foster parent and was under the care of and maintained by that foster parent at that foster parent’s own expense throughout a period or periods totalling at least five years in the first 18 years of life of the foster child; or

(ii) in the case of an inheritance taken on the date of death of the foster parent, where the foster child had, prior to that date, been placed in the foster care of the foster parent under the Child Care (Placement of Children in Foster Care) Regulations 1995 or the Child Care (Placement of Children with Relatives) Regulations 1995.

Accordingly, in a situation where a person has resided with a foster parent for all of their life into young adulthood and, where the person has been cared for and maintained by the foster parent at the foster parent’s own expense for at least five years prior to attaining eighteen years of age, that foster child is entitled to claim the Group A tax-free threshold of €250,000 for Gift and Inheritance Tax purposes in the same manner as a natural child of the foster parent. The foster child is not discriminated against in those circumstances.

Separately, the Capital Acquisitions Tax code completely exempts an inheritance of a dwelling house from inheritance tax in certain circumstances. The main conditions attaching to the exemption are that the beneficiary of the dwelling house must have resided in the dwelling house for a minimum of three years immediately prior to the inheritance and must not have an interest in any other dwelling house. In addition, the beneficiary must continue to occupy that dwelling house as his or her only or main residence for a period of six years from the date of the gift or inheritance.

This exemption ensures that what may be the family home for many people will not be subject of any inheritance tax when it is transferred on a person’s death.

The dwelling-house exemption is available to any beneficiary who meets the conditions for the exemption irrespective of whether or not they are related to the disponer of the inheritance and irrespective of the value of the dwelling house being transferred. Accordingly, this exemption would apply to a foster child if he or she satisfied the conditions governing the exemption.

NAMA Staff Remuneration

Ceisteanna (49)

Shane Ross

Ceist:

49. Deputy Shane Ross asked the Minister for Finance the reason employees of the National Treasury Management Agency have not had the same pay cuts applied to their salaries as civil servants; if there are other State bodies which have not been affected by the so-called across the board pay cut applied to the civil service; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46858/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Under the NTMA business model, its remuneration structure is such that there are no general pay grades and no pay scales and all staff are on individually-negotiated contracts. The legislation which established the NTMA positioned it outside of the wider public service structures with operational freedom to negotiate market competitive salaries so that it would have, for example, the flexibility to recruit and retain specialists in mid-career from the private sector. This business model has been essential in enabling the NTMA to staff itself with the necessary technical expertise to successfully carry out the financial and risk management functions which have been assigned to it. Indeed the NTMA has been required to recruit very actively in the market over the last two and a half years in respect of NAMA, banking system functions and NewERA. In the case of NAMA, most people are employed on the basis of specified purpose contracts, which means that as NAMA winds down and certain functions cease, their term of employment will come to an end.

The public sector pension deduction provided for in the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act 2009 applies to all NTMA staff. The NTMA was not subject to the general reductions in salaries provided for in the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest (No. 2) Act 2009 on the basis it would avail of the flexibility inherent in its remuneration model to deliver payroll savings. In 2010 it secured a reduction of some 8% in overall payroll costs, on a like-for-like basis compared with the previous year, through a reduction in the performance-related element of overall remuneration. In 2011, it secured a further reduction of almost 3% in overall payroll costs, again on a like-for-like basis.

In addition, all fifteen NTMA employees whose salaries exceed €200,000 agreed to my request of December 2011 that they waive 15% of salary or such amount of salary as exceeds €200,000 if application of the full 15% reduction would bring their salary to below €200,000.

VAT Rate Increases

Ceisteanna (50)

Joanna Tuffy

Ceist:

50. Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding value added tax being applied to school books; if there are plans to have parity in relation to the VAT regime for school books that are available as ebooks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46925/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The VAT rating of goods and services is subject to the requirements of EU VAT law with which Irish VAT law must comply. In Ireland the zero rate applies to printed books, including atlases, children’s picture, drawing and colouring books and books of music. It is possible for Ireland to apply the zero rate to printed books because Ireland applied the zero rate to these books on and before 1 January 1991, and the EU VAT Directive provides a derogation for such exceptional VAT treatment to continue to apply. However, the VAT Directive does not allow goods and services to apply at the zero rate which were not in place at that rate on 1 January 1991. As e-books were not applied at the zero rate in 1991 it is not possible to apply the zero rate to them now. Furthermore, under the EU VAT Directive, all digitised publications, regardless of their rate when printed (for example, a book liable at zero rate), are treated as the supply of a service liable at the standard rate of VAT, which in Ireland is 23%. E-books, online newspaper subscriptions and online information services purchased via download over the Internet are also considered the supply of services liable for VAT at the standard rate. There is no option under EU VAT law to exempt e-books from VAT or to apply a reduced rate to them. While it is possible to reduce the standard VAT rate on e-books to below 23%, such a reduction would have to apply to all goods and services at the standard VAT rate, which accounts for the majority of activity liable to VAT, and would be excessively costly to the Exchequer.

Tax Yield

Ceisteanna (51)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

51. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the savings to the Exchequer from reducing the earnings cap for pension tax reliefs from €115,000 per annum to €75,000. [46948/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I assume that the Deputy is referring to the current annual earnings cap of €115,000 which operates to limit the level of tax-relieved personal pension contributions in any one year. The annual earnings cap acts, in conjunction with age-related percentage limits of annual earnings, to put a ceiling on the annual amount of tax relief an individual taxpayer can obtain on pension contributions. A breakdown of the cost of tax relief on employee contributions to occupational pension schemes is not available by income tax rate, as tax returns by employers to the Revenue Commissioners of employee contributions to such schemes are aggregated at employer level. An historical breakdown is available by tax rate of the tax relief claimed on contributions to personal pension plans — Retirement Annuity Contracts (RACs) and Personal Retirement Savings Accounts (PRSAs) — by the self-employed and others, to the extent that the contributions have been included in the personal tax returns of those taxpayers. There is, therefore, only a limited statistical basis for providing definitive figures. However, by making certain assumptions about the available information, the Revenue Commissioners inform me that the combined estimated full year yield to the Exchequer from reducing the current annual earnings cap of €115,000 to €75,000 in respect of individual contributions to occupational pension schemes, RACs and PRSAs would be about €113 million.

Tax Yield

Ceisteanna (52)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

52. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the savings to the Exchequer from standardising all discretionary tax relief. [46949/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the deductions and reliefs which are allowable for tax at an individual’s marginal rate of income tax and for which estimates of cost can be provided are set out below together with estimated costs for the year 2009, the most recent year for which the necessary estimates are available. If relief for these deductions and reliefs was confined to the standard rate of income tax the saving to the Exchequer could be of the order of €1,000 million. This estimate does not take into account any possible behavioural change on the part of taxpayers as a consequence of such a change or the economic effect of such a change. This applies in particular to the BES, Film Relief and Capital Allowances regime. The standard rating of employee pension reliefs would also have an impact on workers’ take home pay.

It should be noted that there have been changes since this period, i.e. some schemes have been abolished or modified and others have been introduced. For instance, as the Deputy will be aware, the BES was re-launched as the Employment and Investment Incentive, with changes to the amount of relief payable and types of companies that can qualify.

 Tax Relief Provision

Total 2009 Cost

Saving if Standard

Rated

-

€m

€m

Person Taking Care of Incapacitated Taxpayer

5.9

2.4

Health Expenses (Nursing Homes)

23.1

6.1

Contributions Under Permanent Health Benefit Schemes,after Deduction of Tax on Benefits Received

3.9

 1.6

Employees' Contributions To Approved Superannuation Schemes

729.0

345.2

Retirement Annuity Premiums

237.2

105.6

Personal Retirement Savings Accounts

77.0

26.5

Interest paid relating to borrowings for  purposes such as

acquiring an interest in a company or partnership or to paydeath duties

26.5

11.6

Expenses Allowable to Employees under Schedule E

73.7

27.4

Retirement Relief for certain Sports Persons

0.2

0.1

Revenue Job Assist allowance

0.3

0

Allowance for seafarers

0.2

0

Investment in Corporate Trades (BES)

25.6

13.1

Investment in Seed Capital

2.9

1.2

Stock Relief

2.0

0.6

Relief for expenditure on significant buildings and gardens

4.6

2.2

Donation of Heritage items

0.7

0.6

Donation of Heritage property to the Irish Heritage Trust

0

0

Donations to Approved Bodies (Income Tax only)

51.11

19.8

Donations to Sports Bodies (Income Tax only)

0.6

0.2

Capital Allowances (Income Tax only)

1,004.9

395.9

Rented Residential Relief -Section 23

46.9

24.0

Investment in Films

42.0

25.6

Total

  2,358.3

1,009.7

Tax Yield

Ceisteanna (53)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

53. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the savings to the Exchequer from standardising pension tax reliefs. [46950/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I assume the Deputy is referring to individual pension contributions, the tax relief on which is allowed at the taxpayer’s marginal tax rate — the standard or higher rate of income tax as appropriate in each case. A breakdown of the cost of tax relief on employee contributions to occupational pension schemes is not available by income tax rate, as tax returns by employers to the Revenue Commissioners of employee contributions to such schemes are aggregated at employer level. An historical breakdown is available by tax rate of the tax relief claimed on contributions to personal pension plans — retirement annuity contracts and personal retirement savings accounts — by the self-employed and others, to the extent that the contributions have been included in the personal tax returns of those taxpayers. There is, therefore, no statistical basis for providing definitive figures. However, by making certain assumptions about the available information, it is estimated that the full-year yield to the Exchequer from confining tax relief to the standard rate of 20% in respect of pension contributions to occupational pension schemes, retirement annuity contracts and personal retirement savings accounts would be approximately €470 million.

Pension Provisions

Ceisteanna (54)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

54. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he has information and if he will provide a breakdown of the number of persons who claimed tax free lump sums in 2011 in the following categories, under €50,000, €50,000-€75,000, €75,000-€100,000, €100,000-€150,000, €150,000 - €200,000, €200,000 plus. [46951/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The following are the current arrangements which apply in relation to the taxation of retirement lump sums paid under Revenue approved pension arrangements. These arrangements apply in both the public and private sectors and were introduced in Budget and Finance Act 2011:

- Retirement lump sum amounts up to €200,000 are paid free of tax. They are also paid free of the Universal Social Charge (USC).

- The portion of a lump sum between €200,001 and €575,000 is taxed on a ring-fenced basis at 20%. (This means that no tax credits or other tax reliefs can be set against this portion of the lump sum.) No USC is chargeable.

- Any amount of a lump sum in excess of €575,000 is taxed under Schedule E and collected under the PAYE system (credits and other tax reliefs are available). In this instance, USC is also chargeable on the excess.

These amounts are lifetime amounts with prior lump sums taken since 7 December 2005 aggregating with later lump sums. As there is no general requirement for data on the number or value of retirement lump sums below the €200,000 limit to be returned to my Department or to the Revenue Commissioners, I am not in a position to provide the figures requested in the question in that regard.

As regards lump sums exceeding €200,000, returns provided to the Revenue Commissioners in respect of lump sum payments between €200,001 and €575,000 indicate that 375 individuals paid tax of €6.6 million for the year 2011. Information is not available to identify the number of individuals, if any, receiving lump sum amounts in excess of €575,000, or the associated tax yield, as such amounts are taxed at the individual’s marginal tax rate (together with USC) as income under the normal PAYE system.

Tax Reliefs Availability

Ceisteanna (55)

Martin Heydon

Ceist:

55. Deputy Martin Heydon asked the Minister for Finance the reason a tax concession which previously existed to ease the administrative burden where small payments were made to those under 50 from pension schemes that were being wound up has been curtailed; if this situation will be reviewed; if Revenue will correspond with an organisation (details supplied) which has been having difficulties in getting a response on this matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46970/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that tax relief is provided at an individual’s marginal income tax rate on amounts contributed to pension schemes (subject to limits). Relief is also provided on contributions made by the employers to such schemes. In addition the amount of profits and gains generated by the investments held by those pension schemes is exempt from tax. Pension benefits are taxable at the individual’s marginal rate, so the amount of tax due will depend on the individual’s personal circumstances. There may be an opportunity to take part of the pension benefit as a tax-free lump sum but this depends on the rules of the pension scheme and is subject to an overall limit of €200,000. When the pension benefits are drawn down they become taxable at the individual’s marginal rate.

There are no circumstances, other than ill health, where a member less than 50 years of age is allowed to make cash withdrawals from an on going pension scheme. However, as a concession in the case of scheme wind-ups where the value of an individual member’s fund is less than €2,000, Revenue allows a once off taxable payment to the individual. It was clarified to the organisation concerned in May 2012 that such payments are subject to tax at the individual’s marginal rate of tax. I am informed that the Revenue Commissioners issued a reply on 20 September 2012 to the representations made by the organisation involved outlining their position on this matter.

VAT Rate Increases

Ceisteanna (56)

Robert Dowds

Ceist:

56. Deputy Robert Dowds asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to the fact that although many unhealthy foods and beverages are taxed at the standard rate, anomalies exist whereby products high in fat, sugar and salt are taxed at a reduced, or zero, rate;his plans to address these anomalies in the Budget 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46975/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

VAT is a tax on the value added to products and services and is governed by the EU VAT Directive. EU VAT rules provide that a standard VAT rate of between 15% and 25% applies to the supply of all goods and services with certain derogations. Annex III of the VAT Directive provides a list of goods and services to which Member States may apply a reduced rate of between 5% and 15% (with Member States applying no more than 2 reduced rates). In addition, various derogrations apply whereby Member States may retain historic VAT rates on specific goods and services where those VAT rates applied on 1 January 1991. In Ireland most food applies at the zero rate of VAT, this includes bread, butter, tea, sugar, meat, milk, and vegetables. This is a derogation from EU VAT law, as described above, as food applied at the zero rate in 1991. Bakery products, for example cakes, crackers, certain wafers, croissants and biscuits operate at the 13.5% reduced VAT rate. This is also an historical VAT treatment. In this regard, all other food and drink apply at the standard VAT rate, such as alcohol, soft drinks, bottled waters and health drinks soft drinks, sweets and chocolate and similar confectionery, wafers and biscuits covered with chocolate or other similar product, ice-cream and ice-lollypops, potato and similar crisps, popcorn, salted and roasted peanuts.

Pension Provisions

Ceisteanna (57)

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

57. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance if he will review the legislative provisions which restrict a holder of pension bond to access the funds prior to their fiftieth birthday; if he proposes to include financial hardship as one such ground for accessing funds at an early stage; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47004/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Revenue approval of occupational pension schemes is given on the basis that retirement benefits may, generally, be paid at normal retirement age which cannot fall before age 60 or after age 70. Most schemes would have a normal retirement age of 65. Revenue approval may also provide, however, for early retirement from age 50 where scheme rules allow and with the employer’s consent. In such situations benefits are restricted. In the case of personal pensions such as retirement annuity contracts (RACs) and Personal Retirement Savings Accounts (PRSAs) benefits can be taken from age 60 with no retirement condition. Buy-out bonds, which are a special type of defined contribution plan which can be availed of by members of occupational pension schemes leaving service or where schemes are winding-up can normally take benefits at any time from age 50.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that in relation to all of these pension arrangements benefits can be taken at any stage where retirement is due to serious ill-health or incapacity. I have no plans to amend the above arrangements for accessing pension benefits.

There are a number of reasons why, under existing policies, early withdrawals of pension savings are not permitted, the principal one being that pension schemes and plans (and the associated tax reliefs) are designed as long term savings vehicles based on the principle that the savings will be “locked away” until retirement. This, in effect, is the quid pro quo for the tax relief which is available to encourage long term saving for retirement.

A number of proposals have been made that individuals should be allowed access to their pension savings prior to retirement. Various rationales have been advanced to justify these proposals including that such access would allow those individuals to pay down mortgage and other debt and would otherwise provide a boost to economic activity. This is not a simple matter. During 2011, at the request of the Government’s Economic Management Council (EMC), an Ad-hoc group was established under the chairmanship of the Department of Social Protection to consider the idea of allowing people to access their pension savings before pension age in order to assist them in paying down debt. The ad-hoc group presented a detailed report to the EMC in September 2011. The conclusions of the Ad-hoc Group report were that:

- There is no evidence that, in general, the group likely to be most affected by mortgage debt (or other debt) has access to sufficient pension savings to make a difference to their situation.

- The legislative and administrative implications for such a scheme would be extremely complex and would appear excessive given the overall impact.

- Longer term difficulties whereby people are not making adequate provision for their retirement would be exacerbated, with potential for increased demands on the State.

- Individuals cashing in their pension savings now would get poor value in current circumstances which they would struggle to replace in the future.

The “Keane Group” on mortgage arrears did not dispute these findings and early access to pension savings did not feature among the recommendations of that Group. A more general scheme of early access to pension savings would present significant problems in terms of the proper targeting of the use of accessed funds and controls over potential abuse.

The tax treatment of pension savings for which I have responsibility is only one aspect of the broad policy of encouraging people to provide for an adequate income in retirement beyond the basic State pension. This policy area is the responsibility of my colleague, Ms Joan Burton TD, Minister for Social Protection, who I know is also aware of the proposals being made for early access to pension savings. The OECD is currently carrying out an independent review of long term pension policy in Ireland on behalf of the Minister for Social Protection. I have been advised, in response to a request from me in this matter, that the terms of reference of the independent review are such as to facilitate consideration of the issue of early access to pension savings and I would expect that the OECD review would deal with this issue.

Fiscal Policy

Ceisteanna (58, 61)

Shane Ross

Ceist:

58. Deputy Shane Ross asked the Minister for Finance the macro-economic stability and debt sustainability analyses, if any, that have been undertaken in which an assumption is that the promissory note is not repaid; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47011/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

61. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the macro economic stability and debt sustainability analyses if any that have been undertaken in which an assumption is that the promissory note is not repaid; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47085/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 58 and 61 together.

My Department undertakes and publishes macro-economic analysis on a frequent basis, including the Stability Programme Update published in April of this year and the forthcoming Medium Term Fiscal Statement. As part of this on-going and wide-ranging work, my Department examines the issue of debt sustainability. Indeed, section 4.5 of the November 2011 Medium-Term Fiscal Statement deals exclusively with an analysis of debt sustainability, outlining alternative trajectories for the debt/GDP ratio corresponding to different assumptions about the gap between the interest rate and the growth rate. Our current debt/GDP ratio is very high and stabilizing and subsequently reducing it is one of the Government’s key policy objectives. In that regard, the end-June euro area summit and more subsequent development signalling that the situation of the Irish financial sector would be examined.

In addition to my Department's own internal analysis, as part of the seventh review of the financial assistance programme, which took place in July 2012, the IMF undertook an analysis of the possible effects on the debt-sustainability of the Irish sovereign of various modes of financing could be. For illustrative purposes, scenarios considered included consideration of the promissory notes. The Fund concluded that the improvement in Ireland’s debt dynamics would depend on the modalities and the quantum under consideration. On-going discussions with the Troika are considering all options for the restructuring of the promissory notes in terms of the source of funding, the duration of the notes, the interest rate applicable etc. As the Deputy would expect our analysis is on-going and is regularly updated in the context of these discussions.

Fiscal Policy

Ceisteanna (59, 62)

Shane Ross

Ceist:

59. Deputy Shane Ross asked the Minister for Finance the analyses that are being undertaken in view of the IMF WEO note on multipliers to establish the short term multiplier for Government spending here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47012/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

62. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the analyses being done in the view of the International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook note on multipliers to establish the short term multiplier for Government spending here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [47086/12]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 59 and 62 together.

At the outset, I want to stress that the Government’s key objective of supporting economic growth that delivers jobs remains to the forefront in framing fiscal and economic policy. Fiscal consolidation reduces the fiscal deficit and increases investor confidence which in turn lowers the cost of borrowing and helps to put public debt on a declining path. Having said that I fully recognise that there will be a short term reduction in output before these medium term benefits are realised. So it is a difficult balancing act between the need for consolidation on the one hand and the need to support the emerging recovery on the other. There is, I think it is fair to say, an acknowledgement among many commentators that we in Government are getting this balance right.

The recent IMF World Economic Outlook suggests that the average size of fiscal multipliers (the effect of consolidation on growth) across countries may have been underestimated in recent years. More recently, senior IMF staff tasked with monitoring developments in Ireland pointed to the multiplicity of factors at play in acting as a dampener on growth and acknowledged that there was no convincing evidence that the fiscal multiplier for Ireland was underestimated compared with that assumed under the programme.

Ireland is a small, open economy with imports accounting for over three quarters of GDP. This means that a considerable amount of consolidation leaks out through reduced demand in countries we import from. We can already see this in the Balance of Payments figure, which shows the current account moving from a deficit of -5.7% of GDP in 2008 to a surplus of 1.1% in 2011. Fiscal multipliers vary according to the fiscal instruments used, and the impact on aggregate demand as a result of expenditure changes can differ from tax changes. I would reiterate the Government’s cognisance of this and its commitment to implementing consolidation in as growth-friendly a manner as possible.

In order to correct our excessive deficit and minimise the cost to the taxpayer through sustaining investor confidence and keeping the cost of borrowing as low as possible, Ireland is committed to implementing further consolidation over the next three years. Evidence of the rewards associated with this approach is already visible through the lowering of bond yields since early summer and the successful return of the NTMA to the debt market.

Barr
Roinn