Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 23 Apr 2013

Written Answers Nos. 153 - 171

Overseas Development Aid Provision

Ceisteanna (153)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

153. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will provide a list of donations of €1m or more by Irish Aid to organizations in 2012, showing the organisation name and the amount donated. [18430/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

For 2012, the Government provided almost €630 million in Official Development Assistance (ODA). Some 80% of the funding was managed by Irish Aid in the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade under Vote 27 – International Cooperation. The remainder consisted of development contributions made through other Government Departments, and Ireland’s share of the EU Development Cooperation budget. Funding under the Government’s aid programme was provided for long term development programmes and emergency humanitarian assistance in some of the poorest countries and communities in the world. In 2012 the programme continued to prioritise the fight against global poverty and hunger, delivering targeted investments in the areas of education, health, good governance, food security and nutrition.

Funding under Vote 27 was delivered through trusted partners including UN Agencies, International Development Organisations, Non Governmental Organisations and Irish Missionary Organisations. The table below provides a listing of grants in excess of €1.0 million provided to those organisations from the Department’s headquarters in 2012. In addition, approximately one third of the Irish Aid programme was managed through our Embassies in Programme Countries, where we implement long term, strategic development partnership programmes. In 2012, Ireland’s Programme Countries were Ethiopia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Uganda, Tanzania and Zambia in sub-Saharan Africa, and Timor Leste and Vietnam in Asia. Full details of this expenditure are currently being compiled for the Irish Aid annual report and will be available later in the year on the Irish Aid website, at www.irishaid.ie.

Organisation Name

In € Millions

United Nations Development Programme

30.00

Concern Worldwide

23.43

Trócaire

18.47

The World Bank

10.39

Misean Cara

16.00

GOAL

14.70

United Nations Children’s Fund – UNICEF

10.25

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

11.80

World Food Programme

11.00

United Nations Central Emergency Response Fund

10.00

International Committee of the Red Cross

8.80

United Nations Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

8.40

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East

6.34

International Labour Organisation

5.95

United Nations Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs

4.56

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS - UNAIDS

3.48

Oxfam Ireland

3.30

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies

3.28

United Nations Population Fund

3.23

Christian Aid Ireland

4.02

Plan Ireland

3.02

Self Help Africa

2.90

Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization

2.75

World Vision Ireland

2.73

Irish Fair Trade Network

2.66

World Health Organisation

2.30

International AIDS Vaccine Initiative

2.00

International Fund for Agricultural Development

2.00

Medicines for Malaria Venture

2.00

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

1.95

United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women

1.73

The Halo Trust

1.64

Sight Savers International

1.57

Médecins Sans Frontières

1.03

Human Rights Issues

Ceisteanna (154)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

154. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the restrictions, if any, that apply to Irish businesses and individuals doing business with Burmese Myanmarese military and Burmese individuals and Burmese companies involved in human rights abuses. [18431/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

On 22 April 2013 at a meeting of the Foreign Affairs Council, Ireland together with our EU colleagues decided to lift all sanctions on Myanmar/Burma with the exception of the arms embargo and embargo on equipment which might be used for internal oppression. This decision was taken in light of the political and economic reforms that have been taking place in Myanmar/Burma since 2011 in the process of democratisation, and further to the Council’s decision to suspend sanctions in April 2012. The current EU restrictions on arms and on equipment which might be used for internal oppression are outlined in the relevant Council Decision of 22 April 2013. Member States and nationals of Member States are prohibited from the sale, supply, transfer or export of arms and related materials to Myanmar/Burma. EU Member States are also prohibited from financing or providing financial assistance to military activities in Myanmar/Burma.

Ireland and our EU partners recognise that Myanmar/Burma still faces complex challenges in terms of democratisation, economic development, human rights, and peace and reconciliation. In keeping with this, the recent decision taken at the Foreign Affairs Council will apply until the 30 April 2014. The decision will be kept under constant review and shall be renewed, or amended as appropriate.

Overseas Development Aid Provision

Ceisteanna (155)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

155. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will confirm his Department’s funding provided to the Republic of Uganda in 2012 and in 2013; and his views on that country’s treatment of homosexuals including through its laws, and specifically his views on legislation before the Ugandan parliament at present which reportedly includes provision for a punishment of life imprisonment for consensual sex between two persons of the same sex. [18432/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Uganda is a priority country for Ireland’s development aid programme, where we have a commitment to long term strategic assistance. The anticipated budget for the programme in Uganda in 2012 was €32.75 million. However, when I became aware of the misappropriation of Irish funds in October 2012, I immediately suspended over €16 million of assistance which was due to be channelled through Government of Uganda systems. The final outturn for the Uganda aid programme in 2012 was €15.54 million. An interim Aid Programme for Uganda has been put in place for 2013 with a budget of €16.4 million. This programme is built around support for projects which operate through non-government systems, most of which involve the continuation of existing programmes and commitments, together with some elements where existing support through Government systems can be replaced with bilateral arrangements. This includes direct support to the Ugandan Office of the Auditor General.

The promotion and safeguarding of human rights, particularly those of minority groups, is a central element of Ireland’s foreign policy. I share the widespread concerns about the difficult situation faced by the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in Uganda. I am particularly concerned about developments in relation to the so-called Anti-Homosexuality Bill. Ireland, together with our EU partners and other international donors in Uganda, has engaged actively on the issue of this draft legislation since it first arose in 2009. The draft Bill was re-introduced in 2012, but has not yet been formally tabled in Parliament. The position of the Government of Uganda on the proposed law is that it was presented as a private member’s bill and is not part of the Government’s legislative programme. President Museveni and the Cabinet have publicly stated that the Bill is unnecessary. He has also made a commitment to engage members of Parliament on the implications of this Bill for Uganda’s international relations and reputation.

I raised the issue directly with President Museveni when I visited Uganda last July and our Ambassador in Kampala has also continued to follow developments closely. She and other EU Ambassadors have outlined our serious concerns in several meetings at the highest levels in Uganda. The Ugandan Government and other interested parties are in no doubt about the Irish Government’s profound concerns on this issue. Ireland, in conjunction with our EU partners and the wider donor community, remains committed to ensuring that citizens of Uganda do not suffer violence or discrimination on the grounds of their sexual orientation. Our Embassy in Uganda will continue to monitor the issue closely over the coming months and to work with partners who are equally concerned to promote respect for these rights.

Certificate of Irish Heritage

Ceisteanna (156, 158)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

156. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will confirm the cost of the Irish heritage certificate scheme to date and specifically the amount paid to date to scheme operator, Fexco; and the projected amounts overall to be paid to Fexco to the end of its contract. [18433/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

158. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will confirm the number of Irish heritage certificates issued to date. [18435/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 156 and 158 together.

With the vast majority of the global diaspora no longer eligible for Irish citizenship, the Certificate of Irish Heritage was introduced to recognise descendents of previous generations of Irish citizens in an official way and to give greater practical expression to the sense of Irish identity felt by many around the world. Following a public tender in April, 2010, Fexco were awarded the contract to operate the Certificate of Irish Heritage on behalf of the Department.Under the terms of the contract, Fexco developed the web systems and necessary software. Fexco also process applications, issue certificates and are the initial point of contact for all customer enquiries. To date, 1794 Certificates of Irish Heritage have been issued. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has spent €3,163 to date on the Certificate of Irish Heritage. These costs are mainly on technical issues relating to the websites which the Department owns (registering domains and security validation procedures etc.) as well as travel costs to meetings with Fexco in Killorglin and some photographs at the launch in New York. No payments have been made to date to Fexco nor are any expected to be made during the contract period. Under the terms of the contract, the Department is not liable to Fexco for any costs associated with the establishment or operation of the scheme.

Consular Services Expenditure

Ceisteanna (157)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

157. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will set out in tabular form for each year 2011 and 2012, the cost, by country, of operating embassies, consulates, chanceries and other diplomatic representation, showing under separate headings for each country, premises, costs, salaries and earnings, and other costs. [18434/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Ireland’s 73 missions abroad perform a wide range of functions in pursuit of Ireland’s foreign policy interests. These include representing and advancing government policies with other States and in international organisations, in particular the EU and UN; economic and cultural promotion; frontline consular and passport services to Irish citizens overseas; engaging with Irish communities abroad and harnessing the resource they offer in assisting economic recovery; and programme management, particularly in the Irish Aid priority countries. The operating costs of each of Ireland’s diplomatic missions for 2011 and 2012 are provided in the tables below. In 2012 there was an overall reduction in administrative costs of €0.57m for the diplomatic network. The figures in these tables include all expenditure items charged to Mission budgets. Salary and related costs of staff posted from Ireland are not included as they are a charge on the overall budget of the Department rather than on a specific Mission. Likewise, capital expenditure is not included as such expenditure does not form part of the Mission’s budget.

A number of Missions manage significant programmes on behalf of Irish Aid and their effective implementation necessarily entails additional management and oversight costs which are included in the figures provided below.

2011

Local Salaries, Foreign Representation and Accommodation

Travel and Subsistence

Other Costs

Communications

Office Supplies

Premises

BERNE

355,817

6,706

14,501

15,014

3,634

103,920

BERLIN

527,329

17,134

21,623

27,236

8,148

325,434

BOSTON

235,071

4,555

1,542

8,792

3,485

106,178

BRUSSELS (EMBASSY)

273,398

2,738

18,024

9,978

2,524

226,495

BRUSSELS (PR-EU)

1,884,193

145,227

60,140

109,471

70,304

1,088,712

BUENOS AIRES

198,964

14,063

14,844

10,817

3,390

173,763

CAIRO

196,430

18,691

7,627

28,981

1,862

169,940

CANBERRA

552,669

44,958

10,806

33,624

10,495

94,018

CHICAGO

227,708

13,499

3,157

13,260

3,779

80,242

COPENHAGEN

294,920

8,067

13,746

13,113

3,094

50,163

GENEVA

707,534

21,188

11,352

26,609

8,026

488,249

THE HAGUE

477,619

8,358

56,278

24,203

5,576

80,079

HOLY SEE

254,007

1,584

20,176

11,954

2,136

123,766

ABUJA

127,933

40,843

29,453

13,219

4,893

36,642

LISBON

236,319

18,129

11,037

21,872

2,092

138,433

LONDON

1,548,603

54,911

100,768

130,835

54,022

979,386

LUXEMBOURG

260,544

370

3,972

6,305

1,933

113,918

MADRID

594,575

11,813

12,410

28,957

3,505

319,757

MOSCOW

383,973

29,845

16,772

29,766

3,984

266,816

NEW DELHI

141,790

23,930

11,435

14,837

6,678

469,766

NEW YORK - PMUN

828,845

5,997

9,719

35,516

13,958

1,062,843

NEW YORK - C.G.

826,242

12,406

16,517

8,092

16,233

789,953

OTTAWA

319,544

37,616

12,647

34,676

12,763

144,058

PARIS

1,224,262

28,883

19,842

37,496

9,432

327,168

ROME

542,241

23,642

21,577

28,132

8,537

522,156

SAN FRANCISCO

193,493

10,230

1,087

-14,003

8,369

140,256

STOCKHOLM

311,733

856

11,893

15,001

4,100

270,763

TEHRAN

141,117

9,308

10,830

1,086

684

158,680

TOKYO

795,396

20,621

48,953

26,647

8,378

1,384,445

VIENNA

378,127

6,339

17,144

14,939

3,918

235,081

WASHINGTON DC

873,991

29,722

26,698

39,004

9,212

93,439

OSLO

261,128

2,071

12,171

15,227

4,746

347,779

STRASBOURG

275,881

5,840

6,328

11,933

3,223

106,407

RIYADH

233,982

17,647

9,848

11,324

4,338

48,515

ATHENS

283,671

5,492

12,381

10,852

2,250

157,211

BEIJING

285,743

45,996

17,160

31,382

5,577

334,170

BELFAST SECRETARIAT

232,588

22,896

33,770

27,791

4,212

347,891

SEOUL

162,127

9,255

8,134

10,382

3,499

164,370

WARSAW

286,651

14,477

23,008

23,888

5,458

382,628

HELSINKI

214,127

4,599

10,463

13,287

3,914

262,529

PRETORIA

464,988

64,024

66,142

40,135

18,629

348,346

PRAGUE

311,675

5,848

14,542

14,860

4,218

219,848

KUALA LUMPUR

147,535

11,147

8,896

9,695

1,939

172,136

BUDAPEST

137,066

7,802

10,760

11,466

736

318,590

OSCE - VIENNA

203,660

23,315

13,490

9,887

2,304

153,511

TEL AVIV

214,283

4,146

15,571

12,392

2,374

299,703

EDINBURGH

103,126

1,330

2,627

9,980

1,273

80,509

ANKARA

186,767

29,306

14,449

12,343

2,165

134,620

MEXICO

181,761

34,838

12,709

22,845

2,788

182,965

ARMAGH

30,150

58,808

10,073

5,695

4,209

465,558

SYDNEY

305,428

9,526

2,236

18,432

4,538

283,884

SHANGHAI

129,640

11,637

6,649

15,211

1,409

387,926

SINGAPORE

315,472

28,249

7,136

7,759

1,853

453,648

RAMALLAH

171,025

2,253

9,797

6,547

958

50,905

BRUSSELS (P.F.P.)

67,734

2,855

279

1,412

1,534

192,691

NICOSIA

128,214

980

6,168

4,572

1,481

225,121

LJUBLJANA

205,701

7,407

16,518

7,994

1,721

161,044

TALLINN

61,909

1,561

5,714

8,343

1,856

299,132

BRATISLAVA

138,986

2,302

8,849

7,970

835

197,813

BRASILIA

247,469

19,217

12,261

15,923

2,621

231,815

BUCHAREST

177,794

5,467

10,104

12,227

2,893

263,587

SOFIA

109,053

5,968

19,324

5,993

961

219,533

LONDON - PPO

195,097

546

0

0

0

0

RIGA

63,009

2,426

6,440

4,946

1,646

105,137

VILNIUS

132,043

1,175

7,185

5,903

956

267,696

VALLETTA

84,950

9,670

1,248

8,742

990

218,648

ABU DHABI

160,678

16,227

11,212

13,627

3,756

180,194

ATLANTA - CONSULATE

84,843

10,140

5,311

5,712

1,721

25,073

ADDIS ABABA

469,421

14,033

70,968

9,025

10,603

58,671

DAR ES SALAAM

574,365

63,315

94,583

22,723

25,365

50,892

DILI

59,111

19,299

3,463

6,433

2,574

36,773

FREETOWN

69,035

6,940

41,340

5,137

2,451

157,016

HANOI

267,943

56,132

23,712

9,239

11,819

334,296

KAMPALA

416,342

50,924

130,209

21,521

15,457

152,267

LILONGWE

175,495

34,206

88,515

19,404

17,940

125,146

LUSAKA

798,441

70,737

94,126

20,876

17,209

132,158

MAPUTO

471,827

98,148

163,390

37,265

21,893

175,871

MASERU

299,381

24,426

61,575

26,619

10,438

82,216

Table

2012

Local Salaries, Rent Allowance, Representation Allowance

Travel and Subsistence

Other Costs

Communications

Office Supplies

Premises

BERNE

352,486

6,275

12,077

14,112

3,995

105,173

BERLIN

485,446

18,316

25,298

24,767

8,380

350,969

BOSTON

233,288

4,309

1,497

11,530

4,567

67,463

BRUSSELS (EMBASSY)

308,370

1,537

13,285

7,291

4,372

295,065

BRUSSELS (PR-EU)

1,863,134

187,745

158,336

113,483

78,913

1,073,841

BUENOS AIRES

188,355

24,656

10,759

10,497

907

154,068

CAIRO

220,509

21,395

5,597

20,183

2,360

179,860

CANBERRA

585,498

60,655

13,718

39,676

11,733

103,376

CHICAGO

234,620

13,895

1,830

17,979

4,223

37,817

COPENHAGEN

271,042

6,878

15,822

13,306

3,240

61,517

GENEVA

703,743

35,140

11,200

24,554

9,722

498,056

THE HAGUE

478,255

5,888

55,699

23,724

4,615

129,982

HOLY SEE

1,688

5,646

0

0

0

0

ABUJA

151,642

39,557

53,601

14,761

5,891

313,439

LISBON

199,341

3,412

9,279

20,474

1,486

144,181

LONDON

1,485,960

46,181

89,322

159,999

54,184

1,025,019

LUXEMBOURG

253,468

3

4,530

6,426

1,326

125,043

MADRID

592,184

6,827

8,654

25,371

4,570

311,239

MOSCOW

404,176

38,357

24,988

33,475

8,175

237,864

NEW DELHI

177,043

31,721

11,515

15,611

8,948

380,661

NEW YORK - PMUN

899,805

2,606

9,615

33,361

18,800

518,782

NEW YORK - C.G.

869,113

20,027

14,189

8,149

21,126

874,924

OTTAWA

340,061

39,117

19,200

24,504

11,725

157,394

PARIS

1,231,041

22,147

21,924

33,339

13,235

320,851

ROME

759,610

23,350

38,469

32,321

9,743

372,650

SAN FRANCISCO

202,647

10,289

1,292

-21,149

7,399

153,830

STOCKHOLM

251,279

4,069

10,127

9,714

3,297

265,261

TEHRAN

274,506

145

-12,417

509

12

-16,341

TOKYO

894,385

19,045

41,368

25,967

7,488

986,372

VIENNA

375,971

2,117

13,614

10,270

4,942

238,572

WASHINGTON DC

884,578

47,219

27,627

42,479

9,571

88,537

OSLO

275,198

1,226

13,531

13,621

3,690

318,966

STRASBOURG

271,237

4,987

6,752

12,505

3,452

105,731

RIYADH

261,172

16,321

11,084

10,411

4,547

52,768

ATHENS

246,386

6,609

12,141

9,527

2,033

155,638

BEIJING

355,444

37,459

24,786

31,498

7,795

392,959

BELFAST SECRETARIAT

266,681

25,474

19,588

26,740

2,774

307,357

SEOUL

156,792

10,290

5,732

10,429

2,019

176,643

WARSAW

278,692

30,410

28,083

21,264

7,363

392,692

HELSINKI

215,505

3,305

9,910

10,738

2,641

216,022

PRETORIA

259,793

29,653

22,430

37,644

10,395

183,591

PRAGUE

441,340

50,715

77,361

40,818

15,648

271,555

KUALA LUMPUR

158,954

6,339

10,757

8,740

1,933

194,731

BUDAPEST

128,007

7,884

12,550

11,926

1,789

272,898

OSCE - VIENNA

192,415

17,531

10,601

15,215

3,277

163,349

TEL AVIV

212,167

2,730

16,297

12,588

1,819

349,081

EDINBURGH

108,743

2,057

2,890

9,243

2,201

80,309

ANKARA

191,677

18,209

14,560

15,099

5,925

142,747

MEXICO

194,623

34,647

13,359

21,559

2,605

213,576

ARMAGH

22,421

47,802

10,118

6,917

4,644

446,060

SYDNEY

348,278

6,761

2,257

21,603

4,625

311,852

SHANGHAI

155,636

6,458

10,455

14,544

3,772

403,129

SINGAPORE

330,317

28,798

9,687

2,357

1,984

556,700

RAMALLAH

169,064

2,403

19,896

7,753

1,818

157,127

BRUSSELS (P.F.P.)

47,135

2,630

286

974

3,193

181,817

NICOSIA

124,581

228

6,882

5,747

2,026

139,157

LJUBLJANA

201,644

10,869

15,147

9,524

4,807

149,044

TALLINN

61,588

2,406

5,503

7,652

1,776

301,719

BRATISLAVA

92,438

1,565

5,781

6,286

1,329

186,683

BRASILIA

237,266

25,750

11,840

17,609

2,229

227,473

BUCHAREST

159,532

4,299

10,704

10,580

2,738

274,233

SOFIA

103,524

1,933

21,037

7,304

436

221,759

LONDON - PPO

210,926

290

0

0

10,529

0

RIGA

62,341

1,258

7,245

4,435

1,691

98,177

VILNIUS

116,847

49

7,934

5,745

1,190

236,218

VALLETTA

88,515

11,397

1,459

10,816

3,604

217,087

ABU DHABI

168,222

15,481

11,488

10,159

2,261

181,174

ATLANTA - CONSULATE

97,905

11,430

1,843

6,575

1,350

52,385

ADDIS ABABA

450,011

14,346

56,086

9,025

11,586

71,708

DAR ES SALAAM

649,047

53,401

103,820

22,723

25,303

55,356

DILI

44,212

19,819

17,655

10,423

3,556

54,342

FREETOWN

103,376

29,243

25,078

9,489

5,088

116,471

HANOI

301,083

83,591

40,160

13,637

10,156

307,544

KAMPALA

533,792

57,275

160,659

21,521

17,566

198,544

LILONGWE

157,560

39,983

80,326

19,404

22,997

116,952

LUSAKA

764,837

52,015

94,417

20,876

14,415

45,056

MAPUTO

550,460

80,644

149,910

37,265

33,985

215,622

MASERU

326,184

24,252

43,095

26,620

8,513

106,039

Question No. 158 answered with Question No. 156.

Ministerial Meetings

Ceisteanna (159)

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

159. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the contacts that he has had with key players on Capitol Hill in the US following the publication of the Outline of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18849/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I welcome the publication of the US Senate’s Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Bill which provides for reform of the US immigration system, which was published last week. The legislation – which was drafted over several months by a bi-partisan group of eight US Senators – includes provisions that would help resolve the plight of thousands of undocumented Irish people who are living illegally in the US. It also provides for future flows of legal migration between Ireland and the US. The Bill is a very positive development which, if adopted, would help to end the great hardship and uncertainty faced by undocumented Irish in the US and their families here in Ireland. The inclusion of a new provision to allow several thousand Irish citizens to legally avail of employment opportunities in the US every year is also particularly welcome.

Both of these issues have been a key focus of my ongoing engagement with political leaders in the US, particularly during my visit to Washington D.C. over St. Patrick’s Day when I discussed them with Ireland’s key friends on Capitol Hill and in the Administration. The Government has maintained close contact since publication of the Bill with the key players through our Embassy in Washington. I am conscious that the overall issues involved are complex and sensitive ones within the US political system and that much further debate is likely to be required before the final shape of any overall legislation becomes clear.

The plight of the undocumented remains a top priority for Government and we have worked closely with the bi-partisan group of Senators and other legislators in the run-up to the publication of this Bill. The Government will continue to liaise closely with them and other key stakeholders in Congress and throughout the Irish-American community.

Departmental Expenditure

Ceisteanna (160)

Timmy Dooley

Ceist:

160. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the situation regarding his recent announcement regarding the allocation to refugees in Turkey, to outline the total such payments made in connection with the war in Syria in 2012 /13; the budget head they came under; if they were supplementary or planned amounts; and the way he explains such out payments to Irish people who see the problems here as priority for funding. [18853/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

After more than two years of intense and indiscriminate violence in Syria, the civilian population is experiencing appalling suffering and requires the support of the international community if the situation is not to become an outright humanitarian catastrophe. There are currently 4 million people in desperate need of the basic means of survival. Over 2 million Syrians are displaced inside the country, their homes and communities destroyed and uninhabitable. More than 1.3 million people are now taking refuge in neighbouring countries after fleeing the hostilities. Despite serious risks and constraints on their operations, humanitarian workers are entering into these Syrian communities each day to reach the most vulnerable with life-saving assistance.

Children have been particularly affected by the crisis. It is estimated that some 2 million children inside Syria are in need of immediate assistance, with many requiring medical attention and psychosocial support. More than 4,000 schools have been destroyed or are no longer operational, and hundreds of thousands of children are being denied a basic education. One out of every two refugees from the conflict is a child.

When I visited al-Zaatari refugee camp on the Syria-Jordan border last August, all the refugees I spoke to were clear that eland’s assistance was greatly needed. Although Syria’s neighbours, including Jordan, were making a major effort to support Syrians affected by the crisis, they were already under strain because of the scale of the challenge and the steady escalation of needs. Earlier this month, the Tánaiste visited refugee camps in southern Turkey and witnessed the major humanitarian effort underway there to support Syrian refugees. This visit further confirmed our belief that the international community has a duty to move immediately to help protect the lives and dignity of the beleaguered Syrian population. Ireland has responded generously to the humanitarian crisis in Syria and neighbouring countries. To date, through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Government has provided over €8.15 million in humanitarian assistance. This has been channelled through long-standing and reputable partners such as the World Food Programme (WFP), the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). They have a demonstrated track record of effective humanitarian response in Syria, with strong strategies for targeting and delivery and robust systems for monitoring and accountability.

The Government’s humanitarian support is allocated through the Emergency Humanitarian Assistance Fund managed by ish Aid. The specific objective of this fund is to save and protect lives in acute crisis situations on the basis of independently assessed humanitarian needs. It is designed to finance activities that provide protection for civilians, the delivery of clean safe water, sanitation services, food, shelter, healthcare, or other forms of assistance necessary to sustain life in natural or manmade disaster situations.

I believe that the ish people strongly support the provision of much-needed humanitarian support for people whose lives and livelihoods are being destroyed by the conflict in Syria. We are continuing to monitor the situation in the region in order to assess the most effective way in which eland can continue to contribute to relief of suffering among the civilian population.

Public Sector Staff Remuneration

Ceisteanna (161)

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

161. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will provide in tabular form the number of civil/public servants under the remit of his Department who earn more than €500,000, between €400,000-€500,00, €300,000 - €250,000, €250,000 - €200,000, €200,000 - €150,000, €150,000 - €100,000, €100,000 - €80,000, €80,000 - €60,000, €60,000 - €40,000 and less than €30,000. [18870/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The table below sets out the range of earnings within my Department. It is classified in accordance with the breakdown requested. For completeness, I have also included the number of staff in my Department earning between €30,000 and €40,000 and €300,000 and €400,000.

>€500,000

NIL

€400,000-500,000

NIL

€300,000-400,000

Nil

€250,000-300,000

NIL

€200,000-250,000

1

€150,000-200,000

8

€100,000-150,000

58

€80,000-100,000

136

€60,000-80,000

188

€40,000-60,000

299

€30,000-40,000

406

<€30,000

310

Human Rights Issues

Ceisteanna (162)

Derek Nolan

Ceist:

162. Deputy Derek Nolan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade in the context of the upcoming Universal Periodic Review of Colombia in the Human Rights Council, if he intends to press the Colombian Government on the security and protection of human rights defenders and trade union workers operating in Colombia; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19096/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The promotion and protection of human rights is a core principle of Ireland’s foreign policy. In line with our priorities in this area, Ireland raises concerns and makes recommendations to States under the Universal Periodic Review mechanism of the UN Human Rights Council, including on the issue of human rights defenders and threats against civil society around the world. In relation to the upcoming Universal Periodic Review of Colombia, it is our intention to contribute to this review, including in relation to the protection of human rights defenders and trade union workers. We will also continue to engage with Colombia in the context of our bilateral contacts. I very much welcomed the opportunity to meet with Colombia’s President Santos and Foreign Minister Holguín last January on the margins of the EU-CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean countries) Summit in Chile. We discussed a range of issues including my concerns regarding the situation of trade unionists and human rights defenders in Colombia. President Santos assured me that this is also an issue of priority for his Government and he briefed me on his Government’s efforts in this regard. Guided by our over-arching commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights, Ireland continues to work closely with our EU partners to support positive developments in Colombia and to promote the progressive improvement of human rights standards.

UN Security Council Resolutions

Ceisteanna (163)

Derek Nolan

Ceist:

163. Deputy Derek Nolan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will consider supporting the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 in Colombia, in the context of Ireland's National Action Plan and its membership of the UN Human Rights Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19097/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Ireland’s National Action Plan (NAP) on UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325 on Women, Peace and Security was officially launched in November 2011. The NAP sets out how Ireland will promote and implement the objectives of the Resolution in its programme support activities, diplomatic advocacy and policy-making, across the interrelated areas of peace, security and development. The NAP commits Ireland to: listen to the voices of women affected by conflict; strengthen women’s leadership and implement accountability mechanisms; strengthen institutional capacities through comprehensive training of staff deployed overseas; support programmes to promote women’s participation in conflict prevention, peacekeeping, peace negotiations, peace building, and post conflict transition and governance; and leverage Ireland’s participation in global and regional fora to champion the implementation of UNSCR 1325. A mid-term review of the NAP is currently underway which will highlight the progress that Ireland has made to date in implementation of the NAP and make recommendations for further actions to fulfil its objectives. As the Deputy may be aware, I attended the EU – CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) Summit in Santiago de Chile in January. I was particularly pleased that an important outcome from the Summit was the commitment by the EU and the CELAC countries to prioritise gender in the context of our bi-regional relations and I look forward to the early implementation of the EU – CELAC Action Plan 2013-2015 in this regard.

Ireland was also one of sixty-six States which supported a Joint Statement on Women’s Rights, Peace and Security at the UN Human Rights Council in 2012. The Joint Statement reaffirmed support for, and commitment to, the implementation of UNSCR 1325 and called on all States to fully realise the objectives of the resolution in their national policies. We will continue to follow this issue closely as a member of the Council for the period 2013-2015. My Department engages with a wide range of international partners in discussions on UNSCR 1325. If we were invited to do so by the Government of Colombia, I would be happy to share our experience of developing our National Action Plan, to offer advice on issues relating to implementation of UNSCR 1325 and to consider any request for other support that might be made.

Human Rights Issues

Ceisteanna (164)

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

164. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade with regard to the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, if he will indicate which Govrernment Departments and agencies will be taking part in the formulation of a national plan for their implementation and which Departments will have overall responsibility; if he will provide a timetable as to when the national plan will be completed, in view of the request by the European Commission that these be submitted by the end of 2012. [19107/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

On 16 June 2011, the UN Human Rights Council endorsed "Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework”. The Guiding Principles cover a range of issues which, in this State, span the policy responsibilities of a number of Government Departments and agencies. The Commission Communication of October 2011, entitled “A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility” invited EU member States to develop national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles by the end of 2012. The EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy, adopted by the Council of the European Union in June 2012, asked member States to develop national plans on the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles in 2013. Consideration is being given as to how to address the Guiding Principles and how to best go about formulating our national action plan for their implementation. I would hope that Government Departments will be in a position to take this forward after the conclusion of Ireland’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union.

Diplomatic Representation

Ceisteanna (165, 166)

Robert Troy

Ceist:

165. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his plans for increasing an Irish presence in Taiwan since the closure of the Industrial Development Agency's Taiwan office in December 2011. [19122/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Robert Troy

Ceist:

166. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his plans to increase the Irish presence in Taiwan in view of the fact that 16 EU member states have offices there and the high number of Double Taxation Agreements that have been signed by many of our common partners with Taiwan. [19123/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 165 and 166 together.

Ireland, along with all EU partners, adheres to the One China policy and, as a result, does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan. This does not, however, preclude the development of economic and trade relations and Ireland, together with our EU partners, sees the benefit of encouraging trade with Taiwan, and continues to explore appropriate opportunities which arise. This does not, however, preclude the development of economic and trade relations and Ireland, together with our EU partners, sees the benefit of encouraging trade with Taiwan, and continues to explore appropriate opportunities which arise.

As the Deputy has noted, IDA Ireland had an office in Taipei but closed it following a reorganisation of resources in 2011. Enterprise Ireland and the IDA currently assess that, given the competing demands on limited resources, they can best manage the needs of their clients in China, including those in Taiwan, from their offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong and Shenzen. Decisions regarding the presence of an Irish State Agencies in Taipei are matters for the Agencies concerned.

The European Union has no formal diplomatic or political relations with Taiwan. The EU does, however, recognise Taiwan as an economic and commercial entity and is represented by the European Economic and Trade Office (EETO) in Taipei, which was established in 2003. A number of EU partner countries also have Trade Offices there.

Irish business and other representatives travelling to Taipei on trade promotion and investment activities are free to liaise with the EETO and to welcome any assistance which might be offered by that office, in addition to the support provided by the Irish State Agencies in China.

In terms of the possibility of concluding a Double Taxation Agreement (DTA) with Taiwan, this matter is currently being considered by the relevant Government Departments and agencies. Ireland has a DTA with the People’s Republic of China which entered into force in December 2001. Since the conclusion of the DTA with China, a separate agreement was agreed with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China (HKSAR) and entered into force in February 2011. However, the situation in Hong Kong is different to Taiwan as Hong Kong’s separate taxation status is specifically provided for in the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, as adopted by the National People’s Congress in Beijing in 1997.

Property Taxation Application

Ceisteanna (167)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

167. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance arising from recent demands for local property tax received by homeowners in recent times, if the current actual market value of a person's property remains as the guiding factor in the determination of actual liability; if any regard may be had for situations whereby a number of employed persons are residing in one dwelling alongside a similar dwelling occupied by a widow, widower, couple on pension; if any cognisance is taken of the ability of the latter to discharge the tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18288/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Finance (Local Property Tax) Act 2012 (as amended) sets out how a residential property is to be valued for Local Property Tax (LPT) purposes. The LPT is a self-assessed tax and it is incorrect to describe the general issue of LPT Returns and supporting documentation by Revenue as demands for LPT. In accordance with the legislation, it is a matter for the property owner to calculate the amount of LPT due based on his or her assessment of the market value of the property. The level of household income, or the number of residents in the household, has no bearing on the amount of LPT due.

The initial valuation of a property on 1 May 2013, assuming it is made in good faith, will be valid up to and including 2016 and will not be affected by any increase or decrease in property prices or other changes, during this period. A system of deferral arrangements for owner-occupiers is available, one of which is dependent on the level of the owner’s annual income. Where a property owner qualifies for deferral, interest will be charged on LPT amounts deferred at a rate of 4% per annum and the deferred amount, including the interest, will attach to the property and will have to be paid before the property is sold or transferred. Details of all the deferral options are available in Revenue’s Guide to Local Property Tax which was issued to property owners and to Oireachtas Members and is also on Revenue’s website www.revenue.ie.

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that as part of the general issue of Returns and booklets, which has been ongoing since last month and is almost concluded, property owners also received a Revenue Estimate of LPT. Revenue has made it clear that the Revenue Estimate is not based on a valuation of each owner’s individual property nor should it be regarded as an accurate calculation of the amount of LPT that the owner should pay. The Estimate is only relevant where an owner does not make his or her self-assessment of the market value and complete and file his or her LPT Return.

To qualify for a deferral, the residential property must be occupied as a sole or main residence. The gross income thresholds for a full deferral will be €15,000 for a single person and €25,000 for a couple, whether married persons, civil partners or cohabitants. A person may claim a deferral if their gross income will not “as can reasonably be foreseen at the liability date” exceed these thresholds in that year. An increased gross income threshold applies in the case of properties occupied as a sole or main residence and subject to a mortgage. In such cases, the gross income thresholds may be increased by 80% of the mortgage interest payments. A deferral option in qualifying cases in this regard will apply until the end of 2017 and will assist individuals currently in mortgage distress.

A deferral of up to 50% of the LPT liability will be possible where the gross income of the liable person does not exceed €25,000 for a single person or €35,000 for married persons/civil partners/cohabitants. A deferral of 50% of the LPT will also be available where gross income does not exceed the above thresholds (€25,000 single, €35,000 couple) as increased by 80% of the gross mortgage interest payments that a liable person expects to make by the end of the year for which the gross income is being estimated. This type of deferral will also be available until 31 December 2017.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (168)

Sean Fleming

Ceist:

168. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Finance in view of developments in Portugal, if he has considered a general increase in PAYE to higher earners over a three year period which would have less deflationary impact on the general economy instead of specifically targeting public sector workers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18501/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

In relation to tax policy the position is that the Programme for Government states that as part of the Government’s fiscal strategy we will maintain the current rates of income tax together with bands and credits and not increase the top marginal tax rates. I should point out that the latest OECD data indicates that Ireland has the most progressive tax system of the EU members of its organisation. A progressive taxation system ensures that the burden of taxation falls most heavily on those with a higher ability to pay.

In addition, the marginal tax rate, which is described as the tax rate that applies to the last euro of the base, is an important consideration in the formulation of tax policy. Marginal tax rates are important because they influence individual decisions to work more. The OECD in its working paper ‘Tax and Economic Growth’ points to the “possibility that high top marginal rates will increase the average tax rates paid by high-skilled and high-income earners so much that they will migrate to countries with lower rates resulting in a brain drain which may lower innovative activity and productivity” .

The top marginal tax rate for employees, including USC and PRSI, is now 52%. This has increased from 43.5% in 2008. The top marginal tax rate for self-assessed is now 55%. This has increased from 46.5% in 2008. It is estimated that in 2013, the top 5 per cent of income earners will pay 44 per cent of the total income tax yield, while it is estimated that those earning €50,000 or less, which represents 78 per cent of income earners, will pay 20 per cent of the total income tax yield. It is further estimated that in 2013, 841,000 individuals, which represents approximately 40 per cent of the income tax base, will be exempt from income tax altogether.

The issue of public service pay and other expenditure policy is primarily a matter for the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform. However, in view of the Unions’ non acceptance of the measures proposed by the Labour Relations Commission to achieve reductions in the public service pay bill, it will now be necessary for the Government to decide on and secure alternative measures that will deliver the savings to meet our expenditure targets.

Customs and Excise Staff

Ceisteanna (169)

Michelle Mulherin

Ceist:

169. Deputy Michelle Mulherin asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm the number of full time Customs and Excise staff employed solely in the detection of drugs for 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18542/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that Revenue is an integrated Tax and Customs administration, and all Revenue staff are available for assignment to any required functions in accordance with currently identified priorities and risks. Currently the Revenue Commissioners have approximately 2,000 staff engaged directly in activities that are dedicated to target and confront non-compliance. These staff play an important part in ensuring compliance with all taxes and duties as well as with customs obligations (including drugs interdiction)

Revenue is subject to the Employment Control Framework staffing reductions imposed since 2009. Revenue’s overall staffing levels have reduced from a total of 6,581(Full Time Equivalent) at the end of 2008 to its current level of 5,780. Notwithstanding this reduction, Revenue staff resources assigned to compliance activities have been maintained at around 2,000. Revenue have accorded a very high priority to the tackling of all illegal trade, including drugs, and they are committed to ensuring that, despite the staff reductions, that this enforcement work will continue to be resourced to the maximum extent possible.

Revenue is very aware that it plays a frontline role in protecting society from the importation of illicit drugs. As a stakeholder in the Government’s National Drugs Strategy, Revenue plays an important role in implementing the Supply Reduction Pillar. Strategic and Operation Plans, which are managed on a national basis, have been put in place to ensure Revenue meets its commitments under the strategy. This ongoing commitment is bolstered by the deployment of the two Revenue Customs Cutters, the RCC Suirbhéir and the RCC Faire , two X-Ray scanners and 14 detector dog teams, coupled with the management of the Customs Drugs Watch programme. Revenue works proactively with an Garda Siochana and the Naval Service as part of the Joint Task Force on Drugs Interdiction. Along with effective operational interventions, Revenue has also used its contacts within international law enforcement agencies to proactively profile drug trafficking networks.

Customs and Excise Staff

Ceisteanna (170, 171)

Michelle Mulherin

Ceist:

170. Deputy Michelle Mulherin asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm the number of part time Customs and Excise staff employed in County Mayo in the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18543/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Michelle Mulherin

Ceist:

171. Deputy Michelle Mulherin asked the Minister for Finance the number of full time Customs and Excise Staff employed in County Mayo in the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18545/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 170 and 171 together.

The Revenue Commissioners have provided me with the following information in relation to their overall staffing numbers in County Mayo in response to the Deputy’s questions.

Total Revenue staff numbers in County Mayo

Year end

Full time

Work Sharing

Totals

Headcount

Headcount

Headcount

2009

107

20

127

2010

111

21

132

2011

111

19

130

2012

106

19

125

Revenue is an integrated tax and customs administration. The Revenue Commissioners currently has approximately 2,000 staff engaged on activities that are dedicated to target and confront non-compliance. These front-line activities include anti-smuggling and anti-evasion, investigation and prosecution. Revenue has an enforcement presence at strategic locations throughout the State. Enforcement strength at particular locations is regularly augmented with additional personnel on a risk-assessment basis, or when particular operations are taking place. The Deputy will appreciate that for reasons of operational sensitivity the Commissioners are not in a position to provide details or plans of enforcement deployment at any given location.

Barr
Roinn