Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Thursday, 17 Oct 2013

Written Answers Nos. 166-175

Residency Permits

Ceisteanna (166)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

166. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if, in the case of persons (details supplied) in County Meath who have a residency entitlement arising from their Irish-born children in the context of the Zambrano judgment, and in view of the extent to which the family has established commitments here, including employment, consideration may be given to awarding permission to remain in the first instance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43969/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The persons concerned are a husband and wife who entered the State as students on separate dates in 2005 and were granted permission to remain until 23rd November, 2006 and 22nd February, 2006 respectively. They have remained in the State without permission since then. Consequently, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the persons concerned were notified, by separate letters dated 2nd February, 2009, that it was proposed to make deportation orders in respect of them. They were each given the options, to be exercised within 15 working days, of leaving the State voluntarily, of consenting to the making of a Deportation Order or of making written representations to the then Minister setting out the reasons why they should not have deportation orders made against them.

While substantial written representations have been submitted by and on behalf of the persons concerned, a representative of my Department wrote to the persons concerned on 10th October, 2013 requesting certain documentation and clarifications. Upon receipt of such documentation and clarifications, the immigration case files of the persons concerned will be decided by reference to the provisions of Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement. All representations submitted will be considered before final decisions are made. Once decisions have been made, these decisions, and the consequences of the decisions, will be conveyed in writing to the persons concerned.

Given that none of the children of the persons concerned can claim an entitlement to Irish citizenship, it is difficult to see how the European Court of Justice Judgment in the Zambrano case would have any bearing on the immigration cases of the persons concerned.

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS of my Department by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Residency Permits

Ceisteanna (167)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

167. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the current position in regard to residency status/entitlement for naturalisation in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43970/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The person concerned was granted permission to remain in the State on 5 September, 2005 for an initial two year period, under the revised arrangements applicable to the non-EEA national parents of Irish born citizen children born in the State before 1 January, 2005, more commonly known as the IBC/05 Scheme. This permission was subsequently renewed for a further three years to 5 September, 2010, and more recently to 4 September, 2013. The person concerned has submitted an application for a renewal of permission to remain to my officials in the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department. My officials have written to the person concerned requesting the submission of certain items of documentation and information in support of his renewal application. Upon receipt of the requested documentation and information, the position of the person concerned will be further considered.

There is no record of an application for a certificate of naturalisation from the person referred to in the Deputy's question.

Section 15 of the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, as amended, provides that the Minister may, in his absolute discretion, grant an application for a certificate of naturalisation provided certain statutory conditions are fulfilled. The conditions are that the applicant must -

- be of full age

- be of good character

- have had a period of one year's continuous residency in the State immediately before the date of application and, during the eight years immediately preceding that period, have had a total residence in the State amounting to four years

- intend in good faith to continue to reside in the State after naturalisation

- have, before a judge of the District Court in open court, in a citizenship ceremony or in such manner as the Minister, for special reasons, allows—

(i) made a declaration, in the prescribed manner, of fidelity to the nation and loyalty to the State, and

(ii) undertaken to faithfully observe the laws of the State and to respect its democratic values.

A foreign national who is married to, or is the Civil Partner of, an Irish citizen for at least three years may apply for naturalisation under section 15A of the Irish Naturalisation and Citizenship Act 1956, as amended, where they have been continuously resident in the island of Ireland for the year immediately prior to the date of their application and for two out of the four years prior to that year. The marriage or civil partnership must be subsisting and recognised under Irish law. Section 15A provides that the Minister may waive certain conditions for naturalisation if satisfied that the applicant would suffer serious consequences in respect of his or her bodily integrity or liberty if not granted Irish citizenship.

Section 16 of the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956, as amended, provides that the Minister may, in his absolute discretion, waive some or all of the statutory conditions in certain circumstances i.e. where an applicant is of Irish descent or of Irish associations; where an applicant is a person who is a refugee within the meaning of the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees; or where an applicant is a Stateless person within the meaning of the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Stateless persons.

It is open to any individual to lodge an application for citizenship if and when they are in a position to meet the statutory requirements as prescribed in the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956 as amended.

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up-to-date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy's view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Residency Permits

Ceisteanna (168)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

168. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 1040 of 18 September 2013, if consideration may be given to extending stamp 4 status or leave to remain in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 11; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43971/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I wish to inform the Deputy that the person referred to has no entitlement to Stamp 4/Leave to Remain.

As outlined in previous Dail replies in this matter the person referred to has no application pending for residency. The person concerned was granted permission to remain for a period of five years on 12th January, 2010 on the basis of being the spouse of an EU citizen, who was residing in the State and was exercising his EU Treaty Rights.

The grounds under which she was granted permission to remain in the State no longer apply, as her EU spouse is no longer residing in this State. Therefore, the permission to remain which was granted under the provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC and European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) Regulations 2006 and 2008 has now been revoked. The person concerned was notified of this decision on 6th October, 2011.

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Divorce Process

Ceisteanna (169)

Seán Ó Fearghaíl

Ceist:

169. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Justice and Equality his views on the costs involved in progressing a legal separation or divorce in the State; his views on whether the costs of such activities may well be excessive; if he will consider means to control or reduce such costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44017/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I fully understand that separation and divorce are extremely stressful times for couples and their families, and can be costly in both emotional and financial terms. There is a range of options open to separating couples depending on the degree to which they can reach mutually acceptable arrangements including, where relevant, in relation to custody of, and access to, their children. Where couples can reach mutually acceptable terms, they may separate by deed without the need to make any court applications, and the terms of the separation in relation to maintenance may be made a rule of court in the event of any future breach of the terms. They may also seek a judicial separation and, if they have been able to agree terms, they may ask the court to make orders based on their agreement. When they have been separated for four out of the previous five years, they may apply for a divorce and again, they may ask the court to make its orders based on any agreements they have come to, provided the agreements meet the Constitutional requirement of "proper provision".

As the Deputy will be aware, there is also a free Family Mediation Service to help separating couples agree the terms of any separation or divorce. Where couples can agree those terms through mediation, this can reduce any legal costs relating to court proceedings by minimising the issues to be so resolved. Information about the Family Mediation Service is available at www.legalaidboard.ie, or through Citizens Information Centres. Where couples have not reached any agreement and the proceedings are concerned extensively with determining the division of assets, appropriate levels of maintenance, and arrangements concerning children, the legal costs will be higher. Ultimately, the reaching of agreement in relation to separation and divorce proceedings relies on the parties concerned and solutions cannot be imposed solely from a legal costs perspective.

It has also been my long-held view that there should be a dedicated and integrated Family Court structure to meet the particular needs of people involved in family proceedings. A commitment has been given in the Programme for Government to introduce a Constitutional Amendment to allow for the establishment of such a court to streamline family law court processes and to make them more efficient and less costly.

At a broader level, the issue of legal costs is being addressed by the Legal Services Regulation Bill 2011 which has commenced Committee Stage in the Dáil and is a key component of the Government's strategy aimed at reducing legal costs in this country and providing those involved in family or other proceedings with less costly alternatives. The Bill makes extensive provision, particularly in Part 9, for a new and enhanced legal costs regime that will bring greater transparency to how legal costs are charged along with a better balance between the interests of legal practitioners and those of their clients. Both barristers and solicitors will be obliged to provide more detailed information about legal costs from the outset of their dealings with clients. When there are any significant developments in a case which give rise to further costs the Bill provides that a client must be duly updated and given the option of whether or not to proceed with the case in question. The Bill also sets out a number of measures aimed at opening up the provision of legal services to new business models that can provide more tailored and competitive services for clients such as those involved in separation or divorce proceedings.

Crime Prevention

Ceisteanna (170)

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

170. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will support local residents (details supplied) in Dublin 5 who are concerned about their safety and security when a paedophile is released soon from prison and who have concerns that there could be violence. [44042/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Deputy will appreciate that it would not be appropriate for me to comment on individual cases. I can however assure him that all offenders subject to the notification requirements under the Sex Offenders Act 2001 are monitored by the Sex Offender Management and Intelligence Unit (SOMIU) at the Garda National Bureau of Criminal Investigation and that there is liaison between the Gardaí and the Prison Service authorities in advance of the release from prison of such persons. The Unit is supported by Garda Inspectors nominated in each Garda Division throughout the State and each such Inspector has access to all necessary Garda resources within that Division to assist in putting in place the required monitoring arrangements.

Naturalisation Applications

Ceisteanna (171)

Robert Troy

Ceist:

171. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will expedite the naturalisation application in respect of a person (details supplied). [44079/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that an application for a certificate of naturalisation has been received on behalf of the person referred to by the Deputy.

The application is currently being processed and will be submitted to me for decision as expeditiously as possible.

The Deputy may wish to note that queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to INIS by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been established specifically for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission Administration

Ceisteanna (172)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

172. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 158 of 10 October 2013 the reason he stated he had no function in determining the content of protocols and if this is the view of both the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission and the Garda Síochána, considering that the protocols provide a basis for timely and complete co-operation and considering that he knows the commission has requested independent access to PULSE on numerous occasions and that he has the power to bring forward amending legislation to compel such an arrangement. [44082/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Section 108 of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 provides that the Ombudsman Commission and the Garda Commissioner shall, by written protocols, make arrangements concerning matters including the sharing of information between both organisations. I have no function in the making of such arrangements or in determining the protocols surrounding those arrangements.

As I stated in my reply to the Deputy of the 10th of October 2013, revised protocols were agreed and signed off by the Chairperson of the Ombudsman Commission and the Garda Commissioner last month. These revised protocols provide the Ombudsman Commission with access to PULSE through the two Garda Superintendents working on secondment with the Ombudsman Commission.

I also informed the Deputy in my earlier reply that I have established a committee chaired by a senior official of my Department, with senior representatives from the Ombudsman Commission and the Garda Síochána, to act as a forum where any future emerging issues concerning the protocols can be identified and appropriately addressed.

Referendum Expenditure

Ceisteanna (173)

Michael Healy-Rae

Ceist:

173. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will provide the total cost involved in holding the recent referendum; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44087/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I take it that the Deputy is referring to the referendum on the Court of Appeal. The estimated cost of the referendum was €1.5 million, although the actual cost may be less. It is not possible to quantify the exact cost at this time as the processing of all outlays is ongoing.

Firearms Licences

Ceisteanna (174)

John McGuinness

Ceist:

174. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 429 of 26 March and 13 June 2013, if the report from the Commissioner is now available. [44092/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I refer the Deputy to my reply by letter to Parliamentary Question Number 429 of 26 March, 2013. This reply, as set out in italics beneath, issued from my Office on 11 July, and was also a follow up reply to Question Number 117 of 13 June.

"I am writing to you further to the Parliamentary Question number 14875/13 you put down for answer on Tuesday, 26 March, in connection with the costs of recent judicial reviews in the firearms licensing area.

I understand that 22 separate Bills of Costs have, so far, been served on the Chief State Solicitor. These refer to some of the adjourned firearms judicial reviews as part of the agreement reached between the parties on 31 January 2012. No Bills of Costs have yet been received regarding the 'test cases'. I understand that in the event of failure of the CSSO's Costs Section to reach agreement on the costs of the 22 Bills of Costs submitted then it will be referred to a Taxing Master for adjudication. It is not possible to give more precise information at this stage.

I am also informed that the issue of costs being awarded in respect of District Court Appeals was the subject of a High Court judgment by Judge Peart on the 1st of May, 2013 in the case Hayes - V- Chief Superintendent Sheahan. In summary, the Judge found that existing court rules do not give a District Court Judge jurisdiction to award costs to an applicant, in the absence of any statutory power to award costs on appeal under Section 15A of the Firearms Acts.

In relation to the request for information for the total estimated cost of all Gardaí time in processing and providing backup to the legal actions, this is not readily available and the Garda Commissioner informs me that it would require a disproportionate amount of Garda time and resources to compile same.

While I have stated that the collapse of the test cases was because of issues associated with record keeping in relation to some applications it is worth noting that the Chief Superintendent is, in law, the persona designata and it is not for me to second guess his or her decision or somehow to assume that because legals costs were incurred that the wrong decision was made. I would not like it to deflect from the issue of the dangers presented by handguns and I am still considering a report submitted to me by the Garda Commissioner in this regard".

Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Payments

Ceisteanna (175)

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

175. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine when a disadvantaged area scheme or area aid payment will be issued to a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43919/13]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The person named held a herd number jointly with his mother and they submitted applications to my Department under both the Single Payment Scheme and the Disadvantaged Scheme for 2013. The mother of the person named passed away after the submission of these applications.

As part of the payment for the Disadvantaged Area Scheme is due to the estate of the deceased herd owner, testamentary documents will be required before payment can be released.

A Transfer of Entitlements application was received on 31 July 2013, from the person named requesting the transfer of 37.89 Single Farm Payment entitlements from the joint herd number held with his late mother into his sole name. As this transfer was by way of inheritance, it was also necessary to request testamentary documentation in support of this transfer. Under the Will of the deceased, other persons are the rightful beneficiaries of the Single Payment entitlements. Therefore, before the requested transfer can be completed, these persons must indicate their intention, if they so wish, to waive their rights in favour of the person named.

Furthermore, as the herd number was transferred into the sole name of the person named after the submission of a joint Single Payment Scheme application, it was necessary to request the Executors of the Will of the deceased to agree to undertake all the responsibilities associated with the Single Payment Scheme.

Officials from my Department are in contact with the person named regarding these outstanding matters.

Barr
Roinn