Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Wednesday, 19 Feb 2014

Written Answers Nos. 23-36

EU Enlargement

Ceisteanna (23, 57, 58)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

23. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the extent to which he directly and in conjunction with his EU colleagues continues to monitor the situation in the Western Balkans with particular reference to the ongoing economic situation there and consequent possible destabilisation as evidenced in recent times; the degree to which particular reference has been made to address issues of concern in the region; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8070/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

57. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the extent to which the European Union continues to monitor the situation in the Western Balkans with particular reference to the need to support the various authorities in their efforts to achieve the acquit communautaire; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8573/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

58. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the extent to which underlying social or economic issues in the Western Balkans are a basis for recent disturbances there; the extent to which this has raised concerns within the European Union; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8574/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 23, 57 and 58 together.

Together with my EU colleagues, I follow very closely the situation in the Western Balkans on an on-going basis. As well as our on-going support for their efforts to align with the acquis communautaire in preparation for EU membership, we monitor the social and economic situation in the region with particular attention.

As the Deputy will be aware, none of the countries of the Western Balkans is a functioning market economy but each is working towards that goal. All are affected by high unemployment, particularly among young people. While they have been hit by the global economic crisis, recovery in the EU should have a positive impact on the region. The European Commission has forecast that the Western Balkans’ economies should grow by 2% GDP in 2013. This modest recovery is not a guarantee for sustainable growth and convergence, however, and significant challenges remain. The lack of economic growth and job opportunities in some countries has led to public demonstrations recently.

The EU, as part of its overall support for the region and for the EU perspective of the Western Balkans, is actively supporting their economic growth and reforms. Our aim is the development of a peaceful, stable and prosperous Western Balkans region.

For example, the European Commission is strengthening dialogue on economic governance with the countries of the region this year to help them better prepare for eventual Union membership in terms of economic reform, competitiveness and job creation. This is an initiative that Ireland very much supports. The EU also places the rule of law at the heart of the enlargement process, recognising that this is key for economic development and for creating a favourable business environment and investment climate.

As part of our ongoing monitoring of the situation in the region, at the last Foreign Affairs Council, on 10 February, we discussed developments in Bosnia and Herzegovina in light of the public demonstrations there in the days preceding the Council. We recalled the importance of that country’s leaders working together on important reforms, including economic reforms, in the interests of their peoples and with a view to advancing their country on its EU path. I expect that we will be returning to the subject of Bosnia and Herzegovina at a future Council.

We in Ireland also remain fully engaged with the Western Balkans region. My colleague, the Minister for European Affairs, Paschal Donohoe, has recently visited both Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina, to express our continued support for their efforts to advance on their respective EU paths. Both he and I also met with the Foreign Minister of Kosovo when he visited Dublin in January. We discussed the progress that Kosovo has made as well as the challenges that remain and assured him of our on-going support for his country.

Together with our EU counterparts, we will remain fully engaged with the region and supportive of the efforts of the countries of the Western Balkans as they undertake the necessary reforms, especially economic reforms, and prepare for EU membership.

Diplomatic Representation

Ceisteanna (24, 36)

Patrick O'Donovan

Ceist:

24. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will provide an update on plans to provide new diplomatic missions; and if he will make provision for any other new missions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8001/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ann Phelan

Ceist:

36. Deputy Ann Phelan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his plans to expand Ireland’s network of embassies further; and if an analysis of these embassies will be undertaken as part of the review of the Irish foreign policy consultation process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7998/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 24 and 36 together.

The Government is committed to achieving the maximum benefit from the resources we commit to our international engagement and to ensuring that Ireland maintains a position of influence and respect in the global community.

With a view to ensuring that we have the right mix of policies and instruments to promote our values and interests in a complex and changing external environment, I have asked my Department to undertake a review of Ireland’s foreign policy and external relations.

This review is an opportunity to reflect on how we can continue to serve the interests of the Irish people, contributing to their security, prosperity and well-being, and promoting their values, through an active international engagement.

The state’s diplomatic and consular network is at the forefront of efforts to promote our interests and values and in providing important services to the Irish people and business community. At present, Ireland’s diplomatic network includes 56 Embassies, 7 multilateral missions and 10 Consulates General and other offices.

The review will reaffirm the importance of this national resource. Deputies will be aware of the recently announced Government decision to expand the diplomatic and consular network by means of five new Embassies and three new Consulates General in locations across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. This decision provides clarity on the assets which the Government is investing in promoting our engagement in key countries and regions for Ireland and represents an important contribution to the outcome of the review.

The scale and focus of the state’s diplomatic and consular network is considered by the Government on an ongoing basis. Any decision to adjust further our external representation will be taken by the Government having regard to national priorities and available resources.

Foreign Conflicts

Ceisteanna (25)

Mick Wallace

Ceist:

25. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the accusations that Sri Lankan security forces destroyed evidence of war crimes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8107/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am concerned by allegations made in a recent report by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre’s International Crimes Evidence Project of human rights abuses committed by the Sri Lankan security forces in the final stages of the Sri Lanka civil war. Allegations that evidence of war crimes was destroyed is particularly concerning. The report also makes allegations of human rights abuses by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

In a statement I delivered on behalf of the EU at the twenty-second session of the United Nations Human Rights Council on 27 February 2013, I highlighted concerns regarding the current human rights situation in Sri Lanka, and, in particular, the need for accountability and reconciliation. In April 2013, Minister of State Joe Costello met with members of the Irish Forum for Peace in Sri Lanka who briefed him on the human rights situation in the country.

More recently, at the 24th session of the UNHRC, which took place from 9 – 27 September 2013, Ireland intervened in the General Debate on human rights situations requiring the Council’s attention and expressed its serious concern at abuses in Sri Lanka, including in relation to the treatment of prisoners incarcerated in connection with the conflict, enforced disappearances, torture, and other human rights violations. Ireland further noted that genuine reconciliation among all groups and communities in Sri Lanka is essential, and requires justice and accountability.

At the same session, the European Union also expressed strong concerns regarding the situation of human rights in Sri Lanka and urged the Government of Sri Lanka to implement effectively the recommendations of the Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission. The EU further encouraged the Government of Sri Lanka to fully cooperate with the UN human rights mechanisms and to allow access for all UN special procedures mandate holders.

Ireland, together with our international partners, will continue to take every opportunity, both bilaterally and multilaterally, to urge the Government of Sri Lanka to adhere to its international obligations and respect the human rights of all its citizens, including at the upcoming 25th Session of the Human Rights Council in March 2014.

Northern Ireland Issues

Ceisteanna (26, 29, 32)

Thomas Pringle

Ceist:

26. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the details of his discussions at the recent meeting with the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Theresa Villiers MP, regarding the ongoing political talks in Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8117/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

29. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will report on his recent engagements with the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Theresa Villiers MP; and the discussion that took place regarding the ongoing political talks in Northern Ireland. [7991/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Eric J. Byrne

Ceist:

32. Deputy Eric Byrne asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will provide an update on developments on the Haas proposals; and if the Irish and British Governments are considering intervention to advance progress; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8000/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 26, 29 and 32 together.

I met with the Secretary of State most recently on 6 February 2014 to discuss the current political talks and how to take forward the compromise proposals on contentious issues facing Northern Ireland.

We agreed that we wish to see the Northern Ireland Parties reach agreement as soon as possible and without further delay. I spoke with the Secretary of State by telephone on 12 February and we further agreed that we would speak again this week to review the situation. In the meantime our officials have been working together to consider how the two governments can best continue to support the talks process.

Human Rights Issues

Ceisteanna (27)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Ceist:

27. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will commit to including human rights issues in his discussions when visiting foreign countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8050/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The commitment of Ireland to the promotion and protection of human rights is an underlying principle of Ireland’s foreign policy and is a priority for the Government. I believe that, in addressing human rights concerns, we must pursue them in the most effective way, taking advantage of the most appropriate opportunities to make our case, privately or publicly, bilaterally or multilaterally, as best fits the situation.

A primary approach is to engage with the international human rights machinery which has been established to monitor implementation of universal human rights standards. As a small state with a limited diplomatic network, Ireland places great value on multilateralism as a platform for raising human rights issue. This includes engaging actively at the UN Human Rights Council and in the Universal Periodic Review, the principal UN mechanism whereby the human rights record of each individual UN Member State is publicly examined by other Member States.

In addition to raising human rights concerns through multilateral channels, Ireland also raises human rights issues in our bilateral contacts. The conversations are generally conducted on a confidential basis, in line with normal diplomatic practice. I discuss human rights issues on a regular basis with Foreign Ministers from other countries, including when visiting foreign countries. I also regularly address human rights issues at Ministerial meetings at the EU level with Foreign Ministers of third countries.

Officials in my Department make Ireland’s views on human rights issues clear in their contacts with officials from other governments. Irish embassies work, within the capacity of their resources and often as part of a coordinated approach, to support the work of human rights defenders and civil society organisations in third countries. This includes addressing legislative and administrative restrictions on the operation of human rights defenders, drawing on findings by human rights agencies, raising cases with third country governments and contributing to the development of national human rights strategies by the EU.

No country is perfect when it comes to human rights. Ireland’s position on the responsibility of each government in relation to the promotion and protection of the human rights of their citizens is quite clear, and none of the countries with which we deal are in any doubt about our views in this regard.

Military Neutrality

Ceisteanna (28)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Ceist:

28. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the way we can maintain our commitment to neutrality when so many reports indicate that Shannon Airport is being used as an advance virtual battle airfield for US military operations and rendition. [5752/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As I outlined in this House yesterday, this Government remains fully committed to Irish neutrality, which is characterised by non-participation in military alliances, and which forms a central element of our foreign policy. It is set alongside our pro-active engagement in the efforts of the international community to maintain global peace and security, through the UN, the EU and through our bilateral engagement. I see no incompatibility with this approach and the landings of US military aircraft at Shannon Airport, a practice which has taken place under successive Governments for over 50 years.

I am unaware of any reports which suggest that Shannon Airport has been used as an ‘advance virtual battle airfield’, and there is no evidence to suggest that any person has been subjected to extraordinary rendition through Irish airspace and airports. The Government’s complete opposition to extraordinary rendition has been made clear on numerous occasions, and is reflected in the current Programme for Government which states clearly that we “will enforce the prohibition of the use of Irish airports and related facilities for purposes not in line with the dictates of international law”. The use of Irish airspace and airports for this practice has not, and will not, be permitted under any circumstances.

Question No. 29 answered with Question No. 26.
Question No. 30 answered with Question No. 10.
Question No. 31 answered with Question No. 14.
Question No. 32 answered with Question No. 26.
Question No. 33 answered with Question No. 17.

Human Rights Issues

Ceisteanna (34)

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

34. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his attention has been drawn to the continued ongoing violent intimidation, repression and arrest of garment workers involved in wage protests in Cambodia and that this repression is being orchestrated by the Cambodian Government; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8110/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I share the concern about the violence during the recent protests by garment workers in Cambodia. We are continuing to follow the situation through our Ambassador in Hanoi, who is accredited to Cambodia, who has been in regular contact with EU colleagues and other partners in Phnom Penh to monitor developments.

Successive Irish Governments have actively promoted the protection of human rights as a core element of our foreign policy. Under the Government’s new policy for international development, One World, One Future, we are committed to working to ensure that economic development is compatible with human rights, including the right to decent work. Our engagement in this area is informed by clear international standards, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. In this regard, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade currently provides assistance to the International Labour Organisation’s programme, ’Decent Work Agenda’, through a partnership programme for the period 2012-2015. This programme seeks to improve the rights and working conditions of workers in industries like the garment sector in countries such as Cambodia.

It is clear from reports, including by the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Cambodia, that Cambodian authorities used excessive force against demonstrators early last month, resulting in multiple injuries and fatalities. I am concerned by these reports, and by the arrests of protestors including several union leaders and human rights defenders. We have used recent opportunities, including at the Universal Periodic Review of Cambodia at the Human Rights Council in Geneva in January, to express our concern and to emphasise to the Cambodian authorities that they must respect the right of peaceful assembly.

The right of human rights defenders to engage without hindrance, intimidation or harassment should also be respected and protected. While freedom of expression is enshrined in the Cambodian Constitution, recent events have demonstrated that restrictions on freedom of expression persist.

Talks to resolve the disputes by garment workers in Cambodia have so far failed to make progress at local level and appear to have reached a political impasse. It is important now that calm is restored and legitimate grievances are addressed. We will continue to monitor the situation and to urge, with our partners that these disputes are addressed and resolved through constructive dialogue.

Question No. 35 answered with Question No. 13.
Question No. 36 answered with Question No. 24.
Barr
Roinn