Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 17 Jun 2014

Written Answers Nos. 173 - 199

Departmental Staff Expenses

Ceisteanna (173)

Niall Collins

Ceist:

173. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide, in tabular form, the total amount spent per annum from 2011 to 2013, inclusive, and to date in 2014, on staff subsistence payments and staff taxi payments; if his Department has been audited for tax compliance on these payments and other benefits-in-kind; if these processes have been revised in view of concerns by the Revenue Commissioners over practices in other State bodies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25815/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The information requested by the Deputy in relation to subsistence claims by staff, and the refund of all taxi costs to staff, is set out in the following table. As regards staff taxi payments, benefit in kind would only arise in respect of journeys to, or from, the place of employment of an employee where these are on a regular basis and not in compliance with the other criteria set out by the Revenue Commissioners.

 -

2011

2012

2013

2014 (to date)

Subsistence

€96,050.76

€147,063.35

€247,047.77

€59,131.88

Taxis

€14,832.27

€27,354.14

€40,873.68

€10,872.53

Total

€110,883.03

€174,417.49

€287,921.45

€70,004.41

In addition, the Department has a contracted taxi service based in Dublin and the payments to that company in respect of usage of the service over the years in question are in the table below. An element of the cost relates to the administration cost invoiced. The taxi service is also used occasionally for conveying packages so not all of the costs are attributable to staff usage of the service.

2011

2012

2013

2014 (to date)

€7,870.24

€9,218.75

€15,803.78

€4,199.88

The Department's Appropriation Accounts are subject to annual audit by the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General. The Department has not been audited for tax compliance on these payments or other benefits in kind by the Revenue Commissioners. The Department is vigilant in the conduct of its activities in these matters to ensure compliance with taxation legislation and Revenue guidelines.

IBRC Liquidation

Ceisteanna (174)

Colm Keaveney

Ceist:

174. Deputy Colm Keaveney asked the Minister for Finance the number of freedom of information requests received by his Department in connection with the liquidation of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation; the number that have been responded to; the number refused, in whole or in part; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25829/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I understand that twelve freedom of information requests were received regarding the liquidation of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation. Of these eleven were responded to and refused in whole. One request was withdrawn and was dealt with directly outside the FOI process.

Departmental Strategies

Ceisteanna (175)

Colm Keaveney

Ceist:

175. Deputy Colm Keaveney asked the Minister for Finance if his Department has carried out any risk assessments into a scenario whereby an inflationary output gap opens in the general eurozone economy to which the ECB responds by raising its base rate but where Ireland may still have a deflationary output gap; if he will provide details of those risk assessments; the risks he believes this may pose to the economy; if this risk has been factored into his medium to long-term budgetary plans; the measures he believes can be taken to counter this risk; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25857/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Risk assessment forms a central element of my Department's analyses. At present, inflationary pressures in Ireland are more muted than those being experienced in the wider euro area, with end-April Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices data indicating an inflation rate differential of some 0.3 percentage points. Ireland registered an inflation rate of 0.4% compared to the euro area rate of 0.7%. Were a deflationary spiral - a prolonged period of negative price growth -  to take hold, this would likely be met by further monetary accommodation by the European Central Bank (ECB) rather than by its reducing interest rates. If, however, a relative inflation differential were to open up between Ireland and the rest of the euro area where prices remain depressed here yet recovered momentum at European level, this would result in a gain of relative price competitiveness for the Irish economy. Given trade exposures to the euro area, however, the cost of imported inputs would increase.

Given that the ECB is effectively constrained in the conduct of its interest rate policy by the current near-zero lower bound of interest rates, if deflation were to take hold without a corresponding offset in policy by the ECB, this could potentially result in an appreciation of the euro exchange rate which would slow euro area growth and pass through to Irish economic dynamics. The impact would be to reduce both nominal and real GDP growth, by lowering consumption and investment volumes as a result of rising real Irish interest rates. There would also be corresponding negative impacts on trade volumes and labour market dynamics.

Quantitative scenario analysis of this type is routinely carried out by the Department of Finance in conjunction with the Economic and Social Research Institute using their NiGEM HERMES model. Risks of this nature are regularly monitored and analysed and input to the conduct of budgetary planning in the form of the scenario analysis is routinely reported in the context of both the Budgetary documentation and the Stability Pact Update. Chapter 4 of the April 2014 Update contains such an analysis.

Eurozone Issues

Ceisteanna (176)

Colm Keaveney

Ceist:

176. Deputy Colm Keaveney asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether the eurozone is an optimal currency area; if there are criteria that make for an optimal currency area in which he believes the eurozone is deficient; the actions he believes necessary to address those deficiencies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25859/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The main objective of the single currency is to enhance the living standards of the citizens of all participating Member States. This is achieved inter alia by greater levels of trade, a deepening of the Single Market and increased financial integration within the EU, all of which are facilitated by the single currency.

While it is fair to say that the euro has been optimal in this regard, it is not to say deficiencies have not become evident in recent years. Perhaps the most obvious example of these is the negative impact of spillover effects resulting from inappropriate policies in some Member States affecting other Member States. A number of important institutional and governance reforms have been implemented in recent years which are addressing these difficulties. These include the six-pack, two-pack and the European Semester. All of these reforms are designed to ensure that Member States implement appropriate and sustainable economic and fiscal policies that take into account the euro area dimension. In addition, steps are being taken to create a safer and sounder financial sector by deepening the integration of the banking system through the creation of the Banking Union.

 This retro-fitting of the monetary union with the tools to make it commensurate with an economic union is a positive development and I would not understate the importance of the improvements that have been made. Having said that, it will clearly take some time for these reforms to fully bear fruit.

Budget Submissions

Ceisteanna (177, 179)

Patrick O'Donovan

Ceist:

177. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Finance if his Department costed the budget proposals for a political party (details supplied) in advance of the 2014 budget in their entirety; if he will provide copies to this Deputy of all the correspondence his Department received from that party in relation to costing budgetary proposals for the 2014 budget, his Department's replies, the impact he envisaged would be caused to the economy if all the proposals were implemented; and if he will provide any other details which he deems necessary. [25869/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Patrick O'Donovan

Ceist:

179. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Finance if he received any requests from political parties or individual Dáil Deputies or Senators in advance of the 2013 and 2014 budgets to provide costings and outcomes on a potential imposition of land tax on farm land; if he will provide to this Deputy copies of all correspondence relating to such requests.; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25891/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 177 and 179 together.

The facility to cost Budget proposals and policies is one made available by my Department, on request, to all opposition parties. No party availed of this facility in relation to Budget 2013. Prior to Budget 2014 my Department received one request for costings from a political party and two from individual Deputies. Such requests are handled by my officials on a confidential basis and as such I cannot provide further details to the Deputy.

Tax Reliefs Cost

Ceisteanna (178)

Patrick O'Donovan

Ceist:

178. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide details, in tabular form, on salary scales of €5,000 in the range of €25,000 to €100,000 of the impact that changes to tax relief on pension contributions for public servants, as proposed by elements of the Opposition, which would see a reduction of 50% in relief, would have to take home pay, and income tax increases to individual public servants; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25870/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am not in a position to provide the information requested by the Deputy. In the first instance I am not clear on the specific proposals for reductions in tax relief on the pension contributions of public servants to which the Deputy refers and the source of those proposals. In any event, it would not be possible to reduce tax relief on the pension contributions made by public servants without applying similar reductions to tax relief on pension contributions, generally, and I have no plans to do so.

Moreover, it would not be feasible to provide reliable estimates of the impact on the take-home pay and tax position of individual public servants or others by reference to gross salary scales. The impact on take-home pay and tax of individual public servants would be influenced not alone by the nature of the reduced tax relief (which is not clear) but also by issues such as the level of pension contributions being made, the marital status of the individual (married/single), the scale of tax credits/allowances available and the rate of income tax applicable in individual cases (standard rate or marginal rate).

Question No. 179 answered with Question No. 177.

National Debt

Ceisteanna (180)

Michael P. Kitt

Ceist:

180. Deputy Michael P. Kitt asked the Minister for Finance if he will outline on a schedule the current budget deficit for each year from 1987 to 2013; if he will outline by schedule the Exchequer borrowing requirement from 1984 to 2013; the total capital budget for each year from 1984 to 2013; the debt-GDP ratio for each year from 1984 to 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25898/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I would point the Deputy to the "Budgetary & Economic Statistics 2013" document which was published by my Department in December 2013. This is available on my Department's website at the following link and contains the requested information to 2012:http://www.finance.gov.ie/what-we-do/economic-policy/publications/data-statistics/budget-and-economic-statistics-2013 .  

Data on 2013 Exchequer outturns are available on my Departments website at: http://www.finance.gov.ie/sites/default/files/Exchequer_Final_Statement%20December%202013.pdf

CSO relevant data are available on the following link: http://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/nationalaccounts/governmentfinancestatistics/

For ease of reference, the figures from the Budgetary & Economic Statistics and outturns for 2013 are shown in the following table.

€billion

Current Spending

Current Revenue

Current Budget Deficit

Capital Budget

Exchequer Borrowing Requirement

National Debt (% of GDP)

1984

10.1

9.1

-1.0

2.1

-2.3

93%

1985

11.0

9.6

-1.4

2.1

-2.7

94%

1986

11.7

10.2

-1.5

2.0

-2.7

103%

1987

12.2

11.0

-1.2

1.7

-2.3

106%

1988

12.3

11.8

-0.5

1.8

-0.8

103%

1989

12.4

11.9

-0.5

2.1

-0.6

94%

1990

13.2

13.0

-0.2

2.1

-0.6

87%

1991

14.3

13.9

-0.4

2.3

-0.3

85%

1992

15.4

14.8

-0.6

2.6

-0.9

83%

1993

16.5

16.0

-0.5

2.8

-0.9

83%

1994

17.6

17.5

-0.1

3.3

-0.9

79%

1995

18.9

18.0

-0.9

3.8

-0.8

71%

1996

20.6

19.8

-0.8

4.4

-0.6

64%

1997

21.5

22.4

0.8

4.3

-0.3

57%

1998

22.3

25.2

2.9

5.1

0.9

48%

1999

24.1

28.9

4.8

6.1

1.5

44%

2000

25.9

33.3

7.4

7.3

3.2

35%

2001

29.9

35.3

5.4

8.6

0.7

31%

2002

33.0

38.9

5.9

8.5

0.1

28%

2003

36.3

41.1

4.8

8.4

-1.0

27%

2004

39.1

45.2

6.1

8.6

0.0

25%

2005

43.1

50.0

6.9

9.4

-0.5

23%

2006

47.5

57.4

9.9

11.8

2.3

20%

2007

52.5

60.2

7.6

12.5

-1.6

20%

2008

57.3

54.0

-3.3

10.7

-12.7

28%

2009

60.7

46.9

-13.8

10.2

-24.6

46%

2010

60.7

47.3

-13.4

6.9

-18.7

59%

2011

59.5

48.4

-11.1

5.7

-24.9

73%

2012

60.2

50.2

-10.1

5.7

-14.9

84%

2013

62.2

51.6

-10.6

5.4

-11.5

106%

Hidden Economy Monitoring Group

Ceisteanna (181, 182)

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

181. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 178 and 179 of 10 June 2014, the number of visits to building sites carried out by officials of the Revenue Commissioners wherein the capital expenditure provided for the projects is State funded in the years 2012, 2013 and to date in 2014; and the site visits which were undertaken jointly with relevant officers from the Department of Social Protection and from the National Employment Rights Authority. [25909/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

182. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 178 and 179 of 10 June 2014, the number of officials from the Revenue Commissioners involved in the hidden economy monitoring group and in the joint investigation units in place which work in conjunction with the Department of Social Protection. [25910/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 181 and 182 together.

As I informed the Deputy last week, the Hidden Economy Monitoring Group is a non-statutory multi-agency group, the primary focus of which is to provide a forum for participants to exchange views on combatting shadow economy activity.  The Hidden Economy Monitoring Group does not have statutory functions nor does it have statutory powers and the number of Revenue staff that attends the meetings has no bearing on the number of Revenue staff involved in audits and investigations.  I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the number of their staff that attends meetings of the Hidden Economy Monitoring Group varies from time to time and that, at the most recent meeting of that Group, apart from the Chair and secretary, six Revenue staff from various locations attended that meeting.  As I understand matters, the Revenue Commissioners will shortly have a dedicated section on their website about the shadow economy and a specific webpage on the role of the Hidden Economy Monitoring Group. 

The assignment of Revenue staff to various functions is a matter for the Revenue Commissioners who have advised me that Revenue is an integrated tax and customs administration with around 2,000 staff assigned to audit, investigation and compliance activity.  The Commissioners accord a very high priority to compliance activity.  Notwithstanding reductions in staff resources in recent years, these numbers have been maintained and the Commissioners are committed to ensuring that this work will continue to be resourced to the maximum extent possible.

Data are not maintained on the total number of Revenue staff who engage with the Department of Social Protection on compliance activities in any given year but the number would be significant and in excess of 30 officers are formally assigned to Joint Investigation duties.

As regards the number of visits to construction sites wherein the capital expenditure provided for the projects is State funded, and as regards the number of such visits undertaken jointly with officers from the Department of Social Protection and from the National Employment Rights Authority (NERA), I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that their officers visit a wide range of businesses, venues and sites annually in their on-going campaign to tackle shadow economy activity. However, given the wide range of businesses visited annually, the number of visits to particular types of businesses is not separately recorded.

On a more general note, the Revenue Commissioners have provided the following data as regards visits to businesses carried out by Revenue staff either solely or jointly with officers from the Department of Social Protection and/or NERA.

 -

2012

2013

2014 (January to April)

Number of visits carried out by Revenue officers only

1,982

1,548

582

Number of visits carried jointly by Revenue officers and Department of Social Protection officers

771

741

160

Number of visits carried out jointly by Revenue officers and NERA officers

180

336

126

Number of visits involving all three agencies Revenue, Department  of Social Protection and NERA

69

111

30

Total number of visits involving Revenue officers

3,002

2,736

898

Banking Sector Redundancies

Ceisteanna (183)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

183. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if AIB plans to reduce its non-finance staff; and, if so, the way it plans to do so. [25922/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will be aware under the Relationship Framework the State does not intervene in the day to day operations of the bank or their management decisions regarding commercial matters. As AIB has previously indicated as part of its agreed EC Restructuring Plan which requires it to reduce costs and increase efficiencies, outsourcing of certain functions would be considered in consultation with unions and affected staff.

Insurance Industry Regulation

Ceisteanna (184, 190, 192, 208)

Jim Daly

Ceist:

184. Deputy Jim Daly asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide any financial assistance to those who lost their insurance premiums following the recent collapse of Setanta Insurance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25925/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Mattie McGrath

Ceist:

190. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the date on which he became aware that Setanta Insurance was in financial difficulty; the measures he took or intends to take to protect the interests of Irish insurance holders who have lost considerable sums of money since the collapse of the company; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25978/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Regina Doherty

Ceist:

192. Deputy Regina Doherty asked the Minister for Finance when the Financial Regulator was made aware of the financial difficulties of Setanta Insurance; if any discussions took place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25992/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Regina Doherty

Ceist:

208. Deputy Regina Doherty asked the Minister for Finance when the Financial Regulator was made aware of the financial difficulties of Setanta Insurance; the discussions, if any, that took place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26073/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 184, 190, 192 and 208 together.

At the outset, I would like to say that both I, as Minister for Finance, and the Government are concerned over the situation that arose with regard to the Irish policyholders of Setanta Insurance Company Limited (Setanta).  My Department and the Central Bank will be reviewing the circumstances relating to Setanta and will be reporting to me on what lessons can be learnt and how the framework can be strengthened. The European Commission has indicated that it will also review whether any issues raised relating to the regulatory framework require action. 

Setanta is a Maltese incorporated company which was both authorised and prudentially supervised by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA). The Central Bank is in contact with the MFSA in relation to Setanta Insurance Company Limited, the impact on policyholders and the provision for relevant and appropriate information.  The current legal and regulatory framework for the provision of insurance in the EEA, and the supervision of that activity, is prescribed by European Union Law in the Life and Non-Life Insurance Directives. The provision of insurance throughout the EEA on a freedom of services basis and a freedom of establishment basis (i.e. a branch) within this framework is predicated upon the absence of internal market frontiers and the mutual recognition of the authorisation of insurance undertakings by Member States. 

The Insurance Directives specify particular roles for both the home Member State supervisory authority (i.e. the supervisory authority that grants an authorisation) and the host Member State supervisory authority (i.e. the supervisory authority of a Member State where an insurance undertaking conducts business of a freedom of services or freedom of establishment basis) of an insurance undertaking. Insurance undertakings authorised under the Insurance Directives are subject to solvency and financial reserving requirements, the supervision of these requirements is the sole responsibility of the home Member State supervisory authority. The primary objective of these requirements is to ensure that claims made in respect of policies issued will be adequately provided for by an insurance undertaking.

Under Article 20 of the Third Non-Life Directive the Home Regulator is required to notify the Host Regulator if the solvency margin of an undertaking falls below the statutory requirement. In such instances the Home Regulator should inform the Host Regulator of the measures it has taken to address the solvency deficit. Following negotiations that were completed at European level in November, 2013, a new regime known as Solvency II will commence on 1 January 2016, which will further strengthen the EU regulatory framework. The Solvency II EU Directive sets out new, stronger EU-wide requirements on capital adequacy and risk management for insurers with the key aim of increasing policyholder protection.  The new regime will also ensure greater cooperation between supervisors.

The Central Bank had Regulator to Regulator contact with the MFSA in September 2013. In October 2013 the Central Bank undertook a consumer protection inspection of Setanta. The Central Bank became aware of prudential issues in the course of this investigation and subsequently shared these with the MFSA in November 2013. At this point the Central Bank entered into a phase of heightened contact with the MFSA in relation to these issues. Regular contact was maintained in the following months, and in January 2014 an announcement was made that the firm would cease writing new business and issuing further renewals. The Central Bank wrote on 16 January 2014 to advise my Department of their concerns with Setanta's solvency margin and I was subsequently informed of this.  

With regard to the position of Setanta policyholders, my officials have been in discussions with the Central Bank of Ireland, with the Setanta Liquidator, the Accountant of the High Court and with the insurance industry representative bodies.  We are endeavouring to obtain legal certainty on a number of matters relating to unearned premiums and policyholders' claims for compensation and this will be made publicly available in due course.  When clarification has been received from the liquidator in the first instance, I will consider what steps, if any, will be appropriate.  At this time, I propose to set out the position as it currently stands. 

Setanta was formally placed into liquidation by the MFSA on the 30 April 2014 and a liquidator was appointed. Officials from my Department together with officials from the Central Bank met with the Liquidator and his representatives in Ireland on 7 May 2014 and the Central Bank is in ongoing contact with him regarding the position of Setanta policyholders. All Setanta policies have now been cancelled by the liquidator in line with the terms of the policies.  

With regard to Setanta premiums and claims, the position on each policy is for the liquidator to decide in due course.  My officials and the Central Bank will remain in close contact with the Liquidator and I have asked that public statements are provided to clarify matters for policyholders and claimants.

The Motor Insurance Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) is a non-profit-making organisation registered in Ireland.  All insurance companies underwriting motor insurance in this county must, by law, be members of MIBI and contribute to the funding of claims in proportion to their market share.  The principal role of MIBI is to compensate innocent victims of accidents caused by uninsured and unidentified vehicles. This is regulated under the terms of an Agreement between the MIBI and the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport.  We are endeavouring to clarify the position on a number of matters relating to policyholders' claims for compensation, including the role of MIBI in this regard.  However, if, for legal reasons, MIBI is not in a position to accept a claim, these third party claims will be eligible to proceed for consideration by the High Court for compensation from the Insurance Compensation Fund (ICF).

Under Section 6 of the Insurance Act 1964 the Minister for Finance may, on the recommendation of the Bank, advance from time to time to the ICF such sum as he thinks proper to enable payments out of the Fund. During the administration of Quinn Insurance Limited, Primor plc (formerly PMPA) and Icarom plc (formerly Insurance Corporation of Ireland) the State was required to advance funds to the ICF in order to ensure that the administrators were adequately funded in order to meet their financial obligations as they arose.

Claims on personal insurance policies will be payable from the ICF.  All ICF payments are subject to the limit of 65% of the amount due or €825,000, whichever is the lesser. Under Section 3.6 of the Insurance Amendment Act 1964 (as amended) first party claims by a body corporate or unincorporated body are not covered by the ICF. The refund of premiums for either commercial or personal insurance policies is not covered by the ICF or MIBI.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (185)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

185. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the transfer pricing standard the Revenue Commissioners adheres to when considering transfer pricing arrangements in which multinational companies operating here engage; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25954/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the internationally recognised standard, which is arm's length pricing, is part of Irish tax law as set out in Part 35A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (TCA). This standard is applied to transfer pricing arrangements of multinational companies in accordance with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations.

The arm's length standard is provided for in section 835C of the TCA and applies to arrangements between associated parties which involve the supply and acquisition of goods, services, money or intangible assets. Section 835C provides that where an amount receivable in respect of a sale is understated or an amount payable in respect of an expense is overstated, the arm's length amount will be substituted in each case.  The arm's length amount is the amount that would have been agreed between independent parties. Section 835D of the TCA provides that the arm's length standard, set out in section 835C, is to be construed in such a way as to ensure, as far as practicable, consistency with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. 

Mortgage Interest Rates

Ceisteanna (186)

Pat Deering

Ceist:

186. Deputy Pat Deering asked the Minister for Finance the reason a recent announcement of a 0.15% reduction in ECB interest rates will not be passed on to mortgage holders on variable interest rates. [25973/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

At the outset, I must confirm to the Deputy that the lending institutions in Ireland - including those in which the State has a significant shareholding - are independent commercial entities. I have no statutory role in relation to regulated financial institutions passing on the European Central Bank interest rate change or to the mortgage interest rates charged.  It is a commercial matter for each institution concerned.  It is not appropriate for me, as Minister for Finance, to comment on or become involved in the detailed mortgage position of mortgage holders.

The Central Bank has responsibility for the regulation and supervision of financial institutions in terms of consumer protection and prudential requirements and for ensuring ongoing compliance with applicable statutory obligations.  The Central Bank has no statutory role in the setting of interest rates by financial institutions, apart from the interest rate cap imposed on the credit union sector in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Union Act, 1997.

The mortgage interest rates that financial institutions operating in Ireland charge to customers are determined as a result of a commercial decision by the institutions concerned.  This interest rate is determined taking into account a broad range of factors, including European Central Bank base rates, deposit rates, market funding costs, the competitive environment and an institution's overall funding. However, as part of the Central Bank's work on mortgage arrears, lenders were asked to consider all avenues to help customers in arrears, including interest rate reductions.

Tax Reliefs Cost

Ceisteanna (187, 188)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

187. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the yield that would be achieved in 2015 from standard rating pension tax relief, taking into account other changes to pension tax relief in recent years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25974/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

188. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of taxpayers who would be affected by standard rating of pension tax relief; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25975/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 187 and 188 together.

A breakdown of the cost of tax relief on employee contributions to occupational pension schemes is not available by either Income Tax rate or by reference to income levels, as returns by employers to the Revenue Commissioners of employee contributions to such schemes are aggregated at employer level. There is, therefore, no statistical basis for providing definitive figures. However, by making certain assumptions about the available information, it is tentatively estimated that the full-year yield to the Exchequer from confining tax relief to the standard rate of 20% in respect of pension contributions to occupational pension schemes, retirement annuity contracts and personal retirement savings accounts and confining tax relief for the Public Service pension related deduction to the standard rate of 20% would be in the region of €467 million. This estimate includes €90 million in respect of the Public Service pension related deduction.

This estimate does not allow for possible behavioural changes that could arise from a change in the rate of relief. In terms of the 2011 Income Tax year, the latest year for which the necessary figures are available, it is estimated that about 768,000 claimants avail of relief on contributions to occupational pension schemes, retirement annuity contracts and personal retirement savings accounts.

Tax Collection

Ceisteanna (189)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

189. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the approximate number of inheritance cases that resulted in a capital acquisitions tax liability in each year from 2010 to 2013, inclusive; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25976/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

It is assumed that the Deputy is referring to inheritance cases where Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) is payable. I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the information available in respect of numbers of persons who paid such tax is as shown in the following table. In large part, the increases in recent years reflect changes in CAT thresholds.

Year

Number

2010

8,440

2011

9,705

2012

10,011

2013

10,166

Question No. 190 answered with Question No. 184.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (191)

Thomas Pringle

Ceist:

191. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Finance if he will address concerns about the bulk purchase option (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25983/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This scheme, which I introduced in the Finance Act 2013, provides for a repayment to qualifying road haulage and bus operators, of a part of the mineral oil tax paid on their purchases of auto-diesel for use in the course of business.  In recognition of the risk of abuse of the tax repayment scheme, provision was made for certain restrictions on the means by which the auto-diesel concerned may be purchased.  Purchases in bulk must be made from a licensed mineral oil trader, and delivered, in a quantity exceeding 2,000 litres, to a premises or place that is under the control of that qualifying road transport operator.  This allows Revenue to verify repayment claims on bulk purchases from licensed mineral oil traders by reference to the monthly electronic returns of such supplies that the oil traders are required to make to Revenue.

Purchases by means of a fuel card, approved by Revenue for that purpose, also qualify for repayment and there is no minimum requirement on purchases made in this way.  A fuel card will be approved where Revenue is satisfied that the fuel card provider will supply it with the information required about purchases of auto-diesel by means of that card.  Fuel cards are widely available and are usable across the road network and there are a number of fuel card providers who can supply suitable fuel cards to road transport operators and fuel retailers.   

The purchasing arrangements under the scheme are necessary to enable Revenue to manage repayments to qualifying operators while controlling the risk of fraud. I am satisfied that the present arrangements present operators with a reasonable set of options while incorporating necessary safeguards to protect against fraud.

Question No. 192 answered with Question No. 184.

Tax Residency

Ceisteanna (193)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

193. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 61 of 13 March 2014, if the Revenue Commissioners have been advised by any company that it is or it will be affected by the change in residence rules as to where it is actually resident, pursuant to section 39 of the Finance (No. 2) Act 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26018/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that there has been no change in the position since my reply to Parliamentary Question No. 61 of 13 March 2014.  Revenue has not, to date, been notified by any company that is or will be affected by the amendment to company residence rules under section 39 of the Finance (No. 2) Act 2013 as to where it is or will be resident following the effective date of this amendment.  The amendment applies from 24 October 2013 for newly-incorporated companies (i.e. companies incorporated on or after that date) and from 1 January 2015 for companies incorporated before 24 October 2014.

Mortgage Arrears Report Implementation

Ceisteanna (194)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

194. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the frequency of phone calls from a financial institution to a customer regarding mortgage arrears; if he considers 16 phone calls in 19 days to be excessive; the redress open to the citizen experiencing such harassment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26052/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Central Bank's Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA) sets out requirements for mortgage lenders dealing with borrowers facing or in mortgage arrears. The CCMA provides a strong consumer protection framework to ensure that borrowers struggling to keep up mortgage repayments are treated in a fair and transparent manner by their lender and that long term resolution is sought by lenders with each of their borrowers. The CCMA applies to the mortgage loan of a borrower which is secured by his/her primary residence.

With regard to the level of communications from a lender to a borrower, the CCMA states that:

21. A lender must produce and implement a policy regarding communications with borrowers. That policy must be approved by the board of directors and must ensure that the requirements of Provision 22 are met.

22. A lender must ensure that:

a) the level of communications from the lender, or any third party acting on its behalf, is proportionate and not excessive, taking into account the circumstances of the borrowers, including that unnecessarily frequent communications are not made;

b) communications with borrowers are not aggressive, intimidating or harassing;

c) borrowers are given sufficient time to complete an action they have committed to before follow up communication is attempted. In deciding what constitutes sufficient time, consideration must be given to the action that a borrower has committed to carry out, including whether he/she may require assistance from a third party in carrying out the action; and

d) steps are taken to agree future communication with borrowers.

Communication is defined, in the CCMA, as "the imparting or exchanging of information between a lender and a borrower by speaking, on paper or another durable medium, or using any other medium".  In addition, a lender must maintain recordings of all Arrears Support Unit telephone calls made to or from a borrower in relation to his/her arrears or pre-arrears.  The intention of this provision is to strengthen protection for borrowers by facilitating compliance monitoring. 

For mortgage loans not secured by a primary residence, consumers are afforded protection under the Consumer Protection Code 2012. This Code states that:

8.13  A regulated entity must ensure that the level of contact and communications from the regulated entity, or any third party acting on its behalf, with a personal consumer in arrears, is proportionate and not excessive.

8.14  Each calendar month, a regulated entity, and/or any third party acting on its behalf, must not initiate more than three unsolicited communications, by whatever means, to a personal consumer in respect of arrears.

The three unsolicited communications include any communication where contact is attempted but not made with the personal consumer but do not include:

a) any communication that has been requested by, or agreed in advance with, the personal consumer; and

b) any communication to the personal consumer the sole purpose of which is to comply with the requirements of this Code or other regulatory requirements.

If a borrower is not happy with the way that their lender is dealing with them or if they think they are not complying with the Codes, the borrower can make a complaint to their lender. Borrowers can also make an appeal to the lender's Appeals Board. If the borrower is not happy with the outcome of the appeal/complaint made to the lender they can refer the matter to the Financial Services Ombudsman (FSO). Further information on how to make a complaint to the FSO is available at www.financialombudsman.ie. The FSO can work with the Central Bank to address persistent patterns of complaints.

I cannot comment on the  case to which the Deputy refers as I do not have specific details. I have previously informed the House that my officials are developing legislation on the sale of loan books to unregulated entities. This will address concerns surrounding the continued applicability of the Codes after loan books are sold to unregulated entities.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (195)

Regina Doherty

Ceist:

195. Deputy Regina Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the way the Revenue Commissioners determine the status of an employee versus a sole trader working on contract in an agency licensed by the aviation authority; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26055/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that there is no statutory definition of employment or self-employment and that the question of whether an individual is engaged under either

1. a contract of service (i.e. an employee), or

2. a contract for services (i.e. self-employed/sole trader)

is a question of fact and of general law.  Case law shows that there is no one formula under which a contract of service or a contract for services between parties can be identified.  Regardless of how the parties may describe themselves, all the possible factors (including written, oral and implied details) that bear on the relationship between the parties must be examined, given their proper weight and a judgement made on their overall effect.

In order to provide some clarity as to whether an individual is employed or self-employed, the Employment Status Group (set up under the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness 2003-2005) published a Code of Practice for determining Employment or Self-employment status of Individuals.  The Code of Practice was updated in 2007 by the Hidden Economy Monitoring Group under the Towards 2016 Social Partnership Agreement.  Revenue practice in terms of considering the status of an individual for tax purposes i.e. the question of whether an individual is an employee or a sole trader, is to apply the criteria set out in the Code of Practice to the facts and circumstances of each case.  This is the practice regardless of who the individual is engaged by.

Where Revenue believes that individuals engaged by a taxpayer are employees but the taxpayer has not operated PAYE because the taxpayer takes the view that the individuals are self-employed, Revenue will raise a PAYE estimate on the taxpayer.  It will be open to the taxpayer to appeal the estimate to the Tax Appeal Commissioners.

NAMA Loans Sale

Ceisteanna (196, 197, 198, 199)

Stephen Donnelly

Ceist:

196. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to the recent announcement by the National Asset Management Agency of its decision to sell its entire portfolio of loans linked to Northern Irish borrowers, if he will confirm if the sale has been concluded; and if he will outline the legacy connection the National Asset Management Agency has with Northern Ireland. [26059/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Stephen Donnelly

Ceist:

197. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to the recent announcement by the National Asset Management Agency of its decision to sell its entire portfolio of loans linked to Northern Irish borrowers, what will happen to properties, particularly those listed in the enforced property section of NAMA's website, to which NAMA has had receivers or similar appointed. [26060/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Stephen Donnelly

Ceist:

198. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to the recent announcement by the National Asset Management Agency of its decision to sell its entire portfolio of loans linked to Northern Irish borrowers, what will happen to developments in which NAMA has previously announced and-or provided investment. [26061/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Stephen Donnelly

Ceist:

199. Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to the recent announcement by the National Asset Management Agency of its decision to sell its entire portfolio of loans linked to Northern Irish borrowers, the position with ongoing litigation with Northern Irish borrowers where NAMA is a party to that litigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26062/14]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 196 to 199, inclusive, together.

I am advised that the sale by NAMA of the Project Eagle portfolio of loans to affiliates of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. has not yet completed and remains subject to contract.  Following the completion of this transaction, NAMA will have a relatively minor exposure as a secured lender to property assets in Northern Ireland, comprising mainly assets owned by debtors from the Republic of Ireland and Britain.  As with all NAMA loan sales, decisions relating to loans in the Project Eagle portfolio, including decisions in respect of the underlying collateral held by a debtor or receiver and any associated cases taken by NAMA, are expected to become matters for the new loan note holder. All matters relating to the portfolio of loans, including those set out in the Deputy's questions, are being discussed as part of the closing process and it would be inappropriate for me to comment further at this time.

Barr
Roinn