Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 16 July 2014
70. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Education and Skills the total yearly cost of paying a weekly training allowance of €20 to those who attend SOLAS-funded training programmes; if she will consider reinstating this payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [31873/14]
Amharc ar fhreagra71. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Education and Skills if she will restore the €20 per week additional training allowance for persons accessing SOLAS-funded training in view of the hardship imposed on many persons due to the withdrawal of this payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [31993/14]
Amharc ar fhreagraI propose to take Questions Nos. 70 and 71 together.
The payment of an additional training allowance of €31.80 per week for the long term unemployed was introduced during a period of high employment levels as an incentive for the long term unemployed to participate in former-FÁS training courses. The payment of this allowance was later extended to those persons in receipt of social welfare disability payments to introduce equality of treatment for all people in training. The payment was reduced from €31.80 per week to €20 per week as part of Budget 2011. In the present economic situation this incentive is no longer considered appropriate and as part of Budget 2014 it was decided to cease this payment for all participants commencing courses after 1st January 2014. This change does not apply to persons who commenced a course prior to January 2014 who will continue to receive the long term unemployed bonus payment for the duration of their course. Travel supports continue to be available to participants.
The overall saving arising from this measure, which also applies to the Vocational Training Opportunities Scheme, is estimated at €2.1 million in 2014 and €6.7 million in a full year. This is a decision taken in the context of the overall savings this Department had to find for 2014 and future years. It was taken against a difficult budgetary background and there is no scope to re-visit it.
