Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Thursday, 15 Jan 2015

Written Answers Nos. 125 - 133

Garda Equipment

Ceisteanna (125)

Brendan Griffin

Ceist:

125. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Justice and Equality her views that modern communications and surveillance technology can play a role in the policing of very isolated rural areas; her further views that the use of Garda surveillance equipment at strategic locations such as unavoidable intersections and so on would act as a deterrent to criminals who feel confident of travelling long distances in rural areas without being seen or intercepted by gardaí; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [1988/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised that extensive use is made of CCTV systems for the purposes of crime prevention and as aids to policing in areas to which the general public routinely have access. Existing arrangements fall into two distinct categories: Garda CCTV systems and community-based CCTV systems.

Garda CCTV systems are planned and implemented on the basis of An Garda Síochána's identified operational needs and priorities. Accordingly, decisions in relation to the introduction or extension of such systems are a matter for the Garda Commissioner. I am advised by the Garda authorities that current Garda CCTV arrangements are kept under ongoing review in the context of An Garda Síochána's operational requirements. I am further informed that there are currently no plans to extend existing Garda CCTV systems.

A community-based CCTV Scheme was launched in 2005. This scheme provided financial assistance to qualifying local organisations towards meeting the capital costs associated with the establishment of a local community CCTV system. Two major rounds of funding were advertised under that scheme.

The current position is that all available funding provided under the previous two rounds has been fully allocated and there are currently no plans to further extend the Scheme. However, the matter will continue to be kept under ongoing review in the context of overall policy considerations and the availability of funding.

I should also mention, as a further example of how technology is assisting in community policing, the Garda Text Alert Scheme, which was launched in September 2013. This scheme provides a further mechanism for Gardaí to provide crime prevention information to community contacts who in turn forward the information to all members of a community group. This initiative has developed as an important crime prevention mechanism with over 500 local groups involving in excess of 100,000 subscribers and with an estimated 200,000 text messages sent each month under the scheme. I am informed that every Garda Division, rural and urban, now offers the text alert service and An Garda Síochána have published guidelines to assist in the establishment and operation of local groups.

The further development and application of technology by An Garda Síochána is a matter in the first instance for the Garda Commissioner and I will of course give careful consideration to any future proposals which she may make in this regard.

Garda Resources

Ceisteanna (126)

Niall Collins

Ceist:

126. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if she will provide in tabular form the budget and human resources allocation to the Garda traffic corps in each year from 2009 to 2015; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2012/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

A report has been sought from the Gardaí and will be forwarded directly to the Deputy.

Human Trafficking

Ceisteanna (127)

Terence Flanagan

Ceist:

127. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of convictions of human traffickers for the past five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2016/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Anti-Human Trafficking Unit of my Department publishes annual reports setting out information on the criminal justice response to human trafficking in Ireland as well as information on alleged victims of human trafficking encountered by An Garda Síochána and International and Non Governmental Organisations working in the field disaggregated by gender, age, region of origin and type of exploitation. To date, annual reports for 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 have been published and are available from Ireland's dedicated anti-human trafficking website www.blueblindfold.gov.ie and on my Department's website. For the purposes of clarity, the information sought, as outlined in these annual reports, is below. As the report for 2013 is to be published soon the figures for 2013 are preliminary as are the figures for 2014.

The specific information sought by the Deputy is set out in the table beneath.

YEAR

Number of Convictions

2010

5

2011

4

2012

6

2013

10*

2014

10

NOTE:

1. Convictions are in respect of offences under the Criminal Law (Human Trafficking) Act 2008 and in respect of other offences related to human trafficking under other Acts, e.g. Child Trafficking and Pornography Act, 1998, Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act, 1993. In addition, *2 cases in 2013 where offenders were prosecuted and convicted for offences other than human trafficking, though prosecutions were initiated as a result of human trafficking related investigations are included in the figure for that year.

2. Convictions occurring in any calendar year may be the result of prosecutions initiated in previous calendar years.

Human Trafficking

Ceisteanna (128)

Terence Flanagan

Ceist:

128. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality her plans for revising laws around human trafficking to ensure more prosecutions; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2017/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I would draw the Deputy's attention to the strong legislative provisions that have been put in place in Ireland to combat and prevent trafficking in human beings over the past number of years. The Criminal Law (Human Trafficking) Act 2008 prohibits trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation, labour exploitation and for the removal of body organs. Any person found guilty of such an offence shall be liable to imprisonment for life or a lesser term, and at the discretion of the court, to a fine. This legislation was further bolstered in 2013 with new forms of exploitation, for forced begging and forced criminal activities, being provided for in new legislation. The Criminal Law (Human Trafficking)(Amendment) Act 2013 also provided, for the first time, a definition of 'forced labour' in Irish law, based on the International Labour Organisation's definition.

I am, of course, committed to keeping under review the adequacy of the measures taken to combat human trafficking, including legislation. In that context, I published on 27 November 2014 the General Scheme of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Bill 2014 which includes two new offences of purchasing, in the context of prostitution, sexual services. The first is a general offence of purchasing sexual services which carries a penalty of a fine of up to €500 for a first offence and fines of up to €1000 for a second or subsequent offence. The second is the offence of purchasing a sexual service from a trafficked person and carries a potential penalty of up to 5 years imprisonment and/or a fine. In both cases, the person selling the sexual service will not be subject to an offence.

Unlike the existing offences relating to prostitution such as soliciting, loitering or brothel keeping, the new offences will specifically target the demand for prostitution. It is estimated that over 80% of persons trafficked in Europe are trafficked for the purpose of sexual exploitation. The purpose of this new legislation is to reduce the demand for the services of victims of human trafficking who are being sexually exploited in prostitution.

Criminal Law

Ceisteanna (129)

Terence Flanagan

Ceist:

129. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality her plans to introduce laws to deal with white collar crime; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2021/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The term 'white collar' crime is not formally defined. It broadly describes a range of non-violent crimes that people in positions of responsibility and trust commit for their own personal gain. It can cover fraud, embezzlement, insider trading on the stock market, bribery, corruption and regulatory offences in specialist fields such as financial activity, occupational health and safety, environmental protection, and food safety. My Department has responsibility for legislation addressing some aspects of white collar crime including fraud and corruption. Other aspects, such as insider trading, Companies Acts offences and environmental offences fall within the responsibility of other Government Departments.

There is extensive legislation on the statute book addressing white collar and corporate crime and amendments to this legislation are also considered in the light of the experience of law enforcement agencies such as the Garda Síochána and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in operating the legislation and in light of relevant court rulings. Where there is an identified requirement for additional legislative provisions to further enhance existing provisions in the law, I will not hesitate in bringing forward proposals.

I would draw the Deputy's particular attention to the Criminal Justice Act 2011, as a recent example of such developments in white collar crime legislation, and one which represents an important step in delivering on the Government’s commitment to tackle white collar crime. Its main purpose is to facilitate the more effective investigation of white collar crime and to reduce associated delays. The Act provides for new procedures to facilitate Garda access to essential information and documentation to assist in current and future investigations of white collar crime. The Act is targeted at specified serious and complex offences (“relevant offences”) attracting a penalty of at least 5 years imprisonment, including offences in the areas of banking and finance, company law, money laundering, fraud and corruption. The Act will provide vital assistance to the Gardaí in the completion of current and future investigations.

Another recent provision of relevance to white collar crime is Part 5 of the Courts and Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2013. It makes provision for the selection of up to 15 jurors to serve in a criminal trial which is likely to last more than 2 months, with 12 jurors to be selected to consider the verdict. These provisions, which give effect to a recommendation of the Law Reform Commission’s recent Report on Jury Service, are of relevance to lengthy trials involving fraud or other complex financial matters where there is a risk of jurors becoming unavailable during the course of a protracted trial.

While the breadth and diversity of the issues faced in addressing serious, organised and white collar crime are such that no one piece of legislation could effectively address it in all its facets, the overall body of legislation in place is comprehensive and, as I have outlined, is continuously under review and development in light of operational experience and other relevant considerations.

In terms of forthcoming legislation, the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889 to 2010 will be replaced by the Criminal Justice (Corruption) Bill which will be published in the coming months. The Bill will:

- replace and update the offences of giving and receiving bribes contained in the old legislation

- address the bribery of foreign public officials

- provide for the liability of corporate bodies for the corrupt actions of their directors, employees and agents

- include discrete offences outlawing trading in influence

- take account of the Mahon Tribunal recommendations to criminalise the making of payments knowingly or recklessly to a third party who intends to use them as bribes

The Bill is also intended to enhance the ability of the DPP to bring prosecutions by providing presumptions of corrupt gifts or payments such as:

- where an interested party makes a payment to a public official;

- where a public official has failed to declare interests as required by ethics legislation; and

- where an official accepts a gift in breach of ethical or disciplinary codes.

Penalties of up to 10 years’ imprisonment and unlimited fines are envisaged for persons convicted on indictment. It is also intended to allow a judge to order a public official convicted of an offence to forfeit their office and exclude them from seeking public office for a period of years. These forfeiture provisions will apply to senior office holders as well as a wide range of civil and public servants.

Residency Permits

Ceisteanna (130)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

130. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the residency status of a person (details supplied) in County Laois; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2033/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that the person concerned has had their permission to remain in the State renewed for a further twelve month period, valid to 14th January, 2016. This decision was conveyed in writing to the person concerned by registered post dated 14th January, 2015.

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Immigration Status

Ceisteanna (131)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

131. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if consideration might be given to awarding Stamp 4 status to undocumented residents here who have been living continuously and working in this jurisdiction for several years, whose children have been born here, such children having no knowledge of any other lifestyle; if cognisance might be taken of the recent announcement by President Obama in respect of Irish undocumented in the US as a template for a similar situation in this country; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2034/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I have no plans to introduce a policy on the lines suggested by the Deputy. The Deputy might wish to note that at EU Level, the Member States, in agreeing the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum at the European Council in October 2008 made specific commitments "to use only case-by-case regularisation, rather than generalised regularisation, under national law, for humanitarian or economic reasons". While the Pact is not legally binding, the political commitment among Member States, then and now, is clearly against any form of process that would in any way legitimise the status of persons present in the State without first examining the merits of their individual cases. This is the approach that has been consistently followed by successive Ministers in this respect. It is open to a person who is in the situation referred to by the Deputy to seek to have their case considered on its merits and to respect the decision that is ultimately made. In some cases that decision would result in their being granted leave to remain. In other instances they would be required to leave the State.

While I appreciate the Deputy's concerns on this issue, it is the responsibility of all non-EEA nationals who are resident in the State to ensure that they have an appropriate permission from the Minister for Justice and Equality. Most migrants do in fact comply with this condition and obey the State's immigration laws. It does not follow that a Stamp 4 immigration permission, which is generally seen as being the most sought after immigration status, should be conferred on a broad basis on persons who have lived here illegally while others who have complied with all of the immigration rules enjoy a lesser status.

Deportation Orders Re-examination

Ceisteanna (132)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

132. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 272 of 19 December 2014, if cognisance might be taken of the extent to which circumstances have changed since the making of a deportation order seven years ago in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Cork; if their case might be re-considered in view of this new information; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2035/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that the person concerned is not the subject of a Deportation Order. The person concerned is, however, subject to the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) given that their asylum and subsidiary protection applications have been refused. In response to the notification pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended), the person concerned has submitted written representations. These representations, together with all other information and documentation on file, will be fully considered, under Section 3 (6) of the Immigration Act 1999 (as amended) and Section 5 of the Refugee Act 1996 (as amended) on the prohibition of refoulement, in advance of a final decision being made in the case of the person concerned.

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS of my Department by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Residency Permits

Ceisteanna (133)

Bernard Durkan

Ceist:

133. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the current residency status in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [2036/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed that an application in respect of the person referred to is currently being processed by the Student Review Office of the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service. I am further informed that this application will be finalised shortly and that the person will be contacted in relation to their case by the Student Review Office of INIS in the coming weeks.

Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up-to-date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy's view, inadequate or too long awaited.

Barr
Roinn