Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Wednesday, 15 Apr 2015

Written Answers Nos. 153-166

National Treasury Management Agency

Ceisteanna (153)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

153. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 277 of 24 March 2015, the level of contact between the Irish Financial Services Centre Clearing House Group and the entity which was referred to in his reply, in view of the fact that in October 2014, it agreed to pay further compensation in the amount of €852,000 to the National Treasury Management Agency, in the spirit of goodwill, and with the intention to compensate the fund for any costs incurred in resolving a matter identified by the Financial Conduct Authority; and if he will provide his policy on the application of technology to financial services, FINTECH. [14369/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Clearing House Group includes a broad range of stakeholders nominated by industry, including the entity to which the Deputy refers.

 The IFS2020 Strategy, launched on 11th March, proposes a new governance structure built on a public sector implementation board and a private sector consultation group which will, once again, be nominated by industry participants.

In relation to FinTech, that same IFS2020 Strategy outlines a number of actions that will be taken across the whole of Government, led by the enterprise agencies, to position Ireland in relation to this important and developing sector.

Tax Reliefs Eligibility

Ceisteanna (154)

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

154. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding a tax issue (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14418/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that this question relates to an issue that has arisen with a company owned and controlled by the person concerned.  The issue relates to a refusal by Revenue to grant relief under Section 486C, Taxes Consolidation Act, 1997 as amended by Section 34(2) Finance Act 2011.  The original enactment, providing relief from tax for certain start-up companies, was amended by the Finance Act 2011.  The effect of the amended legislation was that the company no longer qualified for the relief with effect from 1 Jan 2011. 

The matter is scheduled for hearing by the Appeal Commissioners in June 2015.  The legal arguments for both parties have been exchanged and forwarded to the Appeal Commissioners.

I am precluded from discussing the tax affairs of any particular individual or company.  However I note that this question relates to the three-year tax relief for certain start-up companies, and to the effect of Finance Bill 2011 amendments on that legislation.

A 3-year tax relief for start-up companies commencing a new trade was introduced in 2009, and extended in subsequent Finance Bills, as a support to encourage new business development. The relief is granted in respect of the profits of a new trade and chargeable gains on the disposal of any assets used for the purposes of the new trade. The relief is granted by reducing the corporation tax on profits relating to the trade to nil where the total amount of corporation tax payable by the company for an accounting period does not exceed €40,000. Marginal relief is granted on a tapering basis where the total amount of corporation tax liability for the accounting period is between €40,000 and €60,000. No relief applies where corporation tax payable for an accounting period is €60,000 or more.

The relief was first introduced in 2009 and originally applied to certain companies commencing to trade in that year.  This qualifying period has been extended in subsequent Finance Acts, and the relief is now available to qualifying companies commencing to trade up to and including 2015.  As part of one of the early extensions of the relief, in Finance Act 2011, the basis on which relief is computed was changed to link the reduction in corporation tax to the amount of employers' PRSI paid in an accounting period, subject to a limit of €5,000 per employee and an aggregate limit of €40,000. The purpose of this change was to better target the relief at companies generating employment. The changes introduced in Finance Act 2011 apply to all qualifying companies for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. However, companies which set up and commenced a qualifying trade in 2009 or in 2010 were able to obtain relief on the previous (i.e. pre-Finance Act 2011) basis for profits earned in accounting periods commencing before 2011.

Subsequent amendments have also extended the relief to provide that, where a start-up company does not have sufficient profits to claim the relief in a given year, any relief unclaimed in the first three years can be carried forward into future years for use against future corporation tax liabilities.  

A review of the operation of this relief is taking place this year, to ensure that it meets the policy objectives of creating jobs and activity in Ireland and provides value for money for the Irish taxpayer.

Tax Exemptions

Ceisteanna (155)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

155. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the tax shelters and tax exemptions, that allow the better-off to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, that have been eliminated or restricted since March 2011. [14421/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I would disagree with the Deputy that the purpose of tax reliefs is to allow anyone to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. No tax relief is introduced without a specific purpose in mind and all are reviewed on a regular basis. Where it becomes apparent that any given provision is being abused or is not working to best effect, appropriate action is taken, whether by implementation of anti-avoidance rules or legislative change.

Details of eliminations and amendments that have been carried out to various tax measures in the period specified by the Deputy are set out below.

High Earners Restriction

A restriction limiting the amount of certain reliefs which can be used by certain high income individuals was originally introduced in the Finance Act 2006, which came into effect from the 2007 tax year. Since 2011, this effectively limits the rate at which individuals, with income in excess of €125,000 per annum, can use a wide variety of tax reliefs and exemptions. This limit is graduated so that individuals with incomes in excess of €400,000 per annum will pay a minimum effective rate of income tax of at least 30%, regardless of how many reliefs they have available. This is chargeable in addition to USC and PRSI.

The following measures have been included among the reliefs that are taken into account for the purposes of the application of the restriction.

- For the tax year 2014 onwards, subject to certain conditions, the wear and tear allowance for plant and machinery available to passive lessors (Section 16 Finance (No. 2) Act 2013).

- The Foreign Earnings Deduction (Section 12 Finance Act 2012).

Relief to individuals on loans applied to acquire an interest in partnerships

Relief to individuals on loans applied to acquire an interest in partnerships was abolished for new claimants from 15 October 2013 and reduced on a sliding scale for existing claimants with total cessation from 2017 onwards. This abolition does not include farm partnerships (Section 3 Finance (No. 2) Act 2013).

Donation of heritage property

Tax relief for the donation of heritage property was amended in Section 25 of Finance Act 2013 to lower the amount of the market value of the property that qualifies for relief from 80% to 50%.

Film Relief

Prior to 1 January 2015, an individual could, by virtue of section 481 of the Taxes Consolidation Act (TCA) 1997, claim relief from taxation at his/her marginal rate on amounts not exceeding €50,000 invested in the production of qualifying films in any taxable period.

Section 24 of the Finance Act 2014 terminated this relief with effect from 1 January 2015.  Support to the film industry is now provided in the form of a corporation tax credit which is payable directly to film production companies.    

Income tax losses

Finance Act 2013 and Finance Act 2014 curtailed the relief which individuals could claim for certain 'trade' losses against their other income. 

- Section 18 Finance Act 2013 amended section 381 TCA1997 to provide that individuals who are engaged in the trade of dealing in or developing land cannot claim loss relief against their other income if that loss arises from interest accrued but not yet paid or from the write down in land values where that land has not been sold. This restriction ensures that only losses which have actually been realised are available to reduce the tax liabilities of land developers.

- Section 11 Finance Act 2014 introduced two sections (381B and 381C) to the TCA 1997 to curtail the use of losses. Section 381B ensures that individuals can only claim limited loss relief against their other income if the loss arises from a trade which is not carried out in an active and commercial manner. Section 381C provides that where a loss arises from a tax-avoidance arrangement no loss relief is available against that individual's other income. These amendments prevent individuals from accessing tax reliefs in respect of losses arising from the carrying on of 'hobby' trades. And they also prevent the presentation of certain activities as trades for the purposes of reducing an individual's overall tax liability.

USC

From 1 January 2013 an income limit of €60,000 was introduced for access to the exemption from the top rates of USC for medical card holders and individuals aged 70 years.

Foreign Service Relief

Foreign service relief in respect of termination lump sum payments was ceased in respect of payments made on or after 27 March 2013.

Top Slicing Relief

Top Slicing Relief in respect of termination lump-sums paid on or after 1 January 2013 was restricted to the first €200,000 of the aggregate of all termination lump sums received.

Top Slicing Relief abolished entirely in respect of termination lump-sums paid on or after 1 January 2014.

Pensions

- The Standard Fund Threshold (SFT), which places a limit on the maximum allowable pension fund on retirement for tax purposes, was reduced with effect from 1 January 2014, from €2.3m to €2m.  (Section 18 Finance (No. 2) Act 2013).

- A Personal Fund Threshold (PFT) which may apply instead of the SFT in certain circumstances was restricted, for new PFT applicants, to a maximum of €2.3m where the capital value of an individual's pension rights on 1 January 2014 exceeded the reduced SFT of €2m. (Section 18 Finance (No. 2) Act 2013).

- The valuation factor used for establishing the capital value of defined benefit pension rights at the point of retirement (and which accrue after 1 January 2014) for SFT/PFT purposes was increased from a factor of 20 to a range of higher age related factors that vary with the individual's age at the point at which the pension benefits are drawn down. (Section 18 Finance (No. 2) Act 2013).

- Vested PRSAs (i.e. personal retirement savings accounts in respect of which benefits have commenced) were brought within the imputed distribution regime with effect from the tax year 2012. Prior to 2012, the regime applied only to approved retirement funds (ARFs). Under the regime, both ARF and vested PRSA owners are treated as "receiving an annual payment" from their ARF and/or vested PRSA calculated as a percentage of the assets held in the funds at the annual valuation date. The rate of the imputed distribution varies with the size of the fund and is chargeable to income tax under Schedule E. (Section 18 Finance Act 2012).

- The rate of imputed distribution applying to ARFs/vested PRSAs with assets valued in excess of €2m was increased from 5% to 6% with effect from the tax year 2012. (Section 18 Finance Act 2012).

- The rate of final liability tax applying to a post-death distribution from an ARF to a child (aged 21 or over) of the deceased ARF owner was increased from 20% to 30% with effect from 31 March 2012 (date of passing of Finance Act 2012). (Section 18 Finance Act 2012).

Property Relief Surcharge

Section 531AAE provides for an increase in the Universal Social Charge (USC) in respect of income of certain individuals. It potentially only applies to those whose gross income in the year is at least €100,000 and then only to income which is sheltered by any of the property or area-based incentive reliefs in that year. This means any of the accelerated property capital allowances under any of the incentive schemes as well as the residential lessor relief commonly known as section 23-type relief. The 5% property relief surcharge is payable, in addition to any other USC which the person is obliged to pay on the income in question.

Cap on accelerated capital allowances

There have been many different property relief schemes over the years, each one tailored to address particular regional or sectoral needs, and their rules varied. Although these have all been brought to an end, capital allowances were still being claimed in respect of projects undertaken while the schemes were active.

Finance Act 2012 introduced a provision which meant that with effect from 1 January 2015, certain passive investors in accelerated capital allowance schemes would no longer be able to use any capital allowances beyond the tax life of the particular scheme where that tax life ends after 1 January 2015. Where the tax life of a scheme has ended before that date no carry forward of allowances into 2015 will be allowed. This lead-in period was intended to give individuals time to adjust to this change in advance.

This provision is restricted to passive investors only. A person who is entitled to accelerated capital allowances and who is an active trader will not be affected by this measure. In addition, residential (Section 23) and owner-occupier reliefs are unaffected by these measures.

Ministerial Meetings

Ceisteanna (156)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

156. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide a report on his meeting with Governor Honohan on 2 April 2015, listing all issues discussed, decisions taken and commitments made. [14423/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As Minister for Finance, I meet with the Governor of the Central Bank on a regular basis. Our latest meeting took place on 2 April 2015. The meeting covered a broad range of issues, among them the issue of mortgage interest rates. The Governor provided an update on the ongoing work that he and his officials are carrying out on the issue of the standard variable rates charged by the lenders.

We both noted that the standard variable rates charged in Ireland are higher than other euro area countries and have not fallen in line with ECB wholesale rates. The Central Bank will continue to research why this is the case and will publish results shortly.  The Governor will update me on progress in due course.

 

VAT Rebates

Ceisteanna (157)

Terence Flanagan

Ceist:

157. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance if money will be reimbursed to an organisation (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14451/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that VAT is a tax on consumption and is applied to supplies being made by a person and not to supplies received by a person.  VAT is an EU-wide tax and is governed by the EU VAT Directive with which the VAT legislation in each EU Member State must apply.  Where a Member State's VAT legislation is not in compliance with the EU VAT Directive the Commission will take infringement proceedings against that Member State.

The EU VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provides that Member States shall exempt in the public interest hospital and medical care or treatment provided by a hospital, nursing home, clinic or similar establishment.  Exemption from VAT means that persons engaged in exempt activities are not liable for VAT on their receipts and are not entitled to a credit or deduction for VAT borne on their purchases. The public interest VAT-exemptions have existed since VAT was introduced, mainly because of the practical difficulties in defining and measuring the value added which would be appropriate as a base for taxation.

There is a specific VAT Refund Order (SI 58 of 1992) that provides that VAT incurred on the purchase or importation of new medical instruments and appliances (excluding means of transport), which is purchased through voluntary donations, may be refunded to hospitals or donors, as appropriate, subject to conditions.  The Refund Order does not extend to VAT incurred on construction services.  Further information on the Refund Order, its conditions and the refund claim form VAT 72 is available on the Revenue website at  http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/vat/forms/index.html.

Question No. 158 answered with Question No. 148.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (159)

Anne Ferris

Ceist:

159. Deputy Anne Ferris asked the Minister for Finance if the scheme of tax incentives for child care facilities promoted in the Finance Act 1999 left any obligation on crèche owners, who rent out the operation of the crèche, to ensure the continued use of the premises as a crèche and-or the non-application of prohibitively high rents; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14533/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Crèche owners who rent out the operation of a crèche are obligated to ensure that the premises is used as a crèche if they wish to continue to claim the tax incentives for it that are set out in Finance Act 1999. Where the premises are subject to a lease arrangement, the level of the rent will be set by market forces. The tax legislation does not specify the level of rent to be paid for the relevant facility.

Mortgage Arrears Proposals

Ceisteanna (160)

Anne Ferris

Ceist:

160. Deputy Anne Ferris asked the Minister for Finance if the Central Bank of Ireland has reviewed the split-mortgage proposals offered by Allied Irish Banks and Bank of Ireland to struggling mortgage holders in arrears; if so, his views that this forces Bank of Ireland mortgage holders to enter split-mortgage agreements where the warehoused portion is accruing interest at 2.5% with no write-down whatsoever, while Allied Irish Banks offers a more realistic solution for dealing with the unrealistic debt burden; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14535/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Deputy will be aware that I in my role as Minister for Finance, have no direct or statutory function in relation to banking policies and decisions made by individual lending institutions at any particular time and these are taken by the board and management of the relevant institution. A Relationship Framework has also been specified that defines the nature of the relationship between the Minister for Finance and each bank. These Frameworks were published on 30 March 2012 and can be found at:  http://banking.finance.gov.ie/presentations-and-latest-documents

I have, however, referred the Deputy's question in relation to the Central Bank's approach to reviewing split mortgages to the Central Bank and have received the following response in this regard:

 "The Central Bank's Internal Guidelines on Sustainable Mortgage Arrears Solutions details important factors that Central Bank supervisors will consider when assessing the sustainability of solutions being offered by the banks to resolve borrowers in mortgage distress. Sustainability of a split mortgage (of which there are various designs) will be assessed by the Central Bank inter alia with regard both to the affordability of the un-warehoused debt payment schedule and with regard to the treatment of the warehoused loan at maturity. Transparency to a borrower of the terms and conditions of a split mortgage at the outset of such a solution is essential to the sustainability of this solution, in particular how the bank will treat future increase of income and the repayment of the warehoused loan at maturity.

The sustainability guidelines outline the Central Bank's views on the key characteristics that we would expect to see in a split mortgage, including inter alia:           

- Treatment of the base loan of a split mortgage;

- Treatment of future increases in income;

- Treatment of term of warehoused part of split mortgage.

The Central Bank's position is that split mortgages will only be considered sustainable if the borrower can service both the base loan and there is an appropriate approach to dealing with the warehoused element. This is consistent with the recognition that each borrower's circumstance will be different and the solutions offered for individual borrower's arrears issues will be driven by their own particular circumstance, so long as this is consistent with the Central Bank's requirements (e.g. CCMA)."

The following is the link to the sustainability guidelines available on the Central Bank's website and I would draw the Deputy's attention to section 2.5 in particular which deals with split mortgages. 

http://www.centralbank.ie/regulation/industry-sectors/credit-institutions/Documents/Internal%20Guideline%20-%20Sustainable%20Mortgage%20Arrears%20Solutions.pdf

Mortgage Lending

Ceisteanna (161)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Ceist:

161. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Finance in relation to the new limits for mortgages for residential dwelling units, if he will outline the limits for new mortgages for first-time buyers and for those trading up; if he will indicate the rationale for two categories; the exceptions which are allowed for those who previously had a mortgage but wish to be classified as a first-time buyer; if owner-occupiers who purchased homes at a location (details supplied) in Dublin 13 and lost their savings and-or deposits in that development have been refused the classification of first-time buyer as regards higher mortgages; in view of the difficulties experienced in this case, if he will instruct that previous owners of homes at the location be treated as first-time buyers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14537/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Central Bank of Ireland has put in place new macro prudential regulations for residential mortgage lending (S.I. No. 47 of 2015). These provide for a maximum loan-to-value (LTV) for a First Time Buyer (FTB) to be no more than 90% of the first €220,000 of a property's value and 80% thereafter where the property is a principal home. For Non-FTBs, the maximum LTV is 80%. The regulations also state that a FTB is a borrower to whom no housing loan has ever before been advanced.

Nevertheless, the regulations allow some flexibility to lenders in assessing individual applications in that up to 15 per cent of total new lending may exceed the LTV thresholds if so decided by lenders. However, the Central Bank has also advised that it would not be appropriate for it to comment on specific cases but borrowers could engage directly with their individual bank on this matter.

Budget Targets

Ceisteanna (162)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

162. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the maximum permissible budgetary adjustment possible in budget 2016, based on the latest available statistics, following negotiations with the European Union regarding Ireland's expenditure benchmark; and the way this figure is arrived at. [14544/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will be aware from previous responses, it is expected that from 2016, the public finances in Ireland will be subject to the rules of the preventive arm of the Stability & Growth Pact.  Assessment of compliance with the rules of the preventive arm is based on two pillars: the annual improvement in the structural balance and the expenditure benchmark.  Budget 2016 will be framed with due regard for these assessments.

The expenditure benchmark links growth in expenditure to the potential growth rate of the economy.  Additional expenditure above the benchmark has to be paid for through the introduction of new discretionary revenue measures.  The benchmark also contains a feature than is designed to assist with achieving the minimum annual structural improvement of more than 0.5% of GDP.

On foot of my interventions at political level, my officials have been in discussions at a technical level with the European Commission and other Member States.

The aim of technical discussions has been to ensure that the methodology for calculating potential output and its implementation in the context of EU fiscal rules is applied in a manner that produces credible results that underpin the operation of a sound set of rules.

The focus of our discussions has been two pronged; firstly to improve how estimates of potential GDP are calculated for Ireland by using more appropriate population projections and secondly to apply these calculations in a more logical fashion so that the fiscal policy consistent with these rules is set based on latest available information regarding both the outturn and prospects for the Irish economy.

Discussions are progressing but final decisions at a technical level must be endorsed at the relevant committees. As such, I do not want to prejudice these ongoing discussions by providing specific figures at this stage.

It is hoped that the relevant decisions will be made in time for incorporation into the Spring Economic Statement, which will be published later this month.

Irish Water Funding

Ceisteanna (163)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

163. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the effect and-or cost of the current situation where Irish Water is placed on the books on the deficit-surplus; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14545/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As a result of the approach agreed between the CSO and Eurostat during the 2014 EDP dialogue visit, Irish Water has provisionally been classified within general government for the March EDP returns.  A classification proposal on Irish Water is currently with Eurostat. This is a closed process and the CSO will now await the final adjudication of Eurostat.

This resulted in all Irish Water planned expenditure being treated as general government expenditure. Revenues generated by Irish Water are included in general government revenue with all transactions between government bodies and Irish Water being consolidated.

Table 1 sets out the impact of including Irish Water within general government on the general government balance, based on data available at this point in time.  

Table 1: Impact of Irish Water on general government balance 2014-2016

Year

2014

2015

2016

Impact of Irish Water on surplus / (deficit) (€m)

-340

-580

-395

Deficit-to-GDP Ratio (per cent) *

-0.2%

-0.3%

-0.2%

* GDP as per Budget 2015

Pension Levy

Ceisteanna (164)

Ruth Coppinger

Ceist:

164. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Finance following the end of the levy on pension funds, the steps he will take to remedy the reduction in the pension funds caused by this levy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14547/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The original 0.6% pension fund levy introduced to fund the Jobs Initiative in 2011 ended last year. The additional levy on pension funds at 0.15% which I introduced for 2014 and 2015, mainly to help continue to fund Jobs Initiative, will also end after this year.

The position is that the equivalent value of all of the money raised from the stamp duty levy has been used to fund the wide range of measures introduced in the Jobs Initiative to protect existing jobs and create new jobs.  These include expenditure measures such as the Jobbridge and the Springboard schemes, as well as a number of tax and PRSI incentives such as the reduction in the VAT rate from 13.5% to 9% for the tourism and hospitality sectors and the halving of the lower employer PRSI rate. 

The reduced VAT rate of 9% on tourism and certain other services was one of the very significant and successful measures introduced by the Jobs Initiative. It was due to end in 2013. In my Budget 2014 speech I announced the continuation of the reduced 9% VAT rate. I also announced the ending of the Air Travel Tax from 1 April 2014. The 9% VAT rate has helped to create thousands of new jobs as well as protecting existing jobs. Since the Budget announcement about the Air Travel Tax, airlines have announced the opening up of new routes resulting in significant increases in passenger numbers with the associated increase in tourism activity and employment.

While the pension fund levies have ceased and will be ceased as I have already outlined, I have no plans to repay the pension fund levy tax collected as may be implied in the question. The value of the funds raised by way of the levy have been used to protect and create jobs and this has helped to create the improving financial and economic position of the State. Taxpayers to whom the impact of the levy may have been passed on by the chargeable persons for the levy (the pension scheme trustees and other persons with responsibility for the management of pension scheme or pension plan assets) will benefit from that improving fiscal and economic situation and from the changes that I began in Budget 2015 which will continue in future Budgets to reduce the income tax burden on low and middle income earners.

VAT Rebates

Ceisteanna (165)

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

165. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance in view of the fact that Cystic Fibrosis Ireland raised almost €9 million for hospital building projects over the past four years, of which 23% value added tax was paid to the Government, if this tax can be reimbursed to the organisation to continue with its work; and if he will provide, in tabular form, the intake from value added tax on capital projects by charity organisations, such as the hospital building projects by Cystic Fibrosis Ireland, in the years 2012 to 2014 and in 2015 to date. [14576/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that VAT is a tax on consumption and is applied to supplies being made by a person and not to supplies received by a person.  VAT is an EU-wide tax and is governed by the EU VAT Directive with which the VAT legislation in each EU Member State must apply.  Where a Member State's VAT legislation is not in compliance with the EU VAT Directive the Commission will take infringement proceedings against that Member State.

 The EU VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provides that Member States shall exempt in the public interest hospital and medical care or treatment provided by a hospital, nursing home, clinic or similar establishment.  Exemption from VAT means that persons engaged in exempt activities are not liable for VAT on their receipts and are not entitled to a credit or deduction for VAT borne on their purchases.  The public interest VAT-exemptions have existed since VAT was introduced, mainly because of the practical difficulties in defining and measuring the value added which would be appropriate as a base for taxation.

Non-profit groups engaged in non-commercial activity, such as fund raising, are outside the scope of VAT under the EU VAT Directive.  This means that they do not register for VAT and cannot recover VAT incurred on goods and services that they purchase.  Since they do not register for VAT the Revenue Commissioners do not hold details of VAT incurred on capital projects of the nature described by the Deputy.

There is a specific VAT Refund Order (SI 58 of 1992) that provides that VAT incurred on the purchase or importation of new medical instruments and appliances (excluding means of transport), which is purchased through voluntary donations, may be refunded to hospitals or donors, as appropriate, subject to conditions.  The Refund Order does not extend to VAT incurred on construction services.  Further information on the Refund Order, its conditions and the refund claim form VAT 72 is available on the Revenue website at  http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/vat/forms/index.html.

Mortgage Interest Rates

Ceisteanna (166)

Billy Timmins

Ceist:

166. Deputy Billy Timmins asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the high variable interest rates Irish banks are charging (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14584/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The lending institutions in Ireland - including those in which the State has a significant shareholding - are independent commercial entities. I have no statutory role in relation to regulated financial institutions passing on the European Central Bank interest rate change or to the mortgage interest rates charged.  It is a commercial matter for each institution concerned.  It is not appropriate for me, as Minister for Finance, to comment on or become involved in the detailed position of mortgage holders or the manner in which individual banks choose to put forward mortgage propositions to potential customers or how that relates to existing customers.

That said, the issue of regulation of interest rates remains a policy area under active review and this has been the subject of recent correspondence between the Department of Finance and the Central Bank. The current position is that the Central Bank does not have new proposals for the additional regulation of interest rates.

The Central Bank has responsibility for the regulation and supervision of financial institutions in terms of consumer protection and prudential requirements and for ensuring ongoing compliance with applicable statutory obligations.

It should be noted that The Governor of the Central Bank and I meet regularly. At a recent meeting on the 2nd April, among the items discussed was the issue of mortgage interest rates. The Governor provided an update on the ongoing work that he and his officials are carrying out on the issue of the standard variable rates charged by the lenders.

The Governor and I noted that the SVRs charged in Ireland are higher than other euro area countries and have not fallen in line with ECB wholesale rates. The Central Bank will continue to research why this is the case and will publish results shortly.  The Governor will update me on progress in due course.

Barr
Roinn