Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 30 Jun 2015

Written Answers Nos. 228 - 248

NAMA Expenditure

Ceisteanna (228)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

228. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide figures, in tabular form, in respect of named firms and persons who received over €20,000 in respect of work for the National Asset Management Agency under the following headings in 2014 - portfolio transition costs; portfolio management fees; legal fees, finance, communication and technology costs; rent and occupancy costs, internal audit fees and external audit remuneration; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25796/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by NAMA that the breakdown of firms/persons who received over €20,000 in respect of work for National Asset Management Agency in 2014 under the headings requested is as follows:

The following figures are based on invoices paid during 2014 financial year and exclude accruals and prepayments.

Portfolio Transition Costs

Supplier Name

 Amt €'000

IBRC - Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited (in liquidation)

5,176

Capita Asset Services (Ireland) Limited

3,698

Bank of Ireland

    352

Ernst & Young

    127

CubeMatch

      81

PricewaterhouseCoopers

      59

Portfolio Management Costs

Supplier Name

 Amt €'000

Aon Risk Solutions

    726

Sarasota County Tax Collector

    256

KPMG S.A

   247

Forgo, Damjanovic & Partners Law Firm

   145

Grant Thornton Corporate

    100

BTG Global Risk Partners

      95

Horwath Bastow Charleton Consultants Ltd

     94

Deloitte & Touche

      90

PACT Real Estate Group LLC

      88

Jones Lang LaSalle Ltd - Dublin

    72

Bastow Charleton Advisory Ltd

65

Salamanca Risk Management

      59

KPMG

     58

Smith & Williamson Freaney Ltd

      52

Donal O'Buachalla & Co. Ltd

     51

TWM Select Asset Management Limited

   47

Lambert Smith Hampton

      44

Harry Sexton

  44

Colliers International Dublin

     40

CB Richard Ellis

31

Smart Interiors Ltd T/A Merrion Interiors

      30

Clarke Maintenance Ltd

      29

Hooke & MacDonald

      24

Capita Asset Services (Ireland) Limited

21

Risk Management International Ltd.

     21

Corps Security

21

Legal Costs

Supplier Name

 Amt €'000

DLA Piper UK LLP

   740

McCann Fitzgerald

   582

Ronan Daly Jermyn Solicitors

410

Servulo & Associados

   322

Vroninks & Ricker

   304

Arthur Cox

    283

McCarter & English LLP

    276

Eugene F Collins

245

Beauchamps Solicitors

   240

Mason Hayes + Curran

    208

Bayern LB

  179

Hayes Solicitors

177

LK Shields Solicitors

   157

Lavelle Coleman Solicitors

   151

Taylor Wessing LLP

139

Byrne Wallace

   130

Matheson

   129

McCann Fitzgerald London Solicitors

124

A&L Goodbody Solicitors

   116

Eversheds O'Donnell Sweeney

   112

Maples and Calder

    101

Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co

     98

Arthur Cox Northern Ireland

     98

Uria Menedez

      96

Allied Legal Services

     86

Baker & McKenzie CVBA/SCRL

     75

Taylor Wessing LLP (Munchen)

     69

Graf von Westphalen

     66

Simmons & Simmons LLP

57

P&J Security Services Ltd

    52

Alfred Thornton & Company

      50

Amoss Solicitors

    49

DLA Piper (POLAND)

      46

G O Nuallain & Co

45

William Fry Solicitors

      41

Paul Sreenan

     41

Quarles & Brady LLP

      40

Boyanov & Co

     39

Gartlan Furey Solicitors

     37

Barry C. Galvin & Son Solicitors

     33

Corporate Access (Legal Services) Ltd

30

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

     30

John McKee & Son Solicitors

     30

PriceWaterhouse Coopers

      28

Koushos Korfiotis Papacharalambous LLC

     28

Marcum

28

Wragge & Co

  28

Ciaran Lewis

  26

Burges Salmon LLP

     25

Kennedys Law

       25

Gore & Grimes Solicitors

25

TLT LLP

     23

Giles J. Kennedy & Co.

     22

DLA Piper UK LLP (Germany)

   22

Finance Communication & Technology Costs

Supplier Name

 Amt €'000

Fenergo

1,976

KPMG

   915

PriceWaterhouse Coopers

   259

Version 1

   233

Ernst & Young

   128

Environmental Systems Research Institute

181

UBS Limited

123

Chartered Accountants Ireland

      70

FDS Technology Systems Ltd

      50

DNM Technology

      48

ERGO

     46

Fabrik Creative Media

     38

Rent and Occupancy Costs

Supplier Name

 Amt €'000

Ambiorix Limited

1,980

Active Facilities & Property Management

    406

Energia

    112

Savills Commercial (Ireland) Ltd

    514

CRM Commercial Refurbishment & Management

      45

External Audit Costs

Supplier Name

 Amt €'000

Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General

515

Internal  Audit Costs

Supplier Name

 Amt €'000

Deloitte & Touche

   378

PWC

   376

NAMA Staff Data

Ceisteanna (229)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

229. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the individual amounts that former National Asset Management Agency employees received while on gardening leave last year from the €400,000 paid out under the heading; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25797/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by NAMA that 17 NTMA staff assigned to NAMA under Section 42 of the NAMA Act were placed on garden leave during 2014 with an attributable cost of approximately €400,000 inclusive of Employer's PRSI.  NTMA staff are employed on the basis of confidential individually negotiated contracts.

I am further advised by NAMA that garden leave does not represent an incremental cost but instead forms part of the overall NAMA salary cost that is refunded to the NTMA. This cost would have been incurred regardless of the decision to place the relevant staff on garden leave, that is, if they continued attending work in NAMA whilst under notice. The decision on whether or not to place staff on garden leave is made on a case-by-case basis and would include consideration, inter alia, of the person's role within NAMA and the person's new employer. The average period of garden leave for the 17 staff was two months.

NAMA's Annual Report and Financial Statement for 2014, which is available on the NAMA website (www.nama.ie) also provides the above information (p.115). I would encourage anyone interested in the workings and performance of NAMA who has not yet read these yearly reports to take the time to do so as they are a rich source of information regarding NAMA's performance.

NAMA Staff Remuneration

Ceisteanna (230)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

230. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if bonus payments have been paid to National Treasury Management Agency and National Asset Management Agency staff in 2014 and 2015; his views on whether staff at the National Asset Management Agency should receive bonus payments in order to retain staff at the agency; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25798/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised that the NTMA made performance-related payments to 16 staff in respect of 2014. These payments, in aggregate, totalled €79,200. No performance-related payments were made to any employee earning a salary of over €150,000. I am also advised that no such performance-related payments were made to any staff assigned to NAMA. I am further advised by the NTMA that performance related pay is determined at the end of the year, therefore figures for 2015 are not available at this stage. As outlined in my Department's review of NAMA under Section 227 of the NAMA Act, NAMA's ability to achieve its ultimate objectives is premised on a number of assumptions, including that it is able to retain sufficient operational capacity and specialist staff. As a result a key finding of that review was that any proposal to help safeguard NAMA's operational capacity and staffing expertise should receive careful consideration in light of potentially significant value implications associated with losing key employees.

As Minister for Finance, I am working with the NAMA Board in this respect and, as the Deputy is aware, arising from those discussions, appropriate staff retention and redundancy measures are being put in place to protect the financial performance of NAMA. The overall cost of these measures, including statutory redundancy, will not exceed €20m. NAMA is hopeful that these measures will enable it to manage its staffing requirements to help ensure the delivery of its objectives. I refer the Deputy in this respect to my response to Parliamentary Question 107, which was answered on 12th March 2015 and to page 9 of the 2014 NAMA Annual Report which is available on NAMA's website.

Prize Bonds

Ceisteanna (231)

Tom Fleming

Ceist:

231. Deputy Tom Fleming asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an update on parliamentary questions and follow-up correspondence (details supplied) regarding money laundering; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25799/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Deputy previously asked if I would review the requirement that gift purchases of prize bonds for as little as €25 be subject to the obligation to provide evidence of identity. Following consideration by Officials from both my Department and the NTMA I am pleased to inform you that it was agreed that, in certain circumstances, there is no longer an obligation to provide evidence of identity.

For small value purchases of prize bonds as gifts, where the purchase value does not exceed €100, there is no obligation on the purchaser or the gift recipient to provide any evidence of identity at the time of purchase. For gift purchases of Prize Bonds with a value above €100 there is still an obligation to provide evidence of identity at the time of purchase.

If an individual's cumulative holding of prize bonds exceeds €1,000 or will exceed €1,000 as a result of a new application to purchase prize bonds, there is still an obligation on that individual to provide evidence of identity before the prize bonds can be issued.

Where an individual is making a first time purchase of Prize Bonds for themselves, they are obliged to provide evidence of identity, but will not be routinely asked for evidence again, on the occasion of a repeat purchase, so long as the existing evidence remains valid.

Pension Levy

Ceisteanna (232)

Michael McCarthy

Ceist:

232. Deputy Michael McCarthy asked the Minister for Finance the current policy in relation to ending the pension levy on private pensions, in view of the impact the levy is having on pensioners with low incomes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25850/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I announced in my Budget 2014 speech that the original 0.6% levy introduced in 2011 to fund the Jobs Initiative would be abolished after 2014 and that levy no longer applies. I did, however introduce an additional levy on pension funds at 0.15% for 2014 and 2015. I did this to, among other things, continue to help fund the Jobs Initiative. I confirmed in my Budget 2015 speech that the additional 0.15% levy will expire at the end of this year.

 The chargeable persons for the pension fund levy are the trustees or other persons (including insurance companies) with responsibility for the management of the assets of the pension schemes or plans. The payment of the levy is treated as a necessary expense of a pension scheme and the trustees or insurer, as appropriate, are entitled, where they decide to do so, to adjust current or prospective benefits payable under a scheme to take account of the levy. It is up to the trustees to decide whether and how the levy should be passed on and who should be impacted and to what extent, given the particular circumstances of the pension schemes for which they are responsible.

However, should the option of reducing scheme benefits be taken, in no case may the reduction in an individual member's or class of members benefits exceed the members or class of members share of the levy.

The value of the funds raised by way of the levy have been used to protect and create jobs and this has helped to create the improving financial and economic position of the State. Taxpayers to whom the impact of the levy may have been passed on by the chargeable persons for the levy will benefit from the changes which I began in Budget 2015 and which will continue in future Budgets to reduce the tax burden on low and middle income earners.

NAMA Social Housing Provision

Ceisteanna (233, 234)

Gabrielle McFadden

Ceist:

233. Deputy Gabrielle McFadden asked the Minister for Finance the number of units identified by the National Asset Management Agency for the provision of social housing that have been allocated to each local authority in each year since 2012 and to date in 2015; the number of those identified and allocated that have subsequently been leased or purchased in each county in each year since 2012 and in 2015 to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25853/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Gabrielle McFadden

Ceist:

234. Deputy Gabrielle McFadden asked the Minister for Finance is he satisfied that enough is being done by stakeholders involved in the National Asset Management Agency social housing initiative in order to address the national housing crisis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25854/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 233 and 234 together.

It is clear that NAMA is a making a substantial contribution to the provision of social housing. Since 2012, under an initiative agreed with the then Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, NAMA has identified 6,391 houses and apartments held by its debtors and receivers as being available and potentially suitable for social housing. These properties have been identified on an ongoing basis by NAMA as being available either through the completion, with NAMA funding, of previously unfinished properties, or as formerly tenanted properties have become available. These 6,391 properties equate to more than 45% of the total stock of completed residential properties securing NAMA's loans when it acquired the loans from the participating institutions.

To explain the process, once NAMA identifies a property as being available, it is a matter for local authorities, working through the Housing Agency, to determine demand for that property by reference to criteria such as location and wider planning and housing policy considerations. NAMA has no role in this process - it is a matter for the statutory housing authorities. Once local authorities have confirmed demand for properties, the approved housing bodies (AHBs) are, through the Housing Agency, asked to confirm and progress their interest in leasing or purchasing the properties. Local authorities also have the option of directly acquiring the properties. Again this is a matter entirely for the statutory housing authorities and NAMA is not involved in the process.

Of the 6,391 properties identified by NAMA as available, local authorities have confirmed demand for 2,356 of which 1,198 have already been delivered by NAMA across 74 individual transactions. As requested by the Deputy, a breakdown of delivery by year under this initiative is set out as follows:

Year

Number

2012

229

2013

367

2014

472

Q1 2015

130

Total to Q1 2015

1198

I am advised that NAMA expects the other units for which demand has been confirmed will be delivered in 2015 on the basis that local authorities and approved housing bodies contract to purchase or lease the properties. Updated figures for the period to end Quarter 2 2015 will be published on both the NAMA and Housing Agency websites in early July. 

Once demand has been confirmed for units and contracts signed there is no impediment to the early delivery of properties by NAMA's debtors and receivers or directly through NAMA's social housing SPV, National Asset Residential Property Services Limited (NARPSL). In the case of NARPSL, once demand has been confirmed by local authorities NAMA acquires the related properties from its debtors and receivers for onward leasing under long-term leasing arrangements to AHBs. Where obstacles have emerged, there has been no shortage of effort to work around them and along the way the parties have collectively identified ways to help streamline the process. The establishment of NARPSL is one example of the initiatives that NAMA has taken, in conjunction with the other key stakeholders in this process, to streamline the delivery of properties for social housing. NAMA has also introduced standardised leasing terms. NAMA also advises me that, based on working on this initiative over the past number of years, its experience is that every party involved does whatever it can to deliver these units as quickly and as efficiently as possible. However, the Deputy will appreciate that NAMA's specific role relates to making the houses available in the first place and ensuring that where demand is confirmed the properties are delivered as efficiently as possible. NAMA does not determine which units are selected for social housing nor how these units are allocated. 

In relation to NAMA's role, the Deputy will note that, in the vast majority of cases, the properties for which demand has been confirmed require substantial completion or remediation work and the resolution of compliance issues in relation to planning conditions, and regulatory standards, title issues and Multi-Unit Development Act compliance including transfer of common areas and insolvent management companies. It is NAMA's policy and practice that all properties are completed to a high standard, in compliance with all relevant planning and building regulations. In this context, NAMA has to date provided over €25m for completion works to facilitate the delivery of properties for social housing.

Further detail on this initiative can be found at https://www.nama.ie/social-initiatives/social-housing/

The following table provides a detailed breakdown by local authority functional area of the properties identified by NAMA and the take up by local authorities.

Table 1: Social Housing Delivery by Local Authority

-

Identified by NAMA

Demand Confirmed

Delivered

Carlow Co. Co.

222

147

55

Cavan Co. Co.

49

1

0

Clare Co. Co.

221

60

7

Cork City

465

123

53

Cork Co. Co.

763

318

79

Dublin City

813

399

349

Donegal Co. Co

118

32

0

Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Co. Co.

321

125

93

Fingal Co. Co.

257

94

60

Galway City

178

177

65

Galway Co. Co.

150

70

18

Kerry Co. Co.

210

128

26

Kildare Co. Co.

291

115

93

Kilkenny Co. Co.

177

67

5

Laois Co. Co

98

1

0

Leitrim Co. Co.

35

0

0

Limerick City and County Council

147

55

16

Longford Co. Co

31

0

0

Louth Co. Co.

30

30

27

Mayo Co. Co

75

31

0

Meath Co. Co.

235

62

11

Monaghan Co. Co

42

42

0

Offaly Co. Co.

79

49

29

Roscommon Co. Co.

91

0

0

Sligo Co. Co

111

31

0

South Dublin Co. Co.

581

121

113

Tipperary Co. Co

161

13

0

Waterford City and County Council

103

54

34

Westmeath Co. Co

95

29

20

Wexford Co. Co

206

102

45

Wicklow Co. Co.

36

7

0

Grand Total

6,391

2,483

1,198

Tax Rebates

Ceisteanna (235)

Michael Creed

Ceist:

235. Deputy Michael Creed asked the Minister for Finance if a person (details supplied) in County Cork is entitled to a refund of deposit interest retention tax paid arising from the recent purchase of a family home; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25855/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the person concerned may be entitled to a refund of DIRT under the First-Time Buyers Scheme. Revenue will make direct contact with the person concerned and will provide her with any necessary forms to allow her make a refund application.

IBRC Loans

Ceisteanna (236)

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

236. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Finance his views on correspondence (details supplied) regarding the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited and the selling-off of loans to a company that has a conflict of interest with the corporation; if there are immediate plans to regulate vulture funds companies that buy up mortgage loans from the Irish Nationwide Building Society; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25876/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

In relation to the first part of the question posed, as the Deputy will be aware the terms of reference of the proposed Commission of Investigation in relation to IBRC include the following explicit term of reference (1b) dealing with issues of public concern: The Commission shall investigate all transactions, activities and management decisions, other than those relating solely to the acquisition of assets by NAMA which occurred during the relevant period and which "are specifically identified by the Commission as giving rise or likely to give rise to potential public concern, in respect of the ultimate returns to the taxpayer".

Both Houses of the Oireachtas have approved the terms of reference. It is important that I do not interfere with or prejudice the important work to be conducted by the Commission of Investigation. In those circumstances I have received legal advice that it would be inappropriate for me to comment publicly in relation to certain matters which fall under the scope of the Commission of Investigation.

Moving onto the second part of the parliamentary question, as the Deputy may be aware, borrowers whose loans are sold to unregulated entities will be protected by the Consumer Protection (Regulation of Credit Servicing Firms) Bill 2015 when it is enacted. The purpose of the Bill is to ensure that consumers retain the protections they had prior to the sale of their loan. This Bill will require entities dealing with the consumer to be authorised by the Central Bank and subject to its Codes of Conduct. Dealing with the consumer is credit servicing and the definition of credit servicing is broad. New owners of loan books who deal directly with consumers, that is, who are servicing their own loan books, will be regulated. Otherwise they can have the loan book serviced by a regulated credit servicing firm.

The Bill was published in January 2015 and second stage of the Bill was taken in the Dáil on 4 February 2015. The Bill is continuing its progress through the legislative process. The Bill was passed by the Dáil on 17 June 2015 and Second Stage taken in the Seanad on 24 June 2015. Committee Stage in the Seanad is due later today (30 June 2015).

Banking Sector Staff

Ceisteanna (237)

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

237. Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 262 of 16 June 2015, his views on correspondence (details supplied) regarding outsourcing to a third party service provider by an Irish bank; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25877/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will be aware under the Relationship Frameworks the State does not intervene in the day to day operations of the banks in which it holds investments or their management decisions regarding commercial matters and hence any discussions around matters such as outsourcing are a matter for the bank, the relevant staff and their union representatives. Notwithstanding this position, my officials do take an active interest in how the bank's cost base evolves to ensure that the State's interests as shareholder are protected and to ensure that the Government's remuneration policy is enforced. 

The bank has previously indicated that as part of its restructuring plan to reduce costs and increase efficiencies, outsourcing of certain functions would be considered in consultation with unions and affected staff. I have also been informed by the bank that there have been no compulsory redundancies as a result of its recent outsourcing activities. Any staff who transfer under outsourcing arrangements transfer under the TUPE regulations.

I have been informed that the bank has not at this stage confirmed any agreement to outsource additional IT Services to third party providers.  However, staff working in the Application and Development Management teams have been advised that contracts are expected to be finalised with two suppliers, in early July.

Should any such decision be confirmed then affected staff will be informed and the bank will enter into a full process of information and consultation with employee representatives, as required both by law and in line with engagement principles agreed with the IBOA.

The bank has also advised that there are no planned compulsory redundancies as part of this activity.

I have been informed by the bank that the companies involved in the proposed outsourcing are establishing Delivery Centres in Ireland (in consultation with the IDA) and both organisations are committed to expanding their operations in Ireland to service their Global clients.

Tax Relief Abolition

Ceisteanna (238)

Seán Kenny

Ceist:

238. Deputy Seán Kenny asked the Minister for Finance the tax relief schemes that were abolished in the years 2013 and 2014; the savings to the Exchequer on each of the tax reliefs abolished; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25905/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I understand the Deputy to be referring to reliefs or credits eliminated or commencing to be phased out following changes made in the Finance Acts in 2012 and 2013. The tax reliefs and credits which follow were ceased or are being phased out as a consequence of those Acts.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that Exchequer costs or savings are not available for all measures referred to. For those where information is available, tax returns for 2013 were only due late last year and that the data are currently being processed for analysis. Returns for tax year 2014 are not due to be filed until later this year. Estimated costs of reliefs, allowances and credits for 2012 are published on Revenue's statistics website at http://www.revenue.ie/en/about/statistics/index.html. Updates for later years will be published shortly on the same webpage. In the current absence of this information for 2013 onwards I am providing the Budget estimates relating to the various credits or reliefs, where available.

The section numbers refer to the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997.

Section 87B and section 381B: Section 18 of the Finance Act 2013 applied the following changes, with effect from 13 February 2013, to the taxation of certain individuals deemed to be engaged in the trade of dealing in or developing land:

- Loss relief, related to both the decline in land values and interest deductions, was restricted to circumstances where the decline in value is actually realised and interest on the funding loan is actually paid, and

- The write-off of debts used to acquire land as trading stock, became an income receipt. Previously the write-off of the loan was treated as a capital adjustment and was not taxable.

The purpose of these changes was to deny tax deductions in circumstances where there is no real economic loss suffered by the taxpayer.

Section 88A and section 472A: Section 7 Finance Act 2013 discontinued the double deduction in respect of certain emoluments and relief for the long term unemployed, in respect of employments commencing on or after 1 July 2013. They were replaced by the new JobsPlus scheme.

Section 126: Section 8 of the Finance Act, 2013 removed the tax exemption in respect of maternity benefit, adoptive benefit and health and safety benefit with effect from 1st July 2013.

  Section 201: Foreign Service Relief on ex gratia termination lump-sum payments, provided for in section 201 of Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, was abolished with effect from the passing of Finance Act 2013 (27 March 2013).

  Section 201 and Schedule 3: Top Slicing Relief (TSR) on ex-gratia lump sums payments was ceased from 1 January 2013 where the payment was €200,000 or over. The yield was estimated at €10m in a full year. TSR was abolished completely for ex gratia payments made on or after 1 January 2014 with an expected yield of €22m in a full year.

Section 201: Finance Act 2013 applies a lifetime limit of €200,000 on the amount that may be paid tax-free to ex-gratia payments made on account of the death or disability of an employee. Any amount exceeding €200,000 is taxable in full.

Section 253: Relief to individuals on loans applied in acquiring an interest in a partnership was abolished for new loans with effect from 15 October 2013. Relief for existing loans was restricted commencing in 2014, with relief being reduced on a sliding scale each year until 2016 with no relief available in 2017. Savings of €1m in 2014, and €4m for each year thereafter, were estimated.

  Section 261A and Section 267C: Section 23 of Finance (No. 2) Act 2013 removed the exemption from Deposit Interest Retention Tax (DIRT) which applied to a portion of interest earnings on medium and long term accounts held in financial institutions or credit unions. Medium term accounts are defined as accounts which are held by a deposit taker for a minimum of three years and long term accounts are those held for a minimum of five years. The first €480 of interest earned in any year on medium term accounts, and the first €635 of interest earned in any year on long term accounts, was exempt from DIRT. New accounts opened on or after the 16th October 2013 cannot qualify for the relief but medium and long term accounts opened prior to that date continue to qualify for a duration of three and five years respectively from the date the accounts were opened. The amount of DIRT forgone in respect of medium and long term accounts is not returned to Revenue.

Section 268 and 316: Section 8 of the Finance Act, 2009 provided that capital expenditure on two property tax incentive schemes had final termination dates in 2013. In relation to the Mid Shannon Corridor Tourism Infrastructure Investment Scheme, capital expenditure incurred up to 31 May 2013 qualified for relief. In relation to Qualifying Private Hospitals, provided certain conditions were met, capital expenditure incurred up to 31 December 2013 also qualified for relief.

  Section 462: The One Parent Family Tax Credit (OPFTC) of €1,650 for a single individual with whom a qualifying child resided during a tax year was ceased at 31 December 2013. It was replaced by the Single Person Child Carer Credit from 1 January 2014. This was estimated to yield €18m in 2014 and €25m in a full year.

Section 470: A cap was introduced on relief for premiums for qualifying health insurance policies in respect of policies entered into or renewed on or after 16 October 2013. A maximum relief of €1,000 per adult and €500 per child covered by a policy was introduced. This was estimated to yield €94m in 2014 and €127m in 2015.

  Section 481: Income tax relief for individuals who invest in the production of qualifying films was abolished with effect from 1 January 2015. This relief has been replaced by a Corporation Tax credit of 32% of qualifying expenditure incurred by a Film Production Company in the making of a qualifying film. The cost to the exchequer for the income tax relief in 2013 was estimated to be €76m based on investment in qualifying expenditure of €185m relieved at the 41% marginal income tax rate. If a similar level of qualifying expenditure is incurred in 2015 the move to relief by way of a 32% Corporation Tax credit will yield a saving to the exchequer of €17m.

Section 486B: Section 486B provided for a scheme of tax relief for corporate investments in certain renewable energy projects in the solar, wind, hydro or biomass technology categories. The relief was given in the form of a deduction from a company's profits for its direct investment in new ordinary shares in the qualifying renewable energy company. The relief expired with effect from the 31st December 2014. As a relatively small number of claims were made in 2013 and 2014 in respect of this scheme, I am unable to provide a figure for the tax savings to the exchequer following the abolition of this scheme as release of this information may lead to the identification of the taxpayers who have availed of the relief.

Section 825B: Repayment of tax where earnings are not remitted was phased out with effect from tax year 2012 with end year of 2015. The Special Assignee Relief Programme (SARP - section 825C) was introduced from tax year 2012.

  Section 848A: The scheme of tax relief for donations made to approved bodies (i.e. charities etc.) was amended in a number of respects with effect from 1 January 2013. One of the changes was that relief for donations made by self-assessed taxpayers, previously obtained by way of a deduction from taxable income, was aligned with that for PAYE-only taxpayers such that the relief is now given on a "grossed-up" basis at the rate of 31% to the approved body (and not to the donor). This and the other changes made were on a cost neutral basis.

Section 604A: The CGT property incentive scheme introduced by Budget and Finance Act 2012 and which commenced on 7 December 2011 ceased with effect from 31 December 2014. Since individuals must hold on to a property acquired for 7 years or more before disposing of it in order to qualify for the relief, no tax cost has therefore yet arisen in relation to the relief.  

Indirect Taxation

In Section 55 of Finance Act (No. 2), 2013, I did not extend the Vehicle Registration Tax relief of up to €1,500 which had been available for flexible fuel vehicles, on the basis that this type of vehicle was largely redundant, which also meant that no savings arose. 

In Statutory Instrument 139 of 2014, I abolished the disabled drivers' fuel relief and replaced it with a fuel grant scheme with effect from 1 January 2015. As the relief was replaced by a grant scheme of the same value, no savings resulted.  

Disabled Drivers and Disabled Passengers (Tax Concessions) Scheme

As a consequence of a judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the excise repayment of fuel element of the Disabled Drivers and Disabled Passengers (Tax Concessions) Scheme was converted into a fuel grant of the same value from 1 January 2015. As the grant is the same value as the excise relief, no savings have arisen to the Exchequer.

Carbon Tax Collection

Ceisteanna (239)

Barry Cowen

Ceist:

239. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an update on reviews undertaken by his Department or the Office of the Revenue Commissioners on the levels of compliance with excise duties imposed on the sale of solid fuels; and if he is satisfied that there are high levels of compliance by providers of imported coal with the solid fuel excise duty. [25917/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners, who are responsible for the collection of solid fuel carbon tax (SFCT), that the tax is returned on a self-assessed basis and is subject to the full range of compliance tools for self-assessed taxes, including risk profiling, audit and compliance interventions and debt enforcement. In circumstances where there are grounds to believe that tax due has not been declared and paid by the taxpayer, Revenue investigates the suspect person's tax liabilities and  collects any unpaid tax, including income tax, SFCT and VAT, together with any interest or penalties due. In addition, as part of its tax compliance programme, Revenue chairs the Hidden Economy Monitoring Group (HEMG), established to facilitate the reporting of information by traders through their representative associations. Suppliers who suspect, or have evidence, that illegal and/or untaxed solid fuel is being sold in their area should report this to their Local Authority and to Revenue, respectively, either directly or through their representative associations. Reports of this nature are treated confidentially and investigated by Revenue. 

Revenue inform me also that the administration of the tax is heavily dependent on the regulatory regime for coal established by the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government in 2011. This regulatory regime establishes higher standards for coal supplied in the State compared with Northern Ireland, and provides for enforcement of those standards. Suppliers who supply solid fuels unlawfully are subject to investigation and prosecution by local authorities and other State agencies charged with preventing such supply and with enforcing the coal regulations. Any review of this regulatory regime is a matter for the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government.

Property Tax

Ceisteanna (240)

Olivia Mitchell

Ceist:

240. Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Finance if the Thornhill report on the review of property tax has been completed and considered by him; if not, when it is expected; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25953/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am very conscious of the concerns of homeowners, particularly those in urban areas, as regards increasing property prices and the effects this would have on their LPT liabilities. 

With a view to addressing these concerns, I have asked Dr. Don Thornhill, who chaired the 2012 Inter-Departmental Group which designed the Local Property Tax (LPT), to conduct a review to consider, and make recommendations on, the operation of the LPT, and any impacts on LPT liabilities due to property price developments.

In particular the Review will have regard to:

- Recent residential property price developments,

- The overall yield from LPT and its contribution to total tax revenue on an ongoing basis, and

- The desirability of achieving relative stability, both over the short and longer terms, in LPT payments of liable persons.

I understand the report is presently in the final stages of drafting.

It is intended that the Review be presented to me no later than summer 2015, with a view to consideration of any recommendations therein in the context of the Budget.

Tax Rebates

Ceisteanna (241)

Jack Wall

Ceist:

241. Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Finance if a person (details supplied) in County Kildare is due a tax refund; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25956/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I would refer the Deputy to my written response on 26 May to his previous question on this matter. That position is unchanged.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (242)

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Ceist:

242. Deputy Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Finance the expected yield from the introduction of a 5% sugar tax on sweetened drinks or on fast food products; if steps have been taken to consider the introduction of such a tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25965/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

There is no official data on the total sales revenue of sugar-sweetened drinks in Ireland. However, using data from industry sources gives a yield of €49 million for a rate of 5% on the final sales price of carbonated drinks (diet and non-diet), concentrates, & sports and energy drinks.

The Deputy may be aware that an examination of a tax on sugar sweetened drinks was included as part of the General Excise Duties paper presented to the Tax Strategy Group, an interdepartmental committee chaired by the Department of Finance. The paper examined the impact of a sugar sweetened drink tax imposed as a specific amount per volume of sugar-sweetened liquid (i.e €7.76 per hectolitre), rather than an ad valorem rate.

The General Excise Duties paper is available online at http://www.finance.gov.ie/what-we-do/tax-policy/tax-strategy-group/tsg2014/tsg-2014.

In relation to 'fast food products', it is not possible to provide an estimate for the expected yield of a 5% tax on such products.

All changes to taxation are considered in the context of the annual Budget and Finance Bill process.

Property Tax

Ceisteanna (243)

Jerry Buttimer

Ceist:

243. Deputy Jerry Buttimer asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider making changes to ensure that the local property tax on rented properties is a tax deductible expense; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25982/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that at present Local Property Tax (LPT) is not a deductible expense for income tax or corporation tax purposes.

The Thornhill Group, the inter-departmental group, chaired by Dr Don Thornhill, set up to consider the design of a property tax (the "Thornhill Group") recommended that the LPT paid in respect of a rented property should be deductible for income tax or corporation tax purposes, in a similar manner to commercial rates.

The group recognised the considerable pressures on the public finances and the need to bridge the gap between expenditure and revenue, and, for this reason, suggested that consideration be given to phasing in deductibility over a period of years. The group also considered that it was for Government, having regard to the prevailing budgetary situation, to decide on the time span for phasing-in deductibility and what percentage of LPT to allow as a deduction from gross rents for tax purposes.

The Government accepted the recommendation of the Thornhill Group in principle, but has not yet decided the manner or the timing in which this will happen. Any such change would have to be provided for by primary legislation. Allowing LPT as a deductible expense will reduce the tax base. Therefore I must be mindful of the public finances and the many demands on the Exchequer, given the significant budgetary constraints.

The Deputy will be aware that I have asked Dr. Thornhill to conduct a review to consider, and make recommendations on the operation of the LPT, and any impacts on LPT liabilities due to property price developments.

In particular the Review will have regard to:

- Recent residential property price developments,

- The overall yield from LPT and its contribution to total tax revenue on an ongoing basis, and

- The desirability of achieving relative stability, both over the short and longer terms, in LPT payments of liable persons.

It is intended that the Review be presented to me no later than summer 2015, with a view to consideration of any recommendations therein in the context of the Budget.  

As the Deputy will appreciate, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on matters that may or may not feature in the Budget.

Social Insurance

Ceisteanna (244)

Jerry Buttimer

Ceist:

244. Deputy Jerry Buttimer asked the Minister for Finance regarding the pay related social insurance rate of 4% applied to rental income, if he will ensure that this payment is a contribution for all benefits arising under the social insurance scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25983/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Entitlement to social welfare benefits is primarily a matter for the Minister for Social Protection, who has advised me that self-employed workers pay class S PRSI at the rate of 4% on all of their income, including unearned income such as rental income. PRSI class S contributors can establish entitlement to maternity benefit, adoptive benefit, guardian's payment and long-term benefits such as State pension (contributory) and widow's, widower's or surviving civil partner's pension (contributory). Similarly, individuals whose only source of income is rental income pay class S PRSI at the rate of 4% on all of their income.

An employee with earned self-employed income from a profession or trade is liable to pay class S PRSI at the rate of 4% on the aggregate of all of their self-employed income including any unearned income such as rental income, provided their total income exceeds €5,000.

Employees and occupational pensioners under pension age whose only additional source of income is unearned (including rental income) are liable to pay PRSI at the 4% Class K rate on this unearned income.  While the PRSI Class K charge will not give rise to any additional social insurance benefits, most employees can establish entitlement to benefits based on PRSI paid on their employment income.  Occupational pensioners, who have retired prior to pension age, will have established entitlement to social insurance benefits during their previous employment and can maintain their entitlements in retirement through credits (if unemployed) or through Voluntary Contributions.

Any changes to current social insurance entitlements arising from the payment of PRSI contributions would have cost implications and could only be considered in a budgetary context.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (245)

Shane Ross

Ceist:

245. Deputy Shane Ross asked the Minister for Finance his plans to raise the threshold for inheritance tax for those who return to the family home to care for elderly parents, thus reducing the need for additional or nursing home care; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25999/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I have said in response to a number of other recent Parliamentary Questions on this matter that I recognise that recent growth in property values has implications for the liabilities that can arise from capital acquisitions tax. For this reason, I am reviewing the various aspects of this tax, including the lifetime tax-free thresholds, in the context of my preparations for Budget 2016 and the subsequent Finance Bill.

I would, however, refer the Deputy to the existence of the CAT dwelling house exemption, which allows for a property to be gifted or inherited tax free when the beneficiary is already living in the home. While certain restrictions and conditions apply to ensure its proper use, this exemption is designed to prevent cases of hardship or displacement for individuals who are home sharers and carers. In cases where the dwelling house exemption applies, the tax-free thresholds are unaffected and continue to apply separately and are available to an individual to cover the value of other gifts or inheritances which he or she may benefit from over their lifetime.

Mortgage Interest Rates

Ceisteanna (246, 266)

Anne Ferris

Ceist:

246. Deputy Anne Ferris asked the Minister for Finance in view of the ongoing financial pressure on variable rate mortgage holders, if he will outline the consequences for Bank of Ireland if it refuses to reduce its interest rate for variable rate mortgage holders after 1 July 2015 deadline; the progress made with other banks in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26034/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Clare Daly

Ceist:

266. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance the reason, in spite of his statements that all banks would announce measures by the end of June 2015 indicating the way they would allow customers to avail of lower rates, Permanent TSB has refused to announce any measures; and the action he will take to alleviate the pressure that its customers have been placed under. [26353/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 246 and 266 together.

As the Deputy will be aware, I met with senior management of Ireland's six main mortgage lenders, including Permanent TSB, on 19th and 21st May to discuss the issue of mortgage interest rates. The meetings focused on the mortgage market and specifically the comparatively high standard variable rates currently being charged by the banks.

I outlined my view that Standard Variable Rates being charged in the Irish market are too high. There was agreement from all lenders that customers should have access to more competitive mortgage products as per my recommendation.

The banks agreed to review their rates and products and, by the beginning of July, to have simple options to reduce monthly mortgage payments for SVR customers. Some of the potential products include lower standard variable rates for existing and new customers, competitive fixed rate products and lower variable rates taking account of loan to value for new and existing customers.

In addition to the issue of rates I also outlined the need for greater competition in the market and the need for a more active and well-resourced campaign by the individual banks. This should focus on promoting awareness of their best offering and how easy it is for customers to take up new products and switch between different institutions if they wish to avail of better rates.

In relation to switching, I understand that the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission is planning to provide more information to consumers to encourage switching. I expect that if financial institutions are convinced that there is a threat that they will lose these customers, they will reduce the rates that they currently charge existing customers. The CCPC website www.consumerhelp.ie is a valuable source of information on the rates charged by various financial institutions.

The Government made a commitment in the Statement of Government priorities 2014 to 2016 to applying downward pressure on mortgage rates by increasing and supporting competition in the market and it will continue to work to fulfil that commitment.

As I have previously made clear, officials in my Department will review progress over the coming weeks and a follow up set of meetings with each of the six banks will take place in September in advance of the Budget.

Tax Collection Forecasts

Ceisteanna (247)

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

247. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Finance the revenue that would be raised from an increase in vehicle registration tax rates across all bands by 30%. [26035/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The new bands which would arise from a global 30% increase in rates of VRT are outlined as follows:

Band

Current Rate

Proposed Rate

A1

14%

18.2%

A2

15%

19.5%

A3

16%

20.8%

A4

17%

22.1%

A5

18%

23.4%

A6

19%

24.7%

A7

23%

29.9%

A8

27%

35.1%

A9

30%

39.0%

A10

34%

44.2%

A11

36%

46.8%

The following table outlines the increase in revenue that would arise from introducing the new proposed rates of VRT for a given level of new and used private motor car sales:

New car reg

100,000

110,000

120,000

130,000

Yield

€161m

€178m

€195m

€212m

Used car reg

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

Yield

€37m

€42m

€47m

€53m

Total

€198m

€220m

€242m

€265m

I would note that a VRT increase of this scale would lead to a reduction in the demand for private motor cars.

Tax Collection Forecasts

Ceisteanna (248)

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

248. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Finance the revenue that would be generated from reducing the entry level adjusted income threshold to €100,000 and full restriction level to €200,000, with an effective tax rate of 38%. [26036/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I assume that the Deputy is referring to the restriction on the use of certain tax reliefs and exemptions by high income individuals. I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that data to provide a definitive estimate of the yield from the measures outlined by the Deputy are not readily available. However, based on personal income tax returns filed for the year 2013, the latest year for which data is available, it is tentatively estimated that reducing the entry level adjusted income threshold to €100,000 and full restriction level to €200,000, with an effective tax rate of 38%, would generate an additional yield in the order of €70 million.

It should be noted that this estimate takes no account of any changes in taxpayer behaviour which might arise from the introduction of this change.

Barr
Roinn