Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 27 Sep 2016

Written Answers Nos. 963-985

Child and Family Agency Services

Ceisteanna (963)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

963. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs , further to Parliamentary Question No. 1926 of 16 September 2016, if Tusla has agreed to make referrals to the centre in question as noted in documentation lodged with An Bord Pleanála (details supplied) should the development go ahead; the way in which such an agreement to place children between the ages of three and ten in a residential assessment setting for up to 15 weeks fits with Tusla's current policies regarding placements for children under 12 years of age; and her views regarding the appropriateness of holding children as young as three years of age in a privately run centre for up to 15 weeks for assessment.; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27201/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Tusla has advised that it has had no involvement with this initiative and has not received an application to register this application as a children's residential centre. Tusla will only place children in centres which have completed the registration process.

It is Departmental and Tusla policy that children 12 years and younger requiring admission to care should be placed in foster care. Occasionally, it may be in the interests of a younger child to be placed in an age appropriate residential centre for assessment or therapeutic intervention. This should only occur if it is in line with the child's care plan.

Child and Family Agency Data

Ceisteanna (964)

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

964. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the number of cases awaiting allocation to a social worker in each Tusla local office area, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27472/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

At the end of July 2016, there were a total of 25,069 open child welfare and protection cases nationwide. An open case is one which is assessed as needing a dedicated (allocated) social work service. Of the 25,069 open cases, 80% (20,019) had an allocated social worker and 5,050 were waiting to be allocated a social worker. This is a decrease of 1,668 (25%) in the number of unallocated cases since December 2015. The table gives details of the numbers of open cases broken into allocated and awaiting allocation for each administrative area as at end July 2016.

Tusla is implementing a national caseload management system which allows management to monitor caseloads in terms of both number and complexity. It is recognised that, from time to time, individual cases can occupy a disproportionate amount of resources. The caseload management system gives managers a clearer insight into the pressures on staff. My Department continues to monitor the number of cases that are reported as awaiting the allocation of a social worker. The additional staff being recruited and the caseload management system will make an improvement in these figures.

Administrative Area - July 2016

Number of Open Cases

Number of Open Cases Allocated

% of Open Cases Allocated

Number of Open Cases Awaiting Allocation

% of Open Cases Awaiting Allocation

Dublin South Central

1,222

1,116

91%

106

9%

Dublin South East/Wicklow

1,045

981

94%

64

6%

Dublin South West /Kildare/West Wicklow

1,122

517

46%

605

54%

Midlands

1,638

1,041

64%

597

36%

Dublin North City

1,781

1,533

86%

248

14%

Dublin North

2,716

2,007

74%

709

26%

Louth/Meath

1,407

1,144

81%

263

19%

Cavan/Monaghan

699

475

68%

224

32%

Cork

4,794

4,031

84%

763

16%

Kerry

561

531

95%

30

5%

Carlow/Kilkenny/South Tipperary

1,139

839

74%

300

26%

Waterford/Wexford

1,655

1,376

83%

279

17%

Mid West

1,723

1,411

82%

312

18%

Galway/Roscommon

1,779

1,398

79%

381

21%

Mayo

584

564

97%

20

3%

Donegal

748

700

94%

48

6%

Sligo/Leitrim/West Cavan

456

355

78%

101

22%

National Total

25,069

20,019

80%

5,050

20%

Tusla is currently reviewing the management of unallocated cases in all areas to ensure that thresholds are being applied consistently and appropriate actions taken as required. Tusla report that the increases and decreases in the overall total and numbers per area can be due to an increase in case closures or the allocation of additional cases to social workers.

Early Childhood Care and Education

Ceisteanna (965)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

965. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the projected annual cost of providing free universal access to child care for all children from birth. [27511/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The cost of introducing free universal childcare is very hard to forecast as the measure would have a major impact on childcare usage. The scale of this impact is very hard to predict. The fact that the take-up of the ECCE scheme is 95% indicates that a very large proportion of families who do not currently use non-parental childcare might take up the offer of free childcare. In addition, the hours of childcare used each week by every family might increase significantly, if childcare were free to parents.

If these effects on the demand for childcare are ignored, we can estimate the cost of providing childcare only to families who are already using centre-based childcare. Given current numbers and current patterns of childcare usage, if all childcare were free to parents, and if the State paid childcare providers the equivalent of the current market fees for childcare, the total cost to the State is estimated as €498 million per annum. If the free childcare were available not only to those currently using centre-based care, but also to those currently using paid childminders, the total cost would rise to an estimated €888 million per annum. The impact of such a measure on the demand for childcare would lead to an annual cost that could be a multiple of these figures.

The costs of the measures described are heavily dependent on uptake – it is estimated that, at present, 10% of children under three are in formal childcare. To cater for up to 100% of children between 6 months and 5 years of age would require significant capital investment to increase the capacity of the childcare sector.

The cost of childcare for children under one year old is considerably higher than for children participating in ECCE, as a significantly higher ratio of staff to children is required (11:1 for ECCE-age children, 3:1 for children below one year of age).

Given the complexities described above it is not possible to provide an accurate estimate of cost. The Department is currently in the process of procuring an independent review of the cost of care, following which the data required to enable an answer to this question will be available.

Child and Family Agency Funding

Ceisteanna (966)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

966. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the projected cost in 2017 of eliminating the waiting lists for child social workers and providing a dedicated social worker to every child in State care. [27512/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

At the end of 2015, the Child and Family Agency, Tusla developed a three-year plan which identified the requirement for additional resources to meet critical service concerns including targeted funding to address the findings of a national review of child welfare and protection cases awaiting allocation to a social worker. The plan to address unallocated cases involves increasing staffing levels including the recruitment of multi disciplinary teams to contribute to the delivery of a more effective child welfare and protection service, for example, family support workers, social care workers and business support personnel.

Funding requirements and how resources should be prioritised and allocated across each area of Government spending are considered as part of the annual estimates cycle and budgetary process. It would be inappropriate for me to comment at this time on any future decisions that may be taken by Government in the context of Budget 2017 on the expenditure allocations for programmes and services falling within the Vote of my Department. However, my objective will be to realise funding allocations that reflect expenditure policy priorities and that sufficient resources are directed towards those areas of greatest impact on children and young people.

Early Childhood Care and Education

Ceisteanna (967)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

967. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs the cost of providing a third free early childhood care year. [27513/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The costs of the measures described are heavily dependent on uptake – it is estimated that, at present, 10% of children under three are in formal childcare. To cater for an expansion of Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) Programme would require significant capital investment to increase the capacity of the childcare sector. In addition, this is likely to require an enormous volume of additional qualified staff.

Currently the ECCE Programme is available for children from the age of three until they attend primary school, provided they are no older than five years and six months by the end of the pre-school year, (ie. end of June). As all children must be in primary school by the age of six it would be impractical to extend the ECCE Programme beyond the current cut off point of five years and six months. Therefore, if ECCE were to be provided for a third year the programme would need to be extended to children from the age of two. The cost of childcare for children aged between one year of age, and two years of age is considerably higher than for children participating in ECCE, as a significantly higher ratio of staff to children is required (11:1 for current ECCE-age children, 5:1 for children between the ages of one and two-and-a-half).

Given the complexities described above it is not possible to provide an accurate estimate of cost. The Department is currently in the process of procuring an independent review of the cost of care, following which the data required to enable an answer to this question may be available.

Defence Forces Pensions

Ceisteanna (968)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

968. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence , further to Parliamentary Question No. 345 of 29 September 2015, the reason section 13(2) had been predetermined as applying at that time even though no decision on the pension had been made; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26502/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

No consideration or decision under Section 13(2) of the Army Pensions Act has yet taken place in relation to the case referred to by the Deputy as the determination of the disability pension application has not yet been finalised in this case.

The previous reply referred to by the Deputy stated that if the applicant in this case is awarded a disability pension Section 13(2) of the Army Pensions Act, 1923 will apply. What this means is that the case is subject to and will be considered under Section 13(2) of the Army Pensions Act 1923. The individual in this case received compensation for an injury for which he is also eligible for award of a disability pension under the Army Pensions Acts, therefore the terms of Section 13(2) of the Act will apply and the case will be considered under that provision.

Section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923 provides that if compensation is received for the same disablement as that for which a disability pension is being awarded under the Army Pensions Acts this may be taken into consideration when fixing the amount of any pension, allowance or gratuity awarded for that disablement under the Army Pensions Acts. This can result in a reduced pension or gratuity, or payment in full. The underlying objective of section 13(2) is to take into consideration awards (compensation, pension, gratuity or allowance) made ‘on the double’ for the same disablement for which a disability pension or gratuity is being paid.

Defence Forces Pensions

Ceisteanna (969, 970)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

969. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the circumstances or rules applied by his Department not to have section 13(2) applied on a case under the Army Pensions Act where previous compensation was awarded. [26503/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Clare Daly

Ceist:

970. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence his views on whether it is acceptable that a person who has been deemed permanently incapable of work as a result of an injury acquired in the Defence Forces which led to them being medically discharged would be granted a reduced pension; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26504/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to to take Questions Nos. 969 and 970 together.

Section 13(2) of the Army Pensions Act, 1923 (as amended) provides:

"Any compensation which may be received from or on behalf of the person alleged to be responsible for the act which caused the wounding or death of a person ….may be taken into consideration in fixing the amount of any pension, allowance or gratuity which might be awarded under this Act to or in respect of such person and if such compensation is received after the award of any such pension or allowance the Minister may review the award and, having regard to the amount of such compensation, either terminate the pension or allowance or reduce the amount thereof ".

This Section essentially provides that if compensation has been received for the same disablement as that for which a disability pension or gratuity is being awarded, that the Minister may take this into account when fixing the amount of disability pension or gratuity to be awarded under the Acts. The Minister may take into consideration part or all of the compensation received depending on the circumstances of the case. Alternatively, the Minister may decide to take none of the compensation into account. This can result in a reduced pension or gratuity, or payment in full.

The underlying objective of section 13(2) is to take into consideration awards (compensation, pension, gratuity or allowance) made ‘on the double’ for the same disablement for which a disability pension or gratuity is being paid.

It is not possible to definitively list the circumstances taken into account when a case is being considered under Section 13(2) of the Army Pensions Acts, other than to say that each case is considered on its merits and the Minister personally makes a bona fide decision based on the circumstances of the case.

In advance of consideration under Section 13(2), the person or his/her solicitor is advised of the statutory provisions and of the potential implications for his/her application. The person is invited to put forward a case setting out their circumstances; details of the compensation actually received, and whether there are any special or extenuating circumstances involved. Consideration is given to the case made before a final decision is made under Section 13(2) of the Act.

The Deputy may wish to note that where a member of the Permanent Defence Force leaves on ill health grounds there may also be an entitlement under the Defence Forces Pensions Schemes to an occupational pension, in addition to a disability pension or gratuity under the Army Pensions Acts.

European Defence Capabilities

Ceisteanna (971)

Paul Murphy

Ceist:

971. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence his views on the position of Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker regarding EU defence as outlined in his state of the Union speech, which included support for the establishment of a European defence fund to encourage research and innovation and for a toughening up of EU defence policy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26577/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The views expressed by the Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker on defence in his recent State of the Union address are not something new.  He has made similar statements in the past.  These, however, are matters for the EU member States to decide together and do not fall within the competence of the Commission. 

There have been proposals around for some time, that the EU should establish a joint operational headquarters to support the planning and conduct of its civil and military operations.  A permanent joint civil-military operational headquarters, appropriately configured, could potentially deliver more effective and responsive CSDP operations in support of the UN and international peace and security, a position which Ireland supports.  However, this is a matter which EU member States, including Ireland, will consider in the context of the implementation plan for the recently published EU Global Strategy of Foreign and Security Policy.  Ireland will participate fully in that process and in the ongoing development of the EU Common Security and Defence Policy in support of the UN and international peacekeeping and crisis management.  

The Commission President also referred in his State of the Union speech to the development of a European Defence Fund. Full details have yet to emerge in relation to this proposal but it is understood that it may include the establishment of a European Defence Research Programme (ERDP) post the completion of the Horizon 2020 research programme. The aim of the proposal is to stimulate further research and innovation in the Defence field leading to greater industrial development within the EU.

Officials in my Department and the Department of Finance will be monitoring closely developments in this area.

Departmental Expenditure

Ceisteanna (972)

Robert Troy

Ceist:

972. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the total travel expenses reimbursement costs incurred by his Department per annum from 2011 to 2016 to date, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26857/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Travel expenses paid by my Department to members of the Permanent Defence Force, Reserve Defence Force, civilian employees and civil servants from 2011 to 2016 to date are set out in the table.

Year

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016 (YTD)

€m

1.38

1.27

1.05

1.06

1.10

0.88

Data Protection

Ceisteanna (973)

Frank O'Rourke

Ceist:

973. Deputy Frank O'Rourke asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if his Department has a specific data protection officer in place; if that position is exclusive or if the position holder has other duties; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26874/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department has a specific Data Protection Officer in place, whose role incorporates other duties. My Department is committed to the discharge of its obligations in relation to data protection legislation.

Defence Forces Medicinal Products

Ceisteanna (974)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

974. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Questions No. 308 of 2 June 2016, 88 of 21 January 2016 and 1950 of 16 September 2016, his plans to update the Defence Forces' data management systems such that important data regarding Defence Forces prescribing practices and their outcomes and consequences are available for analysis. [26909/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am informed by the military authorities that, historically, information in relation to specific medication prescribed to each individual is retained in the individual’s paper medical file.

In July 2016 the Defence Forces introduced an electronic records system to enable details of all medical treatment given to individual members to be electronic ally recorded. The Deputy will appreciate that this database of medical information is only being populated from that date onwards and it will necessarily be some time before sufficient electronic information exists to allow meaningful statistical information to be obtained from the new system .

I am informed that there is a plan to record and summarise past medical information contained on individuals’ paper medical files on the new system on a gradual basis and as circumstances allow.

Defence Forces Medicinal Products

Ceisteanna (975, 977, 980, 981, 982, 983, 984, 985)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

975. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of officers or soldiers treated for the side effects of Lariam and the cost of same in the past ten years. [27336/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

977. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the way in which it is determined whether Malarone or doxycycline is issued to soldiers instead of the preferred drug Larium (mefloquine). [27338/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

980. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if alternative anti-malaria drugs, such as Malarone or doxycycline, were prescribed as a matter of course instead of Lariam, mefloquine, to soldiers of all ranks or just some ranks who were scheduled to be deployed in sub-Saharan Africa; and the medical criteria which was used to decide not to prescribe Lariam in individual cases or in the case of certain ranks. [27341/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

981. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if cost was routinely or ever a factor when choices were being made by the Defence Forces medical staff when deciding which anti-malaria drug was to be prescribed for soldiers to be deployed in sub-Saharan Africa since 2005. [27342/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

982. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if an explanation was ever given as to the reason the determination was reached that Lariam was to be the drug of choice for soldiers being deployed abroad in sub-Saharan Africa; if the determination has been reviewed since; and the reason thereof, especially in view of other countries' military authorities no longer prescribing Lariam due to concerns of its lasting side effects. [27343/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

983. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the countries which the military authorise and still regard Lariam as the prescribing drug of choice to be issued to units of deploying soldiers. [27344/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

984. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of persons who have died of malaria annually for the past ten years and the age profile of same [27345/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

985. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if Lariam is prescribed to soldiers deploying to Afghanistan; and if the strain of malaria there, the frequency of administering the tablets or the sensitivity of skin to the sun were factors when deciding which anti-malaria drug to issue to deploying soldiers heading to Afghanistan. [27346/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 975, 977 and 980 to 985, inclusive, together.

The health and welfare of the men and women of the Defence Forces is a priority for both myself and the Defence Forces. The choice of medication for overseas deployment is a medical decision made by Medical Officers in the Defence Forces, having regard to the specific circumstances of the mission and the individual member of the Defence Forces. Cost of medication and or the rank of an individual are not considerations in prescribing anti-malarial medication.

Significant precautions are taken by the Defence Forces Medical Officers in assessing the medical suitability of members of our Defence Forces to take any of the anti-malarial medications. It is the policy of the Defence Forces that personnel are individually screened for fitness for service overseas and medical suitability.

Malaria is a serious disease which killed approximately 438,000 people in 2015, with 90% of deaths occurring in sub-Saharan Africa as reported by the World Health Organisation. I am advised by the military authorities that they are not aware of any serving member of the Defence Forces dying from malaria in the past ten years.

I am advised that information in relation to side effects or illnesses contracted by Defence Forces Personnel including instances of malaria is maintained on each individual’s medical file. There is no way of providing the exact information sought by the Deputy without examining every medical record of each member who served overseas. Within the existing resources available, this is not feasible.

With regard to Afghanistan, Lariam was not the recommended first line chemoprophylactic agent for Irish Defence Force personnel when they were serving there. The Deputy may wish to note that Defence Forces personnel are no longer serving in Afghanistan. As I have indicated, the choice of medication for overseas deployment is a medical decision made by Medical Officers in the Defence Forces, having regard to the specific circumstances of the mission and the individual member of the Irish Defence Forces. 

Deployments to sub-Saharan Africa require the use of an anti-malaria regime. The Defence Forces, Director of the Medical Branch’s current advice, guidance and policy in relation to malaria chemoprophylaxis is that in the case of sub-Saharan Africa, Lariam is the agent of first choice. In special circumstances the other agents may be used. For example, if for operational reasons it was imperative that an individual deploy immediately without the normal ‘lead-in’ time which is required for Lariam, then one of the other alternative medications should be used. Equally, if an individual who had a specific skill set which was fundamental to mission success and either had previously demonstrated sensitivity to Lariam, or had a contraindication to its use in the first place, then that individual would receive derogation from the ‘normal’ policy and be placed on another medication. If during the course of deployment, an individual developed sensitivity to Lariam, he/she would desist from Lariam and be placed on an alternative. In all the examples above, the basic principle remains the same – it revolves around the balance struck between the requirements of the particular mission and patient safety.

As a result of its extended half-life in the blood, Lariam is taken on a weekly basis rather than on a daily basis. This has two direct and significant consequences. Firstly, a weekly medication facilitates compliance. Secondly, even if a dose is missed by 24 hours, there is still a residual quantity of the active ingredient in the blood which gives a certain degree of protection. If, however, one of the daily medications is missed by 24 hours, the patient is immediately susceptible to malaria. Prevention of disease for military personnel serving overseas is of the utmost importance. In addition, a peace keeping or peace enforcing military force has to prepare for all eventualities. The military activity of a force is dictated, not so much by a clock or calendar, but by the operational tempo at any given time. Such a reality creates difficulty in abiding by a daily dosing regimen. This is a fact of life which differentiates the civilian office worker or tourist from the deployed soldier. Thus the weekly medication provides some mitigation against the unforeseen and unpredictable aspect of overseas service. This is one of the reasons why Lariam remains the medication of choice in malaria chemoprophylaxis for Defence Forces personnel deployed to sub-Saharan Africa.

While there are other agents available, their use is associated with an increased risk of contracting malaria as indicated above. Therefore, subject to the special circumstances listed above, an individual who can take Lariam is selected in preference to one who cannot take Lariam because of the lesser risk to the individual and, by extension, to the mission. There are, however, circumstances when the demands of the mission justify this increased risk.

As I have already indicated, significant precautions are taken by Irish Defence Forces Medical Officers in assessing the medical suitability of members of our Defence Forces to take any of the anti-malarial medications. It is the policy of the Irish Defence Forces that personnel are individually screened for fitness for service overseas and medical suitability.

The Deputy will be aware that a Working Group is currently reviewing developments arising in relation to the use of malaria chemoprophylaxis. This work has included further engagement with international experts and I anticipate that it will finalise its second Report shortly.

There are no plans at this time to withdraw Lariam from the range of anti-malarial medications available to the Defence Forces.  The use of and the information on medications is kept under ongoing review. Anti-malarial medications, including Lariam, remain in the formulary of medications prescribed by the Medical Corps for Defence Forces personnel on appropriate overseas missions, to ensure that our military personnel can have effective protection from the very serious risks posed by this highly dangerous disease.

Defence Forces Medicinal Products

Ceisteanna (976, 978)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

976. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of Malarone and doxycycline tablets issued to both officers or soldiers by the Defence Forces since 2012. [27337/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

978. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of tablets of Lariam, Mefloquine, issued to both officers or soldiers by the Defence Forces since 2012. [27339/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 976 and 978 together.

The health and welfare of the Defence Forces is a priority for both myself and the Defence Forces. As the Deputy is aware that there are three anti-malarial drugs in use by the Defence Forces, namely Lariam (mefloquine), Malarone and Doxycycline.

The choice of medication for overseas deployment, for both officers and enlisted personnel, is a medical decision made by Medical Officers in the Defence Forces, having regard to the specific circumstances of the mission and the individual member of the Irish Defence Forces. Rank is not a consideration.

Significant precautions are taken by the Defence Forces Medical Officers in assessing the medical suitability of members of our Defence Forces to take any of the anti-malarial medications. It is the policy of the Defence Forces that personnel are individually screened for fitness for service overseas and medical suitability.

I am advised by the military authorities that the following table reflects the number of Lariam (Mefloquine), Doxycycline and Malarone tablets issued to either officers or enlisted personnel in the Defence Forces since 2012.

Number of tablets issued to either officers or enlisted personnel in the Defence Forces since 2012:

Drug

Dublin

DFTC

Athlone

Cork

TOTAL

Lariam

2145

1897

736

894

5672

Doxycycline 100mg*

5096

7143

2296

3692

18227

Malarone

or equiv

1480

2364

332

560

4736

The Deputy should note that both Malarone and Doxycycline require a daily dosage while Lariam requires a weekly dosage.

*In addition, the Deputy should note that I have been advised that Doxycycline medication is used for a variety of ailments, and is not solely used as an anti malarial.

Question No. 977 answered with Question No. 975.
Question No. 978 answered with Question No. 976.

Defence Forces Medicinal Products

Ceisteanna (979)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

979. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if the Representative Association of Commissioned Officers, RACO, had complained on behalf of its members to military authorities regarding serious side effects of the anti-malaria mefloquine drug Lariam; if his Department was aware of the issues they raised as far back as 2005; and if RACO raised concerns with the military authorities or directly with previous Ministers and if so when. [27340/16]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised that at present there are no concerns or issues from the Representative Association of Commissioned Officers (RACO) to the Military Authorities with respect to the use of Lariam. I am also advised that back in 2005 the use of Lariam was discussed as part of a general briefing in the wider context of medical provisions for overseas deployments, specifically the Liberia theatre of deployment. Such enquiries and debriefs are routine in nature and are not considered to be complaints.

Questions Nos. 980 to 985, inclusive, answered with Question No. 975.
Barr
Roinn