Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 4 Apr 2017

Written Answers Nos. 185-195

Fuel Laundering

Ceisteanna (185)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

185. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his plans to increase enforcement and sanctions for fuel laundering in view of the programme for Government commitment and the estimates in the British-Irish Parliamentary Assembly report on cross-Border crime of the loss to the Exchequer by fuel fraud to be in the range of €140 million to €260 million per year; if he has met his Northern Irish counterpart on this issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16357/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

It is inherently difficult to estimate with confidence the extent of any illegal activity and it is not possible, therefore, to put a figure on the cost to the Exchequer of fuel laundering. Nevertheless, the serious threat that criminal activity of this kind poses to legitimate and compliant businesses, consumers and the Exchequer is recognised, and action against it has accordingly been a priority for Revenue over recent years.

Revenue has implemented a comprehensive strategy to tackle the illegal fuel trade, including the introduction of stringent new supply chain controls underpinning a rigorous programme of enforcement action and supported by a range of new legislative measures that I brought forward in Finance Acts. In addition, Revenue and HM Revenue and Customs in the United Kingdom undertook a joint initiative to find a new fiscal marker for use in marked fuels, which was introduced in Ireland and the United Kingdom from the beginning of April 2015.

I understand that the industry view is that the measures implemented to date have been successful in curtailing fuel laundering in Ireland.  I am also advised that Revenue conducted a National Random Sampling Programme in January 2016, with a view to obtaining an updated picture of the extent of the fuel laundering problem. The programme involved selecting a random sample comprising nearly one in every ten of the 2,500 holders of Auto Fuel Trader Licences (any trader that produces, sells, deals in, or keeps for sale or delivery road diesel is legally obliged to hold such a licence). Road diesel samples were taken from all traders in the programme and tested for the presence of the new marker.  No evidence of the new fiscal marker was found in any of the samples tested.  The random sampling programme was repeated in January 2017 and again, no evidence of the fiscal marker was found. This provides very persuasive evidence that the strategy undertaken in recent years has been successful in addressing the laundering problem.

Revenue works closely with An Garda Síochána in acting against fuel fraud, and the relevant authorities in the State also work closely with their counterparts in Northern Ireland, through cross-border enforcement groups, to target the organised crime groups that are responsible for a large proportion of this criminal activity.  This work is being supported and facilitated by the setting up in 2016, in the framework of "A Fresh Start: the Stormont Agreement and Implementation Plan", of a Joint Agency Task Force, which includes Revenue as well as An Garda Síochána and their Northern Ireland counterparts.  Revenue also works in close cooperation with the relevant authorities in other jurisdictions, the European Anti-Fraud Office and other international bodies and agencies in the ongoing programmes of action at international level to combat the illicit fuel trade. Since 2014 there has been just one fuel laundry detection (in December 2016 in the Castleblayney area) and the level of detections of laundered fuel has decreased considerably.  The most recent detection of laundered fuel occurred during March this year at a premises in Arklow where Revenue officers seized approximately 15,000 litres of laundered fuel and an oil tanker used to transport the illicit fuel. The new marker was a significant contributor to the detection and seizure.

The penalties for offences relating to fuel fraud are laid down in section 119 of the Finance Act 2001 and section 102 of the Finance Act 1999. On conviction following summary prosecution under these provisions, a court may impose a fine of €5,000, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 12 months, or both. Where a person is convicted for an indictable offence, the court may impose a term of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, or a fine not exceeding €126,970, or both. In addition, for an indictable offence under section 119 of the Finance Act 2001, if the value of the fuel concerned in the fraud exceeds €250,000, including duty and taxes, the court may impose a penalty of three times the value of the fuel, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, or both. The current levels of fines were introduced by the Finance Act 2010 and represented significant increases over the previous amounts: for example, the fine on conviction for an indictable offence was increased from €12,695 to an amount not exceeding €126,970.

The Courts decide on the amount of the fine to be imposed in any particular case and, in practice, do not apply fines up to the existing limits. There are no proposals at present to increase the level of fines available to the courts. However, the position is kept under review taking account, among other considerations, of the practical experience of the fines imposed under the current provisions.

I am satisfied that Revenue's work against fuel laundering has achieved a considerable level of success, and I am assured that action against fuel fraud will continue to be a high priority.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (186)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

186. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance when a new tax on sugar drinks will be introduced; the estimated annual yield from such a tax; the rate at which the new tax should be set and the types of drinks included within its scope; the preparation currently being undertaken in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16358/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

It is my intention to introduce a tax on sugar-sweetened drinks in April 2018, to coincide with the introduction of a similar tax in the UK at that time.

The 2016 Tax Strategy papers estimated potential yields from a tax on sugar sweetened drinks based on a total soft drink sales in Ireland of 685.4 million litres per annum.  The TSG papers estimated that the tax would apply to 60% of these sales.  My Department has been informed by the soft drinks industry that due to the continual reformulation of products by that industry the total taxable soft drink products in now closer to 50%.  Based on this information the estimated yields are set out as follows.

Rate per hl

€2.46

€4.93

€7.39

€9.85

€12.32

€24.64

€36.96

€49.27

Increase 330ml can

1c

2c

3c

4c

5c

10c

15c

20c

Yield

€8.4m

€16.9m

€25.3m

€33.7m

€42.2m

€84.4m

€126.6m

€168.7m

It is important to note that the proposed introduction date of the tax on sugar sweetened drinks is April 2018 and the soft drinks industry continue to reformulate their products, reducing sugar content, in order to limit their exposure to the tax.  This indicates that the policy is already having a positive impact prior to its introduction, however, this means that the resulting tax yield will likely be less than estimated.  The UK recently revised down their estimated yield from £520m to £380m on the basis of industry reformulation.

I have not yet finalised the structure, scope or rate of the tax, so estimates are preliminary and subject to change.  Officials from my Department are engaged in ongoing communication with the soft drinks industry to ensure the tax, when introduced, is effective and implemented in an administratively straightforward manner.  It is expected that the underpinning legislation will be introduced in this year's Finance Act.

Credit Availability

Ceisteanna (187)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

187. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance if he has reviewed the most recent quarterly bank watch study from ISME on the ability of small and medium firms to receive loan approval and access to credit; his views on the refusal rate of 35% for requests for credit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16359/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy may be aware, the most recent ISME Bank Watch Survey for Quarter 1 2017 noted that 23% of companies who applied for funding in the three months covering December 2016 to February 2017 were refused credit by their banks.  The figure the Deputy is referring to was reported in the survey results for Quarter 2 2016.

The Deputy will also be aware that my Department conducts a biannual SME Credit Demand Survey. This survey series, currently being conducted by Behaviour & Attitudes, is the most comprehensive survey of SME credit demand in Ireland, covering over 1,500 respondents and involving over 6,000 direct telephone calls to SMEs. SMEs of all sizes trading in all sectors, excluding property development and speculative activities, and in all regions are included.

I would draw the Deputy's attention to the most recently published Department of Finance SME Credit Demand Survey covering the period April to September 2016 which can be found at http://www.finance.gov.ie/what-we-do/banking-financial-services/sme-credit-lending.  This latest survey indicates that the majority of credit requests continue to be approved fully with 84% of credit applications (excluding 'still pending') approved or partially approved.  The current rate of decline stands at 15% of all applications.

The Central Bank of Ireland's most recent SME Market Report for the second half of 2016 also shows that rejection rates, for credit applications by SMEs, loan/overdraft rejection rates are in line with euro area averages.  This report can be found here: http://www.centralbank.ie/publications/Documents/SME%20Market%20Report%202016H2.pdf

The Government remains committed to the SME sector.  I can assure the Deputy that my Department, working with other relevant Departments and Agencies such as the Credit Review Office, will continue to advance policies to support and monitor the availability of both bank and non-bank credit so as to ensure that viable Irish SMEs have sufficient access to finance.

Corporation Tax Regime

Ceisteanna (188)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

188. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance when the European Commission will make a final report on the tax affairs of a company (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16360/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The European Commission published the Final Decision in the Apple State aid case in December 2016.  This was sent to Ireland at the end of August 2016.  Ireland does not accept the Commission's analysis, which is why we have lodged an application with the General Court of the European Union to annul the whole Decision.  It will likely be several years before the matter is ultimately settled by the European Courts.

Banking Sector Regulation

Ceisteanna (189)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

189. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the discussions his Department has had with the Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs regarding the establishment of a local public bank network, as committed to in the programme for Government; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16361/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Programme for Government commits the Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs to thoroughly investigate the German Sparkassen model for the development of local public banks that operate within well-defined regions. It also calls for the investigation of a new model of community banking that could provide a suite of banking services through the Post Office Network, such as the Kiwibank model in New Zealand, where the Post Office-owned bank provides a comprehensive suite of financial services, from personal loans and bank accounts to credit cards, business banking, and insurance.

The Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs have undertaken a period of consultation on this matter. The consultation closed on 29 March. 

The Department of Finance has been in close contact with the Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs on this matter both before and during the consultation period, and has attended a number of the consultation meetings, when requested to do so by the lead Department.

The Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, assisted by the Department of Finance, will be producing a report for both the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs and the Minister for Finance setting out their conclusions on the investigation into Local Public Banks. This report is expected to be completed by the end of May 2017.

European Investment Bank Loans

Ceisteanna (190)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

190. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the discussions his Department has had with the European Investment Bank, EIB, and other Government Departments to establish an off balance sheet special purpose vehicle to draw down funding from the EIB to facilitate large scale mixed social and private residential development; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16362/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department in conjunction with a number of other Departments as well as ISIF and the NTMA, is examining the feasibility of establishing, in conjunction with the private sector, a Housing Investment Fund, in a way that is both off-balance sheet and is commercially viable. This vehicle should be capable of funding the delivery of substantial new mixed-tenure residential developments, comprising social and private housing.

Whilst a major objective of any such funding vehicle is to leverage additionality in terms of social housing supply, it is envisaged that a substantial portion of the overall supply of new units may need to be for private housing to meet the commerciality test and to satisfy the requirements of an off-balance sheet investment model.   

Although there have been a number of recent proposals in this space from private sector residential investors and developers, none have proven to be either commercial or likely to pass the requirements for an off-balance sheet model. 

Engagement with a wide array of key stakeholders in both the public and private sector is ongoing and involves the input of relevant Government Departments, the CSO and others. There is ongoing engagement, also, with the European authorities, including Eurostat, and the European Commission.

Initial discussions with the EIB have taken place, and these have explored possible EIB participation in funding the housing model. These discussions follow recent interaction between this Department and ISIF with the EIB regarding EIB support for housing projects in other Member States. Initial discussions and soundings indicate that the EIB is interested in supporting a housing model. Attention is now focused on developing a model which meets the off-balance sheet requirements, and one in which the EIB might participate.

On the occasion of the formal launch of the EIB Group office in Ireland on 9 December 2016, I chaired the first meeting of the EIB-Ireland Financing Group, comprising relevant Government Ministers, heads of agencies and EIB senior management. One of the purposes of the Group is to examine opportunities for using EIB financing and technical assistance to address housing, transport and other infrastructure investment requirements. The Group is supported by three sub-groups of officials and agency representatives, one of which is tasked with addressing issues in the area of Social Infrastructure, including housing.  My officials are continuing to engage with the work of the sub-groups.

Credit Union Regulation

Ceisteanna (191)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

191. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the progress his Department has made in respect of the EUROSTAT investigation into the establishment by the Government of a bond to finance social housing investment suitable for credit unions to invest their surplus funds in; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16363/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As previously referred to in Parliamentary Question number 208 of 28 February 2017, the Government has been exploring potential mechanisms that would facilitate investment in social housing, including the off-balance sheet potential of private institutional investment. Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) led engagement on the Housing Fund mentioned in Rebuilding Ireland, with a number of actors including both the Central Statistics Office (CSO) and Eurostat, is currently ongoing.  

The agreed Programme for a Partnership Government recognises the potential role that credit unions can play in housing finance.  Officials from both my Department and the Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government have met with credit union representative bodies on a number of occasions to examine how credit unions can assist in the area of social housing.  Officials from both Departments have also met with the Central Bank.  The Central Bank is currently engaging with the sector on proposals for credit unions to provide funding for social housing and has stated that while it does not comment on specific proposals, such investments could be facilitated by future regulations made by the Central Bank, where appropriate.

The Central Bank has also stated that it is willing to consider the type of regulations that would be required to facilitate such proposals. Ultimately, any funding mechanisms will have to be put in place in the first instance by the credit unions themselves, with the support of their members, and with agreement of the Central Bank.

Question No. 192 answered with Question No. 168.

Brexit Issues

Ceisteanna (193)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

193. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the steps the Revenue Commissioners have taken to identify possible customs posts on the Border; the locations that have been examined for these posts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16365/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Government's headline priorities in response to Brexit are well known: minimising the impact on trade and the economy; protecting the Northern Ireland Peace Process; maintaining the Common Travel Area; and influencing the future of the European Union. It is quite clear that there are major challenges ahead for the EU, the UK and for Ireland.

The position in relation to the border with Northern Ireland in the context of Brexit is very clear and has been articulated by the Taoiseach on several occasions and again by Government on the triggering of Article 50.  Continued freedom of movement, absence of a hard border, and minimal impact on business and trade are key objectives.  The Government is clear that any manifestation of a hard border would have very negative consequences.  A key priority is to ensure the continued free flow of trade on the island and the need to avoid a hard border. Clearly in this regard the closer the trading relationship between the UK and EU the better.

My Department has been preparing for the impact of Brexit since well before the referendum on 23 June 2016, with this work now intensified. The primary areas for the Department of Finance relate to the economic and financial sector implications stemming from Brexit. This work is being undertaken within the whole-of-Government framework established by the Department of the Taoiseach.  A consolidated paper providing more detail about Ireland's priorities and approach to the negotiations ahead is due to be published in advance of the European Council meeting on 29 April.

The precise arrangements that will apply after Brexit will depend on the outcome of negotiations between the EU and UK that will now take place following formal notification under Article 50 on Wednesday last, 29 March.

Departmental Reports

Ceisteanna (194)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

194. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance when the results of the consultation process into the impact of bogus self-employment arrangements will be published; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16366/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The consultation process on "the use of intermediary-type employment structures and self-employment arrangements and their impact on tax and PRSI" invited submissions from interested parties on possible measures to address the loss to the Exchequer that may arise under two sets of arrangements:

- where an individual, who would otherwise be an employee, establishes a company to provide his or her services, and

- where an individual, who is dependent on, and under the control of, a single employer in the same  manner as an employee, is classified as a self-employed individual.

As soon as the report on this process reaches me, and my colleague the Minister for Social Protection, we will consider its contents and then I expect we will publish it.

Therefore I am not yet in a position to give the Deputy an exact date for publication but I am informed that the drafting and editing process, being undertaken by a working group of officials, is now in the final stages.

Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Negotiations

Ceisteanna (195)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

195. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the steps he has taken in the interests of protecting Ireland's tax sovereignty in view of the recent developments in respect of the common consolidated tax base; the discussions he has had with his ECOFIN colleagues in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16367/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The European Commission's proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) was published in October 2016 and discussed at the November 2016 ECOFIN meeting.  During the discussion, which was held in public session, a number of my fellow Ministers gave some initial impressions of the proposal.

At the December 2016 ECOFIN, Council Conclusions were approved in respect of the Commission's wider package which includes the CCCTB proposal but there was no specific discussion of the proposals at that meeting.  I expect that there will be a further discussion on this proposal at June 2017 ECOFIN when the Maltese Presidency reports on the tax work carried out during the first half of the year. 

The CCCTB is a complex and detailed proposal and Member States need to analyse fully  its potential impact on national tax systems.  Member States have begun to discuss and debate the various aspects of the proposal in the relevant tax working parties.  Ireland is engaging constructively in these discussions while continuing to assess whether it is in line with our long-term interests.  

Member States maintain full sovereignty on tax matters and unanimity is required before any proposal can be agreed.

Barr
Roinn