Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 20 Jun 2017

Written Answers Nos 1981-1999

Citizen Information Services

Ceisteanna (1981, 1982)

Mick Barry

Ceist:

1981. Deputy Mick Barry asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason for the claim made in her amendment to the Fianna Fáil Private Members' motion on the independence of local citizens' information services that the Citizens Information Board made a decision to restructure the local citizens information services at a meeting on 17 February 2017 when this decision is not recorded in the minutes of this Citizens Information Board meeting which are available online; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26638/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Mick Barry

Ceist:

1982. Deputy Mick Barry asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason for the discrepancy of accounts between herself and the chief executive of the Citizens Information Board as to when a decision was made to restructure the governance of locally formerly independently run citizens information centres (details supplied). [26639/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1981 and 1982 together.

The Citizens Information Board (CIB) is the statutory body responsible for providing information, advice (including money and budgeting advice service) and advocacy services on a wide range of public and social services. CIB delivers on this remit through a network of delivery partners, which includes 51 local Money Advice and Budgeting Services (MABS) and 42 local Citizens Information Services (CIS). In 2017, CIB is set to receive State funding of €54 million, of which €15 million is allocated to CIS services, and €24 million is allocated to the network of MABS services.

Extensive consultation on the proposed restructuring of governance arrangements has taken place over a number of years since CIB commissioned a feasibility study to identify options for organisational integration of its delivery partners. The work, carried out by Pathfinder, approached the study with a firm focus on detailed consultations with all stakeholders including local services, representative bodies, local boards, staff and in the case of CIS’s, volunteers.

In September 2014, Pathfinder presented four options to the Board of CIB. Feedback was received from the delivery partner services and channelled through the National Association of Citizens Information Services, the representative body for Citizens Information Services; the National Management Forum; and National Executive Committee, the representative bodies for management and staff of the MABS companies. In October 2014, the Board of CIB heard submissions from all three representative bodies.

The decision that change was needed in the structure of delivery partner companies was confirmed by the Board of CIB at its November 2014 meeting. This is recorded in the Register of Board decisions. The Board also agreed that a Design Group be tasked with presenting options on new organisational models for its consideration. The work of the Design Group took place in 2015 and recommended restructuring on a regional model basis. In October 2016, having reviewed the output of the Design Group, the Board decided to proceed with restructuring on a regional model basis. This is also recorded in the Register of Board decisions. The Board established a Restructuring Sub Committee to progress this work and report back to the Board of CIB in January 2017.

On 15th February 2017, following detailed discussion on the Report of the Restructuring Sub-Committee, the Board of CIB decided to adopt the Report and proceed with its implementation. The new governance model referred to in the Report comprises of eight regions with eight MABS companies and eight CIS companies. The adoption of the Report, containing the eight region model recommendation, is noted in the minutes and recorded in the Register of Board decisions.

The decision taken by the statutory Board of CIB comes after a lengthy period of consultation and detailed consideration of the options and views put forward at all stages. I am confident that the membership of the Board of CIB, which comprises experienced and competent individuals, representative of a broad spectrum of interests and which includes representatives of the Citizens Information Service and Money Advice and Budgeting Service, has made this important decision in the best interests of the citizens of Ireland, whom the Board serves.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Citizen Information Services

Ceisteanna (1983)

Mick Barry

Ceist:

1983. Deputy Mick Barry asked the Minister for Social Protection the provision in the Comhairle Act 2000 or the Citizens Information Act 2007 which empowers the board of the Citizens Information Board to unilaterally alter the local board structure of independently run citizens information centres; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26640/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Citizens Information Board (CIB) is the statutory body responsible for providing information, advice (including money and budgeting advice service) and advocacy services on a wide range of public and social services. CIB delivers on this remit through a network of delivery partners which includes 51 local Money Advice and Budgeting Services (MABS) and 42 local Citizens Information Services (CIS). In 2017, CIB is set to receive State funding of €54 million, of which €15 million is allocated to CIS services, and €24 million is allocated to the network of MABS services.

The Board of CIB, as a statutory body, has the right to make decisions on its day to day operational activities as it sees fit. The powers and functions of the Board are set out in Sections 6 and 7 of the Comhairle Act, 2000 and as amended by section 4 of the Citizens Information Act 2007.

Section 8 of the Comhairle Act, 2000, requires that the Board of CIB submits its three year Strategic Plan to the Minister for Social Protection and once approved, the Plan is laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas. Successive CIB Strategic Plans have been working towards the goal of joined up citizen centred services and the need to change structures and processes to enable more efficient use of resources, which are entirely publically funded. The current Strategic Plan 2015- 2018 is designed to ensure CIB and its delivery partner services meet the needs of citizens over the three year period in the most organisationally and economically effective way.

The Plan details six priority areas, one of which is to revise the structures of CISs and MABS to better serve the citizen by improving management structures and governance, management of resources and the delivery of consistent high quality services; this includes aligning CIB structures accordingly to maximise effective use of resources.

In January 2016, CIB’s Strategic Plan 2015-2018 was approved by the Minister and noted by Government. The decision taken by the Board of CIB on the 15th February 2017 to move from a governance structure of 93 individual local companies to a new sixteen company regional board model is entirely in keeping with CIB’s Strategic Plan, as approved by the Minister, noted by Government, and laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Rent Supplement Scheme Data

Ceisteanna (1984, 1985, 2082, 2104, 2133)

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

1984. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of households in each county in receipt of rent supplement in tabular form. [26648/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

1985. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of households in each county that have had their rent supplement increased above the prescribed rent limit, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26649/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

John Brady

Ceist:

2082. Deputy John Brady asked the Minister for Social Protection the full-year estimated cost of increasing rent supplement and HAP limits in line with market rents. [28518/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

2104. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated full-year cost of increasing rent supplement limits nationwide by 10%; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28869/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

2133. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated cost of increasing rent supplement limits and HAP limits to county market rents; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28987/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1984, 1985, 2082, 2104 and 2133 together.

Rent supplement plays a vital role in housing families and individuals, with the scheme supporting approximately 42,300 recipients for which the Government has provided €253 million in 2017.

Rent supplement is subject to a statutory limit on the amount of rent that an applicant may incur. The Department carried out a review of the rent limits in line with the commitments contained in the Programme for a Partnership Government. Increased limits for rent supplement were introduced in all areas of the country with effect from 1 July 2016 at a cost of up to €12 million in 2016. The rent limit review conducted represents a realignment of the maximum rent limits with agreed rents generally benchmarked against the 35th percentile of those rents registered with the Residential Tenancies Board.

Initial analysis shows that increasing rent limits by 10%, for 42,300 rent supplement recipients, would result in a full year cost of approximately €32 million. The use of market rents, as published by the residential tenancies board for Q1 2017, would result in full year additional costs of approximately €45 million. Any proposed increase in maximum rent limits must consider the implications for the wider residential market, in particular any distortion which may reduce availability and alternatives for low income working families renting. Previous analysis has shown that increasing rent limits would have a very limited impact in the provision of additional units for the scheme given the extremely low levels of supply of available rentable housing stock being experienced throughout the State. Costs related to housing assistance payment scheme are a matter for my colleague the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government.

In recognition of the on-going rental market difficulties, my Department implements a targeted case-by-case policy approach that allows for flexibility where landlords seek rents in excess of the rent limits. Since the introduction of this flexible approach during 2014, almost 11,800 persons at imminent risk of homelessness have been supported through increased rent supplement payments. To date in 2017, in excess of 1,000 recipients have been supported with increased rent payments. A county breakdown of the payments made in 2017 and overall recipient numbers is provided in the following tabular statement.

As the Deputies will be aware, the strategic policy direction of the Department is to return rent supplement to its original purpose of being a short-term income support with the introduction of the Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) scheme, now available nationwide.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputies.

Tabular Statement: County analysis of rent supplement recipients & increased payments awarded in 2017

County

No. of Rent Supplement Recipients

Total No. of increased payments by County in 2017

CARLOW

504

19

CAVAN

344

12

CLARE

287

0

CORK

4,287

8

DONEGAL

241

0

DUBLIN

19,004

652

GALWAY

2,145

13

KERRY

1,374

73

KILDARE

2,299

54

KILKENNY

261

2

LAOIS

769

0

LEITRIM

223

6

LIMERICK

872

9

LONGFORD

339

7

LOUTH

703

13

MAYO

871

0

MEATH

779

34

MONAGHAN

162

0

OFFALY

442

5

ROSCOMMON

481

14

SLIGO

216

0

TIPPERARY

649

23

WATERFORD

390

2

WESTMEATH

1,065

35

WEXFORD

1,745

1

WICKLOW

1,819

60

GRAND TOTAL

42,271

1,042

Family Income Supplement Data

Ceisteanna (1986)

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

1986. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of households in each county in receipt of family income supplement, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26650/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

On 24 May last there were 57,090 people in receipt of a family income supplement, a breakdown of this number by county is detailed in the following tabular statement.

Tabular statement

Number of Family Income Supplement recipients at 24 May 2017 by county.

County

Recipients

CARLOW

954

CAVAN

1,268

CLARE

1,288

CORK

6,025

DONEGAL

2,708

DUBLIN

13,462

GALWAY

2,714

KERRY

1,720

KILDARE

2,356

KILKENNY

979

LAOIS

1,059

LEITRIM

365

LIMERICK

2,467

LONGFORD

771

LOUTH

2,185

MAYO

1,590

MEATH

2,293

MONAGHAN

1,115

OFFALY

1,085

ROSCOMMON

703

SLIGO

757

TIPPERARY

2,168

WATERFORD

1,824

WESTMEATH

1,247

WEXFORD

2,393

WICKLOW

1,478

OTHERS

116

Total

57,090

Poverty Data

Ceisteanna (1987)

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

1987. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the rates of poverty, consistent poverty and at risk of poverty and deprivation in each region, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26652/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department recently published the Social Inclusion Monitor 2015 providing an update on the social situation in Ireland, including progress towards the national social target for poverty reduction. The Monitor reported continued improvements in poverty, income inequality and living conditions in 2015. The final section discusses the spatial distribution of consistent poverty – a measure that combines relatively low income and deprivation. The rate nationally in 2015 was 8.7%. This compares to the low of 6% in the Mid-East region and high of 11.9% in the Border region. Five of the eight regions had consistent poverty rates below the national average – see Table 1. The remaining regions, the Border, South-East and South-West, had levels above this. It should be noted when considering these figures that the SILC survey, on which they are based, is designed to provide estimates on income and living conditions at the state level. While estimates can be calculated at the regional level, they are more volatile due to the inevitably smaller sample sizes.

Looking now at the two supporting indicators, the at-risk-of-poverty rate was lowest in the Dublin region at 12.7% and highest in the Border region at 22.9%. This compares to a national average of 16.9%. Four of the eight regions had at-risk-of-poverty rates above the national average (i.e. the Border, West, South-East and South-West). In 2015, the basic deprivation rate was lowest in the Mid-West region at 16.2% and highest in South-West region at 32.8%. The comparative national rate was 25.5%. Four of the eight regions had deprivation rates above the national average (i.e. the Border, Midlands, South-East and South-West).

Given the continuing economic recovery throughout 2015 and measures introduced in the Budgets since 2015, it is reasonable to expect future poverty figures to show improvement. I will continue to work with my Government colleagues to ensure that the economic recovery is experienced in all regions and by all families, households and individuals.

The Government’s strategy for addressing poverty and social exclusion is set out in the updated National Action Plan for Social Inclusion, which reflects the multi-dimensional nature of poverty. The Plan identifies a wide range of targeted actions and interventions to achieve the overall objective of reducing consistent poverty. The Department will review the Plan this year, as it reaches the end of its current term, with a view to developing an updated plan for future periods. The Department will also review the national social target for poverty reduction. This review will be undertaken in consultation with relevant stakeholders.

Table 1: CSO 2015 SILC poverty rates by statistical indicator and region

2015

Border

Midlands

West

Dublin

Mid-East

Mid-West

South-East

South-West

Population

At-risk-of-poverty rate (%)

22.9%

16.8%

21.2%

12.7%

14.8%

14.2%

20.3%

18.8%

16.9%

Deprivation rate (%)

30.2%

28.7%

23.2%

22.7%

25.8%

16.2%

26.1%

32.8%

25.5%

Consistent poverty rate (%)

11.9%

8.4%

8.5%

7.4%

6.0%

6.8%

10.1%

11.4%

8.7%

Carer's Allowance Applications

Ceisteanna (1988)

Michael Healy-Rae

Ceist:

1988. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Social Protection the status of a carer's allowance for a person (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26683/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I confirm that my Department received an application for carer’s allowance from the person concerned on 12 April 2017.

Additional information in relation to the person’s application has been requested by a deciding officer on 6 June 2017. Once the information is received the application will be processed without delay and the person concerned will be notified directly of the outcome.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Domiciliary Care Allowance Applications

Ceisteanna (1989)

Pat Breen

Ceist:

1989. Deputy Pat Breen asked the Minister for Social Protection when a decision will issue on a domiciliary care allowance to a person (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26713/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

An application for Domiciliary Care Allowance (DCA) was received from this lady on the 22nd of February 2017. The application will be considered by a Deciding Officer and the decision notified as soon as possible. Applications are processed in date of receipt order. Due to the increasing volume of applications being received, it can currently take approximately 18 weeks to process an application for DCA.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Pension Provisions

Ceisteanna (1990)

Jack Chambers

Ceist:

1990. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Social Protection the position regarding workers having to retire at 65 years of age; if she will address the issue of these workers having to claim jobseeker's payments before they can receive a pension at 66 years of age; her plans to address this problem; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26737/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

There is no statutory retirement age in the State, and the age at which employees retire is a matter for the contract of employment between them and their employers.

Where a person exits the workforce before reaching State pension age they may apply for either the jobseeker’s benefit or jobseeker’s allowance schemes. Jobseeker’s payments are paid to eligible jobseekers aged 18 to 66 years and all recipients of a jobseeker’s payment are subject to the rules of the scheme.

People in receipt of a jobseeker's payment must engage with my Department's activation measures and can face sanctions if they fail to do so. However, from January 2014 these criteria were eased for people aged 62 and over. They are still able to voluntarily avail of an array of supports, which is available from my Department if they wish to return to work, training or education. Furthermore the majority of these individuals will have to register with their local office only once a year and their payments will be paid directly into their bank accounts.

Once a person has exhausted their entitlement to jobseeker’s benefit they may be eligible for jobseeker’s allowance, subject to the means test and other qualifying conditions. However, someone claiming jobseeker’s benefit from a date after their 65th birthday continues to be eligible for that payment until reaching State pension age.

These provisions have enabled these individuals to ease their transition into one of the jobseeker’s schemes until they become eligible for a State pension on their 66th birthday.

Disability Allowance Applications

Ceisteanna (1991)

Robert Troy

Ceist:

1991. Deputy Robert Troy asked the Minister for Social Protection if an application for a disability allowance by a person (details supplied) can be expedited; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26764/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I can confirm that my Department received an application for disability allowance from this lady on 3 April 2017.

On 1 June 2017 the person concerned was requested to supply supporting documentation required by the deciding officer in order to make a decision on her eligibility. On receipt of this information a decision will be made and the person concerned will be notified of the outcome.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Disability Allowance Data

Ceisteanna (1992, 2006, 2008)

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

1992. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the full-year cost of increasing all non-working age payments under the remit of his Department by €3 to €10 respectively by payment, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26775/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

2006. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the full-year cost of increasing the qualified child increase payment in increments (details supplied) in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27067/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

2008. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated full year cost of giving an additional €5, €10, €15 and €20 to all those in receipt of disability allowance, blind pension, invalidity pension and carer's allowance, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [27070/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1992, 2006 and 2008 together.

The costings sought by the Deputy are detailed in the following series of tables.

Table 1: Cost of increasing all non-working age payments by varying amounts

Increase all non-working age weekly payments by:

Full Year Cost

€m

€3.00

88.80

€4.00

118.40

€5.00

148.10

€6.00

177.70

€7.00

207.50

€8.00

236.70

€9.00

266.50

€10.00

296.10

For the purpose of the costings in Table 1, it was presumed that the Deputy was referring to pension age payments, namely: State Pension Contributory, State Pension Non Contributory, Widow/er's or Surviving Civil Partner's (Con) Pension (for those aged 66 and over), Deserted Wife's Benefit (for those aged 66 and over), Death Benefit Pension (for those aged 66 and over) and Carer’s Allowance (for those aged 66 and over).

Table 2: Cost of increasing the Qualified Child Increase to varying amounts

Increase the weekly rate of the

Qualified Child Increase payment from €29.80 to:

Full Year Cost

€m

€31.00

23.80

€32.00

43.60

€33.00

63.50

€34.00

83.30

€35.00

103.10

€36.00

123.00

€37.00

142.80

€38.00

162.60

€39.00

182.50

€40.00

202.30

Table 3: Cost of increasing Disability Allowance, Carer’s Allowance, Blind Pension and Invalidity Pension by varying amounts

Scheme

Full year cost of a €5 increase

€m

Full year cost of a €10 increase

€m

Full year cost of a €15 increase

€m

Full year cost of a €20 increase

€m

Disability Allowance

35.1

70.1

105.2

140.2

Blind Pension

0.35

0.7

1.05

1.4

Invalidity Pension

16.1

32.1

48.2

64.2

Carer’s Allowance

13.5

27.0

40.5

54.0

It should be noted that the costings listed above in Tables 1 & 3 include proportionate increases for qualified adults and for those on reduced rates of payment, where relevant. It should also be noted that these costings are subject to change over the coming months in the context of emerging trends and associated revision of the estimated numbers of recipients for 2018.

Family Income Supplement Eligibility

Ceisteanna (1993)

Declan Breathnach

Ceist:

1993. Deputy Declan Breathnach asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will use an annual P60 and annual earnings to assess if a person qualifies for family income supplement rather than examining a recent payslip; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that persons are being unfairly assessed using this method such as persons that avail of term time working year and work nine months rather than 12 months; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26779/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

In order to calculate assessable income for the purposes of Family Income Supplement (FIS), it is important to use the most appropriate method of calculation based on a customer’s employment circumstances in line with the relevant legislation which is contained in S.I. 142 of 2007, Article 173.

In the case of a new FIS application, a Deciding Officer (DO) would usually base their calculation on the average weekly gross earnings up to the date of application.

In the case of a FIS renewal application, a DO would usually base their calculation on the average weekly gross earnings in the previous tax year using a P.60.

However, S.I. 142 of 2007, Article (2) allows a DO to consider other periods if they deem it more appropriate for estimating assessable family income.

Maternity Benefit Administration

Ceisteanna (1994)

Mary Butler

Ceist:

1994. Deputy Mary Butler asked the Minister for Social Protection the amount of time it is taking to process maternity benefits; the amount of time persons are waiting for their benefit to be paid; if her attention has been drawn to the stress caused, especially for persons with no other income; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26822/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Department continues to make good progress on processing the backlog of maternity claims and I can report that all claims relating to people who have already commenced their maternity leave have now been processed. The Department is currently processing claims where the expectant mother is commencing her maternity leave in the current week and the waiting time for these customers has been eliminated.

Claims are processed by reference to the ‘commencement of maternity leave date’ as this ensures that as many new mothers as possible have their claim awarded by the time they take their maternity leave. Once a decision is made and the claim has been awarded, and where the leave has already commenced, payment issues on the following Monday and this payment will also include any arrears due to the customer at that point.

I want to again take the opportunity to highlight that the Department also facilitates online applications for maternity benefit and an automated decision is made where the customer submits all necessary information and where the detail provided can be validated. I would ask the Deputy to encourage women who are planning maternity leave to use this channel, if possible, as it provides the most effective method of applying for maternity benefit.

I hope this clarifies the position for the Deputy.

Community Services Programme

Ceisteanna (1995)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

1995. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason Pobal has taken the decision to withdraw funding support via the community services programme which was previously provided to a company (details supplied) in County Donegal; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that members of the client company have expressed dissatisfaction with this decision and did not voluntarily withdraw from the scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26871/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The organisation referred to by the Deputy is a not-for-profit co-operative society working to promote tourism and arts and crafts in the Inishowen peninsula in county Donegal. The company operates from two offices based in Buncrana and Carndonagh, which open five days per week. The company manages the website www.visitinishowen.com, develops packages and marketing material, prints brochures, collates visitors data and works with tourist trade operators to promote and package Inishowen as a 'must see' holiday destination. The company receives Community Services Programme (CSP) funding of €117,645.50 per annum, which supports the employment of a manager and 4.5 staff delivering the service.

Following concerns raised regarding the company in early 2016, Pobal, on behalf of my Department, commissioned an independent review of its governance arrangements. The report, completed in December 2016, identified a number of serious governance issues and made 22 recommendations to address these. The company was issued with the report on 22nd December 2016 and was given a deadline of 30th April 2017 to make progress on the recommendations of the report.

Unfortunately, the company has failed to make sufficient progress in implementing the report’s recommendations and, in the circumstances, they were informed that CSP funding for the service could not continue through them beyond 30th June 2017. This decision was accepted by them at a meeting with members of their board on 9th May 2017.

I want to make clear to the Deputy that I do not wish to withdraw funding for the service being provided. However, in light of the governance issues identified, my Department cannot continue to fund the service through the company in question.

Officials from my Department and Pobal are now exploring other options as to how funding for the service can be maintained going forward. It is important to note that the funding will remain in the Inishowen region.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Question No. 1996 answered with Question No. 1978.

Disability Allowance Applications

Ceisteanna (1997)

Tony McLoughlin

Ceist:

1997. Deputy Tony McLoughlin asked the Minister for Social Protection when a decision will issue regarding an application for disability allowance by a person (details supplied) in County Sligo; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [26936/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This lady submitted an application for disability allowance on 22 August 2016.

The application, based upon the evidence submitted, was refused on medical grounds and the person in question was notified in writing of this decision on 1 June 2017 and of her rights of review and appeal. No appeal/review has been received to date.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

State Pension (Contributory) Appeals

Ceisteanna (1998)

Maurice Quinlivan

Ceist:

1998. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Minister for Social Protection the status of an appeal by a person (details supplied) regarding contributory pension payments. [26961/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The person concerned was awarded a reduced rate state pension (contributory) by a Deciding Officer of the Department on 28th February 2014. I am informed by the Social Welfare Appeals Office that the person concerned did not submit an appeal of this decision until 09th March 2017.

In the normal course, an appeal against the decision of a Deciding Officer must be made within 21 days of a decision being notified. Appeals received outside of this time limit may be accepted at the discretion of the Chief Appeals Officer. This limit is not rigidly enforced but in view of the length of time which has elapsed since the person concerned was notified of the decision and in the absence of any explanation for the failure to submit an appeal within the prescribed timeframe, I am advised by the Social Welfare Appeals Office that an appeal could not be accepted at this late stage.

The Social Welfare Appeals Office functions independently of the Minister for Social Protection and of the Department and is responsible for determining appeals against decisions in relation to social welfare entitlements.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Public Sector Pensions Data

Ceisteanna (1999)

Bríd Smith

Ceist:

1999. Deputy Bríd Smith asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 378 of 23 May 2017, if she will provide the figures for all pension contributions made by public sector workers in each body under the aegis of her Department, excluding those in the Civil Service, including the pension levy, in each of the years 2010 to 2016 and to date in 2017. [26978/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The statutory bodies operating under the aegis of my Department are the Citizens Information Board, the Pensions Authority, the Pensions Council, the Pensions Ombudsman and the Social Welfare Tribunal.

Neither the Pensions Council nor the Social Welfare Tribunal has employees. The requested information in relation to the pension contributions by public service staff of the Citizens Information Board, Pensions Authority and Pensions Ombudsman is set out in tabular form below.

The public service Pension-Related Deduction (PRD), which is not a pension contribution, is applied to the pay of pensionable public servants, under terms set out in the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act 2009, as amended. It is sometimes referred to as the “pensions levy”. The tables below also include the requested information in relation to the Pension-Related Deduction.

Citizens Information Board

YEAR

Employee Contributions to Pension Scheme (excludes Single Public Service Pension Scheme)

Employee Contributions to Single Public Service Scheme:

Amount of Public Service Pension- Related Deductions (PRD)

2010

€ 326,717.00

-

€ 289,290.00

2011

€ 306,469.00

-

€ 279,511.00

2012

€ 295,350.00

-

€ 266,188.00

2013

€ 273,500.00

-

€ 257,807.00

2014

€ 250,002.00

-

€ 231,839.00

2015

€ 231,600.00

-

€ 214,220.00

2016

€ 211,177.00

€ 3,063.00

€ 154,594.00

2017 YTD

€ 72,058.00

€ 4,687.00

€ 54,906.00

Pensions Authority

YEAR

Employee Contributions to Pension Scheme (excludes Single Public Service Pension Scheme)

Employee Contributions to Single Public Service Scheme

Amount of Public Service Pension-Related Deductions (PRD)

2010

€ 118,577.00

-

€ 146,126.00

2011

€ 125,390.00

-

€ 153,306.00

2012

€ 173,532.00

-

€ 184,779.00

2013

€ 133,831.00

€ 1,536.00

€ 178,187.00

2014

€ 134,546.00

€ 5,508.00

€ 169,895.00

2015

€ 115,915.00

€ 5,441.61

€ 144,401.00

2016

€ 97,039.55

€ 21,842.45

€ 125,556.00

2017 YTD

€ 36,080.63

€ 10,848.74

€ 47,511.07

Pensions Ombudsman

YEAR

Employee contributions to Pension Scheme (excludes Single Public Service Pension Scheme)

Employee Contributions to Single Public Service Scheme:

Amount of Public Service Pension- Related Deductions (PRD)

2010

€ 7,315.00

-

€ 11,120.00

2011

€ 7,302.00

-

€ 11,099.00

2012

€ 7,301.00

-

€ 11,099.00

2013

€ 6,909.00

-

€ 10,464.00

2014

€ 6,476.00

-

€ 9,641.00

2015

€ 5,334.00

-

€ 7,418.00

2016

€ 2,003.00

-

€ 2,375.00

2017 YTD

-

-

-

Barr
Roinn