Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 20 Jun 2017

Written Answers Nos. 750-778

Equal Opportunities Employment

Ceisteanna (750)

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

750. Deputy Fergus O'Dowd asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the policy regarding the employment of persons with disabilities in his Department and in each State and semi-State body under the aegis of his Department; if there is a responsibility to employ persons with disabilities to a quota of 3% of its workforce; if this quota has now been exceeded; if there has been an advertised competition in relation to this quota; if not, the reason therefor; the dates and details of such competitions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27141/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy may be aware, Part 5 of the Disability Act 2005 provides for a statutory report on the employment of people with disabilities in the public sector.  My colleague, the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, must submit an annual report to the National Disability Authority (NDA) giving details of the number of people with a disability employed in the Civil Service.

I can inform the Deputy that the proportion of staff with a disability employed in my Department, and those agencies under the aegis of my Department, exceeds the Government's 3% target for the employment of people with disabilities across the public sector and currently stands at 5.4%. My Department's commitment to the employment of people with disabilities is further underlined by its active participation in the Willing and Able Mentoring, a work experience programme for graduates with disabilities, under which we are currently seeking to facilitate 5 participants in 2017.

Appointment to civil service positions is generally by way of open competition conducted by the Public Appointments Service. Persons with disabilities are entitled to apply for all competitions subject to their meeting the eligibility requirements of the competition in question. My Department is fully committed to the employment of people with disabilities. Our policy is to ensure that people with disabilities are facilitated with access to employment opportunities and every necessary accommodation is made in this regard.

Garda Data

Ceisteanna (751, 752)

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

751. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of gardaí driving with chief's permission in the each of the years 2012 to 2016 and to date in 2017; the number of gardaí that completed the CPD1 and CPD2 driving courses, respectively, in each of the years 2012 to 2016 and to date in 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27171/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

752. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if different levels of insurance are required and in place for gardaí driving on chief's permission and those that have completed the CPD1 and CPD2 driving courses, respectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27172/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 751 and 752 together.

As the Deputy will appreciate, it is the Garda Commissioner who is responsible for carrying on and managing and controlling generally the administration and business of An Garda Síochána including by arranging for the training of the members and civilian staff of An Garda Síochána and I, as Minister, have no direct role in the matter.

I am informed by the Garda Commissioner that the State Claims Agency provides indemnity to all Designated State Authorities - which includes An Garda Síochána.This indemnity applies in respect of any claims for personal injury (including those to passengers, service users, the public and employees) and third party property damage associated with authorised use of Garda Vehicles on approved Garda business.

I have requested a report from the Garda authorities in relation to the other matters raised by the Deputy and I will write to the Deputy on receipt of same.

A referred reply was forwarded to the Deputy under Standing Order 42A.

Departmental Correspondence

Ceisteanna (753)

Niall Collins

Ceist:

753. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he has received correspondence (details supplied) regarding Limerick prison; his plans to investigate the matters raised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27187/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I wish to inform the Deputy that the correspondence referred to was received in my Department on 25 April 2017.

A preliminary assessment of the anonymous correspondence took place under my Department's Protected Disclosure Policy. This assessment determined that an element of the allegation contained in the correspondence required further review under the policy. This review is currently being undertaken.

A number of other matters referred to in the correspondence are being reviewed and investigated internally by the Irish Prison Service.

As the review and investigation are currently ongoing it would not be appropriate for me to comment further at this time.

Departmental Correspondence

Ceisteanna (754)

Jim O'Callaghan

Ceist:

754. Deputy Jim O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he has received correspondence (details supplied) regarding Limerick prison; his plans to investigate the matters raised; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27219/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I wish to inform the Deputy that the correspondence referred to was received in my Department on 25 April 2017.

A preliminary assessment of the anonymous correspondence took place under my Department's Protected Disclosure Policy. This assessment determined that an element of the allegation contained in the correspondence required further review under the policy. This review is currently being undertaken.

A number of other matters referred to in the correspondence are being reviewed and investigated internally by the Irish Prison Service.

As the review and investigation are currently ongoing it would not be appropriate for me to comment further at this time

Irish Sign Language

Ceisteanna (755)

Ruth Coppinger

Ceist:

755. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Justice and Equality his views on the recognition of Irish sign language as an official language; if the progression of the Recognition of Irish Sign Language for the Deaf Community Bill 2013 is a priority for the Government; if so, the expected timeframe for its enactment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27266/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I consider that it is appropriate and necessary that the needs of users of Irish Sign Language (ISL) in the State are met, particularly when questions of statutory entitlement or obligations are at issue. In this respect, as the Deputy will be aware publication of a new National Disability Inclusion Strategy was approved by Government on 30 May and it will be launched shortly. Issues in relation to the Deaf Community featured strongly in the consultation process that underpinned the development of the Strategy, and in my view the Strategy responds credibly to the concerns raised. I can confirm that the Strategy contains the following actions:

- The extension of the hours of the ISL remote interpretation service to evenings and weekends

- The resourcing of the Sign Language Interpreting Service (SLIS) to increase the number of trained sign language and deaf interpreters, to put a quality-assurance and registration scheme for interpreters in place and to provide on-going professional training and development.

- Support for legislation to ensure that all public bodies provide ISL users with free interpretation when accessing or availing of their statutory services.

I believe that this approach will make a real and measurable difference in the lives of ISL users. In relation to the PMB referred to, as the Deputy will be aware, the Bill is currently awaiting Committee Stage. As I indicated in my second stage speech on the Bill, it contains provisions that are disproportionate and excessively onerous and requires substantial amendments, and my officials are in ongoing discussion with the sponsors of the Bill in this regard.

Equal Opportunities Employment

Ceisteanna (756, 757)

Éamon Ó Cuív

Ceist:

756. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Justice and Equality his plans to publish new legislation on the rights of persons to work while awaiting decisions on permanent permission to remain in the State in view of the recent Supreme Court decision on the matter; his further plans to publish the proposed heads of a Bill in advance of legislation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27271/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

757. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the steps he will take following the recent Supreme Court judgment in a case (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27289/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 756 and 757 together.

Clearly this is an important judgment and its full implications are being examined carefully. The Court itself recognises the complexities around this issue in that it acknowledges the Executive function in not only controlling who should enter the State but also to regulate the activities of non-citizens while in the State and has had to consider the distinctions of rights between citizens and non-citizens in the context of Article 40.1 of the Constitution. It has concluded that an absolute ban on the right to work (as distinct from a time limit being set in legislation or some other means), is contrary to rights under Article 40.1 of the Constitution. The Court recognises that this is a matter for the Executive and Legislature to consider and accordingly has adjourned consideration of the Order the Court should make for a period of six months. Full consideration of the judgment will be given over the coming period and it is expected that the State will make submissions to the Court in relation to the format of the order the Court is to make at the appropriate time.

In many EU Member States, the right to work is not an unfettered right, often arising after a particular period of time – usually 9 months to a year – and in many instances may be limited to particular job categories or the withdrawal of other financial supports, etc. One of the principal aims of the International Protection Act, which was commenced at the end of last year, is to process cases as quickly as possible so that persons in need of international protection are granted status quickly, thereby giving them an automatic right to work.

The judgment raises obvious policy, legal and operational issues spanning a number of Departments and agencies and my Department, working with the Office of the Attorney General, and in consultation with other Departments, will be examining the impacts of the judgment and the legislative options in the coming period.

Closed-Circuit Television Systems

Ceisteanna (758, 759, 760)

Shane Cassells

Ceist:

758. Deputy Shane Cassells asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of applications received to date in 2017 for the community CCTV scheme; the number of applications received by county, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27296/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Shane Cassells

Ceist:

759. Deputy Shane Cassells asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the number of applications which have been granted to date for the community CCTV scheme; the number of granted applications by county, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27297/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Shane Cassells

Ceist:

760. Deputy Shane Cassells asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the amount of funding allocated to date through the community CCTV scheme; the amount of funding allocated by county, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27298/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 758 to 760, inclusive, together.

The Deputy will be aware that on 13 April last the then Minister launched a new grant aid scheme to assist community-based groups to establish community-based CCTV systems in their local areas.

Under the scheme, which is being administered by my Department, eligible community groups can apply for grant-aid of up to 60% of the total capital cost of a proposed CCTV system, up to a maximum grant of €40,000. Upon approval for funding, the applicant will receive an up-front payment of 50% of the grant with the balance to be paid when the CCTV system is fully operational. Full details of the scheme, including guidelines, application forms, code of practice and other relevant documentation are all available from my Department's website.

While my Department has received a number of enquiries in relation to the scheme, no formal applications have yet been received. I would strongly encourage interested groups to avail of the scheme.

Departmental Staff Data

Ceisteanna (761)

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

761. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the organisational breakdown of the policing division of his Department; and the personnel changes that have taken place in the division from assistant principal officer to assistant secretary level since 2005. [27326/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Policing Division of my Department comprises an Assistant Secretary and, at the present date, 5 Principal Officer and 8 Assistant Principal posts together with relevant staff. The areas comprising the Division are: Garda Industrial Relations Section, Garda Síochána Section, Governance and Accountability Section, and Policing Authority Section. The Policing Authority Section acts as liaison between my Department and the independent Policing Authority.

There has been significant turnover in personnel in Policing Division since 2005, and there has been a complete change in all the grades in question since 2014. Records are not held in such a way as to be able to easily identify individual post-holders over time.

Tribunals of Inquiry Establishment

Ceisteanna (762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776, 777, 778)

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

762. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Policing Authority was consulted in advance by the Garda Commissioner regarding the hiring of all persons that are now employed as part of the Charleton liaison committee. [27328/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

763. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the date on which and the format in which the Garda Commissioner consulted with his Department regarding the creation of the Charleton liaison committee. [27329/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

764. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017 (details supplied), the meaning of the phrase "the Commissioner subsequently sought formal sanction to retain the services of a small number of individuals"; and the way in which the Commissioner sought sanction to retain persons if they had not already been formally sanctioned by her Department, the Policing Authority and the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. [27330/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

765. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the way in which the Garda Commissioner sought sanction to retain persons to work on the Charleton liaison committee in view of the fact that this was a new committee that did not exist beforehand. [27331/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

766. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, if the Garda Commissioner employed persons as part of the Charleton liaison committee before getting formal sanction from his Department, the Policing Authority or the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. [27332/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

767. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, if his Department was consulted regarding the persons that would be hired by the Garda Commissioner as part of the Charleton liaison committee prior to their selection. [27333/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

768. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the names of the persons that the Garda Commissioner has hired to be part of the Charleton liaison committee; the length of their contract; and the commencement date of each person. [27334/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

769. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, if all the persons that have been hired by the Garda Commissioner to form part of the Charleton liaison committee were employed following a full public procurement process; and if so, the details regarding same. [27335/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

770. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, if the persons that are now part of the Charleton liaison committee commenced work prior to the Garda Commissioner obtaining formal approval from the his Department, the Policing Authority and the Department of Public Expenditure. [27336/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

771. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the date on which approval was given by his Department for the Garda Commissioner to engage a solicitor as part of the Charleton liaison committee. [27337/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

772. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the date on which consultation was made by the Garda Commissioner regarding the hiring of a solicitor as part of the Charleton liaison committee. [27338/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

773. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the reason it was felt necessary for the Garda Commissioner to hire a solicitor to be part of the Charleton liaison committee in view of the fact that An Garda Síochána already has an in house legal team. [27339/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

774. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the details of the procurement process that took place for the solicitor that was hired as part of the Charleton liaison committee by the Garda Commissioner. [27340/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

775. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to parliamentary Question No. 62 of 1 June 2017, the contact details, commencement date and remuneration of the solicitor that was hired by the Garda Commissioner to be part of the Charleton liaison committee. [27341/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

776. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the purpose of the Charleton liaison committee that is based in An Garda Síochána; the location in which the committee is based; the number of persons that work in the committee; the reporting structures of persons based in the committee; the persons that have access to the work of the committee; and the budget available to it. [27342/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

777. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if all gardaí irrespective of rank or title that are referenced in the Charleton commission have equal access to the Charleton liaison committee, equal use of its resources and equal access to its information and data as it pertains to their individual modules. [27343/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Alan Kelly

Ceist:

778. Deputy Alan Kelly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he received Government approval for the setting up of the Charleton liaison committee; and if so, the date on which. [27345/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 762 to 778, inclusive, together.

As the Deputy will be aware, I established the Disclosures Tribunal following the passing of Resolutions by Dáil Éireann and Seanad Éireann on 16 February 2017.

As the Deputy will also be aware it is the Garda Commissioner who has statutory responsibility to carry on and manage and control generally the administration and business of An Garda Síochána. Accordingly, the putting in place of internal structures to service the Tribunal is a matter for the Commissioner and I, as Minister, have no direct role in the matter. The question of Government approval does not arise.

Having said that, the Government has been anxious to ensure that the Disclosures Tribunal receives the greatest degree of assistance possible from all parties, not least An Garda Síochána, and to that end has been supportive of the Commissioner in ensuring that she has the resources at her disposal to service the Tribunal in a timely and effective manner. This has been particularly important in the context of the sole member's stated intention to carry out the work of the Tribunal rapidly. The Commissioner identified a requirement that could best be met by the re-engagement of a small number of retired persons and my Department approved this in February 2017, subject to formal sanction, which was conveyed in May 2017. The formal sanction provided for the engagement of three persons (i.e. two retired members of An Garda Síochána and one civilian) for up to 9 months for the purposes of servicing the Tribunal. I am advised that the services of two former members of An Garda Síochána (a former Chief Superintendent and a former Assistant Commissioner) have been engaged for a period of six months to 31 August 2017 and that their contracts fully comply with pension abatement regulations. My Department was not consulted nor should it have been in relation to the selection of the individuals concerned. In the event I understand that it has not proved possible to recruit the former civilian member.

The rehiring of persons on a contract basis does not require the approval of either the Policing Authority or the Government. Neither is there a requirement to tender for the purposes of rehiring retired individuals on a temporary basis.

Approval was also formally conveyed in May 2017 to retain the services of a solicitor which would require a procurement process and the involvement of the Office of Government Procurement. In the event, those services are being provided by the Chief State Solicitor's Office and the Commissioner has not availed of the sanction to date.

It should be understood that the provision of these additional resources is to ensure that An Garda Síochána as an organisation is able to cooperate with the Tribunal to the fullest extent, without unduly affecting the ability of the organisation to continue to carry out its vital work, and in that context the Commissioner judged it appropriate that some persons be engaged externally, as with the retired members who have been taken on.

Given the independence of the Disclosures Tribunal, matters relating to access to the Tribunal by members of An Garda Síochána, or indeed by any person, is a matter for the sole member, Mr. Justice Peter Charleton, to decide on. Any member of An Garda Síochána who is or may be requested to cooperate with the Tribunal may either seek his/her own legal assistance or raise the issue of representation by the legal team retained by the Commissioner, and it should be noted that the sole member has already granted legal representation to An Garda Síochána as a whole and to various other parties, including a number of individual Garda members who have a particular interest in the matters to be examined by the Tribunal.

The work of the two retired members supports the Disclosure Tribunal Co-Ordination Office based in Garda Headquarters. That office is staffed by one full-time member, seconded temporarily from the Office of Corporate Communications. A number of additional personnel are facilitating the work of this office on an ad hoc basis as requirements dictate. I am further informed that liaison persons have been nominated from relevant sections/Regions to deal with specific requests from the Tribunal.

Finally, as the Deputy will be aware the sole member has indicated that the Tribunal will be commencing public hearings shortly and it is important that everyone should allow the Tribunal to get on with the very important work with which it has been tasked.

Barr
Roinn