Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

National Maternity Hospital

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 21 June 2017

Wednesday, 21 June 2017

Ceisteanna (114)

Ruth Coppinger

Ceist:

114. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Health the details of the governance arrangements of St. Vincent's hospital and the national maternity hospital following its relocation to Elm Park, Dublin in view of the recent announcement by the religious Sisters of Charity to not be directly involved in St. Vincent's hospital; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27899/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Deputy will be aware that I recently asked for a period of time to reflect on, and address, issues associated with the National Maternity Hospital project. While work is continuing on these issues, I am happy to note the significant developments that have taken place over the period. I have met with the Chair and CEO/Master of both hospitals and reaffirmed my commitment to the project. In addition, there has been extensive engagement between the St Vincent's Healthcare Group and my officials.

On 29 May last, the Sisters of Charity announced their decision to relinquish their ownership and involvement with the St. Vincent's Healthcare Group. This decision, on the part of the Sisters, is an extremely significant development for the healthcare sector. My Department has been briefed on this development. The St. Vincent's Healthcare Group's Constitution will no longer refer to the Sisters of Charity and will be amended to reflect compliance with national and international best practice guidelines on medical ethics and the laws of the Republic of Ireland. I know that despite the specific provisions in the Mulvey agreement, there was a concern on the part of some, about the potential religious influence being brought to bear on the new maternity hospital. The decision of the Sisters of Charity is extremely helpful in dispelling any such concerns.

Discussions are continuing with the St. Vincent's Healthcare Group on the terms of the State's investment in the new hospital and, in particular, arrangements for the protection of this investment. The Mulvey agreement envisaged that further consideration was required in relation to the legal mechanisms necessary to protect the State's considerable investment. My Department is very actively engaged in devising suitable arrangements to ensure that the facilities are legally secured on an on-going basis for the delivery of publicly funded maternity, gynaecology and neonatal services.

I hope to update the Government on the project very shortly.

Barr
Roinn