Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Departmental Reviews

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 28 June 2017

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

Ceisteanna (82, 83, 84)

Maurice Quinlivan

Ceist:

82. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the reason her Department’s web page for making submissions to the consultation on the review of the Succeed in Ireland initiative was not available for a number of weeks; the reason no email address for submissions was included on the web page or in her Department’s draft terms of reference; and the reason submissions have not been published on her Department’s website. [30276/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Maurice Quinlivan

Ceist:

83. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the number of submissions which were made to the public consultation on the Succeed in Ireland initiative; and when the review of the initiative will be completed. [30277/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Maurice Quinlivan

Ceist:

84. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the number of jobs secured by an organisation (details supplied) by company; the number of these jobs verified by the IDA to date; the dates these jobs were verified; and the number of jobs not verified. [30278/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 82 to 84, inclusive, together.

I understand from the IDA that a total of 2,831 jobs have been notified to the IDA in approved projects. Of these, 575 have been verified by the IDA with a further 5 awaiting verification. For reasons of commercial confidentiality, I cannot give a company specific breakdown of these jobs. There are no jobs that have not been verified by the IDA at the end of their approval period.

As was announced previously, my Department will soon be commissioning an independent review of the Succeed-in-Ireland programme. That review, which will be carried out after details of the initiative’s full and final costs are available, will equip us with a thorough understanding of the programme’s results and its contribution to employment generation in the State.

Last month, my Department undertook a public consultation seeking views on the draft terms of reference for the review. The webpage setting out information on that public consultation process was easily accessible on the Department's website. It was not offline at any time during the consultation period. Contact details for the Department, including an email address and telephone number, were also available on that same webpage.

I am pleased that the consultation process elicited 17 different submissions. These are being examined by my Department and will help to shape the terms of reference for the review. The submissions will also be published once the terms of reference have been finalised.

Barr
Roinn