Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 4 Jul 2017

Written Answers Nos. 116-137

Mortgage Lending

Ceisteanna (116)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

116. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to the practice by certain mortgage providers (details supplied) to only seek exemption from Central Bank mortgage lending guidelines for prospective buyers seeking an exemption of more than €40,000 greater than the standard loan-to-value or income ratio; if his attention has been further drawn to the fact that this penalises families seeking minor and modest derogation from income and loan-to-value limited; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31491/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Deputy will be aware that I, as Minister, have no direct function in the relationship between PTSB and its customers. Commercial decisions taken by the bank around mortgage lending exemptions are a matter for the board and management of the bank. Notwithstanding the fact that the State is a shareholder in PTSB, I must ensure that the bank is run on a commercial, cost effective and independent basis to protect the value of the bank as an asset to the State. A Relationship Framework has been specified that defines the nature of the relationship between the Minister and PTSB.  This Framework, as published, can be found at:

http://www.finance.gov.ie/what-we-do/banking-financial-services/shareholding-management-unit/permanent-tsb/relationship

EU Meetings

Ceisteanna (117)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

117. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance if he will report on the ECOFIN meeting on 16 June 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31492/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This Council, which took place in Luxembourg, was the last one under the Maltese Presidency and my first since my appointment as Minister for Finance.

The first item on the agenda was a proposal for amending the Council Directives dealing with a reduced VAT rate for electronically supplied publications (e-Publications). This proposal is part of a project to modernise the VAT regime of the European Union. It allows Member States to charge the same reduced rates of VAT to electronic publications as they would apply to non-electronic publications.

The second proposal dealt with the General Reverse Charge Mechanism and is essentially a measure to combat VAT fraud by making the customer responsible for the payment of the tax rather than the supplier as under the present system.

No agreement was reached on these two tax proposals and the matter will now fall to the Estonian Presidency to address.

Ministers also discussed a number of legislative proposals that dealt with strengthening the Banking Union and also dealt with risk-reduction measures. Two of the proposals – namely a draft directive on the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency proceedings (bank creditor hierarchy) and a draft regulation on transitional arrangements to phase in the regulatory capital impact of the IFRS 9 international accounting standard – were agreed by Minsters. This means that the Presidency can commence discussion on these draft proposals with the European Parliament as soon as the Parliament has approved its own negotiating stance.

The Council noted the progress made by working parties on the remaining four draft proposals. These are:

1. proposal for amending the existing regulations and Directives on bank capital requirements;

2. proposal for a directive amending the directive on bank recovery and resolution as regards the loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity of banks;

3. proposal for a regulation amending regulation 806/14 on the EU's single resolution mechanism as regards the loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity of banks;

4. proposal for a regulation establishing a European deposit insurance scheme.

The first three proposals - issued by the Commission in November 2016 - are aimed at reducing risk in the financial system by making banks more resilient to external shocks. They are designed to incorporate into EU law standards agreed at the global level by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Stability Board. The final proposal sets out to establish an EU-level insurance scheme (European deposit insurance scheme) to strengthen the protection of bank deposits. Work will now continue at a technical level on these proposals.

Ministers were also debriefed on the state of play of current legislative proposals in the field of financial services.

On the remaining portion of the agenda, Ministers were also informed on the state of play as regards:

1. work aimed at tackling high levels of non-performing loans in Europe;

2. the Midterm review of the Capital Markets Union action plan; and

3. progress made on the implementation of the action plan for strengthening the fight against terrorist financing.

The Council will return to the first two topics in July with a view to adopting draft Council conclusions.

The Council also held a discussion on the 2017 European Semester and the corresponding Country-Specific Recommendations (CSRs). The Council approved the CSRs for onward transmission to the June European Council for endorsement with a view to final adoption at the July ECOFIN Council.

Finally, Ministers made decisions under the Stability and Growth Pact to abrogate the Excessive Deficit Procedures for Portugal and Croatia. Also, a recommendation was made to Romania to correct a significant deviation from the adjustment path towards its medium-term budgetary objective.

Infrastructure and Capital Investment Programme

Ceisteanna (118)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

118. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance if he will report on his Department's work on allocating additional resources for infrastructure investment in view of the Taoiseach’s decision to abandon the 45% debt-to-GDP ratio; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31493/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The 45 per cent debt-to-GDP target is currently under review and an update will be provided in the Summer Economic Statement to be published in July.

Regarding infrastructure investment the Government has acknowledged the need for, and is conscious of the importance of, boosting the supply of critical infrastructure.

The current Capital Plan sets a baseline from which the Government intends to increase investment in critical infrastructure, including in areas such as housing and health.

As outlined in the 2017 Estimates, gross voted capital expenditure will increase to €4.5 billion in 2017. This represents an increase of €325 million in comparison to the 2016 outturn. By 2021 it is envisaged that Gross Voted Capital Expenditure will reach €7.3 billion, an increase of over 100 per cent in comparison to its level in 2014.

These increases in investment over the coming years will be allocated to identified priorities on the basis of the outcome of the review of the Capital Plan currently underway.

European Banking Sector

Ceisteanna (119)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

119. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the implications of the European Commission's approval of a €17 billion bailout for troubled Italian banks and the implementation of the banking recovery and resolution directive; the discussions that his Department has had with the European Commission concerning this; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31494/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

In November 2016, as a Risk Reduction Measures (RRM) package, the European Commission proposed amendments to the following key pieces of legislation:

- The Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive (CRR and CRD IV), which were adopted in 2013 and which provide the prudential requirements for institutions and rules on governance and supervision of institutions operating in Europe.

- The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (BRRD and SRMR) which were adopted in 2014 and which set the rules on the recovery and resolution of failing institutions and establish the Single Resolution Mechanism, respectively.

These amendments aim to tackle remaining weaknesses by implementing some outstanding elements of the reform agenda, which are essential to ensuring the resilience of the banking sector.

The Council Working Party on Financial Services met 16 times during the Maltese Presidency to examine the RRM package and will continue its examination during the current Estonian Presidency.

In relation to the recent bailout of two Italian banks, I am informed by the Central Bank that on 23 June 2017, the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank made a determination of ‘Failing or Likely to Fail’ (FOLTF) with respect to Veneto Banca and Banca Popolare di Vicenza, and duly informed the Single Resolution Board (SRB).

However, the Single Resolution Board (SRB) decided that resolution action was not warranted with respect to these two banks on the same day. This decision was based on the application of the public interest assessment (PIA), which concluded that neither of these banks provide critical functions, and that their failure is not expected to have significant adverse impact on financial stability.

As a result, the winding up of both banks is taking place under national insolvency proceedings launched by the Italian authorities. This is in line with the principles of the BRRD.

Outside the BRRD, EU rules foresee the possibility for governments to seek EU Commission approval for the use of national funds to facilitate liquidation by mitigating negative regional economic effects. In this case as the two aided banks will exit the market the EU Commission found that there should be no distortion of competition in European banking markets. Liquidation is largely a national competence and powers and procedures can vary by EU Member State.

Consequently, the Italian Government received approval from the EU Commission to provide support to facilitate the liquidation or these two banks, part of which involved the sale of certain assets to Intesa Sanpaolo. The measures enable the sale of parts of the two banks' activities to Intesa, including the transfer of employees. The measures will also enable the wind-down of the remaining liquidation entity, financed by loans provided by Intesa. The Italian State will grant the following measures:

- Cash injections of €4.78bn; and

- State guarantees of a maximum of €12bn, notably on Intesa's financing of the liquidation process. The State guarantees would be called upon if the liquidated estate were insufficient to pay back Intesa for its financing of the liquidation process.

In both banks, shareholders and junior creditors have fully contributed, reducing the costs to the Italian Government, whilst depositors were protected.

State Banking Sector

Ceisteanna (120)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

120. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his plans to sell additional stakes in a bank (details supplied); his further plans to fast-track the sale of the stake; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31495/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will be aware, the State last week sold 25% of AIB's ordinary share capital at a price of €4.40 per share for consideration of almost €3 billion. The State also granted an additional over-allotment option over a further 3.75% of AIB's ordinary share capital as part of this transaction. Hence unless some of these shares are bought back in the market by our stabilisation agent in the period post floatation, the State will recoup around €3.4 billion from the IPO. This transaction was strongly supported by a broad range of international institutional investors with all of the top investors being categorised as longer term investors and sovereign wealth funds.

Following the AIB IPO the State's remaining shareholding in the bank is in a 'lock-up' period of 180 days. This is standard market practice. I would therefore expect no further sale of AIB shares in 2017. After this period elapses, officials in my Department will revert to monitoring the performance of the bank, its share price and equity markets more generally to determine the next sensible opportunity to realise value from our investment. It is important to point out that exiting our full investment in AIB in a measured way that maximises proceeds is likely to take a number of years but I am confident that we will recoup all the money that we invested in the bank over time.

Under the Programme for a Partnership Government any future sale of AIB shares contemplated before the end of 2018 would need to be approved by the Government.

Small and Medium Enterprises Supports

Ceisteanna (121)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

121. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his plans to help SMEs tackle the challenges they face in view of Brexit, in particular providing credit for SMEs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31496/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will be aware, there are already significant Government measures to support the financing needs of SMEs and these will be available to assist SMEs deal with the effects of Brexit. These include the Supporting SMEs Online Tool, the Credit Review Office, the SBCI, the Microenterprise Loan Fund, Local Enterprise Offices and the Credit Guarantee Scheme.

Government policy is focused on ensuring that all viable SMEs have access to an appropriate supply of credit from a diverse range of bank and non-bank sources. In terms of monitoring the credit requirements for SMEs, officials from my Department collate and examine data from AIB and Bank of Ireland on a monthly basis, including data pertaining to the various sectors. Furthermore, my officials meet the banks on a quarterly basis to ensure an informed understanding of the wider SME bank lending environment which assists the development and implementation of policies aimed at ensuring SME access to finance and increased competition in the SME lending sector.

My Department also commissions biannual surveys to ascertain the demand for credit by SMEs.  This survey series, most recently conducted by Behaviour & Attitudes on behalf of my Department, is the most comprehensive survey of SME credit demand in Ireland, covering 1,500 respondents and involving over 6,000 direct telephone calls to SMEs. SMEs of all sizes trading in all sectors, excluding property development and speculative activities, are included.  The survey covers demand for credit from both bank and non-bank sources.

I would draw the Deputy's attention to the most recently published Department of Finance SME Credit Demand Survey, covering the period October 2016 to March 2017 available on www.finance.gov.ie. The results of this survey show that, when pending applications are excluded, 88% of credit applications to banks were approved or partially approved. Working capital/cash flow requirements are now provided as the main reason for applying for bank finance with 31% stating this is why they requested bank finance. When asked about sources of finance for working capital, internal funds/retained earnings were the main finance source of working capital with 78% of working capital coming from this source (up 5%).  The survey also showed that the number of businesses reporting a profit has increased for the fourth year in a row, and a higher proportion of SMEs than ever are pursuing a growth strategy.

The Government remains committed to the SME sector and sees it as the key engine of ongoing economic growth. I can assure the Deputy that my Department, working with other relevant Departments, Bodies and Agencies, is currently examining additional policy measures that may be required to assist SMEs deal with the impact of Brexit.

Credit Unions

Ceisteanna (122)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

122. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the actions his Department will take on foot of the CUAC report Viability and Irish Credit Unions on 19 May 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31497/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Credit Union Advisory Committee (CUAC) carried out a survey of credit unions and also a viability study of credit unions, both of which were published on the Department of Finance website on 19 May 2016.

These were used to inform part of CUAC's work in reviewing the Implementation of the Recommendations set out in the Report of the Commission on Credit Unions which was published on the Department's website on 6 July 2016.

This Report provides an in-depth analysis of the sector from a financial perspective and CUAC also met with a range of stakeholders to ensure a balanced report providing focused and effective recommendations.  Recommendations were provided under seven specific headings: tiered regulation, section 35, consultation and engagement with the Central Bank, governance, restructuring, business model development and additional matters.

An Implementation Group is now in place and has held six meetings to date.  This group consists of members from credit union representative bodies ILCU, CUDA, CUMA and NSF; a CUAC representative; a Central Bank member and is chaired by the Department of Finance. Work is continuing on developing each of the recommendations for implementation at the appropriate time.

Banking Sector

Ceisteanna (123)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

123. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance if he will report on his engagement with the public banking investigation being conducted by the Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31499/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will be aware, the Programme for Government commits the Government to thoroughly investigating the Sparkassen model of local public banks that operate within well-defined regions in the context of the provision of finance to Irish SMEs. The Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs is the lead Department in respect of this commitment, with support from my Department.

As part of this commitment, a consultation process was undertaken. This process involved consultation with stakeholders and interested parties, including Sparkassen, Irish Rural Link and the Public Banking Forum of Ireland. Following the conclusion of this consultation process, a report is now being finalised by officials from the Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional and Rural Affairs assisted by officials from my Department.

The report will set out the Irish banking context as well as analysing the responses to the consultation on public banking and its applicability in Ireland. It will then set out the findings and conclusions of the investigation of the Sparkassen model of local public banking which will be used to inform policy considerations.

The Deputy may wish to note that there are already significant Government measures in place to support the financing needs of SMEs.  As well as the Strategic Banking Corporation of Ireland (SBCI), there is the Supporting SMEs Online Tool, the Credit Guarantee Scheme, the Microenterprise Loan Fund, Local Enterprise Offices and the Credit Review Office.

Commercial Rates Impact

Ceisteanna (124)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

124. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his views on the direct link between the valuations process and the commercial rates system; his plans to examine the impact this business tax has on local business conditions and cost-competitiveness. [31500/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The valuations process is a matter for the Minister for Justice and Equality and commercial rates are a matter for the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government.  As I do not have responsibility for either area, I am not in a position to comment on any link between the valuations process and commercial rates.

Property Tax Administration

Ceisteanna (125)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

125. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the cost associated with establishing the local property tax system, including the self-assessment valuation mechanism; and the annual cost associated with administering and collecting the local property tax. [31504/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by Revenue that the cost associated with establishing the Local Property Tax (including the arrears of Household Charge) and the ongoing annual costs are set out in the tables.  The figures provided cover the full cost of the development, including the self assessment valuation mechanism, and the cost of administration of LPT for each year. It includes all pay and non-pay costs.

Also included is the amount of LPT collected each year.

Local Property Tax Costs 2012 - 2016

 

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Total Cost

€2.3m

€27.1m

€20.1m

€13.6m

€13.3m

Local Property Tax Collected 2012 - 2016

 

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Total Yield

 

€262m

€519m

€474m

€468m

Tax Data

Ceisteanna (126)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

126. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the yield from the special domicile levy on high net worth persons; the number of persons subject to the levy; the number of non-residents paying the levy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31506/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Domicile Levy was introduced in the 2010 Finance Act and is payable on or before 31 October in the year following the valuation date on a self-assessment basis. For example, the due date in respect of 2015 was 31 October 2016. The valuation date is 31 December each year.

The table sets out the number of persons who have filed Domicile Levy returns and the amount collected since commencement. The table excludes 2016, which is not due until 31 October 2017.

Levy Year

No. of Persons

Amount Collected (€m)

2010

32

€3.43

2011

33

€3.69

2012

24

€2.44

2013

20

€1.90

2014

13

€2.02

2015

13

€2.30

Tax Yield

Ceisteanna (127)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

127. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the estimated loss of income to the Exchequer in respect of bogus self-employment which forces low-income workers to register as self-employed, causing a loss to the Exchequer in income tax, PRSI and USC; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31507/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Deputy will be aware that my predecessor Minister Noonan covered this matter in a reply provided to the House on the 18th May this year.

I am informed by Revenue that, as there are no statistics available to it in respect of the number of individuals who would come within the terms of the Deputy’s question, it is not possible to provide the estimate sought.

However, Revenue continually monitors developments to ensure that its compliance programmes, including joint initiatives with the Department of Social Protection, are tailored to meet evolving risk areas. Revenue’s focus is on protecting the various income streams to the Exchequer across all tax heads, including VAT, customs duties, income tax, USC and corporation tax. Revenue conducts a full range of interventions to combat tax evasion. These include risk management interventions, Revenue Audits and Investigations, in addition to site visits. This process is aided by Revenue’s Risk Evaluation Analysis and Profiling (“REAP”) system and other third party data sources.

Of particular interest in the context of the Deputy’s question is that in 2016 Revenue carried out a comprehensive programme of site visits in the construction sector. This involved 2,126 site visits during which 11,699 interviews were undertaken. The programme resulted in 345 reclassifications from self-employed contractors to employees, 848 employee registrations and 84 employers registering to operate PAYE.

In addition, in the course of a range of Revenue outdoor activities outside of the construction sector during 2016, Revenue activity resulted in 184 re-classifications from self-employed to employees and 1,192 employee registrations.

As the Deputy is aware also, the consultation process on "the use of intermediary-type employment structures and self-employment arrangements and their impact on tax and PRSI” invited submissions from interested parties on possible measures to address the loss to the Exchequer that may arise under two sets of arrangements:

- where an individual, who would otherwise be an employee, establishes a company to provide his or her services, and

- where an individual, who is dependent on, and under the control of, a single employer in the same manner as an employee, is classified as a self-employed individual.

I understand that officials from my Department and the Department of Social Protection, together with Revenue, are currently in the final stages of completing a report on the consultation. As soon as the report on this process reaches me, and my colleague the Minister for Employment and Social Protection, we will consider its contents and then I expect we will publish it.

Stability and Growth Pact

Ceisteanna (128)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

128. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance if progress has been made in the reform of EU fiscal rules in respect of allowing capital investment and the ongoing review of the capital plan; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31508/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy is aware, the fiscal rules to which Ireland is subject have direct application through a number of EU regulations.  Changes to these regulations would have to follow the normal EU approach starting with a proposal from the Commission before consideration by Member States and the European Parliament.

The issue of facilitating greater flexibility in the application of the fiscal rules has received significant focus at European level and framed discussions on the establishment of the structural and investment clauses, which were codified by the Commission in November 2015. Specifically these provisions allow for temporary deviations from the required structural budgetary adjustment, subject to strict conditions.

The harmonised methodology for calculating the economic cycle used in the implementation of the SGP remains an area with limitations within the fiscal rules. My Department has secured useful changes to this methodology over the years by consistently raising concerns and objections at European level. These changes have partially compensated for the reality that the harmonised methodology is not suitable for small open economies. My Department continues to advocate for improvements in the harmonised methodology and will continue to engage constructively on this and other relevant technical issues.

The Government has repeatedly acknowledged the need for increased public investment. The current Capital Plan sets a baseline from which this Government intends to increase investment in critical infrastructure, and in areas such as housing and health, as the Deputy has identified into the future. As outlined in the 2017 Estimates, gross voted capital expenditure will increase to €4.5 billion in 2017. This represents an increase of €325 million in comparison to the 2016 outturn. By 2021 it is envisaged that Gross Voted Capital Expenditure will reach €7.29 billion, an increase of over 100 per cent in comparison to its level in 2014.  These increases in investment over the coming years will be allocated to identified priorities on the basis of the outcome of the review of the Capital Plan currently underway.

It should be further noted that the SGP has a feature designed to promote capital investment in the expenditure benchmark.  Capital formation increases are smoothed over four years with the result that only one quarter of the increase in public investment must be funded in the first year from within the fiscal space. This provision, which means increases in capital spending for housing and other purposes can be front-loaded within the EU rules, has been utilised in Ireland's budgetary plans.

To date, Ireland has not been eligible to apply for the use of the investment or structural reform clauses.  While this remains the case in relation to the investment clause, Ireland is moving into a position where it could apply for use of the structural reform clause.

The Deputy should also be aware that any decision to increase capital expenditure over and above already planned levels would need to balance the danger of potentially over-heating in the economy with the need to address infrastructure priorities and risks such as Brexit. The rainy day fund is one measure announced by the government which would provide a prudent counter cyclical buffer to the economy. This is currently under review and further information will be provided in the Summer Economic Statement (SES) to be published in July.

Customs and Excise Controls

Ceisteanna (129)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

129. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the steps the Revenue Commissioners have taken to identify possible customs posts on the Border; the locations that have been examined for these posts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31509/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Government’s position in relation to the border with Northern Ireland in the context of Brexit is very clear.  Continued freedom of movement, absence of a “hard” border, and protection of the Good Friday Agreement are key objectives for the Irish Government. The arrangements that will apply after Brexit will depend on the outcome of negotiations between the EU and UK.  The Government is clear that any manifestation of a hard border would have very negative consequences.  A key priority is to ensure the continued free flow of trade on the island and the need to avoid a hard border. Clearly in this regard the closer the trading relationship between the UK and EU is more generally the better.

I would point out that the guidelines for the EU 27 Article 50 negotiation framework specifically refer to the need to support and protect the achievements, benefits and commitments of the Peace Process.  In this regard the guidelines recognise the unique circumstances on the island of Ireland, outlining the need for flexible and imaginative solutions, including the aim of avoiding a hard border, while respecting the integrity of the Union legal order.

The Government has welcomed the EU’s negotiating guidelines as reflecting Ireland’s unique concerns and priorities. They express the EU’s continued support for the Peace Process and the need to protect the Good Friday Agreement. They acknowledge the need for flexible and imaginative solutions to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland. They agree to the recognition of existing bilateral agreements and arrangements between the UK and Ireland, which are compatible with EU law, such as the Common Travel Area.  It is clear, however, that the withdrawal of a Member State from the Union is a situation without any precedent, in either political or practical terms. That said, we are looking at other border situations which may offer possible guidance on how we address the unique situation found on the island of Ireland.

Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Proposals

Ceisteanna (130)

Joan Burton

Ceist:

130. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance the discussions he has had with his ECOFIN colleagues in view of the recent developments in respect of the common consolidated tax base; the steps he has taken in the interests of protecting the State's tax sovereignty; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31510/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The European Commission's proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) was published in October 2016 and discussed at the November 2016 ECOFIN meeting where initial impressions of the proposal were exchanged.  That meeting was attended by my predecessor Minister Noonan.

At the December 2016 ECOFIN, Council Conclusions were approved in respect of the Commission's wider package which included the CCCTB proposal but there was no specific discussion of the proposal at that meeting.

Since my appointment as Minister for Finance, I attended the June ECOFIN where CCCTB was not on the agenda and was not specifically discussed.

The CCCTB is a complex and detailed proposal and Member States need to analyse fully its potential impact on national tax systems.  Member States have begun to discuss and debate the various aspects of the proposal in the relevant tax working parties.  Ireland is engaging constructively in these discussions while continuing to assess whether it is in line with our long-term interests.

Member States maintain full sovereignty on tax matters and unanimity is required before any proposal can be agreed.

Insurance Costs

Ceisteanna (131)

Brendan Smith

Ceist:

131. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Finance the measures he plans to implement to deal with the escalating costs of insurance premiums; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31511/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My predecessor as Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan T.D., established the Cost of Insurance Working Group in 2016 in consultation with the Central Bank and other Departments and Agencies.

The initial focus of the Working Group was the issue of rising motor insurance and its Report on the Cost of Motor Insurance was published in January 2017.  The Report makes 33 recommendations with 71 associated actions to be carried out in agreed timeframes, which are clearly set out in an Action Plan.  45 of these action points are due to be implemented by the end of this year with the remainder scheduled for completion before the conclusion of 2018.

There is a commitment within the Report that the Working Group will prepare quarterly updates on its progress and the first such update was published in early May.

My Department will publish the second quarterly update shortly.  This update will again show the progress to date on the overall implementation of the recommendations, with a particular focus on the 17 action points which are due for completion in the second quarter of 2017.

It should be noted that the most recent CSO data indicates that private car premiums have reduced by 8.5% year-on-year.  I do, however, accept that while CSO statistics indicate a greater degree of stability on an overall basis, these figures only represent a broad average and that there are many people who are still seeing increases.  I take the view that while the greater stability in pricing is a good thing, premiums are still at a very high level.

However, I do believe that the implementation of the Report on the Cost of Motor Insurance will make a difference to the pricing of insurance premiums over the next 18 months. I also believe that the Setanta judgment, by finding that MIBI is not liable to meet third party claims, removes a major uncertainty from industry, which I would expect to be reflected in pricing in the short to medium term.

Tax Data

Ceisteanna (132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

132. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the number of persons with an annual income over €100,000. [31516/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

133. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the number of self-employed persons that are subject to the 3% USC levy which is assessed on an individual basis on income over €100,000. [31517/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

134. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the estimated income that would be raised by increasing the self-employed levy on income over €100,000 of 3% to 10%, respectively. [31518/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

135. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the estimated income that would be raised from introducing a new USC levy on all income earners with individual income over €100,000 of 2% to 7%, respectively, to be applied in the same way in which USC is currently applied on an individual basis. [31519/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

136. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the number of persons liable for PAYE that have employer PRSI applied on an individual basis on annual income of over €100,000. [31520/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

137. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the cost of abolishing the 3% USC surcharge on the self employed with income over €100,000. [31521/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 132 to 137, inclusive, together.

The personal tax system is comprised of two charges, income tax and USC, each of which has a different tax base.  For the purposes of income tax, Revenue records incomes at tax unit level (married persons or civil partners who have elected or who have been deemed to have elected for joint assessment are counted as one tax unit) rather than at the individual level. However, using Income Tax returns information it is possible to identify the incomes of individuals used to assess USC liability, which is an individualised tax. On this basis, using information for the year 2015, the latest year for which data are available, 81,794 individuals had annual income for the purposes of USC of over €100,000.

As regards the 3% USC surcharge applicable to self-employed income in excess of €100,000, 12,299 persons were subject to the charge in 2015, the latest year for which data are available.

I am advised by Revenue that the estimated first and full year yields to the Exchequer of increasing the self-employed levy on income over €100,000 as set out by the Deputy are outlined in the table below. These estimates have been developed on the basis that the proposed levies would replace the existing 3% USC levy on self-employed income earners who earn in excess of €100,000.

USC levy on self-employed with income in excess of €100,000

First Year (Millions €)

Full Year (Millions €)

3%

No Change

No Change

4%

23

41

5%

46

82

6%

69

123

7%

92

164

8%

115

205

9%

138

246

10%

160

287

As regards the cost of abolishing the 3% USC surcharge on the self-employed with income over €100,000, I am advised by Revenue that the estimated first and full year cost to the Exchequer of this measure is €69 million and €123 million respectively.

As regards introducing a new USC levy on all income earners with individual income over €100,000, the estimated first and full year yields to the Exchequer of introducing the measures as set out by the Deputy are outlined in the table below. These estimates are net yields derived on the basis that the proposed USC levies would replace the existing 3% levy on self-employed income earners who earn in excess of €100,000.  The estimates therefore incorporate both the cost of abolishing the current 3% levy on self-employed income and the yield from introducing a new levy at the specified percentage on all income in excess of €100,000.

USC levy on all individual income in excess of €100,000

First Year (Millions €)

Full Year (Millions €)

2%

84

79

3%

160

180

4%

236

280

5%

312

381

6%

388

482

7%

465

583

In relation to the number of persons liable for PAYE that have employer PRSI applied on an individual basis on annual income of over €100,000, I would point out that PRSI is applied to earnings on a weekly basis and not by reference to cumulative annual income.  I am informed by the Department of Social Protection that, in 2016, there were 197,902 employments which had a weekly income of over €1,923 in at least one week of the year.  However, this does not necessarily mean that annual income was over €100,000 for each one of these employments, as to reach this amount annually would require 52 weeks of employment at this income.

These above figures are estimates from the Revenue tax forecasting model using latest actual data for the year 2014, adjusted as necessary for income, self-employment and employment trends in the interim. They are estimated by reference to projected 2017 incomes. They are provisional and may be revised.

Barr
Roinn