Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Wednesday, 26 Jul 2017

Written Answers Nos. 108-127

Departmental Contracts Data

Ceisteanna (108)

Jan O'Sullivan

Ceist:

108. Deputy Jan O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Finance if all security and contract cleaning companies that have obtained contracts from his Department and agencies under the aegis of his Department under public procurement rules are paying the legal employment regulation order, ERO, hourly rate to their security and contract cleaning employees; the steps he has taken to confirm full compliance with the ERO system; if he has cancelled contracts with companies that have been found to be in breach of the ERO system since 1 October 2015; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35227/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

In relation to cleaning services, and indeed facilities management services generally, my Department arranges the provision of such services both for itself and for the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.  There is no contract with an outside security company in respect of the provision of security for the buildings occupied by the two Departments.  Following a procurement process in 2015, a contract was awarded to a service provider to provide cleaning services in respect of the offices occupied by the two Departments.  

Under the terms of the Request for Tender, all prospective tenderers were required to be aware of employment law including remuneration as set out in paragraph 2.11.1 of the RFT which stated the following "Under Article 27 of Directive 2004/18/EC as implemented into Irish law by Regulation 27 of European Communities (Award of Public Contracts) Regulations 2006 (S.I. No. 329 of 2006), Tenderers must provide a statement confirming that they have taken account of their legal obligations relating to employment protection and working conditions relating to the provision of the Services sought under this RFT". Written confirmation to this effect was required to be provided by all prospective tenderers. In addition, the current provider of cleaning services to my Department and to the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform has confirmed that it is in compliance with the ERO system.

The information forwarded to my Department by the 18 bodies under its aegis is set out in following table.

Body

Conformation of compliance with ERO hourly rate?

Details of any contracts that have been cancelled arising from breaches of the ERO system since 1 October 2015?

Comptroller and Auditor General

Yes. Confirmation was received from suppliers that they are in   compliance with ERO

None

Central Bank

Our supplier has confirmed that they observe all statutes relating to the ERO’s agreed for both the security and cleaning industries. Our contract with our supplier requires that the rates of pay for staff comply with all applicable laws.  In line with our contract, our supplier has provided these rates to us and we can verify that the rates comply with current ERO rates.  Any changes in pay rates by the supplier will be passed on to us, which enable us to verify compliance with ERO rates.

N/A

Credit Review Office

N/A – The Credit Review Office is housed within the Enterprise Ireland (EI) premises. EI provide all support services to the Credit Review Office, including security and cleaning services.

N/A

Credit Union Advisory Committee

N/A – CUAC are a committee with no office space who meet in the Department of Finance once a month so the information sought does not apply to CUAC.

N/A

Credit Union Restructuring Board (ReBo)

N/A – ReBo have no security requirements & Contract Cleaning is arranged through the Law Reform Commission (from whom they have an accommodation sub-lease)

N/A

Disabled Drivers Medical Board of Appeal

N/A – the DDMBoA does not contract any cleaning companies nor does it have any security requirements. These are managed by the National Rehabilitation Hospital.

N/A

Financial Services Ombudsman Bureau

Contract Cleaning Company contracted by FSOB has confirmed compliance with ERO hourly rate.

N/A

Financial Services Ombudsman Council

FSOC does not procure or manage any such services.

N/A

Investor Compensation Company

N/A - The ICCL do not have any cleaning or security contracts as those services would be provided by the Central Bank under our shared services agreement.

N/A

Irish Bank

Resolution Corporation

N/A - IBRC are outside the scope of public procurement rules.

N/A

Irish Financial Services Appeals Tribunal

Nil - IFSAT has not engaged any security or cleaning contracts under   public procurement rules and is not party to the ERO system.

N/A

Irish Fiscal Advisory Council

Nil - IFAC pay an administration fee to the ESRI, who have procured   cleaning companies to look after the building they work in. That   administration fee comprises costs for many services that they receive from the ESRI, including cleaning and maintenance.

N/A

National Asset Management Agency

The National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) assigns staff to the National Asset Management Agency and provides it with business and support services and systems – please see below from the NTMA.

N/A

National Treasury Management Agency

 

We have received written confirmation from our contract cleaning service that they recognise and adhere to the terms of the ERO. The NTMA do not use contract security staff (The National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) assigns staff to the National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) and the Strategic Banking Corporation of Ireland (SBCI) and also provides them with business and support services and systems).

N/A

Office of the Revenue Commissioners

Following a public procurement exercise, Revenue awarded a contract to one supplier for Cleaning Services in May 2014. Adherence with ERO is a stipulated requirement of the tender contract. Revenue confirmed that the supplier is paying the correct rate of pay to their cleaning operatives. The current Employment Regulation Order (ERO) for the cleaning sector is effective from 1/12/16.

Revenue has one major and multiple smaller suppliers for security   services. As part of a forthcoming tender process for security services, suppliers provided anonymised data in respect of their employees pay rates.  This confirmed that all our current suppliers are paying the correct rate of pay to their staff. This complies with the ERO for the security sector which is effective from 1/6/17. 

To ensure transparency and fairness in the procurement process relating to these sectors, Revenue/OGP are required to include anonymised data provided by the incumbent supplier(s) in relation to employee costs (number of hours, rate of pay, OT, Sunday rates, etc.) as part of the tender documentation.

None

Social Finance Foundation

N/A - The SFF does not have a central office or premises and each   staff member works from home, so there are no security or cleaning contracts   involved.

N/A

Strategic Banking Corporation of Ireland

The National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) assigns staff to the SBCI and provides it with business and support services and systems – please see above from the NTMA.

N/A

Tax  Appeals

Commission

The Tax Appeals Commission has not procured these services however we have confirmed with the Department supplying a cleaning service on our behalf (Revenue) that they are paying in accordance with the ERO rates and this has been confirmed with suppliers.

Revenue have confirmed that:

Following a public procurement exercise, Revenue awarded a contract to one supplier for Cleaning Services in May 2014. Adherence with ERO is a stipulated requirement of the tender contract. Revenue confirmed that the supplier is paying the correct rate of pay to their cleaning operatives. The current Employment Regulation Order (ERO) for the cleaning sector is effective from 1/12/16.

To ensure transparency and fairness in the procurement process, Revenue/OGP are required to publish anonymised data for all suppliers in these sectors relating to employee costs (no. of hours, rate of pay, OT, Sunday rates etc.).

The Tax Appeals Commission does not employ a security service.

No

Tax Credits

Ceisteanna (109, 110)

Michael Healy-Rae

Ceist:

109. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance if he will address the tax credits for single carers and jointly assessed (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35283/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Michael Healy-Rae

Ceist:

110. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance if he will increase the home carer's tax and income thresholds (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35284/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 109 and 110 together.

The two tax credits to which the Deputy refers have different origins and policy objectives and therefore should not be considered in comparative terms.

The Home Carer’s Allowance was introduced in Finance Act 2000 in the context of the commencement of a multi-year plan to move to the full individualisation of the tax system. Prior to 2000, income tax allowed for full joint assessment of married couples, meaning that the earner in a single-income couple could use the combined tax credits and standard rate band available to the couple – i.e. double the personal tax credit and rate band available to a single earner.  As a result, where the primary earner of a couple had sufficient income to use the available reliefs in full, the second earner faced the marginal rate of tax from the first pound of income earned, and this could act as a disincentive to workforce participation for second earners.

A process of moving towards an individualised system of income taxation began in the 2000-01 tax year with the stated economic objectives of increasing labour force participation and reducing the numbers of workers paying the higher rates of income tax.  A fully individualised system would have resulted in a two-parent, single-earner family having the same net income as a single individual from a gross wage – i.e. it would no longer be possible for the tax bands and allowances of the non-earning spouse to be used by the earning spouse.  However, in recognition of the choices made by families in relation to caring responsibilities, the Home Carer Credit (HCC) (or Home Carer’s Allowance as it was then) was introduced in tandem with the move towards individualisation in order to benefit families where one spouse works primarily in the home to care for children or other dependants.  The HCC was increased in both Budgets 2016 and 2017 and now stands at €1,100 per annum.  It may be claimed in full where the home carer’s income is below €7,200 per year, and on a reduced tapered basis where the home carer earns up to €9,200 per year.

The Dependent Relative Tax Credit pre-dates the HCC and may be claimed by an individual who maintains a dependant relative at his or her own expense.  The dependant relative can be an individual unable to maintain themselves due to old age or infirmity; a widowed parent; or a child on whom the claimant depends due to old age or infirmity, and the credit cannot be claimed where the dependant relative’s income exceeds €14,504.

The credit has remained unchanged for many years and the current rate of this tax credit is €70 per annum.  The credit has remained unchanged in recent years as there are inherent limitations in the potential for the tax system to be an effective policy tool, particularly when looking at individuals who may be working on a part-time basis while caring for a dependant relative.  In general, a single employee will only enter the income tax net when income exceeds €16,500, so an increase in a tax credit would have no potential to benefit individuals earning less than that amount.  For this reason, direct expenditure measures can be a more effective policy tool than tax reliefs in providing support to individuals on lower income levels.

With regard to any future increases to the Home Carer Credit, any such announcements would normally be made as part of the Budget and I am not inclined to diverge from this practice.

Insurance Costs

Ceisteanna (111)

Brian Stanley

Ceist:

111. Deputy Brian Stanley asked the Minister for Finance the specific steps he has taken to reduce and curtail the spiralling costs of car insurance and HGV insurance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35318/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My predecessor as Minister for Finance, Deputy Michael Noonan, established the Cost of Insurance Working Group in 2016 in order to examine the factors contributing to the increasing cost of insurance and identify what short, medium and long-term measures can be introduced to help to reduce the cost of insurance for consumers and businesses.  The initial focus of the Working Group was the problem of rising motor insurance premiums and a broad range of issues affecting the cost of motor insurance were examined, including those raised by the Irish Road Haulage Association and the Freight Transport Association Ireland, both of whom were consulted with as part of the Working Group’s consultation process.

The Working Group’s Report on the Cost of Motor Insurance was published in January 2017.  The Report makes 33 recommendations with 71 associated actions to be carried out in agreed timeframes, which are clearly set out in an Action Plan.  45 of these action points are due to be implemented by the end of this year with the remainder scheduled for completion before the conclusion of 2018.

There is a commitment within the Report that the Working Group will prepare quarterly updates on its progress and the first such update was published in early May.  The second quarterly update was published on the Department's website on 21 July 2017 and shows the progress to date on the overall implementation of the recommendations, with a particular focus on the 17 action points which were due for completion in the second quarter of 2017. All 17 of these action points have been completed by their deadline.

It should be noted that the most recent CSO data (for June) indicates that motor insurance premiums have reduced by 10.2% year-on-year.  I accept that while CSO statistics indicate a greater degree of stability on an overall basis, these figures only represent a broad average and that there are many people who are still seeing increases.  I take the view that while the greater stability in pricing is a good thing, premiums are still at a very high level. 

However, I do believe that the implementation of the Report on the Cost of Motor Insurance will make a difference to the pricing of insurance premiums over the next 18 months.  I also believe that the Setanta judgment, by finding that MIBI is not liable to meet third party claims, removes a major uncertainty from the industry, which I would expect to be reflected in pricing in the short to medium term.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (112)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

112. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Finance if interest on home loans is tax deductible. [35335/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

With regard to owner occupiers, Section 244 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 provides tax relief in respect of interest paid by an individual on a loan used for the purchase, repair, development or improvement of his or her sole or main residence or the sole or main residence of his or her civil partner, dependant relative or his or her former or separated spouse.  Tax relief is available in respect of interest paid on qualifying home loans taken out on or after 1 January 2004 and on or before 31 December 2012. Mortgage interest relief (MIR) has been abolished for homes purchased on or after 1 January 2013.  MIR is currently due to expire for the remaining recipients on 31 December 2017, however in Budget 2017 the Government confirmed its intention to extend MIR beyond the current end-date of December 2017 on a tapered basis to 2020, in line with the commitment in the Programme for Government.

The remaining recipients receive relief at a rate of between 15% and 30% of qualifying interest paid – the highest rate of 30% applies to first-time buyers who purchased between 2004 and 2008 when house prices were at their peak. A ceiling on qualifying interest applies of €10,000 per individual (€20,000 per couple) in the first seven years of the mortgage, and €3,000 per individual (€6,000 per couple) in subsequent years.

With regard to mortgage interest paid by landlords, the expenses that may be allowed as deductions against gross rent are specified in section 97 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. Interest on loans used to purchase, improve or repair a property may be deducted, subject to the limitations set out below.

For residential properties, deductibility of mortgage interest is conditional on the registration of all tenancies with the Residential Tenancy Board (RTB). For the period 7 April 2009 to 31 December 2016, 75% of interest was deductible against rental income. Full 100% interest deductibility is being restored incrementally by 5 percentage points per year from 2017, with 80% deductible in 2017, and full deductibility scheduled to apply from 2021.

The Deputy may also be aware that in the Finance Act 2015, a new relief was introduced with effect from 1 January 2016 which increases to 100% the mortgage interest deduction where a landlord undertakes, for a period of at least three years, to provide accommodation to tenants in receipt of social housing supports and registers such undertakings with the Residential Tenancies Board within certain time limits. The additional relief (i.e. the difference between the standard deductibility rate set out above and 100%) in respect of the three-year period is available by way of a claim to Revenue after the end of the period.  Further information on this relief is available in section 97 of the Revenue Commissioners – Notes for Guidance – Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 – Finance Act 2015 Edition – Part 4 Principal Provisions Relating to the Schedule D Charge, which is available at www.revenue.ie/en/practitioner/law/notes-for-guidance/tca/part04.pdf.

Company Liquidations

Ceisteanna (113)

John Halligan

Ceist:

113. Deputy John Halligan asked the Minister for Finance the expected timeframe for payments following judgments to be forwarded to the liquidator in a case (details supplied); the status from the liquidator of the company regarding meeting its obligation to fund the balance of 35% of claims; the current stage of the liquidation process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35395/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Supreme Court delivered its judgment on 25 May 2017 and overturned the previous decisions of the High Court and the Court of Appeal that the Motor Insurers’ Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) is liable in respect of third party motor insurance claims made against the policyholders of Setanta Insurance.  The consequence of this is that the Insurance Compensation Fund (ICF) has been deemed responsible for the payment of such third party claims.

As the judgment has been delivered, it is now possible to begin the process of making payments in accordance with the provisions of the Insurance Act, 1964, as amended. Payments can only be made out of the ICF, with the approval of the High Court and only if it appears to the High Court that it is unlikely that the claim can be met otherwise than from the ICF. If satisfied, the High Court can order payments out of the ICF up to 65% (or €825,000, whichever is the lesser) due to relevant third party claimants.

The Liquidator has informed the Department that, as of 20 July 2017, the number of outstanding claims is 1,552.  The Office of the Accountant of the Courts of Justice and the State Claims Agency are currently working with the Liquidator to progress the making of payments to these claimants.

In this regard, an Order was granted in the High Court on Monday, 24 July 2017 in relation to 324 claims (25 first-party claims and 299 third-party claims). The Courts Service is now in a position to process the payments for these 324 claims.

Over and above the 65% ICF payment, it is expected that a proportion of the balance of money due to third party claimants will be met from the proceeds of the distribution of Setanta’s assets on completion of the liquidation process. However, it is not possible to say definitively at this stage what proportion of the claims this will amount to. In this regard, a preliminary assessment was carried out by Towers Watson in 2014 who indicated that the Liquidator would not be in a position to meet more than 30% of claims out of the assets of the liquidation.  The Liquidator has subsequently informed my Department that as the Supreme Court has now made its judgment, a new actuarial report is being commissioned.  This is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Banking Sector

Ceisteanna (114)

Niamh Smyth

Ceist:

114. Deputy Niamh Smyth asked the Minister for Finance if he will review and intervene to prevent the loss of a service (details supplied) to the towns affected; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35423/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Notwithstanding the State's 14% minority shareholding in Bank of Ireland, I, as Minister, have no direct function in commercial decisions taken by the bank including those which are part of the relationship between the bank and its customers. Decisions of this nature are matters for the board and management of the institution. The Minister has responsibility to ensure that the bank is run on a commercial, cost effective and independent basis to protect the value of the bank as an asset to the State. Accordingly, it would not be appropriate for me to intervene in actions taken by Bank of Ireland in matters of this nature.

A Relationship Framework has been specified which defines the nature of the relationship between the Minister and Bank of Ireland which can be found at the following link: http://www.finance.gov.ie/what-we-do/banking-financial-services/shareholding-management-unit/bank-ireland/relationship-0.

Notwithstanding this, officials in the Department of Finance have been provided with briefing material by Bank of Ireland relating to developments in its branch network with the bank commenting on its retention of a strong nationwide branch presence (c. 250 branches and 16 additional banking outlets), and in branches where staff move from behind the counter, the continued provision to customers of a comprehensive range of products and services, the ability to lodge and withdraw cash from easy to use self-service devices and access to online phone services. In addition, the bank has highlighted its commitment to supporting vulnerable and elderly customers in the use of digital and self-service options.

Finally, the matter raised by the Deputy was the subject of a recent Topical Issues debate and further details of the briefing material supplied by Bank of Ireland were shared with the Dáil on that occasion. The full debate can be found at the following link: http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail2017062900055?opendocument#FFF00500.

Departmental Expenditure

Ceisteanna (115)

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

115. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance the amount spent by his Department on taxi or limousine fares, or both, in the past two years to date by year and amount; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35488/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department employs a taxi company engaged through an Office of Government Procurement drawdown contract.  The company engaged to provide the service is Net Global Taxis trading as Lynx Taxis.

The following table gives details of the amounts paid to the company in the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2017.

Year

Amount paid

01/07/2015 - 30/06/2016

€13,601

01/07/2016 - 30/06/2017

€16,688

Financial Services Regulation

Ceisteanna (116)

Niamh Smyth

Ceist:

116. Deputy Niamh Smyth asked the Minister for Finance the steps he is taking to tackle the problem of illegal moneylenders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35526/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Central Bank regulates the licensed moneylender sector. It is, of course, a criminal offence for an unauthorised firm/person to provide financial services in Ireland that would require an authorisation under the relevant legislation which the Central Bank is the responsible body for enforcing. The Central Bank has no power or regulatory role in respect of illegal moneylending. The activities of anyone undertaking moneylending without the appropriate authorisation falls under the jurisdiction of An Garda Síochána, who are the most appropriate State body to investigate criminal matters. 

Where the Central Bank becomes aware of the suspected provision of unauthorised moneylending services to the public, it refers the matter to An Garda Síochána for criminal investigation. Since 2004, the Central Bank has received 11 complaints in relation to unauthorised moneylending activity, all of which were referred to An Garda Síochána.

Universal Social Charge Data

Ceisteanna (117, 118)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

117. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the number of persons who are exempt from USC from €0 to €13,000; and the number of persons in ranges (details supplied) subject to USC. [35638/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

118. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the estimated revenue from introducing an additional USC rate of 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6% and 7% respectively on individual income above €150,000 (details supplied). [35639/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 117 and 118 together.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the number of persons exempt from the USC in 2015 (the latest year for which final data are available) is shown in the table at http://www.revenue.ie/en/corporate/information-about-revenue/statistics/income-distributions/income-earners-usc-rates.aspx.

As regards the numbers of taxpayers subject to USC by ranges of income in 2015, the latest year for which data are available, I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the available information is published at http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/Define.asp?maintable=rva03&ProductID=DB_rv01&PLanguage=0. While this does not provide the full set of ranges of income specified by the Deputy, it represents the information that is available from Revenue at this time.

In relation to the estimated revenue from introducing additional rates of USC on individual income above €150,000, I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the first and full year yields as a result of the measures set out by the Deputy are provided in the table below.

Additional USC rate on income > €150,000

First Year Yield

€ Million

Full Year Yield

€ Million

2%

131

183

3%

197

274

4%

262

365

5%

328

457

6%

394

548

7%

459

640

These estimates have been generated by reference to 2018 incomes as calculated on the basis of actual data for 2015, the latest year for which returns are available, adjusted as necessary for income, self-employment and employment trends in the interim. The estimates are provisional and may be revised.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (119)

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

119. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the reason paternity benefit is tax free while maternity benefit is taxable; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35690/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am advised by Revenue that paternity benefit is chargeable to income tax in the same way as maternity benefit.  Taxation of paternity benefit was provided for by way of an amendment to Section 126(2A) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, which was contained in section 36 of the Paternity Leave and Benefit Act 2016.

Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears

Ceisteanna (120, 123)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

120. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the recourse available to a mortgage holder who fell into mortgage arrears during the economic downturn (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35693/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

123. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance if a vulture fund (details supplied) is regulated by the Central Bank; if it must adhere to the mortgage arrears resolution process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35720/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 120 and 123 together.

The Central Bank Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears (CCMA) is a key part of the overall framework to protect and assist people who are experiencing difficulty with a mortgage secured on a primary residence.  In particular, the CCMA outlines the process to be followed by relevant firms to ensure borrowers in arrears (or pre-arrears) are treated in a timely, transparent and fair manner by reference to the borrower’s individual circumstances.

The overriding objective of the CCMA is to ensure the fair and transparent treatment of consumers in mortgage arrears (or pre-arrears), and that due regard is had to the fact that each case of mortgage difficulty is unique and needs to be considered on its own merits.  The CCMA recognises that it is in the interests of borrowers and regulated firms to address financial difficulties as speedily, effectively and sympathetically as circumstances allow. The CCMA sets out the four-step MARP process that must be followed when dealing with a mortgage arrears case:

Step 1: Communicate with borrower;

Step 2: Gather financial information;

Step 3: Assess the borrower’s circumstances; and

Step 4: Propose a resolution.

Each regulated entity must consider the borrower’s situation in the context of the solutions they provide, which may differ from firm to firm.  The CCMA includes requirements that arrangements be sustainable and based on a full assessment of the individual circumstances of the borrower.  While the CCMA does not prescribe the solution which must be offered in a particular case, it does provide that a regulated entity may only commence legal proceedings for repossession where it has made every reasonable effort to agree an alternative repayment arrangement with the borrower (or his/her nominated representative), and the specific timeframes set out in the CCMA have been adhered to or the borrower has been classified as "not co-operating" under the provisions of the CCMA. 

Outside of the CCMA process, the statutory insolvency framework and its various options will also be available to people with unsustainable levels of personal debt. Details on the protections and options available to insolvent debtors under the personal insolvency legislation can be found at isi.gov.ie.

Mortgage and other loans can be sold by Central Bank regulated entities to entities which are not regulated by the Central Bank. However, the Consumer Protection (Regulation of Credit Servicing) Act 2015 (“the 2015 Act”) was introduced to fill the consumer protection gap where loans are sold to an unregulated firm.  The Act provides any loans which are purchased by an unregulated firm must be serviced by a "credit servicing firm" which is authorised by the Central Bank to conduct credit servicing activities.  Such credit servicing firms must act in accordance with the requirements of Irish financial services law that applies to ‘regulated financial service providers’. Therefore, this ensures that consumers, whose loans have been sold to an unregulated firm, nevertheless maintain the same regulatory protections that they had prior to the sale, including under the various statutory Codes of Conduct (such as the CCMA) issued by the Central Bank.

From the enactment of the 2015 Act, regulated entities are required to comply with the requirements of financial services legislation including the Central Bank’s Statutory Codes of Conduct (including the CCMA, where relevant) in respect of any credit servicing activities (as defined in the Act) it performs. This means that the regulated "credit services firm" must engage with consumers in accordance with these rules including when managing or administering the credit agreement, including:

(a) notifying the relevant borrower of changes in interest rates or in payments due under the credit agreement or other matters of which the credit agreement requires the relevant borrower to be notified,

(b) taking any necessary steps for the purposes of collecting or recovering payments due under the credit agreement from the relevant borrower,

(c) managing or administering any of the following:

(i) repayments under the credit agreement;

(ii) any charges imposed on the relevant borrower under the credit agreement;

(iii) any errors made in relation to the credit agreement;

(iv) any complaints made by the relevant borrower;

(v) information or records relating to the relevant borrower in respect of the credit agreement;

(vi) the process by which a relevant borrower’s financial difficulties are addressed;

(vii) any alternative arrangements for repayment or other restructuring;

(viii) assessment of the relevant borrower’s financial circumstances and ability to repay under the credit agreement,

Or

(d) communicating with the relevant borrower in respect of any of the matters referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c).

Home Repossessions

Ceisteanna (121)

Eoin Ó Broin

Ceist:

121. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Finance the number of vacant homes in possession in each of the State-backed banks in each of the past 12 months; the number of these homes that were offered to the Housing Agency as per actions 1.1, 2.5 and 5.6 of Rebuilding Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35697/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy is aware, the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government last summer launched Rebuilding Ireland, the Action Plan for Housing and Homelessness. The Action Plan represents a whole of government response to the issues in the housing market with actionable measures across a wide range of areas, designed to stimulate housing supply and remove many of the barriers to a normally functioning market.

While the Department does not have the information requested by the Deputy, I recently received the following responses to this question from the two banks in which the State has a majority shareholding:

AIB

All disclosures in relation to Republic of Ireland residential mortgages – properties in possession can be found on page 109 of AIB’s Annual Financial Report 2016. It is the Bank’s policy to sell all assets on a vacant possession basis. AIB has engaged directly with the Housing Agency to provide a list of more than 675 properties for consideration. As at end of June 2017 the Housing Agency has expressed an interest in over 500 of these properties with 281 of these sale agreed. AIB continues to work directly with the Housing Agency to ensure all suitable properties are made available for consideration.

PTSB

Permanent TSB has informed me that in April 2015 the bank reviewed its entire property stock and offered 45 properties to the Housing Agency (HA) based on the HA requirements at that time.  One property was selected by the HA and progressed to sale.  The bank further advised that the number of properties in possession as at December 2016 were 480. However during 2016 Permanent TSB paused the sale of homes in its possession and paused legal proceedings which might have led to houses being taken into the bank’s possession in order to review processes around such cases in light of lessons from the Mortgage Redress Programme (late 2015).  The bank has now lifted that pause and will review options including the offer of properties to the Housing Agency going forward.

Property Ownership

Ceisteanna (122)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

122. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance if he will investigate the way a vulture fund (details supplied) is able to seek court orders for the repossession of homes on distressed mortgages that were purchased from a bank and did not hold the title deeds in view of the fact they were never transferred legally from a bank; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35716/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Matters relating to the registration and transfer of the ownership and title of land, and any charges attached to land, is a matter which falls within the policy remit of the Department of Justice and Equality.  However, disputes which relate to the basis or legality of a particular debt, or the security provided for such a debt, and the consequent right of the creditor to enforce the debt is a contractual matter for the relevant parties and is ultimately a matter for determination by the courts.

Question No. 123 answered with Question No. 120.

VAT Rate Application

Ceisteanna (124)

Brendan Smith

Ceist:

124. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Finance if he will give consideration to a request by an association (details supplied) regarding the VAT rate on hospitality and tourism; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35749/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will be aware, it is a longstanding practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment in advance of the budget on any tax matters that might be the subject of budget decisions.

Brexit Issues

Ceisteanna (125)

Niamh Smyth

Ceist:

125. Deputy Niamh Smyth asked the Minister for Finance if he has met hauliers or an organisation (details supplied) in view of Brexit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35782/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am well aware of the threat Brexit poses to every sector of the economy, including the haulage industry. I have received a pre-budget submission and a meeting request from the organisation concerned. Both the submission and request for a meeting are being considered.

I would like to note that in recent years a number of measures have been introduced to reduce the operating expenses faced by the haulage industry. These include the introduction of the Diesel Rebate Scheme, which offer a partial refund of excise duty paid on fuel, as well as providing for the use of natural gas as a propellant at the minimum tax rate allowable under the Energy Tax Directive. Further to this in budget 2016, as an interim measure, commercial motor tax was substantially reduced, in some cases by over 80%, pending the introduction of a system of road user charging for heavy goods vehicles.

I will be in contact with that organisation in due course.

Tax Data

Ceisteanna (126, 133)

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

126. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance the estimated yield to the Exchequer from the introduction of a third rate of income tax at 48%, 49% and 50% respectively on incomes of over €100,000; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35794/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

133. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance the estimated amount that would be raised in 2018 if the minimum effective tax rate of persons earning in excess of €300,000 per year increased from 30% to 35%; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35970/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 126 and 133 together.

I am advised by Revenue that the yield to the Exchequer from the introduction of a third rate of income tax on incomes over €100,000 is available in the Ready Reckoner which is published by Revenue and available at http://www.revenue.ie/en/corporate/documents/statistics/ready-reckoner.pdf.

In relation to the question about minimum effective tax rates, I assume the Deputy is referring to the high earners restriction which limits the use of certain tax reliefs and exemptions (known as “specified reliefs”) by high-income individuals. A comprehensive analysis of the high earners restriction is published on an annual basis. These reports are available on my Department's website, http://www.finance.gov.ie, and on Revenue’s website at http://www.revenue.ie/en/corporate/information-about-revenue/research/statistical-reports/high-income-earners-reports.aspx. The latest full year for which information is available is 2014 and updates for 2015 will be published in due course.

The Deputy will note from Table 2A on Page 8 of the 2014 Report (http://www.revenue.ie/en/corporate/documents/research/ror-2014-report.pdf), that the average effective rate of income tax, for cases with income in excess of €300,000 per year to which the high earners restriction applies, was already greater than 35%. As the average effective rate already exceeds the higher rate proposed by the Deputy, no additional yield would arise from increasing the rate from 30% to 35%.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (127)

John Curran

Ceist:

127. Deputy John Curran asked the Minister for Finance the reason the relief granted to resident and non-resident persons with a non-resident spouse in respect of the non-resident aggregation relief tax credit can be greater than the relief that would be granted on the basis of joint assessment to a tax resident couple; his views on whether this is fair; if he will review the issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35850/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Further to the reply to Question No. 119 of 13 July last, which provided a detailed answer to the Deputy setting out the operation of this relief, I am advised by Revenue that the relief operates where a married couple comprises one individual who is tax-resident in Ireland and one who is tax-resident in another jurisdiction. The relief serves to ensure the taxation of the portion of the couple’s combined income that is attributable to the tax resident individual is not greater than it would have been if both spouses were resident for tax purposes. The issue of a direct comparison of the tax outcome of a tax resident couple does not arise as the income of the non-resident individual will, in general, be taxable in the jurisdiction of residence.

This relief was introduced in recognition of the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Murphy v. Attorney General (1982) and Muckley v. Ireland (1985) confirming the constitutional prohibition on any discrimination against the family in the tax code.

If the Deputy is aware of particular instances of unfairness or inconsistency arising from the application of the relief, or any instance of abuse of the relief, he should bring the matter to the attention of Revenue who will investigate fully.

Barr
Roinn