Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Community Employment Schemes

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 19 October 2022

Wednesday, 19 October 2022

Ceisteanna (136)

Michael Lowry

Ceist:

136. Deputy Michael Lowry asked the Minister for Social Protection the plans to address the pay scales and current pay rates of the community employment supervisors and assistant supervisors, given the valuable and dedicated service that CE supervisors and assistant supervisors provide in running CE schemes and in delivering local based community services; the measures that are being taken to alleviate the financial difficulties which community employment supervisors and assistant supervisors working in this sector are experiencing; if additional funding will be made available to such local-based community service organisations to provide pay increases to their staff; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52278/22]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

We are all very conscious of the important role that Community Employment (CE) and other programmes play in our communities.  In addition to providing valuable occupational experience and training as a stepping-stone to employment for people who are unemployed, schemes such as CE also provide important and, in many cases essential, services to their local communities.  

The programme is delivered through independent CE sponsoring authorities who are the legal employers of CE supervisors and CE assistant supervisors.  CE sponsoring authorities receive state funding to cover the cost of remuneration, training and material costs from the department.  Therefore, any pay increases could increase the cost to the state of running CE schemes.  

The Department of Social Protection, as the funder of CE schemes, has received correspondence from Fórsa and SIPTU seeking a pay increase for CE supervisors and assistant supervisors.  However, any increase in pay rates that would potentially increase the overall cost to the state of funding schemes, or state funded activities in the wider community and voluntary sector, must take into consideration the potential cost to the exchequer.  Given these budgetary implications, this correspondence has been forwarded to the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform for their consideration.   

Departmental officials met with union representatives in September, where issues relating to the working conditions of CE supervisors and CE assistant supervisors were discussed.  A further meeting has been scheduled and the Department will continue to liaise with union representatives on these matters.  The Department will also continue to follow-up on this issue with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Barr
Roinn