Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Social Welfare Eligibility

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 17 January 2024

Wednesday, 17 January 2024

Ceisteanna (900)

Seán Sherlock

Ceist:

900. Deputy Sean Sherlock asked the Minister for Social Protection how a DCA appeals process could come back with a response that says "the evidence provided does not indicate that the level of additional support required is substantially in excess of that required by children of the same age without their disability" when all the medical reports for a person (details supplied) demonstrate a high level of care for their child and that the child's condition is recognised as one of the eligible conditions. [57048/23]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Social Welfare Appeals Office is an Office of the Department of Social Protection which is responsible for determining appeals against decisions in relation to social welfare entitlements.  Appeals Officers are independent in their decision making functions. 

The Appellant’s appeal of the Department’s decision to refuse her Domiciliary Care Allowance application was carefully considered by an Appeals Officer in accordance within the provisions of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005, as amended (the "2005 Act") with guidance from the Medical Eligibility Guidelines for Domiciliary Care Allowance and they concluded, having regard to the totality of the evidence, that the Child in question did not meet the legislative threshold to be considered a ‘Qualified Child’ as per Section 1861(1) of the 2005 Act.  The evidence presented and rationale for the Appeals Officer’s decision were set out in correspondence issued to the Appellant from the Social Welfare Appeals Office dated 23 November 2023.

The Deputy may be aware that an appeal outcome is final and conclusive as per Section 320 of the 2005 Act, however an Appellant may, subject to the relevant legislative provisions, request a review of an appeal outcome in light of new or additional evidence or if it is demonstrated that there was an error in fact or law with the original decision, as applicable.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Barr
Roinn