Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Recycling Policy

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 7 March 2024

Thursday, 7 March 2024

Ceisteanna (79)

Darren O'Rourke

Ceist:

79. Deputy Darren O'Rourke asked the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications about the deposit return scheme; to provide an update of his Department’s work to assess the operation of the scheme since its inception; to report on the work on the consultative group to ensure that concerns of those with accessibility issues are heard; to provide an update on the review of the scheme's infrastructure by disability organisations; to report on how his Department will monitor how unredeemed deposits are used; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11412/24]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí ó Béal (6 píosaí cainte)

I wish to ask the Minister about the deposit return scheme and ask for an update of his Department’s work to assess the operation of the scheme since its inception. Will the Minister report on the work of the consultative group to ensure that the concerns of those with accessibility issues are heard and provide an update on the review of the scheme's infrastructure by disability organisations? Will the Minister also report on how his Department will monitor how unredeemed deposits are used? Will the Minister make a statement on the matter?

Formal monitoring and reporting arrangements are in place to ensure that regular reports, both financial and performance, are received from Re-Turn, the scheme operator for Ireland's Deposit Return Scheme, DRS.

DRS is a national infrastructure project which operates primarily on a return-to-retail model. Under the DRS regulations, retailers are required to charge customers a deposit for each bottle sold, to take back empty containers, unless exempt, and to refund the deposit to customers. Retailers are required to ensure that the take-back facility they provide on their premises is accessible for anyone wishing to return empty containers. Inclusivity for all consumers is essential for a successful deposit return scheme. Individuals who have difficulties in returning bottles and cans to their local retailer should contact Re-Turn directly and it will work with the local retail community to find a solution that works for all involved.

Re-Turn is committed to ensuring that all locations are accessible to consumers and is working closely with retailers to embed best practice, ensuring that nationally the system is optimised in terms of convenience and accessibility for all. Re-Turn, the DRS operator, continues to engage widely with all stakeholders and has committed to review accessibility practices considering the needs of consumers. This review includes working with the National Disability Authority, which is supporting Re-Turn in the establishment of a consultative group to ensure that the concerns of all parties, in particular those who have difficulties accessing the DRS and in returning bottles and cans, are heard and addressed. I understand that Re-Turn intends to convene a meeting of this forum in the second half of March and has invited a number of disability organisations to assist in a review of the scheme’s infrastructure. Both the Department and Re-Turn will monitor the issue closely as the scheme builds momentum in the coming months.

I thank the Minister of State. It is important that these issues are recognised. They have been raised in a number of forums with myself and a number of colleagues, particularly the piece on accessibility for people with disabilities. I welcome the fact that there is going to be engagement on them. I look forward to seeing practical measures implemented that address those issues. More widely, there has been significant coverage of the teething problems with the scheme, particularly in regard to international bar codes. People are having the experience of going back to the DRS but their cans or bottles are not accepted into the scheme. Will the Minister of State give us an update in relation to that? I understand there is an issue with the database of barcodes in the first instance, and that is being updated. What should people do in those instances? Will this be resolved when we move to the full suite of properly labelled bottles and cans?

Those are all very reasonable questions. We are in the changeover period for this scheme. The changeover period is four months long. The reason there is a changeover period is so that the old stock on the shelves of the supermarkets can be sold off and at the same time the new stock which has the logos and the new bar codes is coming in. We could not change over overnight because that would have required dumping all the old stock. There would have been a lot of food waste so we had to pick a period of time for that changeover.

We chose a period of four months. We looked at other countries and saw that some of them had shorter periods, while others had longer periods. We think we chose the best length of time.

It is clear there are people who have bottles and cans at home. Half of the bottles and cans have logos while the other half do not. It is confusing when people bring them back to the shop. It is disappointing that half a person's products return money while the other half do not. There is a learning curve, particularly for retailers. Retailers have machines in place. It is like having a new photocopier in an office and not knowing how to change the paper. There was a very low volume of use at the very start but the number of people bringing back cans and bottles is now rapidly increasing. On the first day of the scheme, 5,000 cans and bottles were brought back. On the most recent day for which we have figures, more than 300,000 were brought back. Later in the year, the figure will probably be approximately 3 million or 4 million per day.

I thank the Minister of State. How many bottles and cans have been returned to date? I heard it is in the region of 2 million. I ask the Minister of State to provide an update in that regard. Some people have made the reasonable point that they were already recycling. What is the argument of the Minister of State in that regard? Is it that the scheme will reduce contamination? Is it that it will increase the overall level of recycling? Is that the stated objective here? I have been contacted by football clubs, third level institutions and other organisations other than retail centres that would like to be part of the scheme. Are there plans to allow such bodies to be part of the scheme?

As regards the number of cans and bottles that have been brought back, it is 1.8 million plastic bottles and 2 million cans. That is double what it was a few days ago, which shows the rate of increase. The Deputy asked how it works for people who are already putting bottles and cans into the recycle bin in their kitchen and the objective of the whole plan. The problem is that although approximately 60% of the bottles and cans were going back into those bins, approximately one in three were ending up in the landscape and the environment. That is partly because a very large volume of cans and bottles are being consumed on the go. Approximately 5 million bottles and cans are sold every day for single-use drinks. That is one for every person in the country. Unfortunately, approximately 2 million of those were not making it into recycling. The objective is to increase the rate of recycling of those bottles and cans by 50%, which will also meet EU targets.

As regards sports clubs, it would be ideal for GAA, soccer or other sports clubs to have a machine in place and for the proceeds from the bottles and cans returned to go towards funding the club. I have met with a sustainability officer the GAA on that issue and we are working to deliver that scheme. I have detected a significant amount of enthusiasm and it would be a very practical thing to do.

Barr
Roinn