Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 20 Jul 1989

Vol. 391 No. 7

Estimates, 1989. - Vote 42: Health (Revised Estimate).

I move:

That a sum not exceeding £1,144,905,000 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of December, 1989, for the salaries and expenses of the Office of the Minister for Health (including Oifig an Ard Chláraitheora) and certain services administered by that Office, including grants to Health Boards, miscellaneous grants, and a grant-in-aid.

First, I congratulate my colleague, Deputy Noel Treacy, on his appointment as Minister of State at my Department. The Deputy is very welcome and I look forward to working with him. I hope he will have a very pleasant and productive time in the Department of Health.

The exercise we are engaged in here today has, as the House will appreciate, been overtaken by recent events. I will therefore begin by addressing what actually was provided in the Estimates.

The gross non-capital provision in the Estimate amounted to £1,251.405 million. Allowing for appropriations-in-aid at £141.5 million, the net non-capital grant provision was £1,109.905 million. The net non-capital grant provision represented an increase of £39.357 million on the corresponding out-turn figure for 1988.

The 1989 Estimate included provision for an increase of 3 per cent from July in the rates of allowances for disabled persons. The provision also took account of the cost of second phase pay increases arising under the 1987 agreement on pay in the public sector.

The net capital provision made in the Estimate amounted to £32 million. Allowing for certain non-Exchequer receipts this provision allowed for capital expenditure within the year of £39 million. In addition, a provision of £3 million was made for systems development and related services in the health agencies.

The level of non-capital expenditure approvable on the basis of the subhead provisions in the Estimate was £1,256.5 million in net terms, or £1,363.5 million taking account of the direct income of health agencies. The net non-capital expenditure represented almost 20 per cent of total Government expenditure on supply services as compared with 19 per cent in 1986.

The gross estimated expenditure of £1,363.5 million was an increase of £25 million over the 1988 outturn. It comprised £850.5 million in respect of pay, £440 million in respect of non-pay and £73 million in respect of cash allowances.

The total health capital provision for 1989 was £39 million. These funds are being spent on priority projects that are designed to maintain and consolidate the physical structure of the health services. Capital provision has been made for the major general hospital projects at St. James's, the Mater, Cavan, Mullingar, Castlebar, Sligo, Wexford, Waterford Regional Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda; for psychiatric units at Naas and Roscommon and for the provision of a new 34 bed geriatric unit at St. Patricks Hospital, Waterford. The planning of the new Tallaght Hospital will be continued.

I have examined the capital requirements of the health services for the period up to the end of 1994 and I am finalising the phasing of a multi-annual programme for that period, which will take account of much-needed capital developments in all programmes.

As Minister for Health I have always recognised that, given the precarious economic situation which has existed in recent years and the essential requirement to reduce public expenditure, the funding available for the health services has inevitably had to be less than I or my Government colleagues would have liked.

The acute hospital sector has been the centre of the drive to restrain public expenditure and naturally became the public focus of the previous Government's efforts in this regard. The change that has taken place in this sector has long been identified as necessary. The measures which were undertaken concentrated on achieving maximum efficiency; introducing improved methods of service delivery; and ensuring that patient care was the centre around which the delivery system must function. These objectives will continue to be necessary if we are to meet the changing health needs of our population.

We have a well developed acute hospital system with dedicated and committed nurses, doctors, paramedical and administrative personnel providing a high level and quality of service. We have a level of high technology that compares favourably with that available anywhere in the world. However I am concerned about some aspects of the service.

The number of patients on waiting lists particularly in some specialities and the variation in the numbers and period of time a person is awaiting admission to hospital in different parts of the country is a matter of concern. At present I am having a detailed and minute study of individual waiting lists carried out in a number of hospitals throughout the country.

There is a widespread public perception that patients on public hospital waiting lists can receive priority admission if they are prepared to pay. This could not be tolerated and I have directed the Secretary of my Department to contact each health board and voluntary hospital asking them to make returns to my Department indicating the number of public and private patients treated in their hospitals.

Some of the results of the measures introduced over the past three years have been an increase in the number of inpatients treated; a very large increase in day care activity and major advances in the equipping of our new major units. These success factors are very often overlooked. For a number of reasons they have been overtaken and hidden by increased demands for services. Demographic factors, AIDS and indeed advances in medical knowledge and technique have all led to increased demand.

New methods of investigation and treatment are constantly being developed and are being introduced into our system. All of these factors have placed increasing pressure on our services, as shown by the numbers on waiting lists for certain services. To alleviate this problem the present Government have committed themselves to the provision of an additional £15 million to the health services.

The additional resources are being allocated as follows: (a) introduction of sectoral accident & emergency service in the Eastern Health Board area: £1.5 million; (b) operations this year to reduce waiting lists, with priority for ear, nose, throat and hip-replacement operations: £1.7 million; (c) cessation of planned bed closures, restoration of bed weeks already lost through summer closures, and the opening of additional beds: £9.0 million and (d) the acceleration of the planned opening of new beds, including the purchase of new equipment: £2.8 million.

These provisional allocations will, if necessary, be revised within the same total provision, £15 million, following detailed discussions with the health boards and hospital authorities.

The additional funding which will be invested in the services will be allocated in a targeted purposeful manner and in a way which will ensure the best return on investment in the interests of patient care.

I moved a token Supplementary Estimate this morning on the basis that there will be an opportunity for a full discussion of the entire matter after the summer recess when the detailed allocation of the additional funding has been finalised.

As indicated also in the programme for Government, my Department will be having discussions with the Haemophilia Society to identify the specific requirements of individual claimants with a view to putting into effect through the AIDS fund a revised system of support to haemophiliacs who have contracted the HIV virus.

It is important to place on record that the Government's decision to increase the overall level of service does not mean that health agencies may set aside the spending parameters laid down by my Department. The existing cash and control mechanisms must continue to remain in force. I have stressed continually the importance of good, effective management and management which concentrates on achieving pre-set objectives. The structures through which management can operate and deliver must continually be addressed to improve efficiency.

Regardless of how services are organised in the future the requirement to have capable and productive management throughout the services will be a priority of this Government. A continuing review of the management of the system both in terms of structures, personnel and relationships will be a feature of this new Administration.

It is particularly opportune in my first address to the House on my reappointment as Minister for Health to refer to some of the major areas which will require particular attention over the next four years.

There is a tendency in referring to health to concentrate on the important and necessary services which provide treatment for illness and care for those who are suffering. However, to do so in isolation from the role of health promotion and preventive initiatives is to ignore an important element of public health policy. The House will be familiar with the health promotion structures I put in place during my previous term in office. I will continue to utilise these structures in the interests of achieving worthwhile results.

I have spoken at length in this House on the negotiations and changes that have taken place in the GMS. It is not necessary today to go over that ground again. However, let me say that discussions are continuing on possible additions to this arrangement. The duties of doctors under the new contract are specified and they include a requirement to take account of information and advice on prescribing matters agreed between the profession and management. Provision is also made for the introduction of a national drugs formulary to be operated by general practitioners. A joint working group has produced such a formulary for use in the GMS.

In recognition of the fact that general practice is undergoing significant change and that the contract itself is designed to foster particular aspects of change, the agreement provides that it should be subject to regular review, initially after 12 months and at three-yearly intervals thereafter. Provision is also made for reference to third party adjudication of matters of interpretation of the agreement which may give rise to dispute. New and straightforward arrangements are included in the contract for dealing with complaints about performance by participating doctors to ensure that the are dealt with fairly and efficiently. The agreement also provides for the establishment of a new part time post of practice support medical officer who will liaise closely with participating doctors to assist them to provide a high level of service and to identify and respond to aspects of practice which are capable of improvement in the interest of patients.

I am satisfied that this new agreement constitutes a sound basis, not only for the future of the GMS on a cost effective basis but also for the development of general practice as a whole, enabling it to fulfil its full potential as the primary core of an integrated and comprehensive health service.

The mental handicap service is an expanding service in that the life expectancy of mentally handicapped persons is rising. As a result, the level of financing of mental handicap services has steadily increased as a percentage of overall health expenditure over the past number of years. There have been dramatic improvements in the community services provided by State and voluntary agencies, but more must be done to ensure that all people requiring a service receive it in the appropriate setting. I am committed to ensuring the continued development and improvement of these services.

Much has been achieved in the past two years in developing the community based psychiatric services. There are, however, still too many people in psychiatric hospitals who have been assessed as requiring care in the community setting. I will strive to accelerate the implementation of the recommendations of the report Planning For The Future which forms the basis of my policy for these services.

The elderly are the highest users of health services. The incidence of many physical and mental conditions increases greatly in later life and dependency on medical and social services grows accordingly. The number of persons over 65 is growing as a proportion of the overall population. The growth in the number of very old — those over 80 years — will have important implications for the health services in the coming years.

The recent working party reports, The Care of the Elderly — The Years Ahead, has identified the measures necessary to provide adequate and appropriate services for the elderly, with an emphasis on care in the community. Significant progress has already been made in implementing the recommendations of the report, and improvements in these services will continue to be made.

The Government are committed to improving the lives of all children who are not receiving adequate care and protection. The Child Care Bill, 1988, had completed its Second Stage in the last Dáil and the Government propose to proceed to Committee Stage at the earliest possible date.

Some months ago, I announced my intention to introduce a new community drug subsidisation scheme for persons with limited elegibility who have a regular and continuous need for expensive medication. At present these persons pay the full cost of their prescribed medicines and must claim from the health board the balance over £28 in a given month. I recognise that this places an unfair financial burden on many individuals and families. Under the new scheme, these patients will pay only the first £28 of the cost of their drugs in a given month. The balance of the cost will be met by the pharmacist who will be reimbursed by the GMS payments board. Under these arrangements, the financial outlay of patients will therefore be kept to a minimum. Negotiations are proceeding and it is hoped to introduce the new scheme before the end of the summer.

The priorities which I have just outlined reflect some, but by no means all, of the areas in which the ongoing development of our health services will continue over the next four years in response to the ever changing demands which must be met. The basic principle underlying all of our policies will be to ensure that resources are directed to providing services for those most in need and in the appropriate setting. This inevitably will call for a continuation of my policy of redirecting resources to community care.

The House will be aware of the establishment of a Commission on Health Funding which are currently examining core issues which affect the funding, managing and organisation of health care in the future. I expect to receive their report in the near future and will study the recommendations and review the entire system of management of the health service nationally, including the health boards, to ensure an adequate and efficient public health service providing the best possible patient care. I will then submit to Government an outline of what needs to be done to meet this commitment.

The background to the financial difficulties of the VHI Board has been discussed at length in this House, so it is not necessary to detail once again the various factors which were causing the VHI's costs to escalate out of control. Suffice it to say that decisive action had to be taken to prevent the Board's insolvency and this was done. As a result, the board are no longer operating at a loss and can now begin to restore their reserves to an adequate level provided that the co-operation of hospitals and the medical profession is maintained.

In conclusion, I would like to stress again that the Government's commitment is to the provision of an adequate and efficient health service providing the best possible patient care in an equitable way.

First, I should like to congratulate the Minister on his reappointment and wish him well in his new office. He has proved himself to be most resilient in difficult circumstances. Similarly, I should like to congratulate Deputy Treacy on his appointment as Minister of State and assure them both that I shall be as vigorous as I have been in the past in keeping them on their toes.

The general election campaign proved conclusively that the general public are deeply concerned about the deterioration in the health services under Fianna Fáil and the present Minister for Health. They want immediate action to reduce the hospital waiting lists. They are appalled at the lack of basic dental and optical services for medical card holders and they are fed up with platitudes rather than plans for the proper provision of essential services for mentally handicapped and psychiatric patients in the community, child care facilities and AIDS patients.

Since the election, the health crisis has deepened. At present health boards are unable to cope with their budget allocation for 1989 and will have a substantial overrun. Across the country summer hospital ward closures are coming into effect. We have seen two serious industrial disputes at St. James's and Ardkeen Hospitals. Among health managers there is confusion as to how additional resources will be spent. The Minister's response to this during and since the election has not been thought out and was ill-considered. It is obvious that the additional £15 million secured in the Progressive Democrat deal with not be enough to meet the various commitments in the joint programme for Government relating to the reopening of beds and the 24 hour accident and emergency services in Dublin, let alone reduce substantially waiting lists.

It is incredible that this Government are still, after two years, depending on the Health commission report for any semblance of health reform. They are still totally undecided whether to continue with the health board structure or if more resources are needed. They are still without any proposals as to the future funding of the health services. It is because of this fundamental lack of planning and sensitivity, as well as inadequate resources that Fine Gael will be voting against this Health Estimate.

I wish to refer in some detail to the contents relating to health in the Fianna Fáil-Progressive Democrat Programme for Government, 1989-1993. The first commitment relates to waiting lists and acute hospital services. The Fine Gael proposal to spend £30 million this year and next year to clear the backlog of waiting lists was based on costings at VHI rates for the necessary units of treatment required for the 22,000 patients who are awaiting hospital care. Specifically this included joint replacements and ear, nose and throat operations, including cataract operations for blindness and child deafness.

The present Government programme only allocates one quarter of this amount and they expect that this £15 million will also pay for a major increased capacity of accident and emergency facilities in Dublin on a 24 hour basis. This will not work. The Minister must obtain from the Cabinet additional resources and more importantly must earmark and spend these moneys to ensure that they relate directly to patients on waiting lists. This must involve revising the method of financial allocation to hospitals. We must link additional moneys with contracts of specialised levels of service. For example, for orthopaedic hospitals costings must be established for extra hip replacement operations and the money spent on the basis of an agreed increased level of surgical activity.

The programme for Government also deals with the new accident/emergency facilities to be provided for 1 September in Dublin. If this is to be done properly we must establish cathment areas for each hospital. Too often in the past repetitive costly diagnostic tests have been performed on patients of an identical nature in different hospitals in Dublin simply because of the lack of co-ordination between hospitals, with particular reference to medical records. It is also vital that the extra beds in each hospital required for the daily emergency admissions do not occur at the expense of day hospital facilities or elective admissions, as this can only lengthen waiting lists. It is also vital in this context of improving casualty departments to appoint more senior doctors for quicker and better diagnosis and to co-ordinate the availability of general practitioner services, especially at night, throughout Dublin. This comprehensive approach represents the best solution to the litany of complaints and crises we have witnessed in recent months in this area.

I wish to refer briefly to a further commitment by this Coalition Government in their programme, namely, the allocation of £1 million for haemophiliacs who are HIV positive or who have Aids. I welcome this announcement and I call on the Minister to ensure that this fund will be set up in a separate trust between the Government and the Irish Haemophiliac Society rather than through the AIDS fund. The Government should also seek additional finance for the fund from the pharmaceutical companies whom I have already named in this House for their role in the cause of infection. It is regrettable that we still have no national aid plan for all AIDS patients despite promises made some months ago in the House that we would have such a policy within a week of a Dáil vote. The events since then have proved who in this House was sincere about helping all AIDS victims as opposed to discriminating between different patients on the basis of the cause of infection. I repeat my call in that debate on the Minister to ensure that on a means tested basis all HIV-AIDS patients have proper access to care and medical attention with dignity and adequate welfare assistance to meet their special heating, dietary and other expenses.

I have always believed that part of the role of Opposition includes the responsibility to set out an alternative strategy for the development of our health services. There is little evidence to date that some of the inevitable changes that Fine Gael have been calling for will be implemented by the Government. There is no central executive for the management and delivery of health care in this country. The Department of Health have authority without responsibility, which falls upon health boards and hospitals. This lack of a management structure, coupled with the bureaucratic nightmare of our health boards, prevents planning and its implementation.

There is no good reason that some hospitals should be accountable to the Department of Health and others accountable to health boards. We have no national hospital plan with a clear allocation of national and regional specialities. The way finance is allocated to hospitals actively penalises efficiency, as hospitals that live within their budgets are reduced in expenditure the following year in the same way as hospitals that overrun their budgets. The management structure of many multi-million pound hospitals is inadequate to meet modern complexities. Access to diagnostic facilities in hospitals is not such as to facilitate more efficient practice at the primary care level of general practitioners. Hospital catchment areas do not exist. All this amounts to the current as hoc crisis management and indecision from which so much public concern has arisen.

Fine Gael believe that a national hospital plan to be set out under a new central executive, Bord Sláinte, with finance allocated on the basis of clinical budgeting is the only way forward, thereby relating money to treatment. We have also identified an alternative to the Minister's approach of cash limits to hospitals and health boards and a public service embargo — whereby certain savings can be obtained through more prudent management and control.

I refer principally to the spiralling cost of medicines especially through the GMS from their latest annual report. It is obvious, from price comparisons on the cost of drugs, that being linked to a British price base is simply not in the taxpayers' interest. The present deal between the Department of Health and the Federation of Irish Chemical Industries whereby we pay UK prices plus 10 per cent with a trade weighted average of UK prices plus 4 per cent is contrary to value for money and more jobs in the Irish pharmaceutical sector; 95 per cent of all our medicines are imported. In the near future I will be outlining specific drugs of a generic nature which can be substituted for expensive branded medicines. A national formulary with voluntary implementation by doctors is inadequate. I understand that Ireland and Luxembourg are the only two countries in the western world that do not have a comprehensive system where by at doctor and pharmacy level it is only within a range of generic drugs that certain prescriptions can be taken from. I specifically call on the Government to adopt the British or American approach in this area.

I had hoped that the Taoiseach when appointing his Ministers of State would have taken the opportunity to create the post of a Minister for the disabled. Ten per cent of our population are disabled in one form or another. In many cases, such as mental handicap, they cannot speak for themselves. It is vital that at overall governmental level there is a raised consciousness of the special needs of the disabled. Earlier this year some progress was made in relation to disabled drivers. We need new laws concerning the rights of employment of the disabled in the public and private sector and new laws to ensure accessibility to public buildings for the physically disabled. Some of these issues go beyond the Department of Health and need a clear office with responsibility.

Ireland will assume Presidency of the European Council for the first half of next year. This is a golden opportunity for our Minister for Health Ministers, to of the Council of Health Ministers, to pioneer new European Social Fund funding for sheltered employment. At present our community workshops and rehabilitation centres are limited in their intake of new recruits because of the lack of placement in open employment. After five years ESF funding is not available as it is no longer considered vocational training. It is vital that new centres of sheltered employment are established and funded. A European initiative is the best way to achieve this.

The planned provision of extra residential places for mentally handicapped persons is overdue, especially for adults. Many ageing parents are extremely fearful for the future, after their own lifetime, of their adult sons and daughters who are handicapped. Decisive action is now necessary to provide across the country the correct number of such places in hostel and residential setting.

Earlier this year Fine Gael proposed a new initiative in relation to the dental services. This involved all dental services being brought in under the Department of Health, including the PRSI dental treatment benefit scheme. The health board service would have a specific role in relation to dental prevention and orthodontics, with a new management structure. New grades of dental auxiliaries are required to reduce costs. Most of all medical card holders should have a right to be referred through their local health clinic for routine dental treatment such as fillings, extractions, root canal treatment and the provision of dentures. It is simply an outrageous injustice that at present old age pensioners and those on unemployment assistance are asked to pay for these services while company directors and bank managers have free treatment under the PRSI scheme.

It is a tragedy that the Child Care and Protection Bill is still not enacted. Fine Gael favours a clear set of rights for children with their welfare as the paramount concern; we favour a modern legal framework within which their rights can be enhanced and protected and we will seek to ensure that accompanying any such legislation there will be adequate resources for social workers, residential centres, and family support.

Our psychiatric services account for approximately 10 per cent of our total health budget. Over the last year I have visited many psychiatric hospitals and I have consistently been told of the problems of inadequate nursing levels and in some cases an undue haste in discharging patients into the community. It is vital that very careful scrutiny is observed in relation to the suicide statistics so that voluntary patients are adequately supervised and cared for in any community setting. It will require resources, especially in the short-term, to provide adequate numbers of hotels and community nurses to meet this programme of deinstitutionalising patients. Any shortcuts in this area will have to be resisted and carefully monitored. Fine Gael favour the maximum participation in society for the mentally ill but this must be based on their best interests and not on the expediency of financial book-keeping.

It is tragic that the fine report The Years Ahead setting out a detailed policy for our care of the elderly has been neglected by the Minister. At hospital level geriatric patients are often shuffled between acute, psychiatric, and long stay facilities. We need to establish, at least in every community care area, a geriatric assessment team to ensure the most appropriate placement of the elderly. We need more geriatricians appointed to get better direction on the care of the elderly in acute hospitals. In this regard often elderly patients who cannot be cured by physicians can obtain great benefit in the quality of their life from geriatric specialist advice. This is rarely available in our general hospitals.

We need clear guidelines as to the ratios required of long stay beds within the region and above all we need coordination between the different aspects of State authorities to provide sheltered housing for the elderly living alone in the community. By this I mean the back-up facilities of home helps, meals on wheels, security systems, and a central location to essential services. There is no co-ordination between local authorities and health boards currently in this area, while all the statistics show there is an increased need for this type of planning.

It was a disappointment that in his last term of office the Minister for Health did not succeed in re-negotiating the common contract for consultants. Such a review is urgent and should seek to differentiate between the varying circumstances of hospital based doctors. Greater recognition also needs to be afforded to non-consultant foreign hospital doctors who have been treated disgracefully in the past by both the Medical Council and their employers. These issues have been neglected in recent years and must be tackled in the lifetime of this Dáil.

On the legislative side we need to introduce a new sale of food Bill to modernise our regulations to deal with the almost daily occurrences of different scares concerning consumer products. Not only are stiff penalties required, there is a need for proper enforcement through adequate numbers of environmental health officers. Modern catering techniques have made the current regulations outdated.

Finally, I wish to assure this Government that Fine Gael in opposition will be vigorous in exposing inequality and injustice in our health service. We believe that access to medical care should be based solely on clinical need and not on one's ability to pay. We deplore the fact that the pain of waiting lists can be avoided through access to expensive private medicine. Simultaneously we will support objectively the decisions that are necessary to modernise our health service. This Government are on notice of the public's growing impatience in relation to health care. Failure to resolve these issues a second time will be unacceptable. This Coalition Government have an obligation to urgently rectify the situation and failure to do so will have a high political price.

May I begin by paying what is a rare compliment to the Minister for Health not for his stewardship of the health services, I hasten to add, but for his undoubted political skills of maintaining his job in the heat of the information that has become available to the Government and to the Taoiseach in recent weeks? I hope that the learning process will see a reversal of some of the dreadful policies implemented in the last two and a half years. I wish the Minister and the new Minister of State, Deputy Noel Treacy, well in the very difficult and onerous job they will both have in steering the health services of this nation in the next four years.

Unfortunately, in the years since Deputy O'Hanlon became Minister for Health our health services have gone into a state of deep crisis as a result of the policies of his Government and, particularly, as a result of a policy decision taken by the Government to reduce the financial allocation to health year after year. In the four years during which former Deputy Barry Desmond, was Minister for Health, health spending remained constant at 7 per cent of GNP, that is, £7 out of every £100 of national wealth. In 1987 it was reduced to £6.60, in 1988 to £6.30 and by the end of this year it will stand at £5.80. That is the crisis that has beset the health services since they came under the stewardship of Deputy O'Hanlon. The crisis in our health services is reflected in the following statistics: 5,000 health workers have gone, charges have been introduced for a range of essential services, 4,000 beds have been removed from our system, up to 24 hospitals have been closed outright and the closure threat still hangs over others, for example, Temple Street and the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear hospitals. Statistics alone cannot convey but a cold impression of the suffering caused by the health cutbacks. It is necessary to point out the treatment that has been meted out to people who suffer from, for example, spina bifida, hydrocephalus, mental handicap, psychiatric illness, asthma or AIDS. A host of other particularly vulnerable people have been subjected to this treatment also. There has been hardship and indignity caused to the elderly and to the infirm. What all these groups have in common is that they are to a large extent defenceless and voiceless.

It has taken a general election to being home the reality of the people's suffering to the politicians who caused it. These are the politicians who proposed the health Estimates of the last three years and also those who refused to vote against those Estimates. For those three years, three budgets and three sets of Estimates, the Labour Party sought to bring home the extent and the depth of the crisis to the previous Government and to the other parties who were part of the consensus which dominated the last Dáil. It was not until that Dáil was dissolved and the candidates in the election started to knock on people's doors that they began to realise that what we had been saying was true. I find it all the more remarkable, given the Taoiseach's extraordinary admission during the election campaign, that the response of the new Government to the crisis has been so pathetic. Their proposals can only be described as a "let us look again" attitude. They have failed to grasp the message which was hammered home emphatically on the doorsteps during a three week campaign.

Under the last Fianna Fáil Government we discriminated positively against the poor, a fact that has now been recognised in the joint health commission report of the Catholic Church. Their just published document unequicovally describes health care as a basic human right, so basic a right that there is an explicit obligation on the community to discriminate positively in favour of the community. The £15 million which the new Government have now allocated, or are about to allocate, or promise to allocate as an extra increment in health spending will not reverse that trend. At best it will help to stave off some of the worse consequences of the cutbacks for a short period. We will never have equality of access and, therefore, we will never be able to describe ourselves as having a basic human right, until we face up to the need for a proper level of resources for the health services.

The Government claim they are awaiting the report of the Commission on Health Funding which was established on an emergency basis nearly three years ago. My information, based on reliable sources, is that the interim report is now ready and could be published today if the Government had a will to do so. Why has the report not been published? I understand the reason it is not being published until this Dáil goes into recess is because the Government are faced with two choices, which are unpalatable to an administration which has already been badly bruised by the effects of the cutbacks which they have forced through the House. I am informed that the basic conclusion of the commission is that the health services will collapse if they are allowed to continue at the present level of resources. Therefore, the commission will be recommending to the Government that either a substantial additional allocation of resources is made or further substantial closures must be effected. In other words, the independent commission will not get the Government off the hook. The decision which must be made is a decision of principle. No final decision can be made on how much should be spent on our health services until we decide whether health care is a basic human right. If we decide it is then we make the necessary decisions that will give effect to that fundamental decision.

In a document published during the election campaign, we in the Labour Party, committed ourselves to both short term and medium term measures based on a total acceptance of the principle that health care is a basic human right. Our ultimate aim is the development of a comprehensive unified national health service but we recognise that in the interim action must be taken to ensure that the services provided are capable of meeting the community's need. To that end we believe that the following steps are necessary: the Health Estimate for 1989 must be increased by £48 million, the £15 million referred to by the Minister and included in the coalition programme and which presumably will be the subject of a supplementary estimate in October, is simply not enough.

When the Dáil resumes we will have a motion on the Order Paper for a supplementary estimate for an additional £48 million for the remainder of this year. We will seek in this Dáil, in the context of the 1990 Estimate, to secure additional health funding on top of the present allocation of £70 million. We will take similar action in respect of the 1991 and 1992 budgets. The achievement of this objective would mean £245 million more to be spent on health by the end of 1992.

Health spending with this additional allocation would then be restored to the equivalent of 7.2 per cent of GNP. We have spelt out very clearly where the immediate needs of the health service are in current and capital terms. A sum of £20 million is needed immediately for the reopening of public beds in the regional hospitals, the major hospitals and the public voluntary hospitals. Included among those would be Galway, Limerick, Tralee, Cork, Ardkeen in Waterford, Kilkenny and, in Dublin, Beaumont, St. Jame's, St. Vincent's, the Mater and James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown. In order to open these beds it is necessary, obviously, to provide additional staff to ensure that all hospitals can remain functional during holiday periods and also to make permanent 7,000 staff who are employed on a temporary basis in the health services at present. Without the provision of beds and appropriate staffing levels it would be meaningless to open an accident and emergency unit in the Dublin hospitals on a 24 hour basis. A sum of £5 million is needed immediately to provide for community care services in the areas of additional public health nursing staff and of social work staff in the child care area.

The Minister referred to the Child Care Bill, saying it is a priority with Government. This Bill has been on the rounds for many years now but there are no resources in the Estimate to provide for the extra duties that will be devolved to health boards when that Bill is enacted.

The re-instatement of public service transport to hospital for the elderly must also be a priority. A sum of £3 million will be provided immediately for the provision of at least 300 long stay beds in health board areas, and £2 million for the provision of additional staff for the adult mentally handicapped. A particular priority in this area is the recruitment of additional speech and occupational therapists. Two million pounds should be used to extend the long term illness scheme to children under the age of 16 years who suffer from asthma. The Health Education Bureau should be re-established. A sum of £2 million should be allocated for a public health education programme dealing with AIDS. Five hundred thousand pounds should be provided to open the accident and emergency unit at St. James's Hospital, Dublin. A further £3 million should be made available to employ additional consultants and back-up staff in the orthopaedic and cardiac units in Dublin and Cork, and £1 million should be provided for the purchase of prosthetic equipment. To ensure a full intake of student nurses this year £.5 million is required. One million pounds should be made available to open 60 additional residential places for the mentally handicapped in Cheeverstown and these places can be made available to persons on the waiting lists. All the health charges introduced by Fianna Fáil during the last Dáil should be abolished, and this would cost approximately £8 million for a full year.

Arising out of the dispute over dental treatment, £6 million has been saved by the Department of Social Welfare and we advocate that this money should be used to hire additional public health dentists and othhodontists to deal quickly with the enormous waiting lists for dental services. In eliminating this waiting list we believe that priority must be given to children, many of whom will be deformed before they get the orthodontic treatment they require.

We publish a list of the urgent capital spending that is required in the health area. We believe the following should be a priority: the immediate commencement of the new regional hospital in Tallaght; the completion of the developments at Ardkeen and Wexford, the provision of properly equipped accident and emergency services and fully professional back-up beds on the northside of Cork city, the upgrading of Temple Street Children's Hospital at its present location so that we can continue to provide essential services for the deprived of Dublin's inner city and a programme of capital spending to make additional residential and training places available in the mental handicapped area at a cost of £5 million a year.

I will comment briefly on the Minister's contribution on haemophiliacs. I welcome the £1 million in the joint programme for haemophiliacs who have contracted the HIV virus or full blown AIDS. Had that money been given six weeks ago, the Minister could have saved himself a great deal of hardship and probably there would be one or two extra Fianna Fáil Deputies on the benches opposite. I appeal to the Minister not to dig himself into a hole again and face us with the same obduracy that we faced that night, to allow the £1 million to be given directly to the Haemophiliac Society and not through a third party agency. I support Deputy Yates's call for the establishment of a trust fund. We can co-operate with the Minister in establishing this fund. The Minister should not allow the obduracy that we faced that night blind him to the right thing to do for haemophiliacs. These people are suffering now and need immediate help. I appeal to the Minister to make it available to them in the most efficient way possible.

In the short time available it is not possible to deal with every aspect of the health services that need attention — I would need two hours instead of 15 minutes. But in the minute or two I have left I would like to say a few words on an area of increasing anxiety and crisis — the mentally handicapped. As I have said, services for the mentally handicapped are in acute crisis. The crisis covers many aspects. Its most worrying feature is that there is little or no planning for the future. A great deal of lip service is paid to the concept of planning but the reality is that the agencies and their staff in the field are too busy dealing with the crisis in current services to worry about next year's financial allocation or to look beyond today. We believe that the human hardship associated with mental handicap will get a great deal worse unless planning starts now and the development of plans must take place in the knowledge that resources will become available. That is why we believe it is imperative that the Minister for Finance and the Government should commit themselves now to improving the funding available to the mentally handicapped for a period of years. We believe that the agencies in the field should come together to ensure that all extra funding is spent in a rational, planned and co-ordinated way.

According to estimates prepared by the Eastern Health Board there will be a need for 1,645 new residential places for the mentally handicapped by 1991. Residential places are required where the serverity of the condition is such that the person is incapable of being cared for at home or whose parents are ill or aging. In the Dublin area last year between ten and 20 additional residential places became available to cope with the demand that outstripped supply by a ration of 50-1. One of the largest full time residential centres in Dublin has been unable to admit a new patient for four years. Last year they had to approach the parents of some of their residents to ask them to take home their children — aged between 12 and 40 years — for long weekends to enable the institution to cut down on staffing.

Tá an t-am istigh.

There is much more I could say to the Minister, and I hope over the next number of years I will have an opportunity of addressing all the key issues that face us all with responsibility for looking after and caring for the sick. As I have said, it is impossible to deal with everything. I hope this Government have learned one lesson in the past three weeks, that is, that the allocation they have made to the health services is totally inadequate and that we will have some positive results from the clamour of the people for a better health service as evidenced during the general election campaign.

I do not want to break with the tradition of the House by not wishing the Minister well in his difficult portfolio, but I very much regret that the Taoiseach ignored the clear wishes of the electorate in reappointing Deputy O'Hanlon as Minister for Health. The only thing I can say is that I hope in his term of office that he applies himself immediately to undoing the damage he did during his first term of office in the Custom House.

Over a short period of less than three years, this Minister has gone from being the champion of the public health service when in Opposition to presiding over the most calculated rundown of public health service since its foundation. These Estimates expose the gross inequities and lack of planning in our health services which cash injections alone cannot resolve. Cash injections are certainly welcome but cash injections greater than promised in the Minister's statement are necessary, they alone are not sufficient to tackle the problems in the health services but it would be churlish of me not to welcome them, having been one of the last people, in a different capacity, to meet the Minister's loyal agents shortly prior to 15 June who assured me that it was impossible to find an additional penny to put into the health services.

The Minister has made no attempt in his contribution today to address the structural factors within the hospital services which ensure that those who buy private medicine have quicker access to better services than those subsidised by the State. While there is this growth in the private health sector, it is parallelled by a decline in the service available to public patients. Since the sixties there has been consistent progress towards a comprehensive health service. By 1982, 100 per cent of our population were entitled to a bed in a public hospital free of charge; now only 38 per cent of the population are so entitled. Eighty-five per cent were then entitled to free consultant care, now only 38 per cent are so entitled. There has been a major reverse for the concept of a free comprehensive health service. I acknowledge that the cutbacks did not start with the Fianna Fáil Government in this decade, but nonetheless this Minister has undermined the concept of a comprehensive health service free at the point of delivery, available on the basis of need and not on the ability to pay.

I am glad the Taoiseach learned from the people the harsh facts of the health service which apparently his Minister for Health had concealed from him, namely, that the public health service is in tatters and that intolerable and unnecessary hardship, pain, stress and suffering have needlessly been inflicted on tens of thousands of our people.

That damage and suffering was inflicted with the full support of the party that now claims to be in Opposition, Fine Gael. That party may now add to their identity crisis by voting against this Estimate today but people will not forget the Tallaght strategy. For people in Tallaght, and working people everywhere, the Tallaght strategy meant longer queues for health care, longer queues outside labour exchanges and longer queues for the Passport Office. I am delighted that Deputy Dukes has joined us because in a rare display of parliamentary vigour he added to his identity crisis by attacking Deputies of the left for what he called espousing divisive class politics. Nowhere in our society is class and privilege more manifest than in our two-tier health service. If one has wealth one is entitled to immediate access to deluxe hotel-style private clinics but if one cannot afford private insurance then access to an increasingly deprived public health service becomes a lottery.

Debate adjourned.
Barr
Roinn