Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 7 Mar 1990

Vol. 396 No. 7

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Exports to United Kingdom.

Mervyn Taylor

Ceist:

13 Mr. Taylor asked the Minister for Tourism and Transport if his attention has been drawn to the difficulties being caused to Ireland's exports by road to the United Kingdom arising from the failure of the United Kingdom to provide a good road link between port of entry for most of Ireland's exports by road to the United Kingdom motorway network, as strongly recommended by the EC road infrastructure requirements; if he will use his position in the course of his Presidency of the EC Council of Ministers to ensure that this position is remedied; the steps he has taken in this regard; the steps he proposes to take; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Freight traffic between Irish and UK ports is fairly evenly divided between Liverpool, Holyhead and the Southern ports of Fishguard and Pembroke on the UK side. However, the main difficulties experienced by exporters relate to the A5-A55 road linking Holyhead and the UK motorway network at Chester. While the Deputy will appreciate that the matter is not my direct responsibility, I understand that about 55 miles of the 75 mile route is now up to dual carriageway standard. Work is already under way or planned on an additional ten miles. Last December, the former UK Secretary of State for Wales announced that plans were being developed to convert the whole of the remaining ten miles of the route from Holyhead across the island of Anglesey to dual carriageway standard.

On the broader front, the National Development Plan, 1989 to 1993, confirmed the Government's intention to improve Ireland's access links to Britain and the Continent in the interests of our overall competitiveness. I advised the House in response to a Parliamentary Question on 1 February last of details of a major consultancy project which has recently been commissioned by my Department to examine, inter alia, the feasibility of investment in improved sea and air freight services between Ireland and other EC countries. This study, which is expected to be completed in about two months, will also consider the adequacy of existing infrastructure in and around major ports of destination for Irish exports. Recommendations arising from the feasibility study will be given careful consideration with a view to appropriate action being taken to improve Ireland's trading access to Britain and the Continent. I know that the European Commission is favourably disposed towards Ireland's position, and I will approach the Commission in any case where it is necessary to impress upon the UK Government the need to facilitate trade to and from Ireland.

Is the Minister aware that the lack of adequate road transport links for our exporters to the UK, particularly in Wales, is not in accordance with the overall scheme of road transport infrastructure and that this was commented on in a report of the European Court of Auditors? Does the Minister not agree that this puts Irish exporters of goods to Britain at a serious disadvantage? Has the Minister made representations to the British authorities about this matter either in his capacity as Minister or in his special position in the EC Presidency? What representations has the Minister made, when did he make them and what representations does he propose to make now so that we can compete with our exports to Britain on a fair and proper basis?

I propose to discuss the matter again with the UK representatives. The Deputy is correct in what he is saying to the extent that the main artery from Holyhead to London and on to the Tunnel is critical for Irish exports. This route is as important to this country, if not more important, than many of our roads because of its linkage to the Tunnel. The British Government and the British authorities know full well of our very deep interest in developing this route.

As I said in my reply, 55 miles of the 75 mile route, which is the critical stage, is now a dual carriageway and I understand that the rest of the route is to be upgraded. Work has already started on an additional ten miles of the route. Our only role in this matter is to make sure that the British Government know our position, encourage them and be as helpful as we possibly can — we are as helpful as we possibly can be whenever we are asked — without unnecessarily interfering. We are also as helpful as we possibly can be at Brussels level in supporting any British requests which may be made in regard to the road. Therefore, it is a daily battle.

The tenor of the Minister's response is unsatisfactory and he is being more submissive perhaps to the British position than he might be. Would the Minister not agree that it is not just a matter of assuming that our position on this issue is known to the British but is instead a matter of pointing out forcibly and, if necessary, aggressively to the British that as Europeans and members of the EC Community, which is supposed to have free access of goods back and forth and in and out of countries, they are obliged by EC transport requirements to complete this link and that we demand and require them to do so? Will the Minister take up this matter with the British Government in a forceful manner?

As a result of the Deputy's urgings I will again make direct contact with the UK Transport Minister and urge on him the necessity of continuing to develop this route and offering Ireland's assistance.

I accept that commitment.

I would like to have extra jurisdiction but unfortunately I do not.

A brief question, Deputy.

Would the Minister not agree that it would be helpful if this matter was discussed by the Anglo-Irish Parliamentary group?

That is a separate question.

It would certainly be helpful if all these matters were raised by members on both sides but it is a matter for them to decide. This is only one of many common interests.

Barr
Roinn