Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 21 Mar 1990

Vol. 397 No. 3

Adjournment Debate. - Temporary Employment of Nurses.

I am proud to speak on behalf of the nursing profession, who for far too long have been exploited, ignored and victimised. They are given little or no credit for their contribution to the health services but have been forced to accept poor pay, poor working conditions, long and unsocial hours with little or no hope of promotion within their profession. The employment of nurses is one of the scandals of our time, as is evident in the two hospitals in my constituency, St. Joseph's Hospital, Clonmel, and Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel.

In reply to a question tabled by me to the Minister for Health, I have been informed that in St. Joseph's Hospital, Clonmel, 48.3 per cent of the nursing staff are employed in a temporary or part-time capacity. In Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel, 43.7 per cent of the nursing staff are similarly employed. This is nothing short of scandalous. It is a betrayal of an honourable profession. It is a mean, selfish device employed by the South-Eastern Health Board to curtail expenses and enables them to live within their limited budget. However, I must ask why nurses should be the victims, the people on whom the very essence of our health services depends? I must ask what percentage of the administrative staff in the South-Eastern Health Board or in the other health boards is employed in a temporary or part-time capacity? I can say, without fear of contradication, that in no other group of health board employees is so small a percentage employed on a permanent basis. Why should nurses be singled out for this unfair and unjust treatment? I claim that for far too long the nursing profession has been taken for granted. They are suffering from the Minister's indifference to their plight. They are expected to put the vocational nature of their profession before economic or other considerations.

Surely to God we can do better for our nurses than offer them temporary or part time positions, with all the insecurities and disadvantages that go with that. We are giving them no recognition for their years of experience and we are ignoring their specialised skills in such areas as intensive care, cardiac care and above all we are casting aside the extent of the responsibility imposed on nurses by the very nature of their profession. We must not overlook the fact that there have been huge cutbacks in the medical service. The staffing situation is much tighter, causing the workload to increase and extending the amount of strain and stress borne by nurses. I look forward to the publication of a report on Stress in Nursing but I must ask why it has not yet been authorised for publication? Could it be that the contents are so true, that an embargo had to be placed on its publication so that the Department's neglect of the nursing profession could be cloaked?

The dedication and commitment of Irish members of the nursing profession is acknowledged, not alone in Ireland but from Brisbane to Baghdad and from Luton to Los Angeles. Throughout the merciless cutbacks when the plight of patients was highlighted, and rightly so, and the lack of accommodation was being constantly referred to, seldom, if ever, was a word of acknowledgment given to the heroes and heroines in the nursing profession who were constantly in the frontline of the crisis and working with a spirit of unselfishness while haunted by insecurity, battered by departmental and ministerial indifference and grossly underpaid but always putting the welfare of the sick, the aged and the handicapped before personal feelings or considerations.

Many of our female nurses are the sole earners in their households and are willing to work overtime in order to keep their family together and at home. With better conditions and more readily available employment for both spouses beckoning from abroad, contrasted with the insecurity of their positions here and the indifference to their plight, surely this will eventually, if it is not already happening, lead to nurses being a scarce and rare commodity here at home.

A major nursing crisis is predicted in terms of the availability of adequately qualified people, due to the lack of permanent positions offered and the inadequate recognition and reward for their services. The rate of emigration among this profession is very high. During the past three years alone 4,500 nurses have emigrated and they are valued and cherished in their chosen destinations.

When are we as a nation going to learn how to value the invaluable within our society? What nurse today can afford to buy a home of her own on the paltry pay she is offered? Is it not unacceptable that a sister in charge of a ward, responsible for the vast amount of money spent in that ward and carrying a major responsibility, should receive such a paltry income? I claim that the employment of nurses in a temporary or part-time capacity is going on for far too long and it is alarming that that trend is increasing.

I am aware that five or six positions in St. Joseph's Hospital, Clonmel and Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel, have been advertised but this is merely a drop in the ocean; it will do nothing to alter the imbalance but will still leave 43 per cent of the staff in each hospital working in a temporary or part-time capacity. Something better must be offered and I plead with the Minister of State to extend the number of permanent positions being offered to a realistic and fair number.

In relation to those working in a temporary or part-time capacity, I ask the Minister to ensure that they are given some recognition for their years of experience. It is unacceptable that a nurse working in a hospital for six years or more remains on the first point of the salary scale; incremental credit must be offered. If the Minister of State does not attend to this problem he will be faced with a national crisis due to the unavailability of nurses as those nurses will have turned to other shores where their profession, skills and dedication get the recognition and rewards they deserve. The nurses in St. Joseph's Hospital, Clonmel, and Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel, deserve far better treatment from the South-Eastern Health Board. I trust that the Minister of State will give me some ground for hope in his reply this evening.

I would like to outline the current personnel-management arrangements which are applied by my Department in health agencies generally before I comment specifically on the position in St. Joseph's Hospital, Clonmel, and Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel, both of which are within the South-Eastern Health Board area.

From the start of the current year we have found it possible to allow individual health agencies considerable flexibility in respect of their employment, provided it is applied within available financial resources and an overall approved staffing ceiling. Principally, this permits local managers to respond quickly to changing service demand patterns by adjusting employment levels upwards and downwards in response to such changes in a cost effective manner. This flexibility allows for a much better delivery of service.

Deputies will appreciate that health services staffing is influenced not just by seasonal shifts in demand but also by the need to maintain a minimum staffing level at all times while allowing staff to avail of their entitlements in regard to sick leave, annual leave, maternity leave and, where possible, to appropriate career breaks. These factors conspire to create an ongoing requirement for considerable levels of temporary staffing in the health services. Such staffing is not an automatic indication of staffing difficulties but rather a reflection of the labour intensive nature of the health services and the need to maintain staffing cover at all times.

I listened with great interest to what Deputy Ahearn had to say but as far as we are concerned, neither my Department nor the health service want to exploit, ignore or victimise any nurses. I do not think that happens in any part of the country. It is important that we have an adequate nursing complement. I must point out to the Deputy that within the public sector the greatest number of requests for job sharing and part-time working comes from the nursing profession. This is due to the complexities of the nursing career, the long hours and the desire of many married nurses to maintain the security of the nursing career and the vocational satisfaction which it gives, albeit on shorter hours or on a job sharing basis. This flexibility is of assistance in providing excellent care throughout the country.

In relation to St. Joseph's Hospital, Clonmel, and Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel, I am advised by the South-Eastern Health Board who are responsible for the management of these hospitals that staffing levels there are kept under constant and continuous review. As part of this process and within the flexibility we have devolved to local managers, the South-Eastern Health Board now intend making significant additional permanent appointments in both hospitals. In the case of Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel, interviews have recently been concluded and a total of eight permanent appointments will be made in the coming weeks. As regards St. Joseph's Hospital, Clonmel, I am advised that interviews will commence on 4 April next and that 13 permanent appointments will result.

The effect of these measures will be to reduce whole-time temporary nurse staffing in Our Lady's Hospital from a current level of 12 to four and at St. Joseph's Hospital from a level 14 to one. The remaining whole-time temporary posts and the additional 16 locum and part-time staff employed in both hospitals are there to cover absences by permanent staff and for other specific reasons. Officials of the South-Eastern Health Board met the relevant unions involved, the INO and SIPTU, last week and communicated these decisions to them.

As a confirmation of my earlier remarks as regards the need for such flexible employment, Deputies may be interested to note that among the reasons for retaining these temporary staff at present are the absence of five nurses on career breaks, three on maternity leave and one on long-term sick leave. Other temporary, locum and part-time staff are employed to cover absences due to casual sick leave, annual leave and to meet fluctuations in demand. It would be totally unreasonable to suggest that permanent staff who are temporarily absent should themselves be replaced on a permanent basis. To do so would be to place an unsustainable demand on scarce resources and would lead to considerable displacement of returning and replacement permanent personnel.

Let me conclude by assuring the House that in relation to the position in the South-Eastern Health Board and in other health agencies, my Department monitor staffing levels and their composition on an ongoing basis in consultation with the agency management concerned. Where difficulties arise every effort is made to quickly address the situation in the context of the resources available and competing demands. Total expenditure of £1.4 billion on our health services in 1990 is positive proof of the Government's commitment to ensuring that the best possible health service is provided taking into account that health has been allocated over 21.5 per cent of proposed budgetary expenditure this year.

I thank Deputy Ahearn for raising this matter and her Oireachtas colleagues within her constituency who have also made strenuous representations to my Department on behalf of the staffs of both hospitals. I hope my positive response is to the satisfaction of everybody involved and who has an interest in this matter.

The imbalance remains.

The Dáil adjourned at 12.30 a.m. on Thursday, 22 March 1990 until 10.30 a.m.

Barr
Roinn