Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 30 May 1990

Vol. 399 No. 4

Written Answers. - Tower Height Discrepancy.

Eamon Gilmore

Ceist:

27 Mr. Gilmore asked the Minister for Communications, given that his Department's booklet on MMDS states that a safety factor will be the tower heights of 30 metres or almost 100 feet, if he will outline the discrepancy in the proposed Cork communications tower height as expressed in the planning application (details supplied) of 21 metres.

This is primarily a planning matter. The booklet published by my Department is intended as a guide to MMDS for the general public. The references to tower heights in the booklet are generalisations rather than specifications. My Department expects most MMDS operators to maximise coverage from their transmitters by siting them as high as possible.

The technical conditions to which MMDS operators must adhere do not specify a minimum height. Transmitter antenna heights are limited to those heights necessary to give adequate coverage of the area within range of the transmitter. Operators are also required to adhere to guidelines laid down by the international non-ionising radiation committee of the International Radiation Protection Association — IRPA — on the limits to exposure to radio frequency magnetic fields in the frequency range 100 kilohertz to 300 gigahertz. A tower height of 21 metres would not necessarily conflict with the requirements to observe IRPA guidelines.

I understand that the operator concerned commissioned an independent study of the levels of radio frequency radiation which would be emitted from the installation in question. The study has shown that even when making very pessimistic assumptions, the maximum level of exposure of humans is over 100 times lower than the levels considered safe by the IRPA. I understand that the study has been made available to Cork County Council.
Barr
Roinn