I propose to take Questions Nos. 23, 33, 35, 53 and 67 together.
My Department review the higher education grants scheme on an annual basis in the light of their experience of its operation and/or representations from individuals or public representatives. I am aware of the difficulties facing some parents with children in third level education and this is a matter which is reviewed from year to year.
The means test tables for the scheme are so framed as to give greater financial assistance to students from low income families. I also wish to point out that despite the past few years of severe financial constraints, I have increased the income eligibility limits and rates of maintenance grant payable in line with the increase in the CPI. I have also increased the fee grant in line with increases in tuition fee charges. Moreover, I would also point out that the percentage of students receiving grant assistance in the 1989-90 academic year was over 50 per cent compared with under 47 per cent in 1986-87. Therefore, there have been substantial improvements.
In addition to these improvements I can assure the Deputies that it has been my objective to ensure that the higher education grants scheme is as equitable as possible.
There is no uniform definition of what constitutes a mature student; various interpretations are given by the third level colleges.