Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 21 Apr 1994

Vol. 441 No. 7

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Withholding Tax.

Pat Cox

Ceist:

11 Mr. Cox asked the Minister for Finance, in respect of withholding tax, if he will list all of the accountable persons, that is Government Departments, local authorities and other such persons who will be obliged to collect withholding tax after the passage of the 1994 Finance Bill; the professions or services liable to pay such tax; the annual cash flow benefit to the State of the existence of this tax; the year of payment of tax, whether current or preceding, in respect of self-assessment; the necessity for tax clearance certificates in respect of dealing with State agencies; and the changes, if any, that have been made to the relevant tax legislation since withholding tax was first introduced.

Section 14 of the Finance Act, 1987 specified those bodies which were to be treated as "accountable persons". The list of accountable persons was updated in 1988 to include certain other bodies including the VHI and "other authorised insurers" and in 1992 further additions were made. The current list of accountable persons is set out in the Second Schedule to the Finance Act, 1992, this list is now being updated as specified in section 10 of this year's Finance Bill. The total number of accountable bodies is in excess of 600 and, therefore, it is not feasible for me to name each one at this stage. I have arranged with the Revenue Commissioners to supply the Deputy with the current list.

The professions and services liable to the tax are covered by the definition in section 13 (1) of the Finance Act, 1987. They include: services of a medical, dental, pharmaceutical, optical, aural or veterinary nature; services of an architectural, engineering, quantity surveying or surveying nature, and related services; services of accountancy, auditing or finance and services of financial, economic, marketing, advertising or other consultancies; services of a solicitor or barrister and other legal services; geological services, and training services provided on behalf of FAS.

As well as those specifically included in the definition, the term "professional services" is intended to embrace professional services in the generally accepted sense of that expression.

The Exchequer yield from the tax in 1993 was £69.3 million. This is a net figure after allowing for direct and interim refunds.

Withholding tax at the rate of 27 per cent is deducted by the accountable person at the time the payment is made. In the case of self-employed individuals this tax is then available for credit or offset against the taxpayer's final liability in the following year.

The legislation introducing withholding tax was enacted in 1987. The following changes have been made since then:

In 1988 the withholding tax system was extended to cover payments made by medical insurers in respect of certain medical expenses payable under a contract of insurance. Eolas, the Nuclear Energy Board, CERT and a voluntary public or joint board hospital in receipt of grant aid from the Department of Health were added to the list of accountable persons. The legislation was also amended to take account of the takeover by FÁS of all the functions of AnCO.

In 1990 the legislation was amended as a result of the changeover to the current year basis of taxation for self-employed persons. Prior to 1990 such persons paid tax on the basis of their earnings in the previous year. Withholding tax deducted was held on account to be set against the actual tax liabilities which came due the following year. When the self-employed moved to a current year basis in 1990, the Government decided that there would be no change in the withholding tax — the credit continued to be available in the following year.

In 1992 the legislation was amended to include semi-State bodies and their subsidiaries in the list of accountable persons.

Persons who are awarded public sector contracts or apply for State grants in excess of £5,000 are obliged to present a current tax clearance certificate to the contracting or grant paying authority.

Does the Minister also get letters from doctors in the GMS scheme who have cashflow difficulties because they have spent a great deal of money developing their surgeries? I note that the Minister introduced alleviating measures in last year's Finance Act and this year's Finance Bill for residential property and probate taxes. Where the Revenue Commissioners are satisfied it is a hardship case will he consider amending the Finance Bill to try to ensure that there is a modicum of understanding for those whose net tax liability would not warrant withholding tax being deducted at source?

In 1992 the IMO and others raised this issue with me on behalf of doctors. We have tried to reach an understanding with them and others who are affected by this problem. Withholding tax is deductible from gross payments made by an accountable person from any expense payment even if these are invoiced separately. As the Deputy mentioned, there is no allowance for expenditure incurred by the professional person in providing the service. This is a major issue for doctors, solicitors and others who claim that these expenses account for a large proportion of their turnover.

To lessen the impact we have made provision for the payment of an interim refund where the amount of withholding tax deducted exceeds the tax liability in the previous accounting period. This is an important point and should not be overlooked. It appears from letters I have received that some people are not aware of this. In calculating the interim refund the Revenue Commissioners retain an amount equal to the liability and repay the excess. Tax retained for credit later against tax liability is determined by reference to taxable income and not gross amounts to taxable payable.

It has been said that the position was not as bad when self-employed persons paid tax on a previous year basis. They now pay on a current year basis and that appears to create a difficulty. Before I make any legislative changes I would like to see how this system operates because, as Deputy Yates acknowledged, a large sum of money is involved. If we could resolve any difficulties under the interim refund scheme we would not have to make any changes. If this does not work I will address the matter. I accept that this deduction of 27 per cent from income can give rise to a cashflow problem.

To respond to the Deputy's second point, the turnaround in payments for doctors is a matter of days. This issue is dealt with in the Finance Bill.

Barr
Roinn