Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 19 May 1994

Vol. 442 No. 10

Adjournment Debate. - Dublin Traffic Management.

I wish to raise the issue of the serious traffic problems in Dublin and the inadequate administrative arrangements to deal with them. Traffic problems in Dublin are acute and worsening. The Government established the Dublin Transportation Initiative to examine this matter. Its final report was expected last October but it has not yet been published. Many decisions are being put on the long finger.

The Dublin Corporation Traffic Committee under my chairmanship drew up a comprehensive traffic management policy plan for a 12 month period and finally adopted it a year ago. This plan requested the Government to make several administrative and legislative changes. Decisions on those many proposals have been delayed by the Government pending the finalisation of the report of the Dublin Transportation Initiative, which has also been delayed following the decrease in the allocation of Cohesion Funds from more than £8 billion to less than £7 billion. The administrative and legislative changes which I call for do not require the allocation of Cohesion Funds.

We all agree that traffic law enforcement in Dublin is wholly inadequate. Responsibility for this rests with the Garda who inevitably give traffic law enforcement a lower priority than the prevention and fighting of crime. A measure of this position is evident in that only 23 per cent of all traffic fines imposed are collected. Half the summonses issued are never served and fewer than half those served are brought to a successful conclusion. As a result a great many drivers ignore traffic laws and, consequently, Dublin is choked with traffic. The inadequate provisions are possibly costing the State in income for fines and parking foregone as much as £20 million per annum which would pay several times over for the 300 traffic police corps I propose for Dublin.

At a time of high unemployment it would make sense to create 300 jobs, especially when the public finances would be a net beneficiary. There are additional advantages. It would release gardaí from traffic duties and allow them more time to fight crime and improve the economic environment for job creation in Dublin. The Dublin Chamber of Commerce stated that traffic congestion is doing more to withhold investment than the imposition of taxes. The problem is that a single person or body is not in charge of Dublin traffic. The corporation and the county councils are responsible for traffic management implementation but the Garda Commissioner is the traffic authority responsible for the enforcement of traffic regulations. The Department of Justice is responsible for traffic wardens, unlike other local authorities who have retained that function. The Department of the Environment is the ultimate road and road traffic management authority and the transport authority has responsibility for transport. There is no co-ordinated traffic management system in Dublin.

A five point plan is urgently needed for Dublin City. Dublin Corporation should replace the Garda Commissioner as the traffic authority to merge traffic management with traffic enforcement regulations. A special 300 man traffic police corps should be established under Dublin Corporation which would have responsibility for the traffic warden service. Responsibility for tow-away services, now the responsibility of the Garda, should be transferred back to the corporation and privatised and the inner city should be divided into three contract areas. Provision should be made for an increase in the number of multi-storey car parks in the inner city by means of joint venture between Dublin Corporation and the commercial sector and there should be a parallel reduction in the number of on-street parking places. All the administrative and legislative changes requested by the traffic committee of Dublin Corporation should be implemented as soon as possible.

There is a widespread feeling among Dubliners that Dublin did not get its fair share of European funds. It would be wrong if key transport issues, such as the port access route and a light rail system interconnecting with the DART, were cancelled or deferred because of the Government's mishandling of the Cohesion Funds. There is no excuse for further delay in acceding to the corporation's request for urgent administrative and legislative changes to the congested traffic problem in Dublin.

Road traffic legislation is a matter for the Minister for the Environment. The role of the Minister for Justice is to ensure that road traffic law is enforced to ensure that the Garda have adequate resources to fulfil their responsibilities in the enforcement area.

Regarding the enforcement of road traffic legislation, I will give a broad outline of the role of the Garda Commissioner in this area.

I note Deputy Mitchell refers to the need for special traffic police. The Deputy will no doubt be aware that in the Dublin metropolitan area there is a specific Garda traffic corps which comprises a chief superintendent, one superintendent, three inspectors, seven sargeants and 75 gardaí. This amounts to a total of 87 members of the force whose main function is to enforce the traffic laws in the city and its environs. I do not know what precisely the Deputy proposes when he suggests setting up a special traffic police service. Such a service is already in place and has a very good record in achieving its aims. The Minister for Justice is committed to ensuring that this corps has the most up-to-date and sophisticated equipment, manpower and necessary transport to tackle the problem.

The Garda Commissioner has responsibility for the appointment of traffic wardens in the Dublin Metropolitan Area under section 64 of the Road Traffic Act, 1968. At present there is a total of 57 full-time and 123 part-time wardens. They are primarily concerned with the issue of on-the-spot notices for illegally parked vehicles. Receipts from on-the-spot parking fines in 1993 for such illegal parking amounted to £3,263,000. Those enforcement measures represent a significant effort by the gardaí and traffic wardens to address the problem of illegal parking.

The Garda have acquired seven state of the art two trucks which enables the service to operate on a 24 hour day basis removing illegally and dangerously parked vehicles. The Garda maintains a car pound to which these vehicles are taken. Since January 1990, owners of towed-away vehicles are subject to the charges on retrieval from the car pound; namely a removal fee of £75 and a storage fee of £25 per day or part of a day. Since 1990, almost 27,000 illegally and badly parked vehicles have been towed away by the Garda.

I have dealt with enforcement issues relating to traffic problems in Dublin and it is clear the Garda are very active in this regard. However, the matter does not stop there. I draw the Deputy's attention to the fact that other Ministers and agencies play a substantial role in this area. For example, the Dublin Transportation Initiative is examining and addressing all aspects of transport related problems in the city. The Government is committed to improving the public transport infrastructure in the city by spending large sums of European Structural Funds on the provision of rapid transport systems. A major programme of road construction is well under way which has as one of its central objectives the relief of traffic bottle-necks.

The Government is active on this front which is more than can be said for the period when the Deputy's party was in power when the resources provided for public transport, the road network, and for Garda enforcement, were totally insufficient.

Barr
Roinn