Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 28 Feb 1995

Vol. 449 No. 7

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Border Regions.

Rory O'Hanlon

Ceist:

27 Dr. O'Hanlon asked the Minister for Finance the new initiatives, if any, being considered to enhance the Border region to make it more attractive for inward investment and to offer greater encouragement for existing industry to grow; if he will consider special tax concessions for exports; and, in view of the fact that the EU and the countries contributing to the IFI recognise the need for special measures, if he will ensure that funding provided for the Border region is additional. [3730/95]

There are a number of initiatives specifically targeted at the Border region which should substantially boost economic development in the region.

Commission approval for the Ireland-Northern Ireland INTERREG Programme was announced yesterday. This is the successor to the INTERREG programme for the Border region which ran from 1991 to mid 1994. It is a multisectoral programme comprising a wide range of measures which will give a substantial boost to economic development in the region.

The EU funding for the joint programme amounts to 157 million ECU (approximately £125 million in Irish pound terms). Of this, 89.5 million ECU (approximately £72 million) will go to the Southern Border counties.

As a coherent economic development strategy for the Border region is dependent on adequate infrastructural foundations, the bulk of the funding will be allocated to the infrastructural and environmental protection sub-programmes.Roads, sanitary services, electricity networks and telecommunications are vital underpinnings to the tourism, agricultural, food processing, industrial and service sectors.

As the Deputy will be aware, additional EU funding is being provided to support the Northern Ireland peace process. Draft guidelines have now been approved by the Commission and are in course of examination by the European Parliament, committee of the regions, the economic and social committee and the management committee on community initiatives. Formal adoption of the initiative is expected around the end of April and the operational programme is expected to be approved before the end of the year.

The total EU funding available to the initiative will be in the region of 300 million ECU over three years. The Border counties on the southern side will get at least 20 per cent of the aid amounting to approximately 20 million ECU (£16 million) per annum over the period. Funding over a further two year period will be subject to a review of the situation by the Commission. As with the INTERREG programme the funding available under the peace programme will represent a significant contribution to economic development in the Border region.

There will be an extensive consultative process as part of the preparation of the peace programme. Arrangements in regard to this will be announced at a later date.

President Clinton has appointed Senator George Mitchell as his special adviser for economic initiatives to support the peace process in Ireland. He has been mandated to organise the US investment conference on Ireland to be held in Washington on 24-26 May 1995.

The conference is part of a package of economic measures announced on 1 November by President Clinton to assist in the consolidation of the peace process in Northern Ireland. The most significant of these has been the announced intention to increase the US funding to the International Fund for Ireland by an additional $10 million in 1996 and 1997 on top of the $20 million funding announced for 1995.

The conference will offer a major opportunity to attract new US investment to Northern Ireland and the Border counties. Both Governments will be availing of the conference to reinforce the message that there is now a lasting peace in Northern Ireland and that this dramatically improves the environment for US trade and investment in Ireland.

The Government is targeting considerable additional resources at tackling infrastructural weaknesses in the southern Border counties to further enhance their attractiveness as an investment location. The EU INTERREG programme is an important element of our approach. INTERREG, the peace initiative and the Washington investment conference will greatly complement existing programmes.

As regards the Deputy's suggestion relating to the introduction of special tax concessions in the Border regions to encourage exports, such a course of action would fall foul of EU law. Under the State Aids provisions of the Treaty of Rome, any aid which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall be held to be incompatible with the common market where trade between member states is affected. A special tax concession designed specifically to encourage exports would clearly act to distort competition in this way.

I would point out to the Deputy that a special concessionary rate of corporation tax of 10 per cent already exists for manufacturing and this is available country-wide including the Border regions. In addition, in this year's budget I made the first step in a move to reduce the standard rate of corporation tax paid by services companies and other non-manufacturing concerns towards a level comparable with overseas competitors. Even if EU law were not a barrier, I would not be prepared to start recomplicating the corporate tax system by the introduction of special rates of corporation tax for particular regions. The Deputy is well aware of the tax planning opportunities which such a course of action would open up and the demands I would receive for similar special treatment from many other areas which would view themselves as being just as deserving as the Border regions.

I thank the Minister for his long and comprehensive reply. Is he aware that the European Union has, over the years, recognised the problems in all frontier areas and provided special funding? In Ireland the situation has been even more difficult by virtue of the 25 years of violence. Does the Minister accept that in the last 20 years, indeed, since we joined the EU in 1973, successive Governments have tended to make the moneys substitutional rather than additional with the result that the Border counties are underdeveloped? At present inward investment comes within 20 miles of Dublin where there are good roads, good water and sewerage and good telecommunications and telemarketing.Is the Minister aware that in the Border counties there is practically no fibre optic cable for telemarketing? Now that the peace process is in place and the EU and the US recognise the problems at the Border, will the Minister ensure that the funding will be additional and that the Border counties will receive their fair share from the National Exchequer for the provision of infrastructure so that we attract badly needed inward investment.

It is my intention to ensure that the moneys will be additional but it would be rash to give a guarantee that the percentage will be 100 per cent. The vast bulk of the money under the INTERREG programme will be used to rectify the infrastructural deficiencies to make the Border counties an attractive investment location. The fact that they are no longer close to a zone of violence — the position for the past 25 years — but to a market of 1.5 million people will enhance their attractiveness.

I understand that provision is made in the new INTERREG programme as agreed for urban renewal in Northern Ireland and that this provision will not apply to the southern part of the island. The IFI has been providing funding for urban renewal in Border towns but serious difficulties are being encountered in obtaining matching funds. The urban renewal programme would be beneficial if it was applied to all 12 Border counties.

I am not aware that provision is made for urban renewal in Northern Ireland in the INTERREG programme. It is possible that opportunities could be availed of either under the infrastructure sub-programme or the environmental protection sub-programme to combine some elements of the urban renewal provisions with our designation provisions. To the best of my knowledge there are no similar provisions in Northern Ireland.

We on this side of the House have been making representations and have raised questions about the proportion of funds to be allocated to the six Northern counties and the six Southern counties. The figures of 75 per cent for the six Northern counties and 25 per cent for the six Southern counties were used as a yardstick. We feel it should be divided on a 50:50 basis. Agreement has now been reached that the funds will be allocated on an 80:20 basis. Does the Minister accept that the six Southern counties do not receive the same level of funding from the Exchequer and this fact has not been taken into account? Does he further accept that under the INTERREG programme funding has been provided for projects such as the Ballyconnell Canal and other infrastructural developments rather than to replace the jobs lost following the introduction of the Single Market? That is the reason the INTERREG programme was introduced.For instance, 250 jobs in the customs clearance agency in my area disappeared overnight. Will the Minister endeavour to target the available funding at the replacement of jobs that have been lost rather than at the provision of infrastructure?

I agree with the Deputy's colleague, Deputy O'Hanlon, that the Border counties have been placed at a disadvantage during the past 25 years in particular — he made specific reference to the lack of a fibre optic network for telemarketing services — because of the lack of infrastructure. We can make the most effective use of the available funding by upgrading infrastructure on a once-off basis so that local small businesses and entrepreneurial talent can flourish within a modern framework. By the same token the IDA can attract state of the art foreign companies to this region which would otherwise not locate there. It would be shortsighted to use the money to replace jobs which have been lost because of the dismantling of the customs barriers between North and South; it would be better to improve and upgrade the system to allow economic activity.

The Minister mentioned the environmental protection sub-programme, which is one of the five sub-programmes of the INTERREG programme. Strong representations have been made for an increase in the allocation for roads. Under the programme for 1991-93 only £3.9 million was provided which accounted for between 4 and 5 per cent of the total allocation. According to the Book of Estimates there will be a reduction in the allocation this year. If additional funding is not provided under the INTERREG programme we will find ourselves in a serious position. Will the Minister examine this matter and increase the allocation substantially? There was also a reference to the Delors package. We were led to believe, in replies to a Dáil question, that funds would be allocated on a 75:25 basis. For whatever reason it has been decided that they will be allocated on an 80:20 basis. I hope there will be no further reduction.

We were all led to believe certain things about Delors packages.

We lost out.

As Deputy Ahern confirmed, in this instance funding will be allocated on an 80:20 basis. The amounts of money involved are substantial and it will be up to us to make the best and most effective use of them. I noted what the Deputy said about the road network and I will bring this to the attention of the Department of the Environment.

Given the importance of the peace process, having regard to the impact of the INTERREG programme and that the new INTERREG II programme will have, the efforts of the IFI, the conference which will take place in America to which the Minister referred and the fact that the Framework Document has been made available to people in Northern Ireland to make them aware of the economic benefits, does the Minister agree that it may be possible for him, in conjunction with the European Union and his British counterpart, to do something similar to highlight the tangible economic benefits to solidify the process? There should be a major drive to provide this information to every home in the Border areas as this may be of benefit.

I agree with the Deputy. The criticism was expressed by many people in Border areas that there was a low level of recognition and understanding of the INTERREG I programme and that there was a communications problem in that many of the ongoing activities were not understood or recognised by people in the counties affected. Provision is made in the INTERREG II programme for the establishment of a local office in the region, for an extensive consultation process and community involvement. The Deputy's suggestion that this should be broadened to consolidate the peace process and the discussions on the Framework Document has much merit and I will consider it in consultation with the Department of Foreign Affairs.

Has the Government given instructions to all Government Departments, State and semi-State bodies to attach the utmost urgency to an investment programme for the Border counties and, if so, has a special monitoring system been put in place to monitor the work of these agencies?

By virtue of the fact that there is the INTERREG programme and now the Delors package co-ordination will be required. A higher profile for this activity both at Government and public level will also be required and I will be happy to try to do something along the lines suggested by the Deputy.

Deputy O'Hanlon mentioned the Washington conference. Does the Minister have any idea of the format? Will it be attended by public representatives and members of the business community? What type of conference will it be? Will it be for one or two days or has the Minister any idea of the format?

The conference is being organised in Washington. The person partly responsible for its organisation is a namesake of mine, although no relative, a lawyer called Paul Quinn who is actively involved in Irish-American political affairs. I understand it will be a three day conference. The details of it are still being formulated. The Deputy may have met former Senator George Mitchell who was in Ireland with his advisers taking soundings and opinions from people both North and South to decide how best to organise and structure the conference. The object of the exercise is to proclaim to United States investors the advantages of Ireland as a location and how attractive it has now become as a result of the peace process. The conference will be held from 23 to 26 May, inclusive. The exact programme has not yet been finalised.

The Minister referred to a consultative process in regard to the European Union finding. Will the Minister elaborate on that? In regard to the Washington conference, the IDA regional managers in the two regions along the Border know the situation. Will the Minister ensure they will be involved? In regard to American industry, in five counties along the Border there are only 16 American companies out of a total of 400 in Ireland generally. It is important that we make proper representation at the Washington conference to attract new investment.

In response to the Deputy's first question, my understanding of the Delors package is that its details have to be worked out but provisions will be made for much more consultation and local community participation both in the formulation and the operation of that programme than was previously the case. In respect of the Washington conference, I will certainly bring to the attention of the Minister for Enterprise and Employment the desirability of having local IDA representatives at the conference in addition to the personnel who would normally attend.

Will the Minister confirm whether his Department has a proposal to set up a secretariat in the Border areas to deal with INTERREG funding into the future? If there is not any such proposal, does the Minister believe it would be appropriate in view of what is said in the Framework Document with regard to North-South bodies?

I can confirm that consideration is being given to a proposal to set up a local secretariat to provide closer contact for INTERREG II. With the advent of the peace programme, the logic for doing that seems very compelling.

Barr
Roinn