Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 25 May 1995

Vol. 453 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Washington Conference.

This matter relates to the need to ensure that the interests of the six Border counties are fully represented at the Washington Conference. Some people may think I am raising this issue too late but I do not think so.

Most people regarded the Washington Trade and Investment Conference as a unique opportunity for Border regions, North and South, to catch up on entitlements they had not received for many years. The economies of these regions have been severely damaged by 25 years of violence. Following the announcement of the conference I did all I could at meetings of the Monaghan County Enterprise Board, of which I am a member, and the IDA to ensure that we would have a well documented case to put at the conference. When the co-ops and farming organisations gave evidence at the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation I put it to the President of the ICOS, Billy Nagle, that the co-ops in Monaghan engaged in exports, including three of the major co-ops in Border counties with acquisitions in the US, were ideally placed to develop joint ventures.

On 25 April I put down a question to the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs asking the steps, if any, he had taken to ensure that Government agencies in the six counties south of the Border had a well documented submission for the Washington Trade Conference in seeking inward investment. He replied that in preparation for the conference, Government Departments and State agencies were co-ordinating closely to ensure the best possible presentation of our case. My county enterprise board informed me that at no time was it contacted regarding a submission. The chief executive officers of the enterprise boards were best placed to know the needs of their counties — they had all the statistics and knew the sites and personnel. The county manager in Monaghan was willing to give his invitation to the conference to the chief executive officer of the enterprise board but he was not allowed do this.

I was so concerned about this matter that I wrote to the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs on 16 May stating:

I wish to express my grave disappointment at the failure to issue chief executive officers in the County Enterprise Boards with an invitation to attend the White House Conference for Trade and Inward Investment in Ireland. I believe they would have been ideally placed to make positive contributions to industrial development and investment in Ireland. From enquiries made by me recently there does not appear to be any co-ordinated effort by Government development agencies in the Border region to avail of this opportunity to secure additional funding.

Last night I watched "Marketplace", half of which was devoted to the Washington Conference. It featured four Northern Ireland firms and discussed the conference with an MEP, MP and an economist from the University of Ulster. The only person who referred to the six counties south of the Border was Séamus Mallon who said that the conference was for the six counties north of the Border and the six counties south of the Border. This morning I contacted RTE to let it know now displeased I was with this programme. We have been short-changed in the past and we should not put up with it any longer.

It has been generally accepted for many years that Cavan and Monaghan have fared badly from inward investment. They depend on local entrepreneurs in their food, furniture and engineering industries. We had a unique opportunity but we blew it on this occasion. I will pursue this issue until I get an answer to the case documented and as to who was contacted when the people who had most to offer were ignored and not allowed to attend the conference.

I am grateful for the opportunity to comment on the representation of the Border counties at the White House Conference for Trade and Investment in Ireland, which is currently under way in Washington.

I pay tribute to President Clinton and the US administration for their generosity and commitment and the great efforts they have made towards the peace dividend in organising this conference and for their attitude generally. We owe them a debt of gratitude for what they have done so far.

The interests of the Border counties are being fully represented at the White House Investment Conference in Washington by national, regional and local representatives. This is best illustrated by the high-powered team that makes up the Government delegation at the conference which includes the Tánaiste and the Ministers for Finance, Tourism and Trade, Enterprise and Employment, and the Ministers of State at the Department of Transport, Energy and Communications and at the Department of Enterprise and Employment. In addition, the majority of the representatives that form the Oireachtas delegation come from Border counties.

At county level, the county council chairperson and manager of the six Border counties have all been invited. There is also a number of representatives from county or local-based economic development groups at the conference.

The primary emphasis of the conference is on trade and investment. Accordingly, the greatest representation of the Border counties is from its business community. The US organisers have brought forward a specially designed "Matchmaker programme" that will match 50 Border companies with American companies. Under this programme a Border company will be matched with several appropriate American companies to develop a particular venture or commercial relationship that will be of mutual commercial benefit. Contact between the "matched" US and Border companies will be arranged by the US Commerce Department at the conference. It is anticipated that this will be a very significant element in the strategy to direct even more US inward investment to the Border counties.

All Government Ministers, State agencies and Government officials at the conference are also emphasising the need to recognise and target investment opportunities at the Border counties as these are the areas in this jurisdiction which have been most affected by the negative impact of the Border and the troubles of the last 25 years. For example, the IDA will be represented not only by its top executives from its headquarters in Dublin but also by its regional directors in Sligo and Dundalk. In addition, the IDA has produced a very attractive promotional package for distribution at the conference which highlights the economic, social and environmental benefits for US companies locating in the Border counties.

The US Commerce Department has also produced a strategic overview paper that highlights the benefits of locating in the region for potential US investors.

Deputies from the Border counties will recall their meeting with the Tánaiste last March at which he gave them a commitment——

A commitment on which he did not deliver.

——that he would seek to ensure maximum representation from the political, economic and community development groups in the region. The American organisers have achieved a reasonable balance in representation from the Border counties.

The invitation list for the White House conference was a matter for the American organisers and could not be determined by the Government.

I express our wholehearted appreciation of and gratitude for the work done and the attitude and approach adopted by the American Administration to date in bringing about this wonderful opportunity to secure a peace dividend for Ireland, North and South.

Barr
Roinn