This is a question about Trudder House, not about the general policy of the DPP. I am constrained in giving much information about this case because the file has gone to the DPP. The file was forwarded to the DPP following an 11-month Garda investigation into allegations received that children at Trudder House, Newtownmountkennedy, County Wicklow had been sexually abused by five male staff over a 19 year period from 1975 to 1994. His directions are now awaited. As part of the investigation, gardaí travelled to the United Kingdom and, with the assistance of Scotland Yard, interviewed former residents of Trudder House now residing in the UK. Given that prosecutions may be instituted, I cannot say any more about the investigation.
I share Deputy O'Donnell's concern that people are only now finding the courage and the wherewithal to come forward and report abuses that happened many years ago. These things happened at a time when we all thought Ireland was the land of saints and scholars and nothing like this happened behind our closed doors. Sadly, it did. There were probably very enlightened people at that time who said it was happening, but they were not listened to. The question of lapse of time is an issue. However, I would not anticipate the decision of the DPP on any case. I am sure the DPP takes lapse of time into consideration when making his decision. He has already said publicly that there is not a policy decision that just because something happened 20 years ago a prosecution cannot be instituted. All the evidence is put before the DPP, and he must make his decision based on the range of evidence. What is being highighted is that in some instances it has been the lapse of time that has prevented a prosecution, but there is no policy decision. I am not free to comment on what will happen in this case.