Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 3 Mar 1998

Vol. 488 No. 1

Written Answers - Tax Relief for Disabled People.

Ivor Callely

Ceist:

49 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for Finance if he will review the first schedule of the primary medical certificate issued for the purposes of section 92 of the Finance Act, 1989, and the Disabled Drivers and Disabled Passengers Tax Concession Regulations, 1994; if his attention has been drawn to the difficulties with regard to the completion of the form by the director of community care due to the restrictive nature of the description of particulars of the applicant's disablement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5590/98]

The medical criteria for the purposes of the tax concession under section 92 of the Finance Act, 1989, as amended, are set down in regulation 3 of the Disabled Drivers and Passengers (Tax Concessions) Regulations, 1994. Six different types of disablement are listed under the regulations and a qualifying person must satisfy one or more of them. Where the person meets the medical criteria, the local director of community care and medical officer of health issues a primary medical certificate for presentation to the Revenue Commissioners. Where the issue of a certificate is refused, the person concerned may appeal that decision to the disabled drivers' medical board of appeal, an independent board, whose decision is final.

The current list of medical criteria was drawn up following wide ranging consultation with all interested parties, including organisations representing the disabled. The scope of the medical criteria for qualification was looked at in considerable detail in the course of the review, bearing in mind the various representations which had been received seeking the extension of the benefits of the scheme to many additional categories of disabled people. I should emphasise that the scheme is targeted at those people who are severely and permanently disabled with regard to physical mobility.

I am informed by the Office of the Revenue Commissioners, which administers the scheme, that complaints have been received from medical officers responsible for the issue of the primary medical certificates, that they are being pressurised to issue certificates to persons who are not meeting the qualifying medical criteria. It is understood that persons who have been refused certificates have complained that others, who are no longer disabled, continue to benefit from tax relief despite the improvement in their condition. While I have no plans to carry out a wide ranging review, the aforementioned aspect is now being examined as part of a technical review of the scheme. The question of primary medical certificates being issued, subject to a review clause, at the discretion of the medical officer, and subject to appeal to the medical board of appeal, is under consideration.
Barr
Roinn