Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 2 Jul 1998

Vol. 493 No. 5

Order of Business.

It is proposed to take No. 10, motion re Committees of the Houses of the Oireachtas (Compellabilty, Privileges and Immunities of Witnesses) Act, 1997; No. 8, motion re Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1983 (Increases in Number of Ordinary Members of An Bord Pleanála) Order, 1998; No. 34a. Industrial Development (Enterprise Ireland) Bill, 1998 [Seanad] — Order for Report and Report and Final Stages; No. 5, Criminal Justice (Release of Prisoners) Bill, 1998 — Order for Second Stage and Second and Subsequent Stages; No. 5a. Firearms (Temporary Provisions) Bill, 1998 — Order for Second Stage and Second and Subsequent Stages.

It is also proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that: (1) The Dáil shall sit later than 4.45 p.m. today and business shall be interrupted not later than 7 p.m. (2) Nos. 10 and 8 shall be decided without debate. (3) Report and Final Stages of No. 34a. shall be taken today and the proceedings thereon, if not previously concluded, shall be brought to a conclusion at 12 noon today by one question which shall be put from the Chair and which shall, in relation to amendments, include only those set down or accepted by the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment. (4) The Second and Subsequent Stages of No. 5 shall be taken today; the proceedings on the Second Stage thereof, if not previously concluded, shall be brought to a conclusion at 1.15 p.m. today and the following arrangements shall apply: (i) The opening speech of a Minister or Minister of State and the speeches of the main spokespersons for the Fine Gael Party and the Labour Party shall not exceed 15 minutes in each case. (ii) The speech of the main spokesperson for the Democratic Left Party shall not exceed ten minutes. (iii) The speech of the main spokesperson for the Green Party shall not exceed five minutes. (iv) The speech of each other Member called upon shall not exceed ten minutes in each case. (v) Members may share time; and (vi) A Minister or Minister of State shall be called upon to make a speech in reply which shall not exceed fiveminutes. (5) The Second and Subsequent Stages of No. 5a. shall be taken today; the proceedings on the Second Stage thereof, if not previously concluded, shall be brought to a conclusion at 2.30 p.m. today and the following arrangements shall apply: (i) The opening speech of a Minister or Minister of State and the speeches of the main spokespersons for the Fine Gael Party and the Labour Party shall not exceed 15 minutes in each case. (ii) The speeches of the main spokespersons for the Democratic Left Party and the Green Party and of each other Member called upon shall not exceed ten minutes in each case. (iii) Members may share time; and (iv) A Minister or Minister of State shall be called upon to make a speech in reply which shall not exceed ten minutes. (6) The proceedings on the Committee and Remaining Stages of No. 5, if not previously concluded, shall be brought to a conclusion at 5.30 p.m. today by one question which shall be put from the Chair and which shall, in relation to amendments, include only those set down or accepted by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform. (7) The proceedings on the Committee and Remaining Stages of No. 5a, if not previously concluded, shall be brought to a conclusion at 7 p.m. today by one question which shall be put from the Chair and which shall, in relation to amendments, include only those set down or accepted by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform; and (8) The Dáil shall sit tomorrow at 10.30 a.m. and shall adjourn not later than 4.45 p.m.

Is the proposal for dealing with the Second Stage of No. 5 agreed?

No. It is disgraceful that we are not having a proper Committee Stage debate on legislation concerning the release of some prisoners, but not others, on a discriminatory basis. The criteria for prisoner release should be settled by Statute and as that is not being done in the legislation there should be an opportunity to amend it. It displays very bad ordering of Government business that this legislation was not produced in sufficient time to allow time for a Second Stage debate and a separate Committee Stage debate with a reasonable interval in which to consider amendments.

My party colleagues and I have raised this matter on a number of occasions and we offered assistance to the Government in drafting the legislation. The Government stated that legislation was not necessary. We provided a minimalist Bill that, on the one hand, gave effect to that legal observation and, yet, met the political imperative of introducing legislation on the other. Without any prior consultation, the Government then introduced fairly comprehensive legislation, including provision for a commission. As Deputy Bruton said, the Government is attempting to put all this through in an unacceptably short period. I am not happy with the time provisions that have now been made available, having regard to the nature of this legislation which was not signalled by the Government, either formally or informally, at any stage prior to the circulation of the legislation.

I echo the concerns expressed about this Bill by the two previous speakers. It is a more detailed Bill than the Taoiseach indicated would be necessary. Despite that, the functions being provided to the commission are virtually non existent. It is very much a cover for inaction. We should be given adequate time to debate it on Committee Stage.

The introduction of this Bill was signalled a number of weeks ago. Legally and technically, we did not require legislation on this matter. We were advised by both the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform and the Attorney General on the matter but because of the wording in the British-Irish Agreement, I said we would bring it forward. Second Stage will be taken this morning and Committee Stage will be taken this afternoon. That is an adequate amount of time to address this issue.

Is the Taoiseach seriously suggesting that lunchtime is sufficient to draft amendments on whether some people should stay in jail for up to 20 years and others should be released within a short time? If we are a democracy ruled by law, surely this matter should be debated properly. The Taoiseach's suggestion that lunchtime would be sufficient time to assess what has been said on Second Stage, draft amendments, consider those amendments and, if necessary, adopt them, is not reasonable in any concept of parliamentary business.

I propose amending the Order of Business to extend the time this evening from 7 p.m. to 10.30 p.m. to tease out the amendments to which Deputy John Bruton and others referred. I have raised this matter repeatedly in the past and the time allocation for this Bill is not sufficient. We are due to end our business this evening at 7 p.m. I propose to the Government that Standing Orders be amended to allocate three and a half hours extra time to this legislation.

I received no such request. The Whips originally agreed that the two Stages would be taken together. Yesterday I received a request to separate Second Stage and Committee Stage and I agreed to that. Second Stage will be taken today from 12 p.m. to 1.15 p.m. and Committee Stage will be taken from 3.50 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. This legislation is following on from the primary legislation. I did not receive notice from Deputy Quinn or anyone else for additional time. Members have had two midnight sittings and I do not believe more time is needed for this matter.

I asked the Taoiseach on Tuesday to split the time so that Committee Stage could be taken separately.

The Whips did not agree to that.

It is entirely inadequate. I do not know what the Government Whip was talking about when he said the Whips met yesterday. Nobody here was at such a meeting.

Does the Taoiseach consider it reasonable and proper parliamentary practice that sanctions are placed on tabling amendments to this legislation and that they must be tabled and circulated before the Minister introduces the legislation to the House?

This legislation will give effect to a commitment in the British-Irish Agreement which was negotiated with skill in the final stages by the Taoiseach but which was the product of the collective political efforts of the parties in this House. I ask the Taoiseach to reconsider this issue. We know from the debate that characterised the first session of the Assembly in Northern Ireland yesterday that this is an issue of immense sensitivity. We are only looking for three extra hours to tease out these matters, none of which were intimated when the matter was raised repeatedly by me prior to the publication of this legislation. We have only glanced at this legislation. I remind the Taoiseach that the normal convention is that Opposition parties have two weeks to study legislation between its publication and debate in this House. In the spirit of co-operation which should send a message North of the Border, I ask the Taoiseach to reconsider this matter, allow the Whips to meet and provide for extra time. We have to be here tomorrow anyway.

I propose an amendment to Standing Orders.

That is not in order as there is a proposal before the House. Members can either vote for or against the proposal.

It is possible to amend the Order of Business. I propose an amendment to remove the words "and Remaining Stages" from the Order of Business so that Second Stage will be concluded at 1.15 p.m., thereby allowing arrangements to be made by agreement for the remaining Stages to be taken.

Many people have arrangements tonight because they are not going home. They will be here tomorrow. In view of what Deputy Quinn has said, although I was not formally requested to do so, I will change the Order of Business so that we sit to 9 p.m. That will allow a further two hours to debate this Bill.

I thank the Taoiseach.

I ask the Taoiseach to remove the words "and Remaining Stages" from the Order of Business.

We are not dealing with that proposal, which is No. 6, but with No. 4.

I am dealing with No. 4.

We are dealing with the proposal for Second Stage.

Yes. No. 4 states: "The Second and Remaining Stages of No. 5 shall be taken today". I wish to remove the words, "and Remaining Stages", so that we have an opportunity to deal with Committee Stage later.

We are dealing with the fourth proposal. Is the proposal for dealing with Second Stage of No. 5 agreed to?

What is wrong with taking it tomorrow? That is a composite proposal.

We did not reach No. 6 yet.

I read out No. 5a which was the Firearms (Temporary Provisions) Bill, 1998 — Order for Second Stage and Second and Subsequent Stages. I then said the Dáil should sit later than 4.45 p.m. today and business should be interrupted not later than 7 p.m. I amend that so that the Dáil should sit later than 4.45 p.m. and the business should be interrupted not later than 9 p.m. The Whips can work out the time slots later today.

Is that proposal agreed to? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with Second Stage of No. 5 agreed? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with Second Stage of No. 5a agreed?

What provision has been made for a separate Committee Stage to ensure that there is adequate time available to consider amendments?

As regards No. 5a, this legislation has been introduced with undue haste. The measure is unwise, undesirable and dangerous. We oppose it being taken today.

(Dublin West): Every songbird in the country is dreading the Firearms (Temporary Provisions) Bill, 1998.

We cannot discuss the contents of the Bill.

(Dublin West): It cannot be squeezed into this minuscule amount of time.

Is the proposal for dealing with Second Stage of No. 5a agreed?

Question put.
The Dáil divided: Tá , 74; Níl, 62.

  • Ahern, Bertie.
  • Flood, Chris.
  • Ahern, Dermot.
  • Foley, Denis.
  • Ahern, Michael.
  • Fox, Mildred.
  • Ahern, Noel.
  • Hanafin, Mary.
  • Andrews, David.
  • Harney, Mary.
  • Ardagh, Seán.
  • Haughey, Seán.
  • Aylward, Liam.
  • Healy-Rae, Jackie.
  • Blaney, Harry.
  • Kelleher, Billy.
  • Brady, Johnny.
  • Kenneally, Brendan.
  • Brady, Martin.
  • Killeen, Tony.
  • Brennan, Matt.
  • Kirk, Séamus.
  • Brennan, Séamus.
  • Kitt, Michael.
  • Briscoe, Ben.
  • Kitt, Tom.
  • Browne, John (Wexford).
  • Lawlor, Liam.
  • Byrne, Hugh.
  • Lenihan, Brian.
  • Callely, Ivor.
  • Lenihan, Conor.
  • Collins, Michael.
  • Martin, Micheál.
  • Cooper-Flynn, Beverley.
  • McCreevy, Charlie.
  • Cowen, Brian.
  • McDaid, James.
  • Cullen, Martin.
  • McGennis, Marian.
  • Daly, Brendan.
  • McGuinness, John.
  • Davern, Noel.
  • Moffatt, Thomas.
  • de Valera, Síle.
  • Molloy, Robert.
  • Dennehy, John.
  • Moloney, John.
  • Doherty, Seán.
  • Moynihan, Donal.
  • Ellis, John.
  • Moynihan, Michael.
  • Fahey, Frank.
  • O'Dea, Willie.
  • Fleming, Seán.
  • O'Donnell, Liz.
  • O'Donoghue, John.
  • Ryan, Eoin.
  • O'Flynn, Noel.
  • Smith, Brendan.
  • O'Hanlon, Rory.
  • Smith, Michael.
  • O'Keeffe, Ned.
  • Treacy, Noel.
  • O'Kennedy, Michael.
  • Wade, Eddie.
  • O'Malley, Desmond.
  • Wallace, Dan.
  • O'Rourke, Mary.
  • Wallace, Mary.
  • Power, Seán.
  • Walsh, Joe.
  • Roche, Dick.
  • Wright, G. V.

Níl

  • Barnes, Monica.
  • Higgins, Michael.
  • Bell, Michael.
  • Hogan, Philip.
  • Belton, Louis.
  • Howlin, Brendan.
  • Boylan, Andrew.
  • Kenny, Enda.
  • Bradford, Paul.
  • McCormack, Pádraic.
  • Broughan, Thomas.
  • McDowell, Derek.
  • Browne, John (Carlow-Kilkenny).
  • McGahon, Brendan.
  • Bruton, John.
  • McGrath, Paul.
  • Bruton, Richard.
  • McManus, Liz.
  • Burke, Liam.
  • Mitchell, Gay.
  • Burke, Ulick.
  • Mitchell, Jim.
  • Carey, Donal.
  • Naughten, Denis.
  • Clune, Deirdre.
  • Neville, Dan.
  • Connaughton, Paul.
  • O'Keeffe, Jim.
  • Cosgrave, Michael.
  • O'Shea, Brian.
  • Crawford, Seymour.
  • O'Sullivan, Jan.
  • Creed, Michael.
  • Owen, Nora.
  • Currie, Austin.
  • Penrose, William.
  • D'Arcy, Michael.
  • Perry, John.
  • De Rossa, Proinsias.
  • Quinn, Ruairí.
  • Dukes, Alan.
  • Rabbitte, Pat.
  • Enright, Thomas.
  • Reynolds, Gerard.
  • Farrelly, John.
  • Ring, Michael.
  • Finucane, Michael.
  • Ryan, Seán.
  • Fitzgerald, Frances.
  • Sargent, Trevor.
  • Flanagan, Charles.
  • Sheehan, Patrick.
  • Gilmore, Éamon.
  • Stagg, Emmet.
  • Gormley, John.
  • Stanton, David.
  • Hayes, Brian.
  • Timmins, Billy.
  • Higgins, Jim.
  • Upton, Pat.
  • Higgins, Joe.
  • Wall, Jack.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies S. Brennan and Power; Níl, Deputies Sheehan and Stagg.
Question declared carried.

Is the proposal for dealing with Committee and Remaining Stages of item 5 agreed?

On that matter, now that it is agreed by the House that both Bills will be taken today, albeit on a contested basis, I suggest that there be an allocation of time as between Committee and Report Stages so that there will be a Report Stage for each Bill. I suggest that perhaps the Criminal Justice (Release of Prisoners) Bill, 1998, Committee Stage, might run from 3.50 p.m. to 5.30 p.m; followed by the Firearms (Amendment) Bill, Committee Stage, from 5.30 p.m. to 7.30 p.m; the Criminal Justice (Release of Prisoners) Bill, 1998, Report Stage, from 7.30 p.m. to 8.15 p.m; and the Firearms (Amendment) Bill, Report Stage, from 8.15 p.m. to 9 p.m; and that notice requirements with regard to amendments would be such as to facilitate amendments to be submitted after the conclusion of each stage.

I have no difficulty with the concept of breaking up the time. I understand that the Whips have already had some discussions on this. Subject to them agreeing, I have no difficulty. I do not know whether the times outlined by the Deputy are the exact times.

I know this is the Taoiseach's function, but the proposal which I read is the one which has been put to, and agreed by, the Whips.

That is fine.

Does the Deputy want to do my job?

Is that agreed? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with Committee and Remaining Stages of item 5a agreed? Agreed.

Is the proposal for the sitting tomorrow agreed? Agreed.

Will the Taoiseach join me in condemning the sectarian attacks on Catholic churches overnight which display the worst features of bigotry and hatred of a kind which we must banish from this land? Will he agree it is inappropriate that this has occurred in particular on a day when such a hopeful sign has been shown in the appointment of a First Minister and Deputy First Minister for the two communities who are pledged to work together for the interests of all?

A number of matters relate to Northern Ireland. Certainly, I join Deputy Bruton, as no doubt other Leaders in this House will, in condemning the sectarian attacks in places of worship. May I ask the Taoiseach——

I will return to the Deputy if he has a different question.

I, too, join the other Deputies in condemning last night's arson attacks on churches, regardless of their denomination. It is an attempt to drag Northern Ireland back into the past when a major step forward was taken yesterday with the election of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of the Assembly. I congratulate David Trimble and Séamus Mallon on their election yesterday; it is a major step forward.

On the two issues, first, I congratulate David Trimble and Séamus Mallon and all the other Members who took their places at the Assembly yesterday. It was an historic day. Many of us in this House would have thought it was not possible to get all the representatives of Nationalists and republicans, and Unionists and loyalists working together. I certainly wish the First Minister and Deputy First Minister well in their task.

I join Deputy Bruton in utterly deploring the arson attacks on a number of Catholic churches during the night. It is totally inconsistent with any notion of civil or religious liberty.

Hear, hear.

I ask every responsible person in the Nationalist community to ensure there is no retaliation.

Hear, hear.

That would be only going down the road of those who perpetrated the attacks last night. We have seen all that before and we do not want to see it again. We must continue to make every effort to seek an accommodation in these difficult parades issues on the basis of mutual respect and tolerance. I just hope nobody gets drawn into tit for tat actions. That would be entirely wrong. Needless to say, a Cheann Comhairle, I would be saying this regardless of the denomination of the churches which were attacked during the night.

I welcome the Taoiseach's remarks which I fully endorse and support. In view of the impasse which clearly remains with regard to Drumcree and the flashpoint which it could become, will the Taoiseach take any action in consultation with the British Prime Minister, who, it is reported, may visit Northern Ireland today or tomorrow? Will he indicate to the House if he has had any contact with either the British Prime Minister or the newly elected First Minister, David Trimble, and his deputy, Séamus Mallon.

There was ongoing contact throughout the night. I would like to be able to say that it is leading somewhere but that would not be correct. I am talking to many of the parties, including the British Prime Minister. Officials are in contact with people on the ground to find some basis on which to move forward. Everybody wants to do this. We will continue our efforts throughout the day.

On a different matter, will the Taoiseach ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment to make a statement to the House clarifying the situation about the loss of jobs at the Apple Corporation plant in Cork? There is confusion.

That matter is not appropriate to the Order of Business.

It was announced that only 150 jobs would be lost but we now know that at least 350 jobs will be lost. A spin has been put on it.

The Deputy is out of order.

I have tabled a private notice question. I hope you will allow it.

The Taoiseach has indicated on a number of occasions that there is a group working on the aspects of the British-Irish Agreement which are relevant to the Republic. Has a list of the legislation required been prepared; if so, when will it be published and will it include legislation providing for the establishment of the commission on human rights proposed in the Agreement?

I have the list and will pass it on to the Deputy.

Far be it from me to ask the Taoiseach to adjudicate on remarks made by two honourable lady members of his Government but will he clarify something? In debating the Estimates recently the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands said the Broadcasting Bill would be published in July. On Tuesday the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment indicated it would be published before the end of the year. As the man in charge, will the Taoiseach make a ruling and indicate clearly when we can expect to see the Bill?

That is a sexist remark.

It was not meant to be.

That is men for you.

The matter is being discussed. I hope the Bill will be ready later in the summer.

The Taoiseach is splitting the difference.

As the Taoiseach is aware, Irish Enco, a large construction company, is likely to go into voluntary liquidation today. There are a number of suppliers throughout the country——

The matter does not arise on the Order of Business.

I am coming to the relevant question.

Does the Government plan to introduce legislation to protect small family businesses facing losses arising from liquidations of this nature?

No legislation has been promised.

I was surprised to learn that 75 members of the Defence Forces died while serving abroad. The Minister for Foreign Affairs has promised to introduce legislation to give effect to the convention on the protection of UN personnel serving abroad. The convention cannot come into effect until 20 countries have signed up. We cannot sign up until the legislation is passed. The Taoiseach informed me recently that it was not far off. Will he ensure it is brought forward in the new session?

That was my information but I will raise the matter with the Department of Foreign Affairs.

The Taoiseach informed me recently that he intends to make an order to amend other defective orders affecting non-salaried staff in what was CIE so that workers with 45 years' service will receive a pension greater than £45 per week. When will the order be made and will it apply retrospectively?

We have not reached the stage of preparing the order. The Attorney General is to present a report on what we can do and it will cover the question of retrospection. I said I would like to make progress before the end of July. I will inform the Deputy when the matter has been brought to a conclusion.

Will the Taoiseach confirm that the findings of the Price Waterhouse review of the Naval Service and Air Corps will be published and available before the end of July so that legislation can be introduced providing for the reform of the Defence Forces?

The matter is before the Government.

What is the current situation on the mental health Bill? Has the Government lost the will to proceed with the ground rents Bill?

The purpose of the mental health Bill is to update provisions for the detention and treatment of mentally disturbed persons. It is due to be published during the summer recess. We are awaiting legal advice on the other matter.

There has been an extraordinary delay in introducing the school attendance Bill which is of personal concern in the constituencies of the Taoiseach and Tánaiste. Is the Taoiseach aware that no school has been informed of the promised extra teacher allocation? These were announced three months before the end of the last school year.

It is not in order to raise that matter.

There are 1,000 schools expecting concessionary posts. The Minister has no intention of delivering on his excessive promises.

The Taoiseach should respond to the question relating to legislation only.

I have said many times that the Minister intends to introduce far more comprehensive legislation which will be ready before the end of the year.

Barr
Roinn