Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 1 Oct 1998

Vol. 494 No. 3

Written Answers - Hearing Impairment Claims.

Proinsias De Rossa

Ceist:

39 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Minister for Defence the Government's approach to dealing with army deafness claims particularly in view of the judgment given in the High Court on 22 July 1998 by Mr. Justice Johnston; the total number of claims settled to date; the total amount paid in compensation; the total number of claims outstanding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17826/98]

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

57 Mr. McGrath asked the Minister for Defence the cost to date of the deafness compensation claims submitted by members of the Defence Forces; the legal costs and the administrative cost in this regard; and the awards made. [17889/98]

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

65 Mr. J. O'Keeffe asked the Minister for Defence the position in relation to army deafness claims; the number lodged and the estimated cost of these claims; and his proposals for dealing with same. [17838/98]

Gay Mitchell

Ceist:

73 Mr. G. Mitchell asked the Minister for Defence the cost to date of the deafness compensation claims submitted by members of the Defence Forces; the legal costs and the administrative cost in this regard; and the awards made. [17890/98]

Ceist:

90 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Defence if he will make a statement regarding the hearing or settlement of outstanding claims against Defence Forces arising from hearing loss. [18086/98]

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

94 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Defence the cost to date of the deafness compensation claims submitted by members of the Defence Forces; the legal costs and the administrative cost in this regard; and the awards made. [17891/98]

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

114 Mr. McGrath asked the Minister for Defence the cost to date of the deafness compensation claims submitted by the Defence Forces; the legal costs and the administrative cost in this regard; and the awards made. [17888/98]

Frances Fitzgerald

Ceist:

177 Ms Fitzgerald asked the Minister for Defence the cost to date of the deafness compensation claims submitted by members of the Defence Forces; the legal costs and the administrative cost in this regard; and the awards made. [18126/98]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 39, 57, 65, 73, 90, 94, 114 and 177 together.

By 29 September, a total number of 13,538 claims for Army hearing loss compensation had been received. Settlements have been reached in a total of 1,635 cases and court awards following hearing have been made in 123 cases. A further 93 cases were successfully defended or withdrawn.

Administrative costs are currently estimated at approximately: £750,000 per year for staff and overheads in the Department of Defence; £850,000 per year for staff and overheads in respect of the Defence Forces; and, £795,000 per year for staff and overheads in the Chief State Solicitor's Office. A total estimate for administrative costs is therefore £2,395,000 per year.

Cost projects for the likely eventual cost of Army hearing loss litigation have fluctuated up and down over the past number of years, particularly as various "milestones" have been reached. Given the current and potential scale of the problem, allied to the complex legal and medical variants, it is impossible to give an accurate computation of the future cost. What is clear however, regardless of how the problem is approached, is that we are dealing with a cost burden of huge magnitude.

In light of the award made in theHanley test case last July, my Department has estimated that the cost for loss of hearing on the 11,500 claims which are currently outstanding would be of the order of £550 million. If legal costs and damages for matters such as loss of earnings are included, the potential bill is of the order of one billion pounds. Claims are continuing to arrive in the Department at a current average rate of 50 cases per week. Clearly, if claims continue to arrive in these proportions, we are talking of an eventual cost of multiples of these estimates. The effect of this cost on public finances will be damaging beyond reasonable acceptance. Such damage is not acceptable to the Government nor do I believe is it acceptable to the taxpayer.
Barr
Roinn