Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 3 Mar 1999

Vol. 501 No. 4

Written Answers. - Aviation Policy.

Ivan Yates

Ceist:

71 Mr. Yates asked the Minister for Public Enterprise if her attention has been drawn to the possible consequences for Europe in relation to EU Directive 98/0070 of retaliatory action whereby other forms of trade protection might be put in place which would have a negative effect on European aviation; and the steps, if any, she will take in conjunction with her Government colleagues to delay the implementation of this directive in view of the allegation that it is merely a trade protection for one European aeroplane manufacturer. [6305/99]

Ivan Yates

Ceist:

72 Mr. Yates asked the Minister for Public Enterprise the situation in relation to EU Directive 98/0070 relating to aviation noise; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that this EU decision involves breaking away from the global aviation rules established by ICAO; if her attention has further been drawn to the fact that noise levels by the ICAO standard are more strict than that now contained in this EU directive by ECAC; and the steps, if any, she will take to safeguard employment here which is now being jeopardised by the non-usage of certain aeroplanes which have been reconditioned. [6306/99]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 71 and 72 together.

The European Commission put forward a proposal in March 1998 for a Council regulation on the registration and operation within the Community of certain types of civil subsonic jet aeroplanes which have been modified and recertificated as meeting the standards of Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The purpose of the proposed regulation is to prevent a further deterioration of the noise situation around EU airports. The Governments of a number of EU countries have been coming under increasing pressure to introduce unilateral noise abatement measures at the major hub airports.

The Commission considers that the environmental performance of hushkitted and similarly modified aeroplanes, in terms of fuel burn and atmospheric pollution, is in general worse, and the noise level of these aircraft significantly worse, than for modern current production aircraft and that hushkitted and similarly modified aircraft make a disproportional contribution to the noise impact and degradation of the environment around airports.

The EU Transport Council unanimously adopted a common position on the draft regulation in November 1998. The European Parliament approved the Council's common position on 10 February 1999. Ireland agreed to the proposed regulation after a process of consultation with airlines on the Irish register. Through laying down common EU-wide aircraft noise standards and avoiding proliferation of unilateral measures, the regulation will ensure certainty of access to airports in other EU countries for airlines on the Irish register, including night freight operators.

I am aware that the Government of the United States has concerns about the implications of the proposed measures for their air transport industry. I understand that the European Commission had intended to propose adoption of the proposed regulation at a very early date but that the Commission is now considering the question of deferring the adoption of the proposed regulation to allow for further consultations with the US on the proposed measures.
Barr
Roinn