Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Thursday, 18 Jun 2015

Written Answers Nos. 108-118

Public Sector Pensions

Ceisteanna (108)

Jerry Buttimer

Ceist:

108. Deputy Jerry Buttimer asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will allow a period of time for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons, who are working or who have worked in the Civil Service and who have entered civil partnerships or who will marry, to change their single person pension to a spouse and children pension, on payment of equitable contributions, in view of the fact that such a change would recognise that civil partnerships and marriage were not previously available to these persons; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24467/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Civil Service Superannuation Scheme rules provide that since 1 September 1984 all new entrant civil servants are compulsorily members of the Spouses and Children's Superannuation Scheme. The issue to which the Deputy refers is specific to those civil servants who were serving in August 1984 and who exercised their option not to join the Revised Spouses' and Children's Superannuation Scheme.

In 2013 officials of my Department were asked to give consideration to the implications of a decision to permit those current and former civil servants who were serving in August 1984 and are now in civil partnerships a further option of opting into the Revised Scheme, if they chose not to in 1984.  I am advised that, given the background of changing legislation over the years, including the introduction of divorce, and to avoid a charge of discrimination, this option could not of course be limited solely to those entering civil partnerships.  It would therefore have to be made available to all relevant serving and former civil servants (and public servants in a similar position). In the circumstances I am advised that allowing for this option could likely accrue a substantial additional cost to the existing accrued liability of public service pensions.

As a consequence I do not intend to bring forward proposals to facilitate serving and former civil servants (appointed prior to 1 September 1984) and who exercised the option in 1984 not to join the Revised Spouses' and Children's Superannuation Scheme to revisit that option.

Labour Court

Ceisteanna (109)

Michael McGrath

Ceist:

109. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if he will provide, in tabular form, the number of Labour Court adjudications issued in each year from 2009 to 2014; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24305/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Labour Court is an independent statutory body under the aegis of my Department. The Court’s statutory mandate is to provide a fair, independent and cost effective means of resolving workplace related disputes. The Labour Court investigates trade disputes between workers and employers under the Industrial Relations Acts 1946 to 2012. It also hears appeals from the decisions of the Equality Tribunal under the Employment Equality Acts 1998 to 2011 and appeals from decisions of Rights Commissioners under the following statutes:

- Organisation of Working Time Act 1997

- National Minimum Wage Act 2000

- Protection of Employees (Part-Time Work) Act 2001

- Protection of Employees (Fixed-Term Work) Act 2003

- Section 55M(11) of the Health Act 2004

- Safety Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005

- Employees (Provision of Information and Consultation) Act 2006

- Protection of Employees (Temporary Agency Work) Act 2012

- European Communities (Road Transport) (Organisation of Working Time of Persons Performing Road Transport Activities) Regulations 2012.

Details of the number of adjudications (i.e. recommendations, determinations, decisions etc.) issued by the Labour Court during the period 2009 to 2014 are set out in the following table.

Year

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Labour Court Adjudications Issued

638

831

774

691

655

568

The reduction in the number of adjudications issued in recent years reflects the industrial relations climate generally in terms of the reduction in the number of Industrial Relations referrals received by the Court, as well as the reduction in complaints relating to breaches of Registered Employment Agreements arising from the 2013 Supreme Court decision in the case of McGowan v The Labour Court and ors.

The Workplace Relations Act 2015 was signed into law on the 20 May 2015 and will be commenced on 1 October 2015. Under the provisions of the 2015 Act, the Labour Court will be retained as a stand-alone statutory body and will be the single appellate body to deal with all appeals from the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC). The Labour Court will continue to deliver all of its existing services (other than the small number of first instance functions transferring to the WRC) in addition to taking on the appellate functions of the Employment Appeals Tribunal.

Prisoner Welfare

Ceisteanna (110)

Clare Daly

Ceist:

110. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the reason pricing structures in prison tuck shops are excluded from the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. [24350/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am interpreting the question as asking whether the pricing structures in prison tuck shops are excluded from the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission's statutory remit. As the Deputy will be aware, the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has a broad mandate that covers all sectors of the economy. Furthermore, in addition to its statutory responsibility for the enforcement of competition and consumer protection law, the Commission has a general mandate to promote consumer welfare within the State through, for example, the use of advocacy. The Commission’s functions are set down in Section 10 of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2014 (“the Act”) and include, inter alia:

- promoting and protecting the interests and welfare of consumers;

- enforcing the relevant statutory provisions of the Act;

- encouraging compliance with the Act generally; and

- advising Government and any public body or agency on the likely impact of their actions and/or decisions on consumer protection and welfare.

The course of action open to the Commission in respect of pricing structures in prison tuck shops, if any, would depend on the nature and details of the particular circumstances.

More generally, it is worth recalling that retail prices of goods are not regulated by Irish legislation, regardless of the retail outlet. However, price display and/or the provision of information on prices are subject to the provisions of EU Directive 98/6/EC on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers and EU Directive 2005/29/EC concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (“the Unfair Commercial Practice Directive”). Directive 98/6/EC requires that the price of a product, and where relevant, the unit price of a product, be unambiguous, easily identifiable as referring to that product, be clearly visible and legible to prospective customers and be in proximity to the product.

Jobs Protection

Ceisteanna (111)

Dara Calleary

Ceist:

111. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation the actions he has taken to protect jobs at a company (details supplied) in Dublin 1; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24455/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Since the events of last Friday, I have been engaging very closely on this matter, staying in contact with trade union representatives over the weekend, and on Tuesday meeting with the liquidators in the early morning and the workers and their unions in the late evening. As I understand the background, in September 2012 Clerys was bought from receivership by Gordon Brothers, as US fund which operates as a purchaser of distressed assets. Gordon Brothers set up a new company structure under OCS Investment Holdings limited, and the Clerys employees were transferred to a 100% subsidiary, OCS Operations Limited, under transfer of undertakings with terms and conditions intact. I further understand that the new company structure had a second 100% subsidiary of OCS Investment Holdings limited, OCS Properties Limited, which became the owner of the property.

Last Friday, it was announced that Gordon Brothers had sold their shareholding in OCS Holdings to a new company, Natrium Ltd, a joint venture between a Dublin property company D2 Private, and a London business, Cheyne Capital Management. That afternoon, OCS Operating Ltd. petitioned the High Court to appoint a provisional liquidator, with the Court being told that the company was unlikely to have sufficient monies to make upcoming payments, and was unable to pay its debts. Mr. Kieran Wallace and Mr Eamonn Richardson of KPMG, who I met on Tuesday, were appointed by the Court. In dealing with the devastating impact of the news on the workers concerned the Liquidator put a team of 10 people in place to immediately engage with the workers in those early hours after their appointment on Friday and, to be fair to them, have been engaging actively since then.

My first priority on hearing the news was to work with my colleague, the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection, to ensure that the workers receive their statutory entitlements. Officials from the National Employment Rights Authority (NERA) which comes within the remit of my Department, are working closely with the Department of Social Protection to provide advice and assistance to affected workers. Ireland’s employment rights legislation provides protections for employees difficult situations such as those directly employed by OCS Operations Limited.

The Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973 requires employers to give notice of termination or to pay employees in lieu of notice, and outstanding wages, holiday pay, commission and bonuses are protected by the Payment of Wages Act, 1991. In the event that an employer is insolvent, the employees are entitled to seek payment from the State through the Insolvency Payments Scheme, which is administered by the Department of Social Protection. The employees may also be entitled to payment from this fund in respect of holiday pay, outstanding pay and minimum notice, amongst others.

The Department of Social Protection has assembled a team of people to meet with and advise the workers in relation to entitlements to jobseekers payments, secondary payments such as rent supplement and future options in relation to alternative employment, training and education. Arrangements have been made for Social Protection staff and staff of the National Employment Rights Authority to meet with workers later today. In addition, the Department of Social Protection is informing its network of local offices in the greater Dublin area of these developments to ensure that claims from affected workers are processed in a speedy and sensitive manner.

Claims are made through the person legally appointed to wind-up the company. Monies owed up to the appointment of a liquidator are secured by the Social Insurance Fund, subject to statutory limitations. Entitlements are limited to a maximum weekly rate of €600 and there is a limit of eight weeks’ pay for arrears of pay, sick pay or holiday pay.

A representative of the Liquidator has verbally advised the Department of Social Protection that all staff have been made redundant and that P45s will issue this week. The Liquidator will seek, on behalf of workers, payment from the Redundancy Payments Scheme in respect of statutory redundancy and from the Insolvency Payments Scheme (IPS) in respect of unpaid wages, accrued but untaken leave, and payment in lieu of statutory notice. It is intended that individual meetings will be held between the Liquidator and workers affected to determine, on an individual basis, the extent of liabilities. The Department of Social Protection will deal promptly with individual applications submitted in respect of the IPS by the Liquidator.

The situation regarding the staff employed by the concession stores is somewhat different. I met with representatives from the 50 concessions yesterday. Many of those concessions have other outlets, and it may be the case, for example, that staff can be redeployed to other locations. The concession holders have very immediate concerns in relation to directly owned stock and money which they say is owed to them from their own direct sales proceeds. The Liquidator has indicated to me that he will be dealing with these issues as a matter of priority and I understand that stock is being returned to concession holders – and I welcome that.

I consider it vital that workers are treated with dignity and respect at all time, and that they and their representatives are consulted with on all matters affecting them. There are clearly entities involved in this transaction that did not respect that concept and left it to Court appointed Liquidators to do their communicating for them. The liquidators have met with unions. I welcome the fact that they will be sitting down with the OCS Operations employees individually, to assist them in filling the necessary forms for their statutory entitlements.

What has happened in Clerys is very shocking and those who are directly employed by Clery’s and those who own and work in concession stores have been treated appallingly. Clery’s is part of the wider Dublin city centre community and the Clery’s building represents an iconic landmark which has played an important part in the life of the capital for well over 100 years. I intend to engage with the new owners behind Natrium Limited whom, I believe, should indicate their plans for the property at an early date and how its employment potential can be maximised.

Agriculture Scheme Payments

Ceisteanna (112)

John O'Mahony

Ceist:

112. Deputy John O'Mahony asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will receive an area aid payment for 2013 and 2014; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24245/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The person named was one of a number of applicants under the 2012, 2013 and 2014 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme, whose cases are impacted by the requirement of a minimum stocking density of 0.3 livestock units per forage hectare in 2011 and who applied for and was refused for derogation in this regard. The person named was notified of the outcome in writing and advised of the option to appeal to the Agricultural Appeals Committee should they so wish. To date no appeal has been received from the person named. I have, however, arranged for an official from my Department to contact the person named directly to clarify the matter.

Agriculture Scheme Applications

Ceisteanna (113)

Michael Healy-Rae

Ceist:

113. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on a matter regarding the case of persons (details supplied) in County Kerry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24330/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

In order to comply with EU requirements, the 2015 Basic Payment/Areas of Natural Constraint Scheme application of the person named was one of a number selected for an Ovine animal identification and registration inspection. The inspection results are in the process of being finalised and the person named will be notified of the outcome as soon as possible. In the event that the person named is dissatisfied with the inspection results they will have the option to seek a review from the District Inspector. I will bring the content of your question to the attention of the relevant inspecting officers.

Food Safety Standards

Ceisteanna (114)

Lucinda Creighton

Ceist:

114. Deputy Lucinda Creighton asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he has informed himself of best international practice regarding the growing of food crops in the region of waste incinerators; if he will offer advice to commercial and domestic growers of food, in particular to growers of soft fruit and leafy vegetables in such regions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24393/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Commercial producers of fresh fruit and vegetables (including potatoes and edible fungi) are required to register as food producers with my Department.

My Department carries out inspections of these producers, based on risk assessment, to ensure compliance with food safety regulations.

In addition, any food containing a contaminant in an amount which is unacceptable from the public health viewpoint and, in particular, at a toxicologically significant level, must not be placed on the market. Furthermore, contaminant levels must be kept as low as can be reasonably achieved by following good agricultural practices.

The general European Union procedures for contaminants in food are set down in Council Regulation No. 315/93. A 'contaminant' for the purposes of the Regulation is defined as: 'any substance not intentionally added to food which is present in such food as a result of the production, manufacture, processing, preparation, treatment, packing, packaging, transport or holding of such food or as a result of environmental contamination'.

To protect public health, Regulation No 315/93 provides that maximum levels be set for certain contaminants as part of a non-exhaustive EU list. This list is set out in Commission Regulation No 1881/2006. This Regulation requires that the foodstuffs listed in the Annex are not placed on the market where they contain a contaminant listed in the Annex at a level exceeding the maximum level as set out in the Annex. Fruit and vegetables are among the foodstuffs listed in this Regulation. My Department implements a monitoring programme for chemical contaminants in fruit and vegetables.

My Department would advise food producers that food safety and quality assurance in fresh fruit and vegetables should be an ongoing process that incorporates activities from the selection and preparation of the site, assessing and monitoring the soils, manures and irrigation used in production through to the final preparation and distribution of the product. Both food safety and quality assurance should focus on the prevention of problems since, once safety or quality has been reduced, it is difficult or impossible to restore.

Beef Data Programme

Ceisteanna (115, 116, 117, 119, 122)

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

115. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will postpone the mandatory euro-star index system stipulation of the beef data and genomics programme for five years, and instead implement this aspect of the programme as a more lenient guideline for the next five years, with a view to full implementation, as originally intended, in the year 2020; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24428/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

116. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will amend the beef data and genomics programme by making 2014 and 2015 referral years, in order to afford farmers a more realistic opportunity of inclusion in the programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24429/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

117. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will amend the euro-star index rating of the beef data and genomics programme from 60% to 40% for the next five years, with a view to possibly reverting to the higher percentage of 60% by year 2020, if necessary, to afford farmers a more realistic opportunity to comply with the regulations, as currently outlined in the programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24430/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

119. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide a guarantee that the beef data and genomics programme will not lead to inbreeding over the impending duration of the programme, in view of strong reports that there are not enough bulls with a four or five star rating within the artificial insemination system; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24432/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

122. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will amend the beef data and genomics programme to stipulate that each year over the next five years be considered a rolling year for the purpose of assessing the relevant statistics and information accumulated during this period, on its own merit, on a yearly basis, replacing the current five-year assessment stipulation, as proposed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24435/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 115 to 117, inclusive, 119 and 122 together.

The Beef Data and Genomics Programme (BDGP) was launched on 5 May and my Department received almost 30,000 applications by the extended closing date of 5 June. The Programme forms part of Ireland’s Rural Development Programme (RDP) and allocates funding of some €300 million over the next six years to suckler farmers in Ireland. The BDGP builds on the large strategic investment in data recording and genomics which has been made in recent years, and will ultimately bring about fundamental improvements to the entire sector by substantially improving the genetic quality of the national beef herd.

While the BDGP is an area based payment, the area upon which payment is made is based on the number of suckler cows calving in the herd in 2014. It is not possible to have a “rolling reference year” that changes continuously due to the European Commission requirement for a stable payment and, furthermore, a scheme under the RDP could not provide an incentive to increase stock numbers. Selecting 2014 also adds a measure of administrative simplicity for farmers that will facilitate early payments under the scheme.

Nonetheless, the provisions allow the use of 2015 as an alternative basis for new entrants, young farmers and if force majeure or other circumstances had an adverse impact on stocking levels in 2014. The use of 2015 as a base year will be decided upon request from individual farmers and on a case by case basis. In addition, 2015 can also be used by farmers that reduce their herd in 2015 and would otherwise be ineligible due to the reduction in herd or farm size between 2014 and 2015.

The BDGP builds on the schemes operated by my Department in recent years and most of the actions will already be familiar to the majority of farmers entering the scheme, including the data recording elements and the genotyping requirements. The replacement strategy is one of the main new elements of the BDGP over and above existing schemes for the suckler beef sector. The need for genetic improvement in the Irish suckler herd is widely acknowledged, and the adoption of genomic technology is a critically important tool in increasing production efficiency and ultimately farmer margins. The requirement for farmers to move towards using 4 and 5 star rated stock bulls and heifers is essential to the programmes objectives. Furthermore, any adjustment to these provisions would require engagement with the Commission and would jeopardise the operation of the programme.

In addition, I should note that many farmers are already well on the way to meeting the requirement for 4 and 5 star animals. Analysis undertaken by ICBF of the 2014 Beef Genomics Scheme has indicated that some 30% of herds are already compliant with the requirement for female animals in 2020 i.e. that the number of 4 and 5 star heifers are equal to 50% of the reference animals on each farm. Furthermore, 52% are already compliant with the 2018 requirement. All farmers will receive comprehensive training, and ongoing information and advice to assist them in introducing the required breeding strategy. I am also aware that these requirements will take time to introduce which is why there is a 5 year lead-in time included in the design of the programme.

In relation to the stock bull replacement requirement, I do not consider there to be any risk of inbreeding as a result of the requirements of this scheme. The majority of stock bulls on existing scheme herds are already 4 or 5 stars. There is also a very wide range of AI bulls available for pedigree beef breeding that are 4 or 5 stars on either the replacement or terminal index. For example, the ICBF recently completed a listing of recommended sires for bull breeders involved in the Gene Ireland maternal beef breeding program. In total there are 164 bulls in that catalogue, 151 (92%) of which are 4 or 5 stars on either the replacement or terminal index within or across breeds.

For imported bulls, the ICBF assigns a rating based on the data available for each bull at that time. The approach used to assigning this rating is in line with that used for all other bulls under the EuroStar rating system. The fact that 20% of the AI used can come from other types of bulls also gives scope for pedigree breeders that wish to use some outcross sires as part of the Programme or for commercial herds wishing to use AI from bulls which are not 4 or 5 stars.

As regards genotyping, the number of animals to be genotyped each year will be equal to 60% of the number of calved suckler cows that the applicant had on his/her holding in 2014 – known as the applicant’s “reference animals”. The number of “reference animals” will be advised to applicants upon acceptance into the scheme. For example, an applicant with 15 reference animals in 2014 must have sufficient animals to genotype 9 cows/heifers/calves/stock bulls, in each year of the programme, without repetition.

The 60% of the herd that will be genotyped each year represents an increase compared to the 15% under the 2014 Beef Genomic Scheme, however the percentage of the overall payment related to genotyping is broadly the same under both schemes. The 15% genotyping in 2014 was undertaken to develop the training population for genomic which provides the platform for the more widespread application of genomics and higher level of genotyping now made possible under the BDGP.

The 60% genotyping requirement reflects the need to genotype a high percentage of female calves at birth within scheme herds and to genotype female animals introduced from non-scheme herds so that sufficient 4 and 5 star animals can be identified. The 60% requirement will also include pedigree males and cows for ongoing research and knowledge development. This increased level of genotyping improves the reliability of the breeding indexes and, importantly, ensures the identification of sufficient numbers of 4 & 5 star females required by BDGP herds. In addition, and given that the payment is based on cost incurred and income foregone, any reduction in the level of genotyping would result in a reduction in the payment to the participant farmer to reflect the lower level of genotyping.

Finally, I would like to add that participants in the BDGP will receive advice and guidance on an ongoing basis to assist them in meeting the requirements of the programme. The BDGP, like all RDP Schemes, will be subject to mid-term review. If aspects of the scheme can be improved in the future, I will seek to address these issues in consultation with the EU Commission in a manner consistent with the relevant regulation.

Beef Data Programme

Ceisteanna (118, 123)

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

118. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the number of farmers who currently have applications lodged for the beef data and genomics programme; the way a potential surplus in funding, due to a lower than expected number of applicants, will be used to benefit farmers, should the number of farmers registered fall below the expected figure; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24431/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Bobby Aylward

Ceist:

123. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide assurances that the systems of assessment, which are integral to the operational success of the beef data and genomics programme, will be able to efficiently process results in a timely manner, due to the impending pressure of catering for 25,000 to 30,000 farmers, in view of the fact that in 2014 significant numbers of farmers reported that they had to wait up to six months for these results; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24436/15]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 118 and 123 together.

The Beef Data and Genomics Programme (BDGP) Programme forms part of Ireland’s Rural Development Programme and allocates funding of some €300 million over the next six years to suckler farmers in Ireland. The BDGP builds on the large strategic investment in data recording and genomics which has been made in recent years, and will ultimately bring about fundamental improvements to the entire sector by substantially improving the genetic quality of the national beef herd.

The BDGP was launched on 5 May and my Department received almost 30,000 applications by the extended closing date of 5 June. While analysis of the applications is still ongoing, the initial figures suggest that the programme is fully subscribed and that there will not be a surplus in the Programme’s budget. Of course, should any surplus arise, I will examine the potential to re-open the scheme in 2016 for new applicants.

The number of applications, and subsequently the number of herd owners involved in the programme, is broadly comparable to the numbers with which my Department and the ICBF engaged with as part of both the Beef Genomics Scheme and Beef Data Programme last year. The experience garnered in operating these schemes demonstrates the capability to provide an efficient and effective service. While there are extra elements to the BDGP which will require additional processing resources, I am satisfied that adequate provision has been made to deliver an efficient service to scheme participants, including as regards genomic evaluations.

Finally, I should also note that the 2014 pilot Beef Genomic Scheme provides the research base for which genomic evaluations can be provided to BDGP participants in the coming years. Evaluations could not be provided to participants until this initial and time consuming research had been completed. As a result of this research, made possible by the investment undertaken in 2014, I am happy to note that evaluations will shortly be issuing to scheme participants from the 2014 scheme and that participants under the BDGP will receive evaluations in a regular and timely fashion in the coming months and years.

Barr
Roinn