Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Psychological Assessments Waiting Times

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 28 March 2017

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

Ceisteanna (144)

Fiona O'Loughlin

Ceist:

144. Deputy Fiona O'Loughlin asked the Minister for Education and Skills the timeframe for an assessment of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14800/17]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I can inform the Deputy that my Department's National Educational Psychological Service (NEPS) provides educational psychology service to all primary and post primary schools through an assigned NEPS psychologist and in some cases through the Scheme for Commissioning Psychological Assessments (SCPA), full details of which are on the Department's website. Under this scheme schools can have an assessment carried out by a member of the panel of private psychologists approved by NEPS, and NEPS will pay the psychologist the fees for this assessment directly.

In common with many other psychological services and best international practice, NEPS has adopted a consultative model of service. The focus is on empowering teachers to intervene effectively with pupils whose needs range from mild to severe and transient to enduring. Psychologists use a problem solving and solution oriented consultative approach to maximise positive outcomes for these pupils. NEPS encourages schools to use a continuum based assessment and intervention process whereby each school takes responsibility for initial assessment, educational planning and remedial intervention for pupils with learning, emotional or behavioural difficulties. Teachers may consult their NEPS psychologist should they need to at this stage in the process. Only in the event of a failure to make reasonable progress, in spite of the school's best efforts in consultation with NEPS, will the psychologist become involved with an individual child for intensive intervention or assessment.

This system allows psychologists to give early attention to urgent cases and also to help many more children indirectly than could be seen individually. It also ensures that children are not referred unnecessarily for psychological intervention.

I have made inquiries in the matter and find that NEPS made no arrangement in relation to the assessment of this child in July 2015. However, I can advise the Deputy that the NEPS psychologist for the school the child in question is attending has recently received a request for involvement in this case from the school and is in the process of arranging a suitable date for all parties so that an assessment can take place.

Barr
Roinn